Explore the vast range of titles available.

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) is the most common subtype of breast cancer in women. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib play an important role in the treatment of advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. However, CDK4/6 inhibitors might be associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, including venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a retrospective study at two centers in Saudi Arabia, analyzing data from 447 patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+/HER2- breast cancer between 2016 and 2023. Patients with early-stage, high-risk breast cancer receiving abemaciclib for at least one month were included. The primary outcomes were the incidence of VTE and arterial thrombosis. A total of 505 patients were screened in which 447 breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors were included. Majority of patients were on palbociclib (70.4%), followed by abemaciclib (28.8%), and then ribociclib (0.67%). The thrombotic events were 11.8% (n=53), with 37.7% of these being pulmonary embolism (PE) and 18.8% symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients with a prior history of VTE had a significantly higher risk of thrombosis (p=0.03). Abemaciclib was associated with a higher incidence of thrombosis (16.3%), followed by palbociclib (10.2%), and none of the three patients on ribociclib developed thrombosis. The median time to develop thrombosis while receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy was 11.8 months. There was no significant difference in overall survival in breast cancer patients who developed thrombosis compared to patients without thrombosis (p=0.55). This study shows a higher incidence of thrombotic events in real-world settings than clinical trials, emphasizing the need for risk assessment and possible thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors. Future risk assessment tools needed to be applied in breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors and risk of developing thrombosis.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic condition characterized by nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching, which significantly impacts quality of life. Traditional treatments, including antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids, often fall short in managing moderate-to-severe cases. Recently, biologic therapies such as omalizumab and dupilumab have emerged as potential alternatives. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these biologic therapies in the management of AR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies published between 2000 and 2024. Studies included were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and post-hoc analyses that assessed the impact of biologics on AR symptoms. Data on study characteristics, population demographics, intervention details, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The review included nine studies evaluating omalizumab and dupilumab. Omalizumab demonstrated significant improvements in nasal symptoms and quality of life, with notable efficacy in reducing symptoms and improving asthma control in patients with moderate-to-severe AR. Dupilumab also showed positive outcomes, particularly in patients with comorbid asthma and perennial AR, by reducing severe exacerbations and improving symptom scores. Biologic therapies, including omalizumab and dupilumab, offer promising alternatives for the management of AR, especially in cases that are severe or refractory to conventional treatments. The evidence supports their efficacy in improving symptoms and quality of life. Nevertheless, further research is required to address the limitations identified, including the need for long-term data and clarification of the mechanisms of action. These findings underscore the potential of biologics in advancing the treatment of AR and highlight the importance of ongoing research to optimize patient outcomes.