Explore the vast range of titles available.

We tested whether patients’ trust in physician moderated the hypothesized indirect association between intolerance of uncertainty (IU; inability to tolerate the unknown) and emotional distress through the mediator, experiential avoidance (EA; efforts to avoid negative emotions, thoughts, or memories), in patients with advanced cancer. The sample included 108 adults with Stage III or IV cancer (53% female; Mage = 63 years) recruited from a metropolitan cancer center. All constructs were measured by standardized self-report instruments. The PROCESS macro for SPSS tested the moderated mediation model. IU evidenced significant direct and indirect relationships with anxiety and depressive symptoms. Trust in physician moderated the indirect relationship between IU and anxiety (not depressive symptoms), albeit in an unexpected direction. Specifically, the indirect relationship between IU and anxiety symptoms through EA was significant for those with moderate to high physician trust but not low trust. Controlling for gender or income did not change the pattern of findings. IU and EA may be key intervention targets, particularly in acceptance—or meaning—based interventions for patients with advanced cancer.

The multidimensional burden that results from providing care to a patient with cancer is well documented and a growing number of psychosocial interventions have been developed to address this burden. None, however, target existential distress, a critical, common element - and potentially driving mechanism - of caregiver burden. Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP) is a structured psychotherapeutic intervention originally developed by our group to target existential distress and spiritual well-being among patients with advanced cancer. We are currently developing Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers (MCP-C). The objective of this qualitative study is to describe the application of MCP to the unique experience of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. A case study of a participant from an initial MCP-C group is presented, with a focus on the application of sources of meaning to the cancer caregiving experience. The exploration of critical sources of meaning in the participant's life generally, and related to caregiving specifically, highlighted significant areas of growth, including an increased understanding of the historical context shaping her experience of providing care, the recognition of the need for improved self-care and reconnecting with meaningful activities, and the possibility for continued connectedness to others and the world, despite the limitations resulting from her husband's terminal illness. Existential distress is a critical and often overlooked element of burden among cancer caregivers. MCP-C is intended to target this component of burden and address this critical gap in the palliative care literature. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the efficacy of MCP-C delivered over the Internet. Future studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of MCP-C for particularly burdened groups of caregivers, such as caregivers of patients with brain tumors and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantations, and to identify target points of delivery that will optimize the intervention's benefits.

IntroductionCaregivers of patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) experience tremendous psychological distress before, during and after HSCT. However, few interventions are tailored to the protracted needs of these caregivers while considering scalability and accessibility. We previously developed an evidence-based intervention for caregivers of patients undergoing HSCT that improved quality of life (QOL), caregiving burden and mood. We have since adapted this clinician-delivered intervention into a self-administered, digital health application (BMT-CARE app) and are currently evaluating the effect of this intervention on QOL in caregivers of patients receiving HSCT.Methods and analysisThe study design is a non-blinded randomised controlled trial of a digital health intervention for caregivers of patients undergoing HSCT at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center. We are enrolling and randomising 125 caregivers to receive the BMT-CARE app or usual care in a 1:1 assignment, stratifying by transplant type (autologous vs allogeneic). Caregivers assigned to the BMT-CARE app complete five self-guided modules designed to improve coping and stress management prior to and up to 60 days post-HSCT. The modules include interactive, gamified features and video vignettes to optimise engagement. Participants complete questionnaires at baseline and days 10, 60 and 100 post-HSCT. The primary outcome is comparison of QOL at day 60 post-HSCT. Secondary outcomes include caregiver burden, anxiety and depression symptoms, as well as post-traumatic stress symptoms. We are also exploring the usability of the BMT-CARE app to inform refinements prior to future testing.Ethics and disseminationThe study is funded by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (Protocol #22–634 v.1.5). The results of this study will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. Results will be disseminated at scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT05709912; Pre-results.

There is nothing informal about the care provided by the thousands of caregivers who have now received support in the Caregivers, Couple and Family, and Bereavement Clinics at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) since our programs began, or through the many clinical trials coming out of these clinical services. There is nothing informal about the care that at least 53 million Americans (AARP National Alliance for Caregiving, 2020) are currently providing to loved ones with chronic and/or life-limiting illnesses, care that involves significant physical, emotional, spiritual, existential, and financial costs. [...]these fluctuations meant visual and auditory hallucinations that were disturbing and often accompanied by life-threatening autonomic changes, like sudden drops in blood pressure or temperature. In addition to serving as his stand in nurse, physician, and constant aide, I was also his case manager; I coordinated care among his various medical providers and navigated the financial side of his receipt of healthcare, such as figuring out how to pay for care received by his actual home health aides.

Informal caregivers (ICs) are relatives, friends, and partners who have a significant relationship with and provide assistance (i.e., physical, emotional) to a patient with a life- threatening, incurable illness. The multidimensional burden that results from providing care to a patient with cancer is well documented, and as a result, a growing number of psychosocial interventions have been developed specifically to address this burden. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the state of the science of psychosocial interventions for informal cancer caregivers. A comprehensive systematic review of interventions for cancer caregivers was conducted via an electronic literature search of publications between 1980 and January 13, 2011. A final sample of 49 interventions was reviewed in detail. The interventions, which varied in terms of modality and patient population, fell into the following eight categories: psychoeducation, problem-solving/skills building interventions, supportive therapy, family/couples therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, complementary and alternative medicine interventions, and existential therapy. Benefits and disadvantages of each of the categories are discussed, with special attention given to studies that produced null findings. Beyond specific techniques, structured, goal-oriented, and time-limited interventions that are integrative appear to be the most feasible and offer the greatest benefits for ICs of cancer patients. Future studies are needed to examine the specific benefits and challenges of delivering interventions in alternative modalities (Internet, Skype) so that the needs of a greater number of ICs may be addressed.

Background An advanced cancer diagnosis can be associated with a significant profile of distress. Psychedelic compounds have shown clinically significant effects in the treatment of psychological distress in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Given the challenges of delivering timely and effective intervention in the advanced cancer context, it is possible that an alternative, more pragmatic, approach lies in psychedelic ‘microdosing’. Microdosing refers to repeated administration of psychedelics in sub-hallucinogenic doses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomised controlled trial comparing psychedelic microdose-assisted–meaning-centred psychotherapy (PA-MCP) to standard meaning-centred psychotherapy (MCP) in New Zealand indigenous (Māori) and non-indigenous people with advanced cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Although MCP is a well-established psychotherapeutic treatment in advanced cancer populations, the potential efficacy and effectiveness of this therapy when delivered alongside a standardised microdose regimen of a psychedelic compound have not been investigated. Methods Participants with advanced-stage cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression ( N  = 40; 20 Māori, 20 non-Māori) will be randomised under double-blind conditions to receive 7 sessions of MCP alongside 13 doses of either an LSD microdose (4–20 µg) (PA–MCP) or inactive placebo (placebo-MCP). The feasibility, acceptability, and safety of this intervention and physiological and psychological measures will be recorded at baseline, at each session of MCP, and at a 1-month and 6-month follow-up. Discussion Our findings will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a larger randomised controlled trial and provide an initial indication of the potential benefits of psychedelic microdosing for psychological distress in advanced-stage indigenous and non-indigenous cancer patients. Trial Registration NZCTR, ACTRN12623000478617. Registered 11 May 2023.  https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385810&isReview=true .

Background: Adult child caregivers of parents with cancer may face challenges when communicating with the patient and other family members, communicating during clinical interactions, and navigating web-based information seeking. Objective: We developed and pilot-tested the Healthy Communication Practice program for adult child caregivers of parents with a blood cancer, which aims to help participants learn and implement communication skills central to caregiving. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the training. Methods: Eligible participants completed a preprogram survey. We assessed the feasibility of participants completing the intervention in the allotted time. Participants had 2 weeks to complete the 2-part, 90-minute online program and completed a postprogram survey that included program evaluation items and the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) using a 1-5 rating scale (5=strongly agree). Results: Of 50 caregivers who initially expressed interest, 34 consented, and 30 completed the program and both surveys (88% completion rate). Caregivers had a mean age of 45.07 (SD 11.96) years and provided care for parents who had a mean age of 73.31 (SD 9.38) years. Caregivers were primarily daughters (n=22, 73%). Overall, scores on the AIM scale were high (mean 4.48, SD 0.67). Specifically, caregivers felt the content met their communication needs (mean 4.58, SD 0.62) and their own needs as a caregiver of a parent with a blood cancer (mean 4.39, SD 0.72). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the Healthy Communication Practice program, which aims to enhance family and clinical communication skills among caregivers of a parent with a blood cancer. Future studies will examine the efficacy of the program and its impact on both caregiver and patient communication and health outcomes.

Background: Family caregivers of people with cancer report high levels of psychological distress. Yoga, with well-documented mental health benefits, could be a useful intervention to address distress in this population. However, little is known about yoga practices among cancer caregivers. The present study evaluates their interest in and barriers to yoga practice. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of family caregivers of cancer patients at five suburban satellite locations of an academic cancer center. Survey items and statistical analyses focused on yoga usage as well as interest in and barriers to yoga practice. Results: Among 539 participants, most were females (64.8%), white (84.2%), and caring for a spouse or partner (54.7%). Interest in practicing yoga among study participants was 42.3%. Increased interest was independently associated with being females (odds ratio [OR] = 3.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.98-5.51, P < 0.001) and employed (part-time: OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.1-6.18, P = 0.03; full-time: OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.1-2.01, P = 0.02). Few participants (6.3%) were currently practicing yoga, although 31% had done so in the past. Sixty-one percent of those who had practiced before their loved one's diagnosis stopped practicing yoga afterward. Commonly cited barriers to yoga practice included time constraints (37.3%) and psychological obstacles (33.6%). About a quarter of those who had never practiced yoga lacked awareness of yoga's benefits (26.6%). Conclusion: Despite the low use of yoga, interest in practicing was moderately high, especially among women and employed caregivers. As caregivers face numerous barriers to yoga practice, strategies are needed to overcome these barriers and help them access yoga's health benefits.

Objective Previous work in Huntington’s disease (HD) has shown that a sense of meaning and purpose (M&P) is positively associated with positive affect and well‐being (PAW); however, it was unknown whether HD‐validated patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) influence this association and how M&P impacts PROs in the future. Our study was designed to examine if HD‐validated PROs moderate the relationship between M&P and PAW and to evaluate if baseline M&P predicts 12‐ and 24‐month changes in HD‐validated PROs. Methods This was a longitudinal, multicenter study to develop several PROs (e.g., specific for the physical, emotional, cognitive, and social domains) for people with HD (HDQLIFE). The sample consisted of 322 people with HD (n = 50 prodromal, n = 171 early‐stage manifest, and n = 101 late‐stage manifest HD). A single, multivariate linear mixed‐effects model was performed with PAW as the outcome predicted by main effects for M&P and several moderators (i.e., an HD‐validated PRO) and interactions between M&P and a given PRO. Linear‐mixed models were also used to assess if baseline M&P predicted HD‐validated PROs at 12 and 24 months. Results Higher M&P was positively associated with higher PAW regardless of the magnitude of symptom burden, as represented by HD‐validated PROs, and independent of disease stage. In our primary analysis, baseline M&P predicted increased PAW and decreased depression, anxiety, anger, emotional/behavioral disruptions, and cognitive decline at 12 and 24 months across all disease stages. Interpretation These findings parallel those seen in the oncology population and have implications for adapting and developing psychotherapeutic and palliative HD interventions.

Notably, Ruth was the first non-medical research recipient of a National Cancer Institute Research Training Grant, was elected to the Institute of Medicine in 1990, and was named Nurse Scientist of the Year by the Council of Nurse Researchers in 1993. After 12 years on the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania, Ruth joined Yale Cancer Center and the Yale School of Nursing in 1998 and focused her career on psychosocial oncology, symptom science, palliative care, and quality of life research. The purpose of this landmark study was to describe spouses’ psychological distress across the caregiving trajectory from the patients’ diagnosis until 2 years after the patients’ death and to test the effects of an oncology nursing intervention on patient and caregiver outcomes.