Explore the vast range of titles available.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus underscored the crucial role of laboratorial tests as a strategy to control the disease, mainly to indicate the presence of specific antibodies in human samples from infected patients. Therefore, suitable recombinant antigens are relevant for the development of reliable tests, and so far, single recombinant proteins have been used. In this context, B-cell epitopes-based chimeric proteins can be an alternative to obtain tests with high accuracy through easier and cheaper production. The present study used bioinformatics tools to select specific B-cell epitopes from the spike (S) and the nucleocapsid (N) proteins from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, aiming to produce a novel recombinant chimeric antigen (N4S11-SC2). Eleven S and four N-derived B-cell epitopes were predicted and used to construct the N4S11-SC2 protein, which was analyzed in a recombinant format against serum and urine samples, by means of an in house-ELISA. Specific antibodies were detected in the serum and urine samples of COVID-19 patients, which were previously confirmed by qRT-PCR. Results showed that N4S11-SC2 presented 83.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity when using sera samples, and 91.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity using urine samples. Comparable findings were achieved with paired urine samples when compared to N and S recombinant proteins expressed in prokaryotic systems. However, better results were reached for N4S11-SC2 in comparison to the S recombinant protein when using paired serum samples. Anti-N4S11-SC2 antibodies were not clearly identified in Janssen Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19-vaccinated subjects, using serum or paired urine samples. In conclusion, this study presents a new chimeric recombinant antigen expressed in a prokaryotic system that could be considered as an alternative diagnostic marker for the SARS-CoV-2 infection, with the potential benefits to be used on serum or urine from infected patients.

BackgroundPhase III trials evaluating the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer have pointed to the importance of patient selection. Two studies showed conflicting results regarding the benefit of SCS in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of SCS on recurrent ovarian cancer according to BRCA1/2 status.MethodsAll patients with ovarian carcinoma with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease and tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutations were included. Cox regression and log rank test were used to evaluate the impact of SCS on progression-free survival (PFS) and the influence of BRCA1/2 mutations on the effect of SCS.Results127 patients were included, 45.6% were treated with SCS and chemotherapy and 54.3% treated with chemotherapy only. Patients treated with SCS were younger, presented better performance status, had lower CA125, and had a longer platinum-free interval. In multivariate analysis SCS was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.72, p = 0.002). BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 35 patients (27.5%), and 11.8% of patients were treated with PARP inhibitors. Although not statistically significant, both BRCA1/2 wild type patients (PFS: 21.6 vs 18.4 months; p = 0.114) and BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (PFS: 23.1 vs 18.2 months, p = 0.193) appeared to derive benefit from SCS.DiscussionThe present study suggests a benefit of SCS irrespective of BRCA1/2 status among patients mostly not treated with PARP inhibitor. Further data on post hoc analysis from the phase III trials are warranted to confirm whether BRCA1/2 mutated patients should be selected for SCS.

Background Benefit of carboplatin and dose-dense weekly paclitaxel (ddCT) in first line treatment of ovarian cancer patients has been different in Western and Asian studies. In the present study we compare progression-free survival (PFS) of ddCT to three-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) in first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma in a single institution in a Western population. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective review of medical records from patients with ovarian carcinoma treated in a tertiary cancer center from 2007 to 2018. All patients treated with ddCT or CT in the first-line setting were included. Patients who received first-line bevacizumab were not included. PFS and overall survival (OS) were compared in a propensity score-matched cohort to address selection bias. Patients were matched according to age, ECOG performance status, CA 125, FIGO stage, residual disease, and histological subtype, in a 1:2 ratio. Results Five hundred eighty-eight patients were eligible for propensity score matching, the final cohort consisted of 69 patients treated with ddCT and 138 CT group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. After a median follow-up of 65.1 months, median PFS was 29.3 vs 20.0 months, favouring ddCT treatment ( p  = 0.035). In the multivariate cox regression ddCT showed a 18% lower risk of progression (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99, p  = 0.04). Overall survival data is immature, but suggested better outcomes for ddCT (not reached versus 78.8 months; p  = 0.07). Conclusion Our retrospective study has shown superior PFS of ddCT over CT regimen in first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma in a Western population not treated with bevacizumab.