Explore the vast range of titles available.

Persuasion is a complicated procedure and there are certain people who are regarded to be gifted to persuade someone or some people. Ordinary speech can not be used to persuade someone. This paper has tackled the use of symbolism and irony by public figure like actors or T.V. shows presenters to persuade people to do the right things. Five speeches have been selected to be the data of the study. It has been found that all the four speakers use symbolism very often due its great effect on people when they need persuade them, where the use of irony was very rare because irony always involve comic meaning, and this will not help the speakers to persuade anybody. A table has been designed to show the frequency of the symbolism and irony in those four speeches.

The present study deals with the use of lexical items by Tom Hardy for self-promotion and Self-supplication. It deals with the use of different lexical items as a micro level device by Tom Hardy to be viewed as the successful Hollywood actor who acts in successful films besides being viewed as the helpless young man who made illegal actions for being immature to gain more fame, wealth, new turns in films and passing the ideology of Americanism to the audience. The problem of this study is that the use lexical items by Tom Hardy for gaining the impressions of self-promotion and supplication has not been tackled within the field of critical pragmatics. This study aims at finding out the types of lexical items used by Tom Hardy in Jonothan Ross Show for self-promotion and self-supplication. This study hypothesizes that Tom Hardy uses mainly lexical items with experiential value to be viewed as a successful actor and helpless young man. This study is significant since it deals with the use of social psychological strategies by an actor for influencing the audience from a critical pragmatic perceptive.

This study identifies how TMD patients may present lateral deviations in speech, that is, these changes are expected in patients with joint involvement, as well as in the knowledge of which are the main characteristics that occur in the movement of the jaw during the speech, which are the lateral deviations. This process is important, since it directs a closer look at the professionals working in the TMD area, in the sense that they consider this function during the evaluation of the patient and, if they find any alteration, it may add information for the diagnosis of joint conditions and with the understanding of the painful phenomenon. Moreover, the study is a try to discover the relationship between linguistics and dentistry field.

This study deals with the use of different linguistic, pragmatic, and ideological strategies for gaining a psychological impression related to the strategic use of ingratiation to manipulate and control the minds of the audience for gaining different benefits and gaining acceptance and naturalization for different ideologies. Ingratiation is to gain favor or favorable acceptance for by deliberate effort. The study deals with the usage of the psychological strategy of ingratiation by Will Smith in Jimmy Kimmel Live from a critical pragmatic perspective used for gaining different benefits that are promotional marketing of films, gaining fame, wealth, fans and passing the ideology of Americanism to the audience. This study hypothesizes that Will Smith uses macro, micro, pragmatic, and sub-ingratiation strategies to gain the impression of being loved and admired by the audience and for promoting for his new films. This study aims at investigating the linguistic, ideological, mind control strategies and the types of ingratiation strategies employed by Will Smith to form the desired impression related to ingratiation. For fulfilling the aims and testing its hypotheses, the procedures used are presenting a theoretical background regarding the field of critical pragmatics, the psychological tactic of ingratiation and the ideologies of Americanism and promotional marketing. Explaining the model utilized for the analysis of Will Smith's discourse in Jimmy Kimmel Live. Analyzing Will Smith's discourse in this talk show according the model developed for the present study.

A fallacy is a step in the development of an argument that is illogical. In academic writing, an argument is essentially a conclusion or claim that is supported by assumptions or other justifications. For instance, yellow is a bad color because it is associated with disease, is an argument because it states a claim and provides evidence to back it up. Regardless of whether the assertion we make is true or false, we might support it with arguments that lack logic or arguments that lack logic themselves. For someone who associates yellow with pleasure, the aforementioned argument, for instance, might be seen as fallacy. Although fallacies are common in politics, the law, and the media, they also occur frequently in everyday life. Tricksters use fallacies to get their audiences to accept illogical claims because they can make illogical arguments appear logical. But we can avoid being deceitful and falling for others' lies if we can learn to pinpoint fallacies. The current study looks into political fallacies in social media regarding the hijab banning. Fallacy as a derailment of strategic maneuvering can be defined as the process of issuing a defective argument (when subjected to certain criteria) to support and strengthen a previouslyissued one for purposes of persuasion. However, fallacy is a broad topic that has beenapproached from different perspectives.

The current study is carried out in the field of Critical Discourse Analysis (henceforth CDA) for the analysis of articles taken from New York Times (henceforth NYC), as a representative for American media. The study rises the following questions: (1) How radical Islamists groups are tackled linguistically in the discourse of American newspapers? (2) Which type of modality is used heavily to reflect the ideologies of American newspapers? (3) Do American newspapers rely on a specific trigger in the production of news? (4) Do American newspapers consider radical Muslims as if they were representative for Islam or not? The study aims at: (1) Analyzing linguistically the discourse of newspapers to know what is the role of the American writers in the reproduction of racism, and discrimination in their discourse. (2) Examining the role of modality in presenting issues related to radical Islamists. (3) Finding out which presupposition trigger is used mostly in American newspapers. (4) Explaining the western view to Islam and Muslims. To achieve the aims of this study the following procedures are presented: (1) presenting a brief review about CDA and Radical Islamists. (2) Discussing the model used. (3) Analyzing the articles following van Dijk Dijk\"s \"News discourse\" (1988) which is taken to handle the linguistic level of the study. Concerning the ideological level, van Dijk ,,s \"Ideological Square\" (1995b) is used. The study also uses Yule\"s (1996) for the analysis of presupposition triggers.