Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
157
result(s) for
"Albrecht, James M"
Sort by:
Reconstructing Individualism:A Pragmatic Tradition from Emerson to Ellison
2012,2020
America has a love-hate relationship with individualism. In Reconstructing Individualism, James Albrecht argues that our conceptions of individualism have remained trapped within the assumptions of classic liberalism. He traces an alternative genealogy of individualist ethics in four major American thinkers-Ralph Waldo Emerson, William James, John Dewey, and Ralph Ellison. These writers' shared commitments to pluralism (metaphysical and cultural), experimentalism, and a melioristic stance toward value and reform led them to describe the self as inherently relational. Accordingly, they articulate models of selfhood that are socially engaged and ethically responsible, and they argue that a reconceived-or, in Dewey's term, \"reconstructed\"-individualism is not merely compatible with but necessary to democratic community. Conceiving selfhood and community as interrelated processes, they call for an ongoing reform of social conditions so as to educate and liberate individuality, and, conversely, they affirm the essential role individuality plays in vitalizing communal efforts at reform.
Reconstructing Individualism
2012
America has a love-hate relationship with individualism. In Reconstructing Individualism, James Albrecht argues that our conceptions of individualism have remained trapped within the assumptions of classic liberalism. He traces an alternative genealogy of individualist ethics in four major American thinkers-Ralph Waldo Emerson, William James, John Dewey, and Ralph Ellison. These writers' shared commitments to pluralism (metaphysical and cultural), experimentalism, and a melioristic stance toward value and reform led them to describe the self as inherently relational. Accordingly, they articulate models of selfhood that are socially engaged and ethically responsible, and they argue that a reconceived-or, in Dewey's term, \"reconstructed\"-individualism is not merely compatible with but necessary to democratic community. Conceiving selfhood and community as interrelated processes, they call for an ongoing reform of social conditions so as to educate and liberate individuality, and, conversely, they affirm the essential role individuality plays in vitalizing communal efforts at reform.
SAYING YES AND SAYING NO
2012
The writings of Ralph Ellison constitute one of American literature’s most sophisticated explorations of the doubleness that W. E. B. Du Bois described as central to African-American identity. While Du Bois testified to the African-American’s “longing” to overcome the social and psychic divisions imposed by American society, to “merge his double self into a better and truer self,” he envisioned that “truer” self as one in which the doubleness of African and American elements would coexist: “In this merging he wishes neither of the older selves to be lost. He would not Africanize America, for America has too much to
Book Chapter
LET US HAVE WORSE COTTON AND BETTER MEN
2012
Pragmatism, as noted in my introduction, rejects absolutism in favor of an experimental and melioristic approach to inquiry and conduct. Relinquishing the notion of truth as providing any absolute certainty, and rejecting simplistic notions that truth provides an objective account of an unchanging reality, pragmatism views ideas as limited human constructs—hypotheses or tools whose truth resides in their ability to guide our actions to beneficial results. By extension, all such results must in turn be treated as only provisional ends, and most importantly as means to further action. It is worth while here to cite again William James’s claim
Book Chapter
CHARACTER AND COMMUNITY
2012
The writings of John Dewey occupy a pivotal position in the genealogy of pragmatic individualism charted in this study.¹ Spanning the era from the Civil War to the Cold War (1859–1952), Dewey’s life is remarkable for the sheer scope of social changes he witnessed and participated in, and the breadth of these changes is reflected in his prodigious range and output as a philosopher. When Democracy and Education was published in 1916, Dewey, at age fifty-seven, had already achieved a notable career as a philosopher of pragmatism and a pioneer of progressive educational reform.² In the subsequent decades, well
Book Chapter
THE LOCAL IS THE ULTIMATE UNIVERSAL
2012
In 1926, when John Dewey delivered and revised the series of lectures that would be published as The Public and Its Problems, the future of individualism in American culture weighed heavily on his mind. In “William James in Nineteen Twenty-Six,” he wondered aloud about James’s melioristic ethic of individualized vocation—as typified in James’s vision in “Pragmatism and Religion”—of individuals willing to stake themselves in the uncertain struggle to realize ideals in “the parts of the world to which [they] are closest”:¹ had James described “an abiding, an indestructible, possession of American life,” or merely “summed up an age,
Book Chapter
WHAT’S THE USE OF READING EMERSON PRAGMATICALLY?
2012
In the opening lines of Pragmatism, William James approvingly quotes G. K. Chesterton’s claim that “the most practical and important thing about a man is still his view of the universe”—in other words, his philosophy. In the broadest and most meaningful terms, James asserts that philosophy is “not a technical matter” but rather describes each person’s “sense,” consciously articulated or not, “of what life honestly and deeply means.”¹ A philosophy, pragmatists such as James and Dewey argue, is in essence a belief, an attempt to describe reality and orient ourselves toward it in a manner that satisfies fundamental human
Book Chapter
MOMENTS IN THE WORLD’S SALVATION
2012
They don’t make intellectuals like William James anymore.¹ James forged a career whose remarkable breadth seems unimaginable in the academic and popular cultures of today. He traversed and blended several disciplines, writing pioneering works in psychology and religion in addition to the work for which he is most famous—providing one of the founding articulations of pragmatism, the most distinctive and influential school in American philosophy. Moreover, James was a true public intellectual²: he was an expert contributing to his discipline at the highest level, writing texts that continue to challenge and inspire professional philosophers, but he also translated his
Book Chapter
Saying Yes and Saying No: Individualist Ethics in Ellison, Burke, and Emerson
by
Albrecht, James M.
in
African American culture
,
African American literature
,
African American studies
1999
The allusions to Emerson in Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man are usually read as a scathing indictment of Emersonian individualism. Yet even as Ellison satirizes the Emerson canonized in Lewis Mumford's The Golden Day, the career of Ellison's narrator extends a pragmatic tradition of individualism leading from Emerson through Kenneth Burke. Though often accused of ignoring tragic limits, Emerson describes the self as existing only within the material limitations of culture-and thus as always socially implicated and indebted. While Emerson claims that the pursuit of one's own most vital work is a moral end that fulfills one's social duties. Burke and Ellison demand more complex scrutiny of one's ethical connections to others. Burke insists that the social context of our individual acts requires a comic ethics of identification: we must identify with others across social conflicts and recognize how our individual acts may be identified with those conflicts. Ellison's narrator progresses toward this Burkean ethic: in his final confrontation with Mr. Norton (who has recommended Emerson to him), the narrator adopts a mode of communication that asserts the democratic connection of all Americans at the same time that it confronts the systemic discrimination that separates them.
Journal Article