Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective The Gamma Knife Icon (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) allows frameless stereotactic treatment using a combination of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT), a thermoplastic mask system, and an infrared-based high-definition motion management (HDMM) camera system for patient tracking during treatment. We report on the first patient with meningioma at the left petrous bone treated with adaptive fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (a-gkFSRT). Methods The first patient treated with Gamma Knife Icon at our institute received MR imaging for preplanning before treatment. For each treatment fraction, a daily CBCT was performed to verify the actual scull/tumor position. The system automatically adapted the planned shot positions to the daily position and recalculated the dose distribution (online adaptive planning). During treatment, the HDMM system recorded the intrafractional patient motion. Furthermore, the required times were recorded to define a clinical treatment slot. Results Total treatment time was around 20 min. Patient positioning needed 0.8 min, CBCT positioning plus acquisition 1.65 min, CT data processing and adaptive planning 2.66 min, and treatment 15.6 min. The differences for the five daily CBCTs compared to the reference are for rotation: −0.59 ± 0.49°/0.18 ± 0.20°/0.05 ± 0.36° and for translation: 0.94 ± 0.52 mm/−0.08 ± 0.08 mm/−1.13 ± 0.89 mm. Over all fractions, an intrafractional movement of 0.13 ± 0.04 mm was observed. Conclusion The Gamma Knife Icon allows combining the accuracy of the stereotactic Gamma Knife system with the flexibility of fractionated treatment with the mask system and CBCT. Furthermore, the Icon system introduces a new online patient tracking system to the clinical routine. The interfractional accuracy of patient positioning was controlled with a thermoplastic mask and CBCT.

Abstract BACKGROUND The median time to recurrence of glioblastoma (GB) following multimodal treatment is ∼7 mo. Nearly all cancers recur locally, suggesting that augmenting local treatments may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to the resection cavity is safe and effective. METHODS INTRAGO was a phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IORT with 20 to 40 Gy of low-energy photons in addition to standard radiochemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02685605). The primary endpoint was safety as per occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also performed an exploratory analysis of the local PFS (L-PFS), defined as recurrence within 1 cm of the treated margin. RESULTS Fifteen patients were treated at 3 dose levels. Of these, 13 underwent incomplete resection, 6 had unresected satellites, and 3 did not receive per-protocol treatment (PPT). The MGMT promoter was unmethylated in 10 patients. The median follow-up was 13.8 mo. The majority of grade 3 to 5 adverse events were deemed unrelated to IORT. Five cases of radionecrosis were observed, 2 were classified as grade 3 events. Other grade 3 events judged related to radiotherapy (external-beam radiotherapy and/or IORT) were wound dehiscence (n = 1), CSF leakage (n = 1), cyst formation (n = 1). No IORT-related deaths occurred. The median PFS was 11.2 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4-17.0) for all patients and 11.3 mo (95% CI: 10.9-11.6) for those receiving PPT. The median L-PFS was 14.3 mo (95% CI: 8.4-20.2) for all patients and 17.8 mo (95% CI: 9.7-25.9) for those receiving PPT. The median OS was 16.2 mo (95% CI: 11.1-21.4) for all patients and 17.8 mo (95% CI: 13.9-21.7) for those receiving PPT. CONCLUSION These data suggest that IORT is associated with manageable toxicity. Considering the limitations of a 15-patient phase I/II trial, further studies aimed at assessing an outcome benefit are warranted.

Background and purpose Conventional algorithms show uncertainties in dose calculation already for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) might even increase these. We wanted to assess differences in dose distribution for pencil beam (PB), collapsed cone (CC), and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm for both 3D-CRT and IMRT in patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and methods Based on 20 computed tomograph (CT) datasets of patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma, we created treatment plans according to the guidelines of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) with PB and CC algorithm for 3D-CRT and with PB and MC algorithm for IMRT. Doses were compared for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk. Results For 3D-CRT, PB overestimated PTV 95 and V 20 of the lung by 6.9% and 3.3% and underestimated V 10 of the lung by 5.8%, compared to the CC algorithm. For IMRT, PB overestimated PTV 95 , V 20 of the lung, V 25 of the heart and V 10 of the female left/right breast by 8.1%, 25.8%, 14.0% and 43.6%/189.1%, and underestimated V 10 of the lung, V 4 of the heart and V 4 of the female left/right breast by 6.3%, 6.8% and 23.2%/15.6%, compared to MC. Conclusion The PB algorithm underestimates low doses to the organs at risk and overestimates dose to PTV and high doses to the organs at risk. For 3D-CRT, a well-modeled PB algorithm is clinically acceptable; for IMRT planning, however, an advanced algorithm such as CC or MC should be used at least for part of the plan optimization.

PurposePartial breast irradiation using intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) after breast-conserving surgery could be sufficient for a selected group of breast cancer patients. We report the results of a cohort of patients from a single center treated as part of the randomized phase-3 TARGIT-A trial.MethodsPatients (≥50 years) with cT1 cN0 cM0 and invasive ductal histology on biopsy were randomized between IORT with 20 Gy (arm-A) or postoperative whole-breast RT (WBRT) up to 56 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (arm-B). Postoperatively, patients in arm-A with multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, nodal invasion, extensive intraductal component, invasive lobular carcinoma, or resection margins <1 cm received additional postoperative WBRT.ResultsBetween 2002 and 2012, 184 patients were randomized, of whom 90 in arm-A and 90 in arm-B were evaluated. Median follow-up was 8.5 years. The 5‑year overall survival was 94.4% in arm-A and 93.3% in arm-B (p = 0.73). Two local recurrences were observed: one at 70.3 months in an arm-A patient who received IORT + WBRT and another at 4.5 months in an arm-B patient who refused all forms of adjuvant treatment, thus resulting in a 5-year local recurrence of 0% in arm-A and 1.1% in arm-B. The 5‑year in-breast recurrence (outside of the index quadrant) was 0% in arm-A and 1.2% in arm-B. Salvage mastectomy was performed successfully in all patients with relapse.ConclusionLong-term follow-up of this single-center cohort consolidates the earlier reports of low local recurrence rates after single-dose IORT. Our results are in line with non-inferiority of risk-adapted IORT for selected patients with early breast cancer.

Background The spine is the most frequent location of bone metastases. Local treatment aims at palliation of pain and, given the increased likelihood of long-term cancer survival, at local control. Kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT) provided instantaneous pain relief in 70% of patients at the first day after the intervention and resulted in local control rates of > 93% at 1 year in a recently conducted phase I/II trial. To assess its clinical value, we designed a phase III trial which tests Kypho-IORT against the most widespread standard-of-care, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in patients with painful vertebral metastases. Methods This phase III study includes patients ≥50 years of age with up to 4 vertebral metastases and a pain score of at least 3/10 points on the visual/numeric analogy scale (VAS). Patients randomized into the experimental arm (A) will undergo Kypho-IORT (Kyphoplasty plus IORT with 8 Gy prescribed to 13 mm depth). Patients randomized into the control arm (B) will receive EBRT with either 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 8 Gy as a single dose. The primary end point is pain reduction defined as at least − 3 points on the VAS compared to baseline at day 1. Assuming that 40% of patients in the Kypho-IORT arm and 5% of patients in the control arm will achieve this reduction and 20% will drop out, a total of 54 patients will have to be included to reach a power of 0.817 with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints are evaluation of the percentage of patients with a pain reduction of at least 3 points at 2 and 6 weeks, local tumor control, frequency of re-intervention, secondary fractures/sintering, complication rates, skin toxicity/wound healing, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life. Discussion This trial will generate level 1 evidence on the clinical value of a one-stop procedure which may provide instantaneous pain relief, long-term control and shortened intervals to further adjuvant (systemic) therapies in patients with spinal metastases. Trial registration Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT02773966 (Registration date: 05/16/2016).