Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
3 result(s) for "Aldrete, Michelle"
Sort by:
Coastal California Wastewater Effluent as a Resource for Seawater Desalination Brine Commingling
California frequently experiences water scarcity, especially in high population areas. This has generated increased interest in using the Pacific Ocean as a water resource, with seawater desalination becoming a popular solution. To mitigate the environmental impacts of the high salinity brine from seawater desalination, California recommends commingling brine with wastewater effluent before ocean discharge. Results reveal that throughout the California coast, approximately 4872 MLD (1287 MGD) of treated wastewater are discharged into the ocean and might be available as dilution water. Most of this dilution water resource is produced in Southern California (3161 MLD or 835 MGD) and the San Francisco Bay Area (1503 MLD or 397 MGD), which are also the areas with the highest need for alternative water sources. With this quantity of dilution water, in principle, over 5300 MLD (1400 MGD) of potable water could be produced in California through seawater desalination. Furthermore, this study provides a survey of the treatment levels and typical discharge violations of ocean wastewater treatment facilities in California.
United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge and Research Productivity in Dermatology Residency Applications in the Post-Step 1 Era: Analysis of Match Outcomes From 2020 to 2024
In recent years, the evaluation metrics for dermatology residency applications have changed, particularly following the transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a pass/fail grading system. This retrospective analysis examines dermatology residency match data from 2020 to 2024, focusing on trends in USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores and research publications. Data extracted from the National Resident Matching Program documents revealed a notable increase in unmatched applicants with Step 2 CK scores above 250 and a decrease in matched applicants with similar scores. Concurrently, research output has risen, with matched applicants reporting over 25 publications increasing from 80 in 2020 to 121 in 2024, and a corresponding increase among unmatched applicants from 10 to 35 over the same period. Despite these improvements in individual metrics, the overall match rates for applicants with high Step 2 CK scores and extensive research portfolios have declined, suggesting that excellence in these areas alone does not guarantee a successful match.
A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study Assessing Neuropathy in Patients With Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis
Objective The objective of this study was to examine the potential relationship between leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV), a small-vessel vasculitis, and neuropathy. While LCV primarily affects the skin, its systemic involvement, including the development of neuropathy, has been increasingly recognized. This study aimed to assess whether LCV patients have a higher risk of developing neuropathy compared to a demographically matched control group. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX database (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA). A total of 4,519 patients diagnosed with LCV were matched with 4,519 control patients based on demographic factors such as age, sex, and race to ensure comparable baseline characteristics between groups. Neuropathy in both groups was identified using the ICD-10-CM diagnostic code G62.9. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the relative risk of neuropathy in LCV patients compared to the control group. Results The analysis revealed that 5.4% of LCV patients were diagnosed with neuropathy, while 4.6% of the control group were affected. This difference was statistically significant, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.209, indicating that LCV patients have a 20.9% higher risk of developing neuropathy than controls (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.009-1.448, p = 0.0396). These findings suggest that LCV may contribute to the development of neuropathy. Conclusion This study provides evidence supporting the association between LCV and an increased risk of neuropathy. The findings highlight the potential for systemic neurological complications in patients with LCV, which may be attributed to vasculitic damage to the nerve blood supply. Despite the challenges in diagnosing LCV-associated neuropathy, the study underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring for neurological symptoms in LCV patients.