Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy targets T cell-negative costimulatory molecules such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). Combination anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-1 blockade therapy has enhanced efficacy, but it remains unclear through what mechanisms such effects are mediated. A critical question is whether combination therapy targets and modulates the same T cell populations as monotherapies. Using a mass cytometry-based systems approach, we comprehensively profiled the response of T cell populations to monotherapy and combination anti–CTLA-4 plus anti–PD-1 therapy in syngeneic murine tumors and clinical samples. Most effects of monotherapies were additive in the context of combination therapy; however, multiple combination therapy-specific effects were observed. Highly phenotypically exhausted cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) T cells expand in frequency following anti–PD-1 monotherapy but not combination therapy, while activated terminally differentiated effector CD8 T cells expand only following combination therapy. Combination therapy also led to further increased frequency of T helper type 1 (Th1)-like CD4 effector T cells even though anti–PD-1 monotherapy is not sufficient to do so. Mass cytometry analyses of peripheral blood from melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapies similarly revealed mostly additive effects on the frequencies of T cell subsets along with unique modulation of terminally differentiated effector CD8 T cells by combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy. Together, these findings indicate that dual blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1 therapy is sufficient to induce unique cellular responses compared with either monotherapy.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved unprecedented results in melanoma, the biological features of the durable responses initiated by these drugs remain unknown. Here we show the genetic and phenotypic changes induced by treatment with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade in a genetically engineered mouse model of melanoma driven by oncogenic BRAF. In this controlled system anti-PD-1 treatment yields responses in ~35% of the tumors, and prolongs survival in ~27% of the animals. We identify increased stroma remodeling and reduced expression of proliferation markers as features associated with prolonged response. These traits are corroborated in two independent early on-treatment anti-PD-1 melanoma patient cohorts. These insights into the biological responses of tumors to ICI provide a strategy for identification of durable response early during the course of treatment and could improve patient stratification for checkpoint inhibitory drugs. Identification of clinical relevant biomarkers to predict response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in melanoma remains challenging. Here, the authors show that stroma remodelling and reduced cell division are associated with durable response to anti-PD1 in a mouse model of melanoma and in ICB-treated patients.

BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) are standard of care for the treatment of BRAF V600 mutation-driven metastatic melanoma, but can lead to paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway. This can result in the promotion of precancerous lesions and secondary neoplasms, mainly (but not exclusively) associated with pre-existing mutations in RAS genes. We previously reported a patient with synchronous BRAF -mutated metastatic melanoma and BRAF wt / KRAS G12D -metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), whose CRC relapsed and progressed when treated with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436). We used tissue from the resected CRC metastasis to derive a cell line, LM-COL-1, which directly and reliably mimicked the clinical scenario including paradoxical activation of the MAPK signalling pathway resulting in increased cell proliferation upon dabrafenib treatment. Novel BRAF inhibitors (PLX8394 and PLX7904), dubbed as “paradox breakers”, were developed to inhibit V600 mutated oncogenic BRAF without causing paradoxical MAPK pathway activation. In this study we used our LM-COL-1 model alongside multiple other CRC cell lines with varying mutational backgrounds to demonstrate and confirm that the paradox breaker PLX8394 retains on-target inhibition of mutated BRAF V600 without paradoxically promoting MAPK signalling.

Cancer research has seen unprecedented advances over the past several years, with tremendous insights gained into mechanisms of response and resistance to cancer therapy. Central to this has been our understanding of crosstalk between the tumor and the microenvironment, with the recognition that complex interactions exist between tumor cells, stromal cells, overall host immunity, and the environment surrounding the host. This is perhaps best exemplified in cancer immunotherapy, where numerous studies across cancer types have illuminated our understanding of the genomic and immune factors that shape responses to therapy. In addition to their individual contributions, it is now clear that there is a complex interplay between genomic/epigenomic alterations and tumor immune responses that impact cellular plasticity and therapeutic responses. In addition to this, it is also now apparent that significant heterogeneity exists within tumors-both at the level of genomic mutations as well as tumor immune responses-thus contributing to heterogeneous clinical responses. Beyond the tumor microenvironment, overall host immunity plays a major role in mediating clinical responses. The gut microbiome plays a central role, with recent evidence revealing that the gut microbiome influences the overall immune set-point, through diverse effects on local and systemic inflammatory processes. Indeed, quantifiable differences in the gut microbiome have been associated with disease and treatment outcomes in patients and pre-clinical models, though precise mechanisms of microbiome-immune interactions are yet to be elucidated. Complexities are discussed herein, with a discussion of each of these variables as they relate to treatment response.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. The first ICI to demonstrate clinical benefit, ipilimumab, targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4); however, the long-term overall survival is just 22%. More than 40 years ago intralesional (IL) (BCG), a living attenuated strain of , was found to induce tumor regression by stimulating cell-mediated immunity following a localized and self-limiting infection. We evaluated these two immune stimulants in combination with melanoma with the aim of developing a more effective immunotherapy and to assess toxicity. In this phase I study, patients with histologically confirmed stage III/IV metastatic melanoma received IL BCG injection followed by up to four cycles of intravenous ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01838200). The trial was discontinued following treatment of the first five patients as the two patients receiving the escalation dose of BCG developed high-grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) typical of ipilimumab monotherapy. These irAEs were characterized in both patients by profound increases in the repertoire of autoantibodies directed against both self- and cancer antigens. Interestingly, the induced autoantibodies were detected at time points that preceded the development of symptomatic toxicity. There was no overlap in the antigen specificity between patients and no evidence of clinical responses. Efforts to increase response rates through the use of novel immunotherapeutic combinations may be associated with higher rates of irAEs, thus the imperative to identify biomarkers of toxicity remains strong. While the small patient numbers in this trial do not allow for any conclusive evidence of predictive biomarkers, the observed changes warrant further examination of autoantibody repertoires in larger patient cohorts at risk of developing irAEs during their course of treatment. In summary, dose escalation of IL BCG followed by ipilimumab therapy was not well tolerated in advanced melanoma patients and showed no evidence of clinical benefit. Measuring autoantibody responses may provide early means for identifying patients at risk from developing severe irAEs during cancer immunotherapy.

Unprecedented advances have been made in the treatment of cancer through the use of immune checkpoint blockade, with approval of several checkpoint blockade regimens spanning multiple cancer types. However, responses to this form of therapy are not universal, and insights are clearly needed to identify optimal biomarkers of response and to combat mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. A working knowledge of the hallmarks of cancer yields insight into responses to immune checkpoint blockade, although the focus of this is rather tumour-centric and additional factors are pertinent, including host immunity and environmental influences. Herein, we describe the foundation for pillars and hallmarks of response to immune checkpoint blockade, with a discussion of their relevance to immune monitoring and mechanisms of resistance. Evolution of this understanding will ultimately help guide treatment strategies to enhance therapeutic responses.

BackgroundDespite the success of combined cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint blockade (cICB), the majority of patients with melanoma fail to respond or experience severe treatment-related toxicity. Currently, there are no reliable biomarkers available to predict these events and guide treatment choices. We here evaluated the peripheral immune compartment to identify features associated with cICB outcome and toxicity.MethodsBlood samples were collected from 51 patients with advanced melanoma prior to commencing and after one cycle of cICB. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on radiographic best overall response to treatment, and grouped by the occurrence of severe toxicity. Absolute immune cell counts were obtained and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cryopreserved prior to spectral flow-cytometric T-cell immunophenotyping.Results20 patients (39%) failed to respond to treatment, and 29 (57%) experienced severe toxicity. Pre-treatment, patients had fewer T cells than age-matched healthy controls (median 892 vs 1297 cells/µL, p=0.0004), mostly due to reduced naive CD4+ (p=0.0038) and CD8+ (p=0.0031) T cells. One cycle of cICB restored patient T cells to levels equivalent to healthy controls through expansion and activation of CD4+ and CD8+ memory and regulatory, but not naive subsets, and skewed the T-cell compartment towards an activated phenotype. This T-cell expansion correlated strongly with pre-treatment PD-1 (r=0.88, p=0.0003) but not CTLA-4 (r=0.32, p=0.34) expression levels, and was accompanied by upregulation of molecules including Ki67, inducible co-stimulator of T cells (ICOS), T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), and T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) on effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Greater upregulation of Ki67 in CD4+ central memory cells significantly differentiated responders and non-responders after one cycle of treatment (p=0.0086, area under the curve (AUC)=0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.88), while higher on-treatment TIM-3 frequency within CD8+ T cells differentiated patients who experienced severe toxicity (p=0.0086, AUC=0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.88).ConclusionsWe here show that response and toxicity to cICB in advanced melanoma are driven by distinct immune features evident after only one cycle of treatment. These could serve as prognostic biomarkers upon validation in larger cohorts.

Approaches to prolong responses to BRAF targeting drugs in melanoma patients are challenged by phenotype heterogeneity. Melanomas of a “MITF‐high” phenotype usually respond well to BRAF inhibitor therapy, but these melanomas also contain subpopulations of the de novo resistance “AXL‐high” phenotype. > 50% of melanomas progress with enriched “AXL‐high” populations, and because AXL is linked to de‐differentiation and invasiveness avoiding an “AXL‐high relapse” is desirable. We discovered that phenotype heterogeneity is supported during the response phase of BRAF inhibitor therapy due to MITF‐induced expression of endothelin 1 (EDN1). EDN1 expression is enhanced in tumours of patients on treatment and confers drug resistance through ERK re‐activation in a paracrine manner. Most importantly, EDN1 not only supports MITF‐high populations through the endothelin receptor B (EDNRB), but also AXL‐high populations through EDNRA, making it a master regulator of phenotype heterogeneity. Endothelin receptor antagonists suppress AXL‐high‐expressing cells and sensitize to BRAF inhibition, suggesting that targeting EDN1 signalling could improve BRAF inhibitor responses without selecting for AXL‐high cells. Synopsis Melanoma heterogeneity challenges durable responses to BRAF targeting. During BRAF‐inhibitor treatment endothelin‐1 (EDN1) supports phenotype heterogeneity thereby allowing outgrowth of resistant cells. Blocking EDN1 signalling can overcome this support. Phenotype heterogeneity in melanoma is characterised by MITF‐high and AXL‐high subpopulations. Tumours enriched in AXL‐high subpopulations are resistant to BRAF‐inhibitor treatment. BRAF inhibitor‐responding tumours contain a small population of AXL‐high cells. Treatment with BRAF inhibitor induces upregulation of EDN1, and paracrine acting EDN1 supports the outgrowth of AXL‐high subpopulations. Treatment with EDN receptor (EDNR) antagonists overcomes paracrine EDN1 signalling and prolongs BRAF‐inhibitor responses. Graphical Abstract Melanoma heterogeneity challenges durable responses to BRAF targeting. During BRAF‐inhibitor treatment endothelin‐1 (EDN1) supports phenotype heterogeneity thereby allowing outgrowth of resistant cells. Blocking EDN1 signalling can overcome this support.

BackgroundThere is uncertainty around clinical applicability of tumor mutational burden (TMB) across cancer types, in part because of inconsistency between TMB measurements from different platforms. The KEYNOTE 158 trial supported United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Foundation Medicine test (FoundationOneCDx) at TMB≥10 mut/Mb as a companion diagnostic (CDx) for single-agent pembrolizumab in second+line. Using a large real-world dataset with validated survival endpoint data, we evaluated clinical validity of TMB measurement by the test in over 8000 patients across 24 cancer types who received single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI).MethodsPatients with advanced-stage cancers from 24 cancer types treated with single-agent anti-PD(L)1 therapy in standard-of-care settings were included. Deidentified data from electronic health records from approximately 280 cancer treatment facilities were captured into a clinico-genomic database. This study used the TMB algorithm from the FDA-approved test supporting solid tumor CDx and composite mortality variable validated against the national death index: real-world overall survival (rwOS). Following a prespecified analysis plan, rwOS by TMB level was assessed using Cox PH models adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, prior treatment, microsatellite instability, sex, age, opioid rx pretherapy, and socioeconomic assessment.Results8440 patients met inclusion criteria. Adjusting for aforementioned factors, increasing TMB was significantly associated with rwOS across tumor types; HRs (95% CIs) relative to TMB<5: TMB 5 to <10: 0.95 (0.89 to 1.02), TMB 10 to <20: 0.79 (0.73 to 0.85), TMB≥20: 0.52 (0.47 to 0.58). For individual cancer types with prespecified statistical power, adjusted rwOS comparing TMB≥10 vs TMB<10 significantly favored TMB≥10 in 9 of 10 cancer types. In microsatellite stable subcohorts (except colorectal cancer), TMB≥10 remained associated with enriched ICI benefit. Exploratory assessments of patients receiving ICI+chemotherapy (n=4369) observed more favorable rwOS only in TMB≥20.ConclusionsAcross >8000 patients treated with single-agent ICI, and within individual cancer types with sufficient power, elevated TMB based on the FDA-approved CDx was associated with more favorable rwOS compared with similar patients with lower TMB levels. This biomarker deserves further clinical investigation to potentially guide the use of immunotherapy in expanded clinical contexts.

BackgroundPatients with BRAF-mutant and wild-type melanoma have different response rates to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. However, the reasons for this remain unknown. To address this issue, we investigated the precise immune composition resulting from BRAF mutation in treatment-naive melanoma to determine whether this may be a driver for different response to immunotherapy.MethodsIn this study, we characterized the treatment-naive immune context in patients with BRAF-mutant and BRAF wild-type (BRAF-wt) melanoma using data from single-cell RNA sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC).ResultsIn single-cell data, BRAF-mutant melanoma displayed a significantly reduced infiltration of CD8+ T cells and macrophages but also increased B cells, natural killer (NK) cells and NKT cells. We then validated this finding using bulk RNA-seq data from the skin cutaneous melanoma cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas and deconvoluted the data using seven different algorithms. Interestingly, BRAF-mutant tumors had more CD4+ T cells than BRAF-wt samples in both primary and metastatic cohorts. In the metastatic cohort, BRAF-mutant melanoma demonstrated more B cells but less CD8+ T cell infiltration when compared with BRAF-wt samples. In addition, we further investigated the immune cell infiltrate using flow cytometry and multiplex IHC techniques. We confirmed that BRAF-mutant melanoma metastases were enriched for CD4+ T cells and B cells and had a co-existing decrease in CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, we then identified B cells were associated with a trend for improved survival (p=0.078) in the BRAF-mutant samples and Th2 cells were associated with prolonged survival in the BRAF-wt samples.ConclusionsIn conclusion, treatment-naive BRAF-mutant melanoma has a distinct immune context compared with BRAF-wt melanoma, with significantly decreased CD8+ T cells and increased B cells and CD4+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. These findings indicate that further mechanistic studies are warranted to reveal how this difference in immune context leads to improved outcome to combination immune checkpoint blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma.