Explore the vast range of titles available.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous lung condition characterised by chronic respiratory symptoms, fixed airway obstruction and persistent inflammation that leads to a progressive airflow limitation. Although COPD has traditionally been linked to neutrophilic inflammation, recent studies have identified a subset of patients – approximately 20%–40% – with elevated eosinophil levels in blood and sputum. Emerging evidence suggests that eosinophilic inflammation has a pivotal role in a subset of COPD patients and may influence disease progression, exacerbation frequency and therapeutic responses. This narrative review provides a comprehensive analysis of the role of eosinophils in COPD with particular attention to their role as biomarkers in blood and sputum. We evaluate the prevalence of eosinophilic inflammation in COPD exanimating different thresholds used in blood and in sputum to define it. In addition, we focus on eosinophilic COPD phenotype as a treatable trait, emphasising recent evidence that supports the effectiveness of biological target therapy.

Background: Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Few studies investigated its role in airway inflammation and its correlation with lung function. Objectives: The aim of the present study is to assess its effect after 1 year of treatment, focusing on airway inflammation. Design: This is a retrospective observational study, in an Italian tertiary reference centre specialised in diagnosis and management of severe asthma patients. Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study including SEA patients treated with benralizumab for 1 year. Clinical, functional and inflammatory data were collected at baseline, 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) months. Results: Twenty-two SEA patients on benralizumab were included. We observed a reduction in exacerbations rate and systemic steroid treatment (p < 0.0001) as well as an improvement in asthma control (p < 0.0001), health-related quality of life (p = 0.017) and lung function pre-BD FEV1 (L) (p = 0.02) and percentage (p = 0.004) and post-BD FEV1 (L) (p = 0.01) and percentage (p = 0.003) from baseline to T6 and T12. A reduction in sputum eosinophil percentage was observed at T6 and T12 (p < 0.005). We found a positive correlation between the variation of sputum eosinophils percentage and FEV1 (L) at T12 (rho = −0.79, p = 0.04). Moreover, the improvement of FEF25%–75% from baseline to 6 (rho = −0.53, p = 0.03) and 12 (rho = −0.62, p = 0.01) months negatively correlated with the duration of asthma disease. In our cohort 12/22 patients were super-responders at T6 and 15/22 at T12. Furthermore, clinical remission was reached by 12/22, and all of them obtained blood and sputum eosinophils counts normalisation. Conclusion: Our data confirm that it is a rapid and effective treatment for SEA acting on clinical, functional, systemic and airway inflammatory outcomes. Our results highlight the role of induced sputum as a promising non-invasive technique to investigate pathophysiologic mechanisms in severe asthma treated with biologics. Finally, a negative correlation between small airway improvement and the duration of asthma may suggest that a prompt referral to asthma centres may delay lung function worsening. Additional studies are needed to investigate more in-depth the role of induced sputum in the management of asthma, response to treatment and remission. Plain language summary Analysis of the effect of a biological therapy on severe asthma Background: Asthma is estimated to affect almost 5%-8% of the European adult population, and 5%–10% of these patients suffer from a severe asthma form. Severe asthma is characterised by chronic airway inflammation despite traditional inhaled treatment and patients may experience acute flare ups requiring courses of steroids and eventually hospitalization leading to a poor quality of life. New biological drugs have been introduced to treat severe asthma characterized by inflammation in the blood and in the lungs. Benralizumab is a well known biological option for severe asthmatic patients. Methods: We provide data on 22 patients followed up in our tertiary severe asthma centre in Tradate, Italy, affected by severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab for at least one year. Results: Our data confirmed a rapid effect of benralizumab on respiratory symptoms, exacerbations and quality of life. In addition, we documented a significant improvement in lung function along with a normalization of inflammation in the blood and in the lungs, assessed with a non-invasive tool: the induced sputum. Conclusions: Interestingly, our data highlight the importance of induced sputum as a promising non-invasive technique to investigate pathophysiologic mechanisms in severe asthma treated with biologics. Additional studies are needed to implement its role in the management of asthma also in terms of response to treatment towards a personalized approach.

(1) Background: “Brittle Asthma” was considered an asthma clinical phenotype and deemed to be life-threatening in the early 2000s; then, this definition disappeared. The purpose of this review is to examine what has historically been referred to as this term and see whether it may be applied to modern clinical practice, thus acquiring fresh relevance and meaning. (2) Methods: A non-systematic search of the literature was conducted using both MeSH and free-text phrases. No limitations on the research design or type of publication were applied. (3) Results: Reliable data regarding “Brittle Asthma” are lacking due to the paucity of current data and the few studies available. After a few years of reworking, it was divided into two sub-classes: one characterized by a wide PEF variability despite high-dose therapy and the other by sudden acute attacks in otherwise apparently normal airway functions or well-controlled asthma. Their characteristics were hardly defined because of their low prevalence. Data regarding risk factors, atopy, mechanisms, and treatments were analyzed. (4) Conclusions: Over time, different terminology has been introduced to define asthma severity and control. It would be worth investigating whether the term “Brittle Asthma” previously used may be helpful to find new hints to stratify patients and improve disease management.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory respiratory disease often associated with comorbidities. Among cardiovascular comorbidities, arterial hypertension seems to create an additional health burden in asthmatics. However, evidence on this relationship is lacking. Our study aims to evaluate the characteristics of hypertensive asthmatics, focusing on the role of inflammation as a possible link between these diseases. We conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis consecutively including asthmatics who underwent induced sputum (IS) at our asthma referral center. Patients were divided in two groups according to presence or absence of history of hypertension. Clinical, functional, and inflammatory (airway and systemic) data were collected. Data on two hundred and sixty asthmatic patients were analyzed. Seventy-nine (30.4%) of them had a diagnosis of hypertension requiring a specific pharmacological treatment. Asthmatics with hypertension were more frequently male (  = 0.047), older (  < 0.001), and with higher body max index (BMI) (p < 0.001) when compared to normotensive patients. No difference concerning asthma control, severity and pharmacological treatment was observed between the two groups (all  > 0.05); distribution of comorbidities and lung function impairment (forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC); all  < 0.05) were statistically different between groups. Mixed granulocytic airway inflammation was prevalent in the hypertensive asthmatics (  = 0.014). Interestingly, a multivariable analysis revealed that age ≥ 65 years and an increased percentage of sputum neutrophils (≥61%) were independent predictors of hypertensive status (  < 0.001). Our data suggest that neutrophilic airway inflammation (as evaluated by induced sputum) is strictly associated with hypertension. In clinical practice, phenotyping asthmatic patients with comorbidities like hypertension could be useful also from a therapeutic point of view. Additional studies are mandatory to further elucidate the role of neutrophilic airway inflammation in asthma with cardiovascular diseases.

Background: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has shown potential in improving negative symptoms (NS) and Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia (CIAS). However, heterogeneity in stimulation protocols and sample characteristics limit definitive conclusions regarding tDCS effectiveness in schizophrenia. Given the detrimental effects of cigarette smoking, particularly on cognition, this study explored the role of cigarette smoking as a modifiable individual factor potentially contributing to methodological heterogeneity by evaluating tDCS effects on NS and CIAS in Smoker (SM) and Non-Smoker (NoSM) patients. Methods: Post hoc analyses of a double-blind RCT were performed on 50 patients, randomized to 2 mA active or sham-tDCS (15 weekday sessions) with bilateral bipolar-nonbalanced prefrontal placement. The sample was divided according to the smoking status, consisting of 28 SM and 22 NoSM. Separate one-way analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were performed within each subgroup to assess changes over time between treatment conditions. Clinical outcomes included Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total scores. Results: SM exhibited baseline lower cognitive scores in verbal memory, motor speed and working memory domains. NS improved in both SM and NoSM with large effect size. Significant improvement in CIAS, specifically in working memory and verbal fluency, were found exclusively in NoSM. Conclusions: Cigarette smoking appeared to limit tDCS effectiveness in improving CIAS but not NS in schizophrenia. We suggested that the neurotoxic milieu linked to chronic exposure to neurotoxins of cigarette smoking could be responsible for these effects, counterbalancing the neuroprotective effects of tDCS. Further studies are warranted to replicate these findings.