Explore the vast range of titles available.

Autoimmune nodopathy (AN) is a new entity in the field of peripheral neuropathies and is defined by the presence of auto-antibodies against structures of the node of Ranvier combined with specific clinico-pathophysiological features and therapy response in affected patients. The target-specific antibodies do not only serve as diagnostic biomarkers but also for treatment evaluation during follow-up. We report a 66-year-old female patient with various autoimmune diseases, including a history of membranous glomerulonephritis which presented with acute-onset, sensorimotor tetraparesis, cranial nerve involvement, and mild respiratory insufficiency. Under the suspicion of Guillain-Barré syndrome, she received intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and achieved remission. At 8 months later, she relapsed with now a poor response to IVIg and developed additional features such as severe sensory ataxia, tremor, and neuropathic pain. Anti-contactin-1 IgG2 antibodies were detected, and the diagnosis was reverted to AN. Plasma exchange and rituximab treatment led to a serological remission and corresponding significant clinical improvement, and the therapy was paused. At 2 years after symptom onset, her condition worsened again with sensorimotor symptoms and severe neuropathic pain despite seronegativity for contactin-1. However, serum binding assays to teased nerve fiber staining showed recurring antibody reactivity against paranodal structures. Caspr-1 was identified as a new target antigen via cell-based assay, and high-titer antibodies of the IgG4 subclass were confirmed via ELISA. Hence, a new cycle of plasma exchange and regular rituximab treatment was initiated, with subsequent clinical improvement and serological remission. The serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) levels were assessed retrospectively and rose and fell together with the antibody titer. This case demonstrates that autoimmunity to (para)nodal structures can reoccur especially in patients prone to autoimmune disorders and can switch its target antigen and subclass in the course of disease. The presence of auto-antibodies against different targets at the node of Ranvier has direct implications for therapeutic management. We suggest a close follow-up of patients with AN after successful therapy. In case of deterioration despite seronegativity, non-specific tests such as teased fiber assays and repeated screening for different target antigens should be considered.

Background Autoantibodies against the paranodal protein contactin-1 have recently been described in patients with severe acute-onset autoimmune neuropathies and mainly belong to the IgG4 subclass that does not activate complement. IgG3 anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies are rare, but have been detected during the acute onset of disease in some cases. There is evidence that anti-contactin-1 prevents adhesive interaction, and chronic exposure to anti-contactin-1 IgG4 leads to structural changes at the nodes accompanied by neuropathic symptoms. However, the pathomechanism of acute onset of disease and the pathogenic role of IgG3 anti-contactin-1 is largely unknown. Methods In the present study, we aimed to model acute autoantibody exposure by intraneural injection of IgG of patients with anti-contacin-1 autoantibodies to Lewis rats. Patient IgG obtained during acute onset of disease (IgG3 predominant) and IgG from the chronic phase of disease (IgG4 predominant) were studied in comparison. Results Conduction blocks were measured in rats injected with the “acute” IgG more often than after injection of “chronic” IgG (83.3% versus 35%) and proved to be reversible within a week after injection. Impaired nerve conduction was accompanied by motor deficits in rats after injection of the “acute” IgG but only minor structural changes of the nodes. Paranodal complement deposition was detected after injection of the “acute IgG”. We did not detect any inflammatory infiltrates, arguing against an inflammatory cascade as cause of damage to the nerve. We also did not observe dispersion of paranodal proteins or sodium channels to the juxtaparanodes as seen in patients after chronic exposure to anti-contactin-1. Conclusions Our data suggest that anti-contactin-1 IgG3 induces an acute conduction block that is most probably mediated by autoantibody binding and subsequent complement deposition and may account for acute onset of disease in these patients. This supports the notion of anti-contactin-1-associated neuropathy as a paranodopathy with the nodes of Ranvier as the site of pathogenesis.

IgG4 autoantibodies against paranodal proteins are known to induce acute-onset and often severe sensorimotor autoimmune neuropathies. How autoantibodies reach their antigens at the paranode in spite of the myelin barrier is still unclear. We performed in vitro incubation experiments with patient sera on unfixed and unpermeabilized nerve fibers and in vivo intraneural and intrathecal passive transfer of patient IgG to rats, to explore the access of IgG autoantibodies directed against neurofascin-155 and contactin-1 to the paranodes and their pathogenic effect. We found that in vitro incubation resulted in weak paranodal binding of anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies whereas anti-neurofascin-155 autoantibodies bound to the nodes more than to the paranodes. After short-term intraneural injection, no nodal or paranodal binding was detectable when using anti-neurofascin-155 antibodies. After repeated intrathecal injections, nodal more than paranodal binding could be detected in animals treated with anti-neurofascin-155, accompanied by sensorimotor neuropathy. In contrast, no paranodal binding was visible in rats intrathecally injected with anti-contactin-1 antibodies, and animals remained unaffected. These data support the notion of different pathogenic mechanisms of anti-neurofascin-155 and anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies and different accessibility of paranodal and nodal structures.

In autoimmune nodopathies, autoantibodies target the nodes of Ranvier, impairing saltatory nerve conduction. Understanding the impact of autoantibody binding on protein assembly is crucial for gaining insights into the pathogenicity of different autoantibodies. We investigated nodal, paranodal, and cytoskeletal axonal proteins in teased fibers from a sural nerve biopsy of a patient with anti-pan-neurofascin autoantibodies. Conventional diagnostic tools, including fluorescence microscopy, often miss subtle alterations at the ultrastructural level. We utilized direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), a super-resolution fluorescence imaging technique, to assess the nanoscale architecture of nodal, paranodal, and cytoskeletal axonal proteins. While conventional fluorescence microscopy revealed severe paranodal and nodal damage in 14% of the nodes, with 86% appearing normal at first glance, the super-resolved images revealed a decreased neurofascin-155 and Caspr-1 density, but preserved colocalization of these adhesion proteins in paranodes that initially seemed normal. At the nodes, sodium channel density and distribution remained intact, but neurofascin-186 density was reduced. Axonal beta-IV spectrin was altered only in severely damaged nodes. This indicates that axonal integrity is largely preserved, with a potentially reversible decrease in paranodal and nodal adhesion proteins in patients with nodopathy revealing subtle alterations in nodal integrity that are not apparent with conventional imaging. These likely reversible changes may explain the rapid recovery seen in patients with anti-pan-neurofascin autoantibodies following autoantibody depletion. Conversely, the small percentage of severely and axonally damaged nodes may account for the residual symptoms experienced by most patients.

Autoantibodies against fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) have been suggested as a diagnostic marker in both sensory large and small fiber neuropathy. Yet, their clinical relevance remains unclear and no standardized protocols for antibody testing exist. Here, we evaluate an anti-FGFR3 ELISA protocol in an inter-laboratory comparison. We performed anti-FGFR3 ELISA on 42 serum samples of patients with sensory neuronopathy (n = 18), small fiber neuropathy (n = 18), and healthy controls (n = 6) in two independent centers in France (center 1) and Germany (center 2) using identical protocols, with double immunofluorescence staining on rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sections as a confirmational test. Overall ELISA concordance was 34/42 (81.0%, Cohen's kappa = 0.61, substantial agreement). Discordance occurred for sera with optical densities (OD) near the cut-off. ODs correlated (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001), but were lower at center 2 (median = 0.076 vs 0.293, p < 0.0001), indicating that cut-off values are laboratory-specific. 11/16 (68.8%) ELISA-double-positive sera stained small DRG neurons, colocalizing with commercial anti-FGFR3 antibody, while positive binding was only found in 1/20 (5%) of ELISA-negative sera (p < 0.0001). DRG-positive samples showed higher ODs than negative ones (p < 0.0001). We provide and evaluate a detailed ELISA protocol for anti-FGFR3 diagnostic assessment. Positive results near the threshold should be interpreted cautiously. Anti-FGFR3 DRG staining may be a useful confirmatory method and could increase diagnostic specificity. This study facilitates future studies on the diagnostic relevance of anti-FGFR3 autoantibodies in sensory neuropathies.

Multifocal motor neuropathy is an immune mediated disease presenting with multifocal muscle weakness and conduction block. IgM auto-antibodies against the ganglioside GM1 are detectable in about 50% of the patients. Auto-antibodies against the paranodal proteins contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 and the nodal protein neurofascin-186 have been detected in subgroups of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Recently, auto-antibodies against neurofascin-186 and gliomedin were described in more than 60% of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. In the current study, we aimed to validate this finding, using a combination of different assays for auto-antibody detection. In addition we intended to detect further auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins, specifically contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 in multifocal motor neuropathy patients' sera. We analyzed sera of 33 patients with well-characterized multifocal motor neuropathy for IgM or IgG anti-contactin-1, anti-neurofascin-155 or -186 antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, binding assays with transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and murine teased fibers. We did not detect any IgM or IgG auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 or -186 in any of our multifocal motor neuropathy patients. We conclude that auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 and -186 do not play a relevant role in the pathogenesis in this cohort with multifocal motor neuropathy.

ObjectiveAutoantibodies against paranodal proteins have been described in patients with inflammatory neuropathies, but their association with pathology of nodes of Ranvier is unclear. We describe the clinical phenotype and histopathological changes of paranodal architecture of patients with autoantibodies against contactin-1, identified from a cohort with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (n=53) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (n=21).MethodsWe used ELISA to detect autoantibodies against contactin-1. Specificity of the autoantibodies was confirmed by immunoblot assay, binding to contactin-1-transfected human embryonic kidney cells, binding to paranodes of murine teased fibres and preabsorption experiments. Paranodal pathology was investigated by immunofluorescence labelling of dermal myelinated fibres.ResultsHigh reactivity to contactin-1 by ELISA was found in four patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and in none of the patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, which was confirmed by cell binding assays in all four patients. The four patients presented with a typical clinical picture, namely acute onset of disease and severe motor symptoms, with three patients manifesting action tremor. Immunofluorescence-labelling of paranodal proteins of dermal myelinated fibres revealed disruption of paranodal architecture. Semithin sections showed axonal damage but no classical signs of demyelination.InterpretationWe conclude that anti-contactin-1-related neuropathy constitutes a presumably autoantibody-mediated form of inflammatory neuropathy with distinct clinical symptoms and disruption of paranodal architecture as a pathological correlate. Anti-contactin-1-associated neuropathy does not meet morphological criteria of demyelinating neuropathy and therefore, might rather be termed a ‘paranodopathy’ rather than a subtype of demyelinating inflammatory neuropathy.

ObjectivesRecently, IgG autoantibodies against different paranodal proteins have been detected and this has led to important advances in the management of inflammatory neuropathies. In contrast, not much is known on IgM autoantibodies against paranodal proteins.MethodsIn the present study, we screened a large cohort of patients (n=140) with inflammatory neuropathies for IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155, neurofascin-186 or contactin-1.ResultsIgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155 were detected by ELISA in five patients, four with inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and one with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and were confirmed by ELISA-based preabsorption experiments and Western blot. Titres ranged from 1:100 to 1:400. We did not detect IgM anti-neurofascin-186 or anti-contactin-1 antibodies in this cohort. All patients presented with distally accentuated tetraparesis and hypesthesia. Remarkably, tremor was present in three of the patients with CIDP and occurred in the patients with GBS after the acute phase of disease. Nerve conduction studies revealed prolonged distal motor latencies and F wave latencies. Nerve biopsies showed signs of secondary axonal damage in three of the patients, demyelinating features in one patient. Teased fibre preparations did not demonstrate paranodal damage.ConclusionIn summary, IgM neurofascin-155 autoantibodies may be worth testing in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Their pathogenic role needs to be determined in future experiments.

Multifocal motor neuropathy is an immune mediated disease presenting with multifocal muscle weakness and conduction block. IgM auto-antibodies against the ganglioside GM1 are detectable in about 50% of the patients. Auto-antibodies against the paranodal proteins contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 and the nodal protein neurofascin-186 have been detected in subgroups of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Recently, auto-antibodies against neurofascin-186 and gliomedin were described in more than 60% of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. In the current study, we aimed to validate this finding, using a combination of different assays for auto-antibody detection. In addition we intended to detect further auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins, specifically contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 in multifocal motor neuropathy patients' sera. We analyzed sera of 33 patients with well-characterized multifocal motor neuropathy for IgM or IgG anti-contactin-1, anti-neurofascin-155 or -186 antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, binding assays with transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and murine teased fibers. We did not detect any IgM or IgG auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 or -186 in any of our multifocal motor neuropathy patients. We conclude that auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 and -186 do not play a relevant role in the pathogenesis in this cohort with multifocal motor neuropathy.