Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective This review will explore the categorization of migraine‐provoking molecules, their cellular actions, site of action and potential drug targets based on the migraine cascade model. Methods Personal experience and literature. Results Migraine impacts over 1 billion people worldwide but is underfunded in research. Recent progress, particularly through the human and animal provocation model, has deepened our understanding of its mechanisms. This model have identified endogenous neuropeptides such as calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase‐activating peptide (PACAP) that induces controlled migraine‐like attacks leading to significant discoveries of their role in migraine. This knowledge led to the development of CGRP‐inhibiting drugs; a groundbreaking migraine treatment now accessible globally. Also a PACAP‐inhibiting drug was effective in a recent phase II trial. Notably, rodent studies have shed light on pain pathways and the mechanisms of various migraine‐inducing substances identifying novel drug targets. This is primarily done by using selective inhibitors that target specific signaling pathways of the known migraine triggers leading to the hypothesized cellular cascade model of migraine. Conclusion The model of migraine presents numerous opportunities for innovative drug development. The future of new migraine treatments is limited only by the investment from pharmaceutical companies.

Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder, diagnosis of which is based on clinical criteria. A shortcoming of these criteria is that they do not fully capture the heterogeneity of migraine, including the underlying genetic and neurobiological factors. This complexity has generated momentum for biomarker research to improve disease characterisation and identify novel drug targets. In this Series paper, we present the progress that has been made in the search for biomarkers of migraine within genetics, provocation modelling, biochemistry, and neuroimaging research. Additionally, we outline challenges and future directions for each biomarker modality. We also discuss the advances made in combining and integrating data from multiple biomarker modalities. These efforts contribute to developing precision medicine that can be applied to future patients with migraine.

BackgroundAdenosine is a purinergic signaling molecule with a wide range of physiological functions including anti- and pronociceptive properties. Adenosine receptors are expressed in the trigeminovascular system, and adenosine receptor antagonist, caffeine, relieves migraine headache. We performed a systematic review of the literature of preclinical data addressing the role of adenosine in migraine pathophysiology.MethodsPubMed and EMBASE were searched for pre-clinical studies on the role of adenosine in migraine pathophysiology on September 5th, 2021.ResultsA total of 2510 studies were screened by title and abstract. Of these, thirteen pre-clinical studies evaluating adenosine, adenosine A1, A2A and A3 receptors were included. These studies showed that adenosine signaling pathway is involved in controlling vascular tone. Furthermore, electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion modulates the expression of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal nucleus caudalis implicating adenosine signaling pathway in pain transmission.ConclusionPreclinical studies showed that adenosine has a dual effect on vasodilation and trigeminal pain pathway due to different receptor activation, suggesting a possible role of adenosine in migraine pathophysiology. Studies investigating pharmacological characteristics of subtypes of adenosine receptors are needed to further elucidate their role as a potential target for migraine treatment.

Migraine is a primary headache disorder ranked as the leading cause of years lived with disability among individuals younger than 50 years. The aetiology of migraine is complex and might involve several molecules of different signalling pathways. Emerging evidence implicates potassium channels, predominantly ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels and large (big) calcium-sensitive potassium (BKCa) channels in migraine attack initiation. Basic neuroscience revealed that stimulation of potassium channels activated and sensitized trigeminovascular neurons. Clinical trials showed that administration of potassium channel openers caused headache and migraine attack associated with dilation of cephalic arteries. The present review highlights the molecular structure and physiological function of KATP and BKCa channels, presents recent insights into the role of potassium channels in migraine pathophysiology, and discusses possible complementary effects and interdependence of potassium channels in migraine attack initiation.

Purpose of Review Migraine remains a challenging condition to treat, thus highlighting the need for a better understanding of its molecular mechanisms. This review intends to unravel a new emerging target in migraine pathophysiology, the adenosine 5′-triphosphate-sensitive K + (K ATP ) channel. Recent Findings K ATP channel is a common denominator in the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) mediated intracellular cascades, both of which are involved in migraine. Intravenous infusion of K ATP channel opener, levcromakalim, provoked migraine attack associated with dilation of extracerebral arteries in all persons with migraine. Summary Preclinical and clinical studies implicate K ATP channels in migraine initiation. K ATP channel is a novel therapeutic target for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Future studies are warranted to provide a better understanding of the role of K ATP channel subgroups in migraine.

Intravenous infusion of ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) opener levcromakalim causes headache in humans and implicates KATP channels in headache pathophysiology. Whether KATP channel blocker glibenclamide inhibits levcromakalim-induced headache has not yet been elucidated. We aimed to investigate the effect of posttreatment with glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy participants. In a double blind, randomized, three-arm, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 20 healthy participants were randomized to receive 20 mL of levcromakalim (0.05 mg/min (50 mg/mL)) or 20 mL placebo (isotonic saline) intravenously over 20 min followed by oral administration of 10 mg glibenclamide or placebo. Fifteen participants completed all three study days. The primary endpoint was the difference in incidence of headache (0–12 h) between glibenclamide and placebo. More participants developed headache on levcromakalim-placebo day (15/15, 100%) (P = 0.013) and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (13/15, 86%) compared to placebo-placebo day (7/15, 46%) (P = 0.041). We found no difference in headache incidence between levcromakalim-placebo day and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (P = 0.479). The AUC0–12 h for headache intensity was significantly larger in levcromakalim-placebo day and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day compared to placebo-placebo day (106.3 ± 215.8) (P <0.01). There was no difference in the AUC0–12 h for headache intensity between the levcromakalim-placebo day (494 ± 336.6) and the levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (417 ± 371.6) (P = 0.836). We conclude that non-specific KATP channel inhibitor glibenclamide did not attenuate levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers. Future studies should clarify the involvement of the distinct isoforms of sulfonylurea receptor subunits of KATP channels in the pathogenesis of headache and migraine.

Large (big)-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK Ca ) channels are expressed in migraine-related structures such as the cranial arteries, trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal spinal nucleus, and they play a substantial role in vascular tonus and neuronal excitability. Using synthetic BK Ca channels openers was associated with headache as a frequent adverse effect in healthy volunteers. Additionally, BK Ca channels are downstream molecules in migraine signalling pathways that are activated by several compounds known to provoke migraine, including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Also, there is a high affinity and a close coupling between BK Ca channels and ATP-sensitive potassium (K ATP ) channels, the role of which has recently been established in migraine pathophysiology. These observations raise the question as to whether direct BK Ca channel activation can provoke migraine in migraine patients, and whether the BK Ca channel could be a potential novel anti-migraine target. Hence, randomized and placebo-controlled clinical studies on BK Ca channel openers or blockers in migraine patients are needed.

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides (PACAPs) are structurally and functionally related, yet different in their migraine-inducing properties. It remains unclear whether the lack of migraine induction can be attributed to the only transient vasodilatory response after a 20-minute infusion of VIP. To determine whether a 2-hour infusion of VIP would provoke migraine attacks. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted between May and September 2020 at the Danish Headache Center in Copenhagen, Denmark. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were ages 18 to 40 years, weighed between 50 and 90 kg, had a diagnosis of migraine without aura as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders, and had a migraine frequency of 1 to 6 attacks per month. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a 2-hour infusion of VIP or placebo on 2 different days. The primary end point was the difference in incidence of experimentally induced migraine attacks during the observational period (0-12 hours) between VIP and placebo. Twenty-one patients (17 [81%] women and 4 [19%] men; mean [range] age, 25.9 [19-40] years) were recruited in the study. Fifteen patients (71%; 95% CI, 48%-89%) developed migraine attacks after VIP compared with 1 patient (5%; 95% CI, 0%-24%) who developed a migraine attack after placebo (P < .001). The VIP-induced migraine attacks mimicked patients' spontaneous attacks. The area under the curve (AUC) of headache intensity scores (0-12 hours), as well as the AUC of the superficial temporal artery diameter (0-180 minute) were significantly greater after VIP compared with placebo (AUC0-12h, P = .003; AUC0-180min, P < .001). A 2-hour infusion of VIP caused migraine attacks, suggesting an important role of VIP in migraine pathophysiology. VIP and its receptors could be potential targets for novel migraine drugs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260035.

Background Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP38) are key pathogenic drivers of migraine. While CGRP has become the target of several mechanism-based therapies, less is known about PACAP38 signaling in migraine pathogenesis. Previous studies suggest that PACAP38 can modulate CGRP release, but it might also induce migraine attacks via CGRP-independent mechanisms. Whether PACAP38 signaling is independent of and parallel to CGRP signaling has implications for future therapeutic strategies. Here, we aimed to ascertain whether PACAP-38 can mediate migraine attacks independently of CGRP signaling by assessing the ability of eptinezumab to prevent PACAP38-induced migraine attacks. Methods In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we randomly allocated adults with migraine without aura to receive either an intravenous infusion of 300-mg eptinezumab or matching placebo (isotonic saline) over 30 min. Two hours post-infusion, all participants were administered PACAP38 intravenously at 10 pmol/kg/min for 20 min. The primary endpoint was the incidence of migraine attacks during the 24-hour observational period post-infusion of eptinezumab or placebo. Key secondary endpoints included between-group differences in incidence of headache, and area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity scores, diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial skin blood flow. Results A total of 38 participants were enrolled and completed the study. No difference was observed in the incidence of PACAP38-induced migraine attacks between the eptinezumab (10 [53%] of 19) and placebo (12 [63%] of 19) groups (Fisher’s exact test: P  = 0.74). Headache of any intensity was reported by 15 (79%) participants in the eptinezumab group, compared with 16 (84%) participants in the placebo group (Fisher’s exact test: P  > 0.99). The AUC for headache intensity scores did not differ between the two groups during the first 12 h post-infusion of PACAP38 (Mann-Whitney U-test: P  = 0.96). No differences were observed in AUC between the eptinezumab and placebo groups with respect to changes in STA diameter and facial skin blood flow ( P  > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions Our results suggest that PACAP38 may mediate its signaling independently of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Therapies targeting PACAP signaling are thus a promising new avenue for treating migraine. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05635604. Registered on November 15 2022. Graphical abstract

The kynurenine pathway (KP) is the main path for tryptophan metabolism, and it represents a multitude of potential sites for drug discovery in neuroscience, including pain, stroke, and epilepsy. L‐kynurenine (LKYN), the first active metabolite in the pathway, emerges to be a prodrug targeting glutamate receptors. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LKYN in humans have not been previously investigated. In an open‐label, single ascending dose study, six participants received an intravenous infusion of 50, 100, and 150 µg/kg LKYN and new six participants received an intravenous infusion of 0.3, 0.5, 1, and 5 mg/kg LKYN. To compare the pharmacological effects between species, we investigated in vivo the vascular effects of LKYN in rats. In humans, LKYN was safe and well‐tolerated at all dose levels examined. After infusion, LKYN plasma concentration increased significantly over time 3.23 ± 1.12 µg/mL (after 50 µg/kg), 4.04 ± 1.1 µg/mL (after 100 µg/kg), and 5.25 ± 1.01 µg/mL (after 150 µg/kg) (p ≤ 0.001). We observed no vascular changes after infusion compared with baseline. In rats, LKYN had no effect on HR and MAP and caused no dilation of dural and pial arteries. This first‐in‐human study of LKYN showed that LKYN was safe and well‐tolerated after intravenous infusion up to 5 mg/kg over 20 minutes. The lack of change in LKYN metabolites in plasma suggests a relatively slow metabolism of LKYN and no or little feed‐back effect of LKYN on its synthesis. The therapeutic potential of LKYN in stroke and epilepsy should be explored in future studies in humans. Study design and outcomes