Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundRecording intraoperative videos has become commonplace during surgery, with applications in video-based assessment, education and research. These videos can be both manually and automatically analyzed for performance analysis. A number of commercial entities providing video acquisition and processing has flourished over the recent years. As these companies expand, a number of medico-legal, licensing, intellectual property and data sharing related questions have been raised.MethodsWe performed a qualitative survey of surgeons, hospital administrators, lawyers and commercial entities offering video recording capabilities for serious issues that the average surgeon who records their videos should consider. To address these concerns, we reviewed relevant legal precedent and currently available contracts.ResultsWe identified several key medico-legal constraints, including data ownership and storage, FDA compliance, privacy and potential for use in litigation, present the legal background and potential solutions.ConclusionGiven the availability of surgical recording and the future of video-based performance analysis, surgeons need to become comfortable with the medico-legal issues and the potential solutions available with national physician-led lobbying.

Introduction With the increasing performance of bariatric surgery, rare complications are becoming prevalent. We review the diagnosis and treatment of dysautonomia after bariatric surgery and the limited treatment options available. We summarize the suggested mechanisms and explain why a complete understanding of the etiology has yet to be determined. Methods In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was performed. Results Of 448 studies identified in the literature search, 4 studies were reviewed, describing 87 patients diagnosed with dysautonomia. We present a patient who developed severe dysautonomia following conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to gastric bypass. Conclusion Treatment needs to focus on optimizing nutrition, avoiding hypoglycemia, and optimizing volume status.

BackgroundEvaluation of robotic surgical skill has become increasingly important as robotic approaches to common surgeries become more widely utilized. However, evaluation of these currently lacks standardization. In this paper, we aimed to review the literature on robotic surgical skill evaluation.MethodsA review of literature on robotic surgical skill evaluation was performed and representative literature presented over the past ten years.ResultsThe study of reliability and validity in robotic surgical evaluation shows two main assessment categories: manual and automatic. Manual assessments have been shown to be valid but typically are time consuming and costly. Automatic evaluation and simulation are similarly valid and simpler to implement. Initial reports on evaluation of skill using artificial intelligence platforms show validity. Few data on evaluation methods of surgical skill connect directly to patient outcomes.ConclusionAs evaluation in surgery begins to incorporate robotic skills, a simultaneous shift from manual to automatic evaluation may occur given the ease of implementation of these technologies. Robotic platforms offer the unique benefit of providing more objective data streams including kinematic data which allows for precise instrument tracking in the operative field. Such data streams will likely incrementally be implemented in performance evaluations. Similarly, with advances in artificial intelligence, machine evaluation of human technical skill will likely form the next wave of surgical evaluation.

IntroductionOperative time has been traditionally used as a proxy for surgical skill and is commonly utilized to measure the learning curve, assuming that faster operations indicate a more skilled surgeon. The Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) rubric is a validated Likert scale for evaluating technical skill. We hypothesize that operative time will not correlate with the GEARS score.MethodsPatients undergoing elective robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single bariatric center of excellence hospital from January 2019 to March 2020 were captured in a prospectively maintained database. For step-specific scoring, videos were broken down into three steps: ligation of short gastric vessels, gastric transection, and oversewing the staple line. Overall and step-specific GEARS scores were assigned by crowd-sourced evaluators. Correlation between operative time and GEARS score was assessed with linear regression and calculation of the R2 statistic.ResultsSixty-eight patients were included in the study, with a mean operative time of 112 ± 27.4 min. The mean GEARS score was 20.1 ± 0.81. Mean scores for the GEARS subcomponents were: bimanual dexterity 4.06 ± 0.17; depth perception 3.96 ± 0.24; efficiency 3.82 ± 0.19; force sensitivity 4.06 ± 0.20; robotic control 4.16 ± 0.21. Operative time and overall score showed no correlation (R2 = 0.0146, p = 0.326). Step-specific times and scores showed weak correlation for gastric transection (R2 = 0.0737, p = 0.028) and no correlation for ligation of short gastric vessels (R2 = 0.0262, p = 0.209) or oversewing the staple line (R2 = 0.0142, p = 0.344).ConclusionsOperative time and crowd-sourced GEARS score were not correlated. Operative time and GEARS scores measure different performance characteristics, and future studies should consider using both a validated skills assessment tool and operative time for a more complete evaluation of skill.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits urokinase-type plasminogen activator and tissue-type plasminogen activator. PAI-1 participates in angiogenesis, wound healing and tumor invasion, and additionally regulates endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis and tumor growth. The purpose of the present study was to measure plasma PAI-1 levels perioperatively in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR). Patients with CRC who underwent elective MICR were eligible for the study. All patients were enrolled in an approved data/plasma bank. Patients with preoperative, postoperative day (POD) 1, POD 3, and at least one POD 7-34 plasma sample collection were studied. Plasma PAI-1 levels were determined in duplicate using ELISA, and the medians and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined. The correlations between postoperative plasma PAI-1 levels and length of surgery were evaluated. PAI-1 levels were compared between patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vs. hand-assisted surgery. The preoperative PAI-1 levels of stage I, II, III and IV pathological stage subgroups were also compared. A total of 91 patients undergoing MICR for CRC were studied. The mean incision length was 8.0±3.9 cm, and the length of stay was 6.8±4.3 days. Compared with the median preoperative levels (17.30; 95% CI: 15.63-19.78 ng/ml), significantly elevated median levels were observed on POD 1 (28.86; 95% CI: 25.46-31.22 ng/ml; P<0.001), POD 3 (18.87; 95% CI: 17.05-21.78 ng/ml; P=0.0037), POD 7-13 (26.97; 95% CI: 22.81-28.74 ng/ml; P<0.001), POD 14-20 (25.92; 95% CI: 17.85-35.89 ng/ml; P=0.001) and POD 21-27 (22.63; 95% CI: 20.03-30.09 ng/ml; P<0.001). The PAI-1 levels in the hand-assisted group were higher compared with those in the laparoscopic-assisted group for 4 weeks after surgery; however, a significant difference was found only on POD 1. Therefore, plasma PIA-1 levels were found to be significantly elevated for 4 weeks after MICR, and the surgery-related acute inflammatory response may account for the early postoperative PIA-1 increase. Furthermore, PAI-1-associated VEGF-induced angiogenesis in the healing wounds may account for the late postoperative elevations, and increased PAI-1 levels may promote angiogenesis in residual tumor deposits.

IntroductionGender bias has been identified consistently in written performance evaluations. Qualitative tools may provide a standardized way to evaluate surgical skill and minimize gender bias. We hypothesized that there is no difference in operative time or GEARS scores in robotic hysterectomy for men vs women surgeons.MethodsPatients undergoing robotic hysterectomies performed between June 2019 and March 2020 at 8 hospitals within the same hospital system were captured into a prospective database. GEARS scores were assigned by crowd-sourced evaluators by a third party blinded to any surgeon- or patient-identifying information. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean operative time and GEARS scores for each group, and significant variables were included in a one-way ANCOVA to control for confounders. Two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsSeventeen women and 13 men performed a total of 188 hysterectomies; women performed 34 (18%) and men performed 153 (81%). Women surgeons had a higher mean operative time (133 ± 58 vs 86.3 ± 46 min, p = 0.024); after adjustment, there were no significant differences in operative time (p = 0.607). There was no significant difference between the genders in total GEARS score (20.0 ± 0.77 vs 20.2 ± 0.70, p = 0.415) or GEARS subcomponent scores: bimanual dexterity (3.98 ± 0.03 vs 4.00 ± 0.03, p = 0.705); depth perception (4.04 ± 0.04 vs 4.05 ± 0.02, p = 0.799); efficiency (3.79 ± 0.02 vs 3.82 ± 0.02, p = 0.437); force sensitivity (4.01 ± 0.04 vs 4.05 ± 0.05, p = 0.533); or robotic control (4.16 ± 0.03 vs 4.26 ± 0.01, p = 0.079).ConclusionThere was no difference in GEARS score between men vs women surgeons performing robotic hysterectomies. Video-based blinded assessment of skills may minimize gender biases when evaluating surgical skill for competency evaluation and credentialing.

BackgroundSurgical training requires clinical knowledge and technical skills to operate safely and optimize clinical outcomes. Technical skills are hard to measure. The Intuitive Data Recorder (IDR), (Sunnyvale, CA) allows for the measurement of technical skills using objective performance indicators (OPIs) from kinematic event data. Our goal was to determine whether OPIs improve with surgeon experience and whether they are correlated with clinical outcomes for robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR).MethodsThe IDR was used to record RIHRs from six surgeons. Data were obtained from 98 inguinal hernia repairs from February 2022 to February 2023. Patients were called on postoperative days 5–10 and asked to take the Carolina Comfort Scale (CCS) survey to evaluate acute clinical outcomes. A Pearson test was run to determine correlations between OPIs from the IDR with a surgeon’s yearly RIHR experience and with CCS scores. Linear regression was then run for correlated OPIs.ResultsMultiple OPIs were correlated with surgeon experience. Specifically, for the task of peritoneal flap exploration, we found that 23 OPIs were significantly correlated with surgeons’ 1-year RIHR case number. Total angular motion distance of the left arm instrument had a correlation of − 0.238 (95% CI − 0.417, − 0.042) for RIHR yearly case number. Total angular motion distance of right arm instrument was also negatively correlated with RIHR in 1 year with a correlation of − 0.242 (95% CI − 0.420, − 0.046). For clinical outcomes, wrist articulation of the surgeon’s console positively correlated with acute sensation scores from the CCS with a correlation of 0.453 (95% CI 0.013, 0.746).ConclusionsThis study defines multiple OPIs that correlate with surgeon experience and with outcomes. Using this knowledge, surgical simulation platforms can be designed to teach patterns to surgical trainees that are associated with increased surgical experience and with improved postoperative outcomes.

Background Traumatic pancreatic injuries are rare, and guidelines specifying management are controversial and difficult to apply in the acute clinical setting. Due to sparse data on these injuries, we carried out a retrospective review to determine outcomes following surgical or non-surgical management of traumatic pancreatic injuries. We hypothesize a higher morbidity and mortality rate in patients treated surgically when compared to patients treated non-surgically. Methods We performed a retrospective review of data from four trauma centers in New York from 1990–2014, comparing patients who had blunt traumatic pancreatic injuries who were managed operatively to those managed non-operatively. We compared continuous variables using the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical variables using the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the possible confounding factors associated with mortality in both treatment groups. Results Twenty nine patients were managed operatively and 32 non-operatively. There was a significant difference between the operative and non-operative groups in median age (37.0 vs. 16.2 years, P  = 0.016), grade of pancreatic injury (grade I; 30.8 vs. 85.2%, P value for all comparisons <0.0001), median injury severity score (ISS) (16.0 vs. 4.0, P  = 0.002), blood transfusion (55.2 vs. 15.6%, P  = 0.0012), other abdominal injuries (79.3 vs. 38.7%, P  = 0.0014), pelvic fractures (17.2 vs. 0.00%, P  = 0.020), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (86.2 vs. 50.0%, P  = 0.003), median length of stay (LOS) (16.0 vs. 4.0 days, P <0.0001), and mortality (27.6 vs. 3.1%, P  = 0.010). Conclusions Patients with traumatic pancreatic injuries treated operatively were more severely injured and suffered greater complications than those treated non-operatively. The greater morbidity and mortality associated with these patients warrants further study to determine optimal triage strategies and which subset of patients is likely to benefit from surgery.

IntroductionThe relationship between intraoperative surgical performance scores and patient outcomes has not been demonstrated at a single-case level. The GEARS score is a Likert-based scale that quantifies robotic surgical proficiency in 5 domains. Given that even highly skilled surgeons can have variability in their skill among their cases, we hypothesized that at a patient level, higher surgical skill as determined by the GEARS score will predict individual patient outcomes. MethodsPatients undergoing robotic sleeve gastrectomy between July 2018 and January 2021 at a single-health care system were captured in a prospective database. Bivariate Pearson’s correlation was used to compare continuous variables, one-way ANOVA for categorical variables compared with a continuous variable, and chi-square for two categorical variables. Significant variables in the univariable screen were included in a multivariable linear regression model. Two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsOf 162 patients included, 9 patients (5.5%) experienced a serious morbidity within 30 days. The average excess weight loss (EWL) was 72 ± 12% at 6 months and 74 ± 15% at 12 months. GEARS score was not significantly correlated with EWL at 6 months (p = 0.349), 12 months (p = 0.468), or serious morbidity (p = 0.848) on unadjusted analysis. After adjusting, total GEARS score was not correlated with serious morbidity (p = 0.914); however, GEARS score did predict EWL at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p < 0.001). All GEARS subcomponent scores, bimanual dexterity, depth perception, efficiency, force sensitivity, and robotic control were predictive of EWL at 6 months (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p < 0.001) on multivariable analysis.ConclusionFor patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, surgical skill as assessed by the GEARS score was correlated with EWL, suggesting that better performance of a sleeve gastrectomy can result in improved postoperative weight loss.

BackgroundRecent studies have correlated surgical skill measured by video-based assessment with improved clinical outcomes. Certain automated measures of operative performance in robotic surgery can be gathered beyond video review called objective performance indicators (OPIs). We explore the relationship between OPIs, surgeon experience, and postoperative recovery, hypothesizing that more efficient dissection will be associated with experience.MethodsFifty-six robotic cholecystectomies between February 2022 and March 2023 were recorded at a large tertiary referral center. Surgeon experience and clinical outcomes data from the EMR were obtained for all 56 cases with 10 completing the QOL survey. Two steps of robotic cholecystectomies were reviewed: dissection of Calot's triangle (DCT) and dissection of the gallbladder from the liver (DGL). Postoperative recovery was measured using the SF-36 well-being survey. Univariate analysis was conducted using Pearson’s coefficient.ResultsIncreased operative experience was associated with more efficient camera and instrument movements. DCT had 7 and DGL had 31 of 41 OPIs that correlated with experience. With respect to DGL, more experienced surgeons had reduced step duration and instrument path length and increased camera and instrument speeds.ConclusionsSeveral OPIs correlate with surgical experience and may form the basis of more instructive feedback for trainees and less experienced surgeons in improving intraoperative technique.