Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of dentifrices containing fluoro calcium phosphosilicate, calcium sodium phosphosilicate, and strontium chloride hexahydrate for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) when applied twice daily. Materials and Methods: Participants with a history of DH and with visual analog scale (VAS) score of ≥5 to a painful test stimuli response (dental explorer) in at least one tooth at the qualifying baseline visit were enrolled in this four-week randomized study. Participants (n = 93) were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: Group 1--fluoro calcium phosphosilicate (BioMin™), Group 2--calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin®), and Group 3--strontium chloride hexahydrate. Clinical effectiveness (VAS), perceived sensation score (verbal rating scale [VRS]), participants' subjective assessment (four-item questionnaire) and oral health-related quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile-14 [OHIP-14]) questionnaire) were assessed. Results: A significant (P < 0.0001) reduction in symptoms over a period of four weeks (from baseline) was noted in all groups; however, the intergroup difference was not statistically significant. At week 2, the percentage reductions in VAS (Group 1: 58.19%; Group 2: 49.18%; Group 3: 52.69%) and VRS (Group 1: 58.19%; Group 2: 47.16%; Group 3: 49.05%) scores were higher in Group 1 as compared with other groups. Subjective assessment results and oral health-related quality of life were comparable in all the three groups at the end of four weeks. Conclusion: Fluoro calcium phosphosilicate bioactive glass containing desensitizing dentifrice treatment may provide better treatment response for the treatment of DH because of its early onset of action in relieving hypersensitivity symptoms as compared with other dentifrices (CTRI/2018/04/013481).

Context: Various agents are studied for their remineralization potential. Aim: To evaluate the effect of GC Tooth Mousse and Toothmin Tooth Cream on microhardness of bleached enamel. Settings and Design: In vitro- study. Methods and Material: Twenty freshly extracted anterior teeth were cut sagittally and impregnated in cold cure acrylic resin. Specimens were kept in artificial saliva to prevent from dehydration. After measuring baseline hardness, teeth were randomly divided into two groups. Everbrite In - Office Tooth whitening kit (Dentamerica) was used to demineralize the teeth following which hardness was measured again. Teeth in group one (n=10) and group two (n=10) were treated with GC tooth mousse (Recaldent) and Toothmin tooth cream (Abbott Healthcare Pvt.Ltd) daily for seven days and microhardness of enamel surface was measured. Statistical Analysis Used: Mean, SD, and percentage change in the microhardness were calculated. Student's paired t-test was used to evaluate the signifi cance of change from initial, after bleaching for 5 min and after 1-week remineralization Unpaired't' test was used to compare difference between groups. Results: Microhardness significantly decreased in both groups after bleaching (% change group one: 3.24% group two: 3.26% in group; P<0.01 in both groups). Both products significantly increased mineralization after seven days of treatment (P<0.01). Remineralization was numerically better in Toothmin group (Abbott Healthcare Pvt.Ltd ) compared to GC Mousse(Recaldent) (% change 3.27% vs 6.34%). However, difference was not significant (P >0.05). Conclusion: Both GC Tooth Mousse (Recaldent) and Toothmin Tooth cream (Abbott Healthcare Pvt.Ltd) increase the microhardness of bleached enamel. Toothmin tooth cream is a better agent for increasing microhardness, although difference is not significant.