Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Al-Humam, Ibrahim"
Sort by:
A Systematic Review to Assess Assessing Side Effects of Acetazolamide
Background:Acetazolamide (AZM), a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, is widely used for conditions such as glaucoma, acute mountain sickness (AMS), and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. While effective, AZM’s use is often limited by frequent side effects, including paraesthesia, dysgeusia, polyuria, and fatigue, which may be dose-dependent. Previous studies have provided limited quantitative data, necessitating a systematic assessment of the overall risk and dose dependence of AZM’s adverse effects.Methods:We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral AZM to placebo in adults. Studies reporting side effects were included, while those involving non-adults, hemodialysis patients, non-oral AZM formulations, or combined treatments were excluded. Primary outcomes included paraesthesia, dysgeusia, polyuria, and fatigue. Data were extracted and analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method,Results:A total of 35 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse AZM dosages (125–4000 mg/day) and treatment durations (1–180 days). AZM significantly increased the risk of paraesthesia (OR: 6.5, NNTH: 2.3), dysgeusia (OR: 3.2, NNTH: 18), polyuria (OR: 2.7), and fatigue (OR: 2.3).. Secondary side effects, such as nausea, diarrhea, and drowsiness, were also significantly associated with AZM. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, and publication bias was not detected.Conclusion:AZM use is associated with a significant and dose-dependent increase in common side effects, particularly paraesthesia, dysgeusia, and fatigue. These findings underscore the importance of balancing efficacy with tolerability by optimizing AZM dosing. Clinicians should consider individual patient factors, such as renal function and body weight, when prescribing AZM to minimize adverse effects and improve adherence.
Measuring Vitamin Literacy and Information-Seeking Behavior
Background The significance of vitamins in maintaining health necessitates a comprehensive understanding among the population, which is critical for making informed decisions pertaining to diet and vitamin supplementation. Nevertheless, there is a notable deficiency in research regarding the mechanisms through which individuals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) acquire and utilize vitamin-related knowledge, marking a considerable void in public health and nutrition education. Methods This study proposes a quantitative, cross-sectional analysis to evaluate vitamin literacy and information-seeking behaviors within KSA's diverse demographic sectors. Survey instruments will be utilized to ascertain the primary sources from which individuals derive vitamin information and to analyze the factors that influence the integration of this knowledge into daily health practices. Results Analysis showed significant variance in vitamin literacy with age and education acting as key differentiators. Kruskal-Wallis tests indicated significant differences in self-rated vitamin knowledge across age groups (p < 0.001), and Chi-square tests confirmed the association between education level and supplement use (p = 0.0022). The majority of participants demonstrated moderate knowledge of vitamins, yet a discrepancy exists between this knowledge and dietary application. Trust in information sources emerged as a significant predictor of dietary change (Chi-square, p < 0.001), although a substantial portion of participants did not actively incorporate vitamin knowledge into their daily diet. Conclusion The enhancement of vitamin literacy is paramount for the formulation of effective public health strategies. Our findings suggest that targeted educational programs, especially for younger and less-educated populations, are crucial to bridge the gap between vitamin knowledge and its application in daily diet. In addition, efforts should focus on improving the credibility of information sources, as this significantly influences dietary changes. These initiatives can lead to more informed decision-making regarding diet and vitamin supplementation, ultimately fostering healthier living practices and reducing the occurrences of vitamin-related health issues within the KSA populace. This research contributes substantively to the development of tailored educational initiatives and informed policymaking, guiding future efforts to advance nutrition guidelines and public health in the region.