Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the distinct impact of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) combination and monotherapy in immune response to an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis phase 4 prospective study analysed seroconversion (SC) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralising antibodies (NAb) induced by the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in patients with RA in comparison to controls (CG). Disease activity and treatment were also assessed. Only participants with baseline negative IgG/NAb were included.ResultsPatients with RA (N=260) and CG (N=104) had comparable median ages (59 years (50–65 years) vs 58 years (49.8–64 years), p=0.483). Patients with RA had moderate but lower SC (61.8% vs 94.2%, p<0.001) and NAb positivity (45% vs 78.6%, p<0.001) in comparison to CG after full vaccination. Baseline disease activity did not influence immunogenicity (p>0.05). After multivariate analyses, factors independently related to reduced SC were: older age (OR=0.79 (0.70–0.89) for each 5-year interval, p<0.001), methotrexate (OR=0.54 (0.29–0.98), p=0.044), abatacept (OR=0.37 (0.19–0.73), p=0.004) and number of DMARD (OR=0.55 (0.33–0.90), p=0.018). Regarding NAb, age (OR=0.87 (0.78–0.96) for each 5-year interval, p=0.007) and prednisone >7.5 mg/day (OR=0.38 (0.19–0.74), p=0.004) were negatively related to the presence of NAb. Further comparison of SC/NAb positivity among RA treatment subgroups and CG revealed that methotrexate/tofacitinib/abatacept/tocilizumab use, in monotherapy or in combination, resulted in lower responses (p<0.05), while tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and other conventional synthetic DMARD interfered solely when combined with other therapies.ConclusionsPatients with RA under DMARD have a moderate immunogenicity to CoronaVac. We identified that nearly all DMARD combinations have a deleterious effect in immunogenicity, whereas a more restricted number of drugs (methotrexate/tofacitinib/abatacept/tocilizumab) also hampered this response as monotherapy. These findings reinforce the need of a broader approach, not limited to specific drugs, to improve vaccine response for this population.Trial registration details NCT04754698.

Objective Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has progressed rapidly around the world, reaching a lethality of up to 20% due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This latter condition is a relevant concern for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, data on this topic are limited to few case series. Our objective was to evaluate in hospitalized patients with SLE and with COVID‐19–associated ARDS (confirmed by reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction) the risk of mortality and combined poor outcomes (death, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, and/or mechanical ventilation [MV] use) and to compare with that of patients without SLE. Methods This is a nationwide cross‐sectional study of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nested in the national Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System (Sistema de Informação de Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe [SIVEP‐gripe]). Mortality rates, frequencies of ICU admissions, and MV use for 319 patients with SLE and 251 800 patients without SLE were calculated as well as relative risks (RRs). A fully adjusted multiple logistic regression was performed to adjust factors, such as age and well‐known comorbidities, that might impact worse outcomes. Results Patients with SLE had an increased risk of death and combined poor outcome compared with patients without SLE (RR = 1.738, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.557‐1.914, and RR = 1.391, 95% CI: 1.282‐1.492, respectively). Among all investigated comorbidities, SLE yielded the higher risk of death and combined poor outcomes (RR = 2.205, 95% CI: 1.780‐2.633, and RR = 1.654, 95% CI: 1.410‐1.88, respectively). Conclusions This study provides novel evidence that patients with SLE hospitalized because of COVID‐19 have significantly higher risks of death and poor outcomes compared with patients without comorbidities and patients with other comorbidities.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect on immunogenicity and safety of 2-week methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation after each dose of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine versus MTX maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis was a single-centre, prospective, randomised, investigator-blinded, intervention study (NCT04754698, CoronavRheum) including adult patients with RA (stable Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day) randomised (1:1) to withdraw MTX (MTX-hold) for 2 weeks after each vaccine dose or maintain MTX (MTX-maintain), evaluated at day 0 (D0), D28 and D69. Coprimary outcomes were anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG seroconversion (SC) and neutralising antibody (NAb) positivity at D69. Secondary outcomes were geometric mean titres (GMT) and flare rates. For immunogenicity analyses, we excluded patients with baseline positive IgG/NAb, and for safety reasons those who flared at D28 (CDAI >10) and did not withdraw MTX twice.ResultsRandomisation included 138 patients with 9 exclusions (5 COVID-19, 4 protocol violations). Safety evaluation included 60 patients in the MTX-hold and 69 patients in the MTX-maintain group. Further exclusions included 27 patients (13 (21.7%) vs 14 (20.3%), p=0.848) with positive baseline IgG/NAb and 10 patients (21.3%) in MTX-hold with CDAI >10 at D28. At D69, the MTX-hold group (n=37) had a higher rate of SC than the MTX-maintain group (n=55) (29 (78.4%) vs 30 (54.5%), p=0.019), with parallel augmentation in GMT (34.2 (25.2–46.4) vs 16.8 (11.9–23.6), p=0.006). No differences were observed for NAb positivity (23 (62.2%) vs 27 (49.1%), p=0.217). At D28 flare, the rates were comparable in both groups (CDAI, p=0.122; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C reactive protein, p=0.576), whereas CDAI >10 was more frequent in MTX-hold at D69 (p=0.024).ConclusionWe provided novel data that 2-week MTX withdrawal after each dose of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine improves anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG response. The increased flare rates after the second MTX withdrawal may be attributed to the short-term interval between vaccine doses. This strategy requires close surveillance and shared decision making due to the possibility of flares.

► Pre- and post-vaccination disease and muscle parameters were comparable. ► The vaccine was well tolerated without any severe adverse effects during follow-up. ► Seroconversion, seroprotection rate, GMTs and FI in the GMTs were comparable. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the influence of the influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccine on dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM) disease parameters and the potential deleterious effect of therapy on immune response. Thirty-seven DM and 21 PM patients (Bohan and Peter's criteria) were gender- and age-matched to 116 healthy controls. Seroprotection, seroconversion, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) and the factor increase (FI) in the GMTs were calculated. Disease safety was determined from a muscle enzyme analysis and the DM/PM scores [patient's visual analog scale (VAS), physician's VAS, manual muscle strength (MMT-8)] evaluated pre- and post-vaccination. The mean age (43.1±9.9 vs. 43.8±8.4 years, p=0.607) and gender distribution (p=1.00) were comparable between the patients and controls. After 21 days, seroconversion (p=0.394), seroprotection (p=0.08), GMT (p=0.573) and the FI in the GMT (p=0.496) were similar in both groups. The disease and muscle parameters remained stable throughout the study, including the creatine kinase (p=0.20) and aldolase levels (p=0.98), the physicians’ VAS (p=1.00), the patients’ VAS (p=1.00) and the MMT-8 (p=1.00). Regarding the influence of treatment, the seroconversion rates were comparable between the controls and patients undergoing treatment with glucocorticoid (GC) (p=0.969), GC >0.5mg/kg/day (p=0.395) and GC+immunosuppressors (p=0.285). Vaccine-related adverse events were mild and similar in the DM/PM and control groups (p>0.05). Our data support the administration of the pandemic influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccination in DM/PM, as we found no short-term harmful effects related to the disease itself and adequate immunogenicity in spite of therapy. Further studies are necessary to identify any long-term adverse effects in patients with these diseases.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used to treat Sjögren’s disease (SjD) patients. However, there are no studies evaluating drug adherence through HCQ blood levels, pharmacy refill (PR) and medication adherence questionnaires. The relationship of HCQ blood levels with glandular/extraglandular disease parameters was also poorly assessed. This cross-sectional observational study included 74 adult SjD patients, who were receiving a stable HCQ dose (4-5.5 mg/kg/day, actual weight) for at least 3 months before study inclusion. HCQ blood levels were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Adherence was assessed by PR and Medida de Adesão aos Tratamentos (MAT) questionnaire. The following parameters were evaluated: Xerostomia Inventory, Ocular Surface Disease Index, EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index, EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index, Schirmer’s I test and non-stimulated/stimulated salivary flow rates. HCQ blood levels were 775.3(25.0–2,568.6)ng/mL. Eleven patients (14.9%) had HCQ blood levels < 200ng/mL (non-adherent group); 11(14.9%), 200-499ng/mL (sub-therapeutic levels group); and 52(70.2%), ≥ 500ng/mL (adherent group). PR classified incorrectly all non-adherent/sub-therapeutic patients and 2/52(3.9%) adherent patients. Using MAT, the overall misclassification was 24/52(46.2%) in the adherent group, and were correctly identified 9/11(81.8%) patients in non-adherent and 7/11(63.6%) in sub-therapeutic groups. MAT sensitivity and specificity to identify non-adherent/sub-therapeutic patients were 72.7% and 53.9%, respectively. The three groups were comparable regarding glandular/extraglandular disease parameters (p > 0.05). The assessment of HCQ blood levels is a promising tool for evaluating drug adherence in SjD. This is particularly crucial as one-third of patients exhibited non-adherence/sub-therapeutic levels, and neither PR nor MAT reliably identified these patients.

ObjectiveTo assess the longitudinal production of anti-adalimumab antibody (AAA) and baseline risk factors for this antibody development in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients initiating adalimumab (ADA).MethodThirty consecutive JIA patients under ADA therapy were prospectively followed. JIA clinical/laboratorial/treatment data and sera for ADA and AAA assays (ELISA and bridging ELISA) were obtained at baseline (BL), 2 months (2M), 3 months (3M), 6 months (6M), 12 months (12M), and 24 months (24M). Patients with therapy failure requiring ADA withdrawn had their sera evaluated at their last medical visit prior to biologic switch (blinded to ADA and AAA levels).ResultsAAA was absent at BL, first detected at 2M after ADA initiation in 2/30 (7%) patients with a significant increase at 3M (10/29 (34%), p = 0.013) and no major change in 6M (11/30 (37%)) and 12M (9/26 (35%)). Of note, at 3M, AAA levels correlated negatively with ADA levels (r = − 0.781, p = 0.0001). Analysis of BL predictors revealed a significantly higher risk of developing AAA in patients with female gender (OR 21; 95% CI 1.08–406.57; p = 0.044), ESR > 30 mm/1st hour (OR 5.44; 95% CI 1.04–28.53; p = 0.045), and leflunomide use (OR 9.33; 95% CI 1.51–57.66; p = 0.016). In contrast, concomitant use of methotrexate was protective for AAA appearance (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01–0.53; p = 0.009). After 12M of ADA, 60% of AAA-positive patients required drug switch for drug failure compared with 15% in AAA-negative group (p = 0.03).ConclusionsThis study provides novel evidence of AAA production kinetics demonstrating a timely significant increase starting at 3M and stable throughout 24M. We also identified female gender, increased ESR, and leflunomide use as relevant risk factors for AAA production at BL, whereas methotrexate was protective. Early systematic monitoring of AAA at 3M may, therefore, guide drug switching in these patients.Key Points• Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) production kinetics demonstrated a timely significant increase starting at 3M in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients under adalimumab therapy• Female gender, increased ESR, and leflunomide use were identified as relevant risk factors for AAA production in JIA, whereas methotrexate was protective

Introduction There is no study specifically focused on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). Objectives To assess the immunogenicity, safety, possible effects on disease activity, and autoantibody profile of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine in pSS. Methods Fifty-one pSS patients and 102 sex- and age-balanced controls without autoimmune diseases were included in a prospective phase 4 trial of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine (two doses 28 days apart, D0/D28). Participants were assessed in three face-to-face visits (D0/D28 and six weeks after the 2nd dose (D69)) regarding adverse effects; clinical EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (clinESSDAI); anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (seroconversion (SC) and geometric mean titers (GMT)); neutralizing antibodies (NAb); and pSS autoantibody profile. Results Patients and controls had comparable female sex frequency (98.0% vs. 98.0%, p  = 1.000) and mean age (53.5 ± 11.7 vs. 53.4 ± 11.4 years, p  = 0.924), respectively. On D69, pSS patients presented moderate SC (67.5% vs. 93.0%, p  < 0.001) and GMT (22.5 (95% CI 14.6–34.5) vs. 59.6 (95% CI 51.1–69.4) AU/mL, p  < 0.001) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG but lower than controls, and also, moderate NAb frequency (52.5% vs. 73.3%, p  = 0.021) but lower than controls. Median neutralizing activity on D69 was comparable in pSS (58.6% (IQR 43.7–63.6)) and controls (64% (IQR 46.4–81.1)) ( p  = 0.219). Adverse events were mild. clinESSDAI and anti-Ro(SS-A)/anti-La(SS-B) levels were stable throughout the study ( p  > 0.05). Conclusion Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine is safe in pSS, without a deleterious impact on disease activity, and has a moderate short-term humoral response, though lower than controls. Thus, a booster dose needs to be studied in these patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04754698. Key Points • Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine is safe in pSS, without a detrimental effect on systemic disease activity, and has a moderate short-term humoral response • A booster dose should be considered in these patients

Prognosis of several autoimmune diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease (CD), and psoriasis, usually refractory to conventional treatment improved considerably with the introduction of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antagonistic agents, which is now available (infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab). However, a portion of patients persists with active disease, infusion reactions, and relapses even during current biological therapy. One of the reasons for this is the associated immunogenicity to these drugs. The incentive for induction of antibodies against anti-TNF-α agent depends mainly on its constitution. Chimerical drugs have a higher capacity of inducing immunogenicity compared to completely human drugs. Among the three anti-TNF-α agents, this phenomenon has been studied mainly in patients using infliximab, especially in RA and CD. The prevalence of anti-infliximab antibodies in RA varies from 12% to 44% and seems to be inversely proportional to the level of seric infliximab and therapeutic response. The use of etanercept was associated to the development of anti-etanercept antibodies in 0% to 18% of patients, without apparent effect on effectiveness or adverse events. Studies with RA and CD patients show prevalence of anti-adalimumab antibodies from 1% to 87%. Immunosuppressive drug addiction can reduce the induction of anti-TNF-α antibodies.

The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical, laboratorial, and therapeutical response of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment. We systematically searched English articles on the subjects of PMR who were treated with TNF blockers in Pubmed from 1994 to 2010. In addition, we reported on two patients with PMR who were treated by the Rheumatology Division of the Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade in São Paulo, Brazil. Ninety-nine cases of patients with PMR treated with anti-TNF were reviewed. The age of these patients ranged from 63 to 84 years, and 70.7% of them were female. Disease duration varied from 10.5 weeks to 95 months, and time of follow-up varied from 2 weeks to 21 months. Infliximab was the anti-TNF of choice in three studies, while etanercept was in five. Time to response varied from 2 to 8 weeks. After anti-TNF treatment, prednisone reduction was observed in all studies. Clinical improvement was found in 7/7 studies, and laboratory improvement of at least 50% of inflammatory markers was observed in 6/7 studies. This study demonstrated a good clinical and laboratory response to anti-TNF therapy in patients with PMR, with or without glucocorticoid.

Dry eye disease (DED) is common in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. The application of conjunctival goblet cell count as a clinical biomarker to diagnose and respond to treatment can take place in rheumatoid arthritis patients under TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the ocular surface parameters and the long-term effects of TNFi therapy on ocular surface features and goblet cell count of rheumatoid arthritis patients. At baseline, rheumatoid arthritis patients eligible to TNFi were compared to healthy controls (similar age/gender), regarding Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Schirmer I test, tear break-up time test, vital dye staining of the ocular surface, and conjunctival impression cytology. DED severity grade, impression cytology score, and goblet cell count were analyzed. Rheumatoid arthritis patients were followed after three (3 M) and 12 months (12 M), during TNFi treatment. Sixteen rheumatoid arthritis patients and 24 controls were compared: a higher frequency of abnormal OSDI (68.8% vs. 16.7%, p  = 0.002), Schirmer’s test < 10 mm (37.5% vs. 8.3%, p  = 0.042), meibomian gland dysfunction (50% vs. 8.3%, p  = 0.007), abnormal impression cytology (75% vs. 8.3%, p  < 0.001), and mild to moderate DED (81.3% vs. 4.2%, p  < 0.001) were observed in rheumatoid arthritis patients, who also had lower goblet cell count [325 (274–707) cells/mm 2 vs. 742 (562–863) cells/mm 2 , p  = 0.004]. The presence of Meibomian gland dysfunction was associated with higher disease activity scores ( p  < 0.05). The prospective early observation of these patients at 3 M showed an increase improvement in tear production by Schirmer’s test [13 (7.5–17.5) vs. 23.5 (16–35); p  = 0.001], and an improvement in impression cytology score [1 (0.5–2) vs. 1 (0–1), p  = 0.031] and in goblet cell count [325 (274–707) vs. 931 (656–1,244), p  < 0.001]. Eight RA responders to TNFi were also re-evaluated at 12 M with further improvement in goblet cell count [393 (275–827) vs. 872 (502–1,185) vs. 1,079 (867–1,244), p  = 0.047]. Multifactorial DED is frequent in RA patients, comprising aqueous, lipid, and mucin components. TNFi prompt improves tear production and recovers the goblet cells, which can be a biomarker of the pathological process and response to therapy in this population.