Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Ambrisi, Francesca"
Sort by:
Prevalence, Evolution and Prognostic Factors of PASC in a Cohort of Patients Discharged from a COVID Unit
2025
Background and Aim: PASC is a potentially debilitating clinical condition consisting of different general symptoms experienced by about 10% of patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study analyses a cohort of patients with a history of hospitalization for COVID-19 and aims to evaluate prognostic factors for experiencing PASC and to investigate the characteristics of patients experiencing PASC symptoms. Methods: This is an observational, monocentric retrospective study including all adult patients admitted to our COVID unit from 28 February 2020 to 30 April 2022, discharged alive, and having performed at least one follow-up visit at our post-COVID outpatient clinic after a minimum of three months from discharge. Patients who experienced persistent clinical manifestations or the development of new symptoms three months after the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, with these symptoms lasting for at least two months with no other explanation, were defined as having PASC. Results: A total of 429 patients were discharged alive from our COVID Unit and 244 patients performed at least one follow-up visit in our outpatient clinic. Of these, 134 patients did not experience PASC, while 110 patients experienced PASC. Long-COVID patients were more frequently female (43.6% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.048), more frequently presented throat pain and headache at hospital admission (respectively 8.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.041 and 15.8% vs. 5%, p = 0.007), and were more likely to have a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (25.5% vs. 13%, p =0.013). At the multivariable analysis, female gender, type 2 diabetes, and headache at admission were factors associated with PASC. All 46 patients who performed at least two different admissions in our outpatient clinic were divided in two groups: the first including the 16 patients who experienced a reduction or a resolution of symptoms related to COVID-19, the second comprising the 30 patients who experienced clinical worsening or persisting symptoms. Smoking habit was more represented among patients with stable or worsening symptoms (42.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.042); myalgias at admission were more frequent in the clinical worsening group (27.6% vs. 0%, p= 0.039); and a larger amount of patients who reported neuropsychiatric symptoms and respiratory symptoms were in the stable or worsening PASC symptoms group. Discussion: In conclusion, this study underscores the complexity of PASC, identifying female sex, Type 2 diabetes, and certain acute COVID-19 symptoms as potential predisposing factors for its development. PASC still represents a substantial public health challenge, and ongoing efforts are essential to better understand its underlying mechanisms and improve patient outcomes.
Journal Article
The Clinical Impact of the Omicron Variant on Octogenarian Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: The Results from CoviCamp Cohort
by
Milite, Filomena
,
Parrella, Roberto
,
Numis, Fabio Giuliano
in
Aged patients
,
aging
,
Antiviral agents
2025
Introduction: This study aims to investigate the clinical impact of Omicron Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on the clinical presentation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the very old (≥80 years old) population. Methods: All patients aged 80 years or older, hospitalized from March 2020 to June 2023 with a SARS-CoV-2 infection in one of the 17 COVID-19 units in eight cities of Campania, southern Italy, were enrolled in a multicenter, observational, retrospective study. Results: 341 patients ≥ 80 years of age were included: 80 of them in the Omicron and 261 in the non-Omicron period. Patients admitted during the Omicron period were older (p = 0.0001) and more comorbid, showing more frequently arterial hypertension (p = 0.018), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.0001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.002), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p = 0.001), and active cancer (p = 0.0001). Severe and critical outcomes were observed more often in the non-Omicron variant (p = 0.0001). Patients in the Omicron group did not show a significantly prolonged hospitalization time (p = 0.063) or a higher likelihood of death during hospitalization (p = 0.097). Discussion: In our study, despite the greater frailty of patients hospitalized during the Omicron period, the disease appeared less severe compared to previous waves, suggesting that the lower severity of the disease could be attributed to virological rather than population characteristics. These findings underscore the importance of prevention strategies for older people, as the administration of vaccination and early antiviral therapies in at-risk subjects.
Journal Article
Efficacy and Safety of Sotrovimab Versus Oral Antiviral for Early Treatment in High-Risk Patients in Omicron Era: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
2025
Introduction: High-risk patients with COVID-19 benefit from early treatment to prevent severe outcomes. Sotrovimab, a monoclonal antibody, and oral antivirals such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir have been used for early intervention, but their comparative efficacy and safety, particularly during the Omicron-dominant phase, require further evaluation. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study performed in southern Italy including all adult patients who received early antiviral treatment (sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir/r or molnupiravir) between January 2022 and February 2024 (omicron phase). Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were analyzed to assess primary endpoints of 28-day mortality and hospitalization. Logistic regression models identified predictors of key outcomes. Results: A total of 668 high-risk patients treated with sotrovimab (n = 326) or oral antivirals (n = 342: 69 with molnupiravir and 273 with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) were included. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between groups (0.8% sotrovimab vs. 1.8% oral antivirals; p = 0.679). However, patients treated with sotrovimab exhibited a longer median time to SARS-CoV-2 negativization (13 vs. 11 days; p = 0.008) and higher non–COVID-19-related hospitalizations (2.45% vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis identified cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases as the sole significant predictor of prolonged viral positivity (OR 1.585, 95% CI 1.072–2.345; p = 0.021). Additionally, immunocompromised status (OR 16.929, 95% CI 1.835–156.170; p = 0.013) and chronic non-COVID-19 oxygen therapy (OR 10.714, 95% CI 1.623–70.725; p = 0.014) were strongly associated with mortality. Conclusions: Sotrovimab and oral antivirals demonstrated similar efficacy in preventing mortality and hospitalization among high-risk patients. Patient-specific factors, particularly cardiovascular comorbidities and immunosuppression, significantly influenced outcomes and should guide treatment choices.
Journal Article