Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is the major cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The probability of reconnection is higher if the primary lesion is not sufficiently effective, which can be unmasked with an adenosine provocation test (APT). High-power short-duration radiofrequency energy (HPSD) guided with ablation index (AI) and the third generation of the visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) are new methods for PVI. Methods: A total of 70 participants (35 in each group) who underwent a PVI with either AI-guided HPSD (50 W; AI 500 for the anterior and 400 for the posterior wall, respectively) or VGLB ablation were included in this observational pilot trial. Twenty minutes after each PVI, an APT was performed. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival from AF after three years. Results: A total of 137 (100%) PVs in the HPSD arm and 131 PVs (98.5%) in the VGLB arm were initially successfully isolated (p = 0.24). The overall procedure duration was similar in both arms (155 ± 39 in HPSD vs. 175 ± 58 min in VGLB, p = 0.191). Fluoroscopy time, left atrial dwelling time and duration from the first to the last ablation were longer in the VGLB arm (23 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 3 min, p < 0.001; 157 (111–185) vs. 134 (104–154) min, p = 0.049; 92(59–108) vs. 72 (43–85) min, p = 0.010). A total of 127 (93%) in the HPSD arm and 126 (95%) PVs in the VGLB arm remained isolated after APT (p = 0.34). The primary endpoint was met 1107 ± 68 days after ablation in 71% vs. 66% in the VGLB and HPSD arms, respectively (p = 0.65). Conclusions: HPSD and VGLB did not differ with respect to long-term outcome of PVI. A large, randomized study should be conducted to compare clinical outcomes with respect to these new ablation techniques.

Application of high power radiofrequency (RF) energy for a short duration (HPSD) to isolate pulmonary vein (PV) is an emerging technique. But power and duration settings are very different across different centers. Moreover, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical data, studies measuring acute effectiveness of various HPSD settings are limited. Twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) were treated with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using HPSD. PVI was performed with a contact force catheter (Thermocool SF Smart-Touch) and Carto 3 System. The following parameters were used: energy output 50 W, target temperature 43°C, irrigation 15 mL/min, targeted contact force of > 10 g. RF energy was applied for 6 to 10 s. Required minimal interlesion distance was 4 mm. Twenty minutes after each successful PVI adenosine provocation test (APT) was performed by administrating 18 mg adenosine to unmask dormant PV conduction. All PVs (100 PVs) were successfully isolated. RF lesions needed per patient were 131 ±  41, the average duration for each RF application was 8.1 ± 1.7 s. Procedure time was 138  ±  21 min and average of total RF energy duration was 16.3 ±  5.2 min and average amount of RF energy was 48209 ± 12808W s. APT application time after PVI was 31.1 ± 8.3 min for the left sided PVs and 22.2 ± 4.6 min (p = 0.005) for the right sided PVs. APT was transiently positive in 18 PVs (18%) in 8 (32%) patients. Pulmonary vein isolation with high power for 6-10 s is feasible and shortens the procedure and ablation duration. However, acute effectiveness of the HPSD seems to be lower than expected. Further studies combining other ablation parameters are needed to improve this promising technique.

Purpose The current study investigated whether the changes in patient care in times of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the reduction of in-person visits, would result in a deterioration of the arrhythmic and clinical condition of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and remote patient monitoring. Methods Data were obtained from a local ICD registry. 140 patients who received ICD implantation at our department and had remote patient monitoring were included. The number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapy, the number of visits to our outpatient clinic and hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, stroke or heart failure were compared during three time intervals of the COVID-19 pandemic (first (LD1) and second (LD2) national lockdown in Germany and the time after the first lockdown (postLD1)) and a time interval 1 year before the pandemic began (preCOV). Each time interval was 49 days long. Results Patients had significantly fewer visits to our outpatient clinic during LD1 ( n  = 13), postLD1 ( n  = 22) and LD2 ( n  = 23) compared to the time interval before the pandemic ( n  = 43, each p  ≤ 0.05). The number of patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapy and clinical events showed no significant difference during the time intervals of the COVID-19 pandemic and the time interval 1 year prior. Conclusions The lockdown measures necessary to reduce the risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic, led to a reduction of in-person patient visits, but did not result in a deterioration of the arrhythmic and clinical condition of ICD patients with remote patient monitoring.

Introduction Arrhythmia‐induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is an underrecognized condition resulting in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) that is primarily caused by atrial fibrillation (AFib). The relationship between AIC, right ventricular (RV) function, and quality of life (QoL) has not been well studied. Methods We performed a post‐hoc analysis of our AIC trial in which we prospectively screened for patients with tachyarrhythmia and newly diagnosed, otherwise unexplained LVSD. Following rhythm restoration, patients were followed up at 2, 4, and 6 months. Only patients with persistent sinus rhythm were analyzed. RV function was assessed via echocardiography (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TASPE] and fractional area change [FAC]) and QoL by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Results Of a total of 50 patients recovering from LVSD, 41 were diagnosed with AIC and 9 with non‐AIC. Initially, RV function was reduced in the AIC group and recovered after rhythm restoration, whereas no relevant changes were noted in the non‐AIC group. QoL was reduced in both groups and also improved after rhythm restoration. Regression analysis identified low TAPSE as a predictive parameter for AIC diagnosis and worse QoL in AIC patients. Conclusion We demonstrated that RV function and QoL are impaired in patients with AIC. Six months after rhythm restoration, TAPSE may serve as an early indicator of AIC while also correlating with QoL. This underscores the importance of detailed echocardiographic evaluation with a focus on RV function in patients with concomitant tachyarrhythmia and LVSD. Initial tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), quality of life (QoL) as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during atrial fibrillation (AFib) or atrial flutter (AFlut) were reduced in patients with arrhythmia‐induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) compared with values at the end of 6 months of follow‐up in sinus rhythm. In this paper we show that low TAPSE (optimal cut‐off 18.5 mm) has good predictive power for the diagnosis of AIC and that a low quality of life is associated with low TAPSE. Values in red indicate the relative percent the baseline values were reduced compared with the post‐recovery measurement at the end of follow‐up.

Background: Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is characterized by the reversibility of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after rhythm restoration. This study is a cardiac magnetic resonance tomography substudy of our AIC trial with the purpose to investigate whether left ventricular fibrosis affects the time to recovery (TTR) in patients with AIC. Method: Patients with newly diagnosed and otherwise unexplainable LVSD and tachyarrhythmia were prospectively recruited. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured by echocardiography at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 months after rhythm control, and stress markers were assessed. After initial rhythm control, LV fibrosis was assessed through late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients were diagnosed with AIC if their LVEF improved by ≥15% (or ≥10% when LVEF reached ≥50%). Non-responders served as controls (non-AIC). Results: The LGE analysis included 39 patients, 31 of whom recovered (AIC). LV end-systolic diameters decreased and LVEF increased during follow-up. LV LGE content correlated positively with TTR (r = 0.63, p = 0.003), with less LGE favoring faster recovery, and negatively with ΔLVEF (i.e., LVEF at month 2 compared to baseline) as a marker of fast recovery (r = −0.55, p = 0.012), suggesting that LV fibrosis affects the speed of recovery. Conclusion: LV fibrosis correlated positively with the time to recovery in patients with AIC. This correlation may help in the estimation of the recovery period and in the optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with AIC.

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) is the most widely used prognostic marker in cardiovascular diseases. LV global function index (LVGFI) is a novel marker which incorporates the total LV structure in the assessment of LV cardiac performance. We evaluated the prognostic significance of LVGFI, measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting mortality and ICD therapies in a real-world (ICD) population with secondary ICD prevention indication, to detect a high-risk group among these patients. In total, 105 patients with cardiac MRI prior to the ICD implantation were included (mean age 56 ± 16 years old; 76% male). Using the MRI data for each patient LVGFI was determined and a cut-off for the LVGFI value was calculated. Patients were followed up every four to six months in our or clinics in proximity. Data on the occurrence of heart failure symptoms and or mortality, as well as device therapies and other vital parameters, were collected. Follow up duration was 37 months in median. The mean LVGFI was 24.5%, the cut off value for LVGFI 13.5%. According to the LVGFI Index patient were divided into 2 groups, 86 patients in the group with the higher LVGFI und 19 patients in the lower group. The LVGFI correlates significantly with the LVEF (r = 0.642, p < 0.001). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, a lower LVGFI (<13.5%) was associated with a higher rate of mortality and rehospitalization (p = 0.002). In contrast, echocardiographic LVEF ≤ 33% was not associated with a higher rate of mortality or rehospitalization. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed a lower LVGFI (p = 0.025, HR = 0.941; 95%-CI 0.89–0.99) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.027, HR = 0.33; 95%-CI 0.13–0.88) as an independent predictor for mortality and rehospitalization. There was no association between the combined endpoint and the LVEFMRT, LVEFecho, NYHA > I, the initial device or a medication (each p = n.s.). Further, in Kaplan–Meier analysis no association was evident between the LVGFI and adequate ICD therapy (p = n.s.). In secondary prevention ICD patients reduced LVGFI was shown as an independent predictor for mortality and rehospitalization, but not for ICD therapies. We were able to identify a high-risk collective among these patients, but further investigation is needed to evaluate LVGFI compared to ejection fraction, especially in patients with an elevated risk for adverse cardiac events.

Background Implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) from the left pectoral region is the standard therapeutical method. Increasing numbers of system revisions due to lead dysfunction and infections will consecutively increase the numbers of right-sided implantations. The reliability of devices implanted on the right pectoral side remains controversially discussed, and the question of testing these devices remains unanswered. Methods In a prospectively designed study all 870 patients (60.0±14 years, 689 male) who were treated with a first ICD from July 2005 until May 2012 and tested intraoperatively according to the testing protocol were analyzed. The indication for implantation was primary prophylactic in 71.5%. Underlying diseases included ischemic cardiomyopathy (50%), dilative cardiomyopathy (37%), and others (13%). Mean ejection faction was 27±12%. Implantation site was right in 4.5% and left in 95.5%. Results Five patients supplied with right-sided ICD (13%, p = 0.02 as compared to left-sided) failed initial intraoperative testing with 21 J. 3 patients were male. The age of the patients failing intraoperative testing with right-sided devices appeared higher than of patients with left-sided devices (p = 0.07). The ejection fraction was 28±8%. All patients reached a sufficient DFT ≤ 21 J after corrective procedures. Conclusion Implantation of ICDs on the right side results in significantly higher failure rate of successful termination of intraoperatively induced ventricular fibrillation. The data of our study suggest the necessity of intraoperative ICD testing in right-sided implanted ICDs.

We investigated factors associated with prolonged prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 439 patients (351 males, 88 females; mean age 57+/-12 years) with ST-elevation AMI were interviewed within 48 hours of hospitalization. Patients were pain-free and hemodynamically stable at the time of interview. Data were collected on the time from the onset of chest pain to hospital admission and on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The patients were evaluated in two groups according to the place to which the first presentation was made, i.e., a local clinic/small hospital (clinic group: n=209, 47.6%) or our tertiary fully equipped cardiovascular center (hospital group: n=230, 52.4%). The median and mean delay times were 70 min and 185.2+/-334.8 min, respectively. Of the study group, 136 patients (31%) arrived within 60 minutes after the onset of symptoms. The median delay time was significantly longer in the clinic group (120 min vs 60 min; p<0.001). Female sex, age > or = 55 years, and total education time <9 years were associated with a longer prehospital delay, whereas a history of coronary artery disease (CAD), smoking, and the absence of diabetes were associated with a shorter prehospital delay. In multivariate regression analysis, total education time <9 years, female sex, age > or = 55 years, and the absence of previous CAD were independent predictors of prolonged prehospital delay. The incidence of direct hospital presentation significantly increased with older age, smoking, aspirin use, and previous CAD. In multivariate analysis, only previous CAD was an independent predictor of direct hospital presentation. The median delay time of 70 min in this Turkish cohort is in accordance with the data from western populations. Public education campaigns to shorten prehospital delay should place more emphasis on the factors and patient subgroups associated with prolonged prehospital delay.

BackgroundImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is well established for secondary prevention, but studies on the efficacy and safety in elderly patients are still lacking. This retrospective study compared the outcome after ICD implantation between octogenarians and other age groups.MethodsData were obtained from a local ICD registry. Patients who received ICD implantation for secondary prevention at our department were included. All-cause mortality, appropriate ICD therapy and acute adverse events requiring surgical intervention were compared between different age groups.Results519 patients were enrolled, 34 of whom were aged ≥ 80 years. During the median follow-up of 35 months after ICD implantation 129 patients (annual mortality rate 5.0%) had died, including 16 patients aged ≥ 80 years (annual mortality rate 9.4%). The mortality rate of patients aged ≥ 80 years was significantly higher than that of patients aged ≤ 69 years (p < 0.001), but similar to that of patients aged 70–79 years. Age at the time of ICD implantation was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (p < 0.001). 29.7% of patients had appropriate ICD therapy with no difference between age groups. Acute adverse events leading to surgical intervention were low (n = 13) and not age-related.ConclusionAge is an independent predictor of mortality after ICD implantation for secondary prevention. Mortality rates did not differ significantly between octogenarians and other elderly aged 70–79 years. Appropriate ICD therapy and acute adverse events leading to surgical intervention were not age-related. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for secondary prevention seems to be an effective and safe treatment modality in octogenarians.

PurposeIonizing radiation is able to cause severe damage to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In Germany, the DEGRO/DGK guideline recommends close monitoring of patients with CIEDs undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Nevertheless, especially in the era of intensity-modulated techniques and predominant use of 6 MV photons, errors of CIEDs are rare events. Therefore, we performed daily CIED controls and hypothesized that no relevant device interaction would occur in our cohort.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2018, we collected data of 51 patients (62 courses) with daily interrogation (n = 1046) of CIED. The dose to the skin above the CIED was measured by semiconductor or ion chamber dosimetry at least once per RT course. In many cases the dose was also calculated.ResultsThe prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) ranged from 7.5 to 78.0 Gy (IQR 27.8–61.0 Gy). The median measured cumulative dose to the skin above the CIED was 0.17 Gy, whereas the median calculated dose was 1.03 Gy. No error occurred in the group with maximum beam energy >10 MeV. Three events without clinical relevance could be recognized in the group with an intensity-modulated technique at 6 MV. None of the three concerned devices were located directly within the PTV.ConclusionErrors of CIEDs during RT are rare events. The approach according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline is safe, but also consumes resources. In our cohort it was not compulsory to relocate any CIED. Clinically relevant events are uncommon, so it remains debatable which procedure is necessary. Daily controls could be avoided in some selected cases without compromising patient safety.