Explore the vast range of titles available.

Individuals in positions of authority commit white-collar crimes, characterized by non-violent offenses such as embezzlement, fraud, and corruption, which have significant, multifaceted effects on both societies and economies. This paper critically examines the pervasive impact of white-collar crimes in Uganda, drawing on secondary data from various sectors. It draws attention to the wider social ramifications, such as the rise in social vices and the burden on Uganda's legal system, as well as the economic ones, such as job losses, business closures, and a deterrent to foreign investment. The paper's conclusions indicate that systemic corruption and shoddy governance frameworks exacerbate the long-term consequences of white-collar crimes. Consequently, the paper proposes some policy suggestions aimed at enhancing Uganda's legislative and regulatory structures. These include reclassifying white-collar crimes as felonies, ensuring judicial independence, establishing special tribunals for faster prosecutions, and implementing comprehensive whistleblower protection policies. Additionally, the paper advocates for the enactment of restitution laws, improved government transparency, and enhanced public awareness campaigns. By adopting these measures, the study offers a robust approach to mitigating the socioeconomic harm caused by white-collar crimes while promoting a culture of accountability and legal compliance.

The research examines the African response to international crimes and extradition with regard to inter-regional cooperation, focusing on the legal frameworks, mechanisms, and institutions that promote or hamper this process. The number of agreements and frameworks governing extradition is insufficient, resulting in a delayed process concerning international crimes. This research aims to examine the prevailing legal framework that regulates extradition in Africa; highlight the gaps and problems of inter-regional cooperation on international crimes; and, subsequently, propose recommendations for strengthening legal cooperation among African states. The research, using doctrinal methodology and both primary and secondary sources of data, reveals significant strides in regional cooperation, exemplified by the role of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the Special Court for Sierra Leone. However, gaps persist in the harmonization of laws and treaties related to extradition across African regions. The research would, therefore, be recommending a more integrated legal framework on extradition in Africa, increased capacity building for the legal institutions concerned, and more active involvement of the RECs aimed at ensuring smooth cooperation among the states.

Recent coups in Sub-Saharan Africa underscore a concerning trend of democratic backsliding, despite the institutional efforts of the African Union (AU). The existing continental and regional mechanisms designed to prevent unconstitutional government changes have proven largely ineffective. This article argues that the AU must critically reassess its convention on unconstitutional government changes to address its inherent shortcomings. Employing document analysis as the primary methodology, this study systematically evaluates the AU's mechanisms, aiming to enhance their operational efficiency. A comprehensive assessment of the AU's successes and challenges will illuminate essential areas requiring strategic reform. This is because reinforcing the commitment to democratic governance among African states is crucial for the sustainability of democratic institutions. Achieving this necessitates the establishment of robust frameworks that promote democratic practices and ensure accountability at both regional and national levels.