Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and aims Subsite-specific incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomas may vary considerably by race, sex and age as well as due to different screening strategies. We assessed variations in the anatomical distribution of adenomas according to age and sex in an average-risk screening cohort testing positive at immunological faecal occult blood test (i-FOBT) in northern Italy. Methods Data from 2,281 consecutive asymptomatic i-FOBT-positive subjects ageing 50–70 years undergone colonoscopy were reviewed. Size, number, macroscopic and histological features of all adenomas found as well as their proximal or distal location in relation to the splenic flexure were examined. Odds ratios (OR) of proximal neoplasms, according to the presence of distal neoplasms and other selected covariates were assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 2,599 neoplasms were found in 1,396 patients. Of these, 116 (5 %) were colorectal cancers, diagnosed in 106 patients. Out of 2,483 adenomas found, 1,564 (63 %) were sessile, 795 (32 %) were peduncolated and 124 (5 %) were flat-type; 54 % of all adenomas were tubular, 36 % were tubulovillous or villous, and 10 % were serrated adenomas. The majority of neoplasms (66 %) were located in the distal colon. Tumour subsite distribution was consistent in both sexes, whereas significant proximal migration of neoplasms occurred in the older age cohort. Indeed, the rate of proximal neoplasms in patients aged ≥60 years was 37 % as compared with 29 % in those ageing 50–59 years. Male gender (OR 1.84), age of 60 years or older (OR 1.44), having a family history of colorectal neoplasms (OR 1.47) and presence of at least 1 distal advanced adenoma (OR 1.63) were all significant predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms. Conclusions A left to right shift of colorectal adenomas with increasing age is evident in northern Italian asymptomatic i-FOBT-positive population. Advanced proximal neoplasms are not uncommon in subjects with or without distal adenomas, especially after 60 years of age. This should be carefully considered when implementing public screening strategies for CRC since the use of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening tool, particularly in older age groups, appears to be less effective.

Bevacizumab is approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer, either in first-line therapy or for patients with recurrent disease not previously treated with the same drug. We aimed to test the value of continuing bevacizumab beyond progression after first-line treatment with the same drug. In our open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 82 sites in four countries, we enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received first-line platinum-based therapy including bevacizumab, and had recurrent (≥6 months since last platinum dose), International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a carboplatin-based doublet intravenously (carboplatin area under the concentration curve [AUC] 5 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days; carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days; or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1, every 28 days), or a carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 14 days combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–carboplatin, or 15 mg/kg every 21 days combined with gemcitabine–carboplatin or paclitaxel–carboplatin). Evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines was required before randomisation. Randomisation was done through the trial website with a minimisation procedure, stratified by centre, time of recurrence, performance status, and type of second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01802749 and EudraCT 2012-004362-17. Between Dec 6, 2013, and Nov 11, 2016, 406 patients were recruited (203 [50%] assigned to the bevacizumab group and 203 [50%] to the standard chemotherapy group). 130 patients (64%) in the bevacizumab group and 131 (65%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after receiving a last dose of platinum more than 12 months before, and 146 patients (72%) in the bevacizumab group and 147 (72%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after completion of first-line bevacizumab maintenance. 161 participants (79%) progressed in the standard chemotherapy group, as did 143 (70%) in the bevacizumab group. Median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 8·4–9·3) in the standard chemotherapy group and 11·8 months (10·8–12·9) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·41–0·65; log-rank p<0·0001). Most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (20 [10%] in the standard chemotherapy group vs 58 (29%) in the bevacizumab group), neutrophil count decrease (81 [41%] vs 80 [40%]), and platelet count decrease (43 [22%] vs 61 [30%]). 68 patients (33%) died in the standard chemotherapy group and 79 (39%) died in the bevacizumab group; two deaths (1%) in the standard chemotherapy group and one death (<1%) in the bevacizumab group were deemed to be treatment-related. Continuing bevacizumab beyond progression combined with chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer improves progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy alone and might be considered in clinical practice. Hoffmann–La Roche and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.

Purpose A phase III trial assessed the efficacy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone given once in preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens. Methods This multicentre, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial evaluated two different treatment groups. One group received palonosetron (0.25 mg intravenously) and dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) before chemotherapy, while the other was administered the same regimen on day 1 followed by dexamethasone 8 mg orally on days 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) during the overall phase (days 1–5 after chemotherapy initiation). The non-inferiority margin was predefined as a 15% difference between groups in the primary endpoint. Results Of 332 chemotherapy-naïve patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis, 65.1% were female, and 35.2% received anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-based regimens. Overall CR rates were 67.5% for those administered dexamethasone only on day 1 ( n  = 166), and 71.1% for those also administered dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 ( n  = 166; difference −3.6% (95% confidence interval, −13.5 to 6.3)). CR rates were not significantly different between groups during the acute (0–24 h post-chemotherapy; 88.6% versus 84.3%; P  = 0.262) and delayed phases (days 2–5; 68.7% versus 77.7%; P  = 0.116). Conclusions Palonosetron plus single-dose dexamethasone administered before common MEC regimens provide protection against acute and delayed CINV which is non-inferior to that of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 3 days. However, the major benefit of the single-day regimen occurs in patients receiving non-AC MEC regimens.

To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC) treated with 3D conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as monotherapy. From March 2004 to November 2017, 277 men with LPC underwent 3D conformal HDR-BT as monotherapy, with a temporary implant. The dose prescription was: 38 Gy in 4 fractions (149 patients), 27 Gy in 2 fractions (41 patients), and 19-20 Gy in a single fraction (87 patients). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity assessment were performed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The mean age was 67 (range, 47-81) years. Overall, 145 patients were low-risk, 116 intermediate-risk, and 16 high-risk prostate cancer. After a median follow-up of six years (range, 6-160 months), bPFS, PFS, and CSS were 81%, 96%, and 97%, respectively. Dose prescription, initial prostate specific antigen (iPSA) ≥ 9,5 ng/ml, and high-risk disease resulted in prognostic factors regarding bPFS. Only G2-G3 acute or late GI and GU toxicities were observed. HDR-BT as monotherapy is a valid and safe treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. After a long follow-up, patients receiving 19-20 Gy in a single fraction had a lower biochemical control rate compared to patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions or 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Randomized prospective trials with a longer follow-up are necessary to confirm our results, and define total doses and dose per fraction for HDR-BT in patients with LPC.

Experimental data have suggested that the pineal hormone melatonin (MLT) may counteract chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and immunosuppression. In addition, MLT has been shown to inhibit the production of free radicals, which play a part in mediating the toxicity of chemotherapy. A study was therefore performed in an attempt to evaluate the influence of MLT on chemotherapy toxicity. The study involved 80 patients with metastatic solid tumors who were in poor clinical condition (lung cancer: 35; breast cancer: 31; gastrointestinal tract tumors: 14). Lung cancer patients were treated with cisplatin and etoposide, breast cancer patients with mitoxantrone, and gastrointestinal tract tumor patients with 5-fluorouracil plus folates. Patients were randomised to receive chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus MLT (20 mg/day p.o. in the evening). Thrombocytopenia was significantly less frequent in patients concomitantly treated with MLT. Malaise and asthenia were also significantly less frequent in patients receiving MLT. Finally, stomatitis and neuropathy were less frequent in the MLT group, albeit without statistically significant differences. Alopecia and vomiting were not influenced by MLT. This pilot study seems to suggest that the concomitant administration of the pineal hormone MLT during chemotherapy may prevent some chemotherapy-induced side-effects, particularly myelosuppression and neuropathy. Evaluation of the impact of MLT on chemotherapy efficacy will be the aim of future clinical investigations.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Objective: Single-agent epirubicin was tested as primary chemotherapy treatment in patients with early breast cancer >3 cm. Methods: 100 women with locally advanced breast cancer >3 cm were treated with three cycles of single-agent epirubicin at a dose of 120 mg/m 2 . All patients showing tumor shrinkage to less than 3 cm were considered candidates for conservative surgery (quadrantectomy); in the remaining patients modified radical mastectomy was carried out. Postsurgical treatment consisted of CMF chemotherapy except for postmenopausal node-positive, estrogen-positive patients who were assigned to hormonal treatment with tamoxifen and postmenopausal node-negative, estrogen-positive ones who did not receive any treatment. Results: Quadrantectomy was carried out in 71 patients. At the median follow-up time of 69 months, the relapse rate was 29.6% among patients who underwent quadrantectomy (21 out of 71) and 58.6% among patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy (17 out of 29). Conclusions: Single-agent chemotherapy with anthracyclines could appear to be an effective treatment in inducing a tumor downstaging in patients with early breast cancer >3 cm. This treatment can be administered outside clinical trials in patients who desire to preserve their body integrity. Further prospective, randomized trials are needed in order to validate and better define the role of epirubicin in the neoadjuvant strategy of breast cancer patients.

Docetaxel is one of the most active drugs in second-line therapy for non-small-cell-lung-carcinoma (NSCLC). The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly low-dose docetaxel. Forty-two patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with cisplatinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Docetaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) weekly for 12 consecutive weeks. A total of 386 doses were given with a median number of 10 doses per patient (range: 3-12). Treatment showed low incidence of hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity. An episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia was reported but no episodes of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Most frequent non-hematologic toxicities were asthenia and alopecia. Response rate was 10.5% and median survival time (MST) was 12.8 weeks. Weekly treatment with 25 mg/m(2) docetaxel for 12 consecutive weeks appears to be a feasible and active regimen with mild toxicity in heavily pretreated NSCLC patients.

Diarrhea is one of the dose-limiting toxicities for administration of fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with colorectal cancer and can result in severe morbidity and mortality. No well-defined prognostic factors influencing 5FU-associated diarrhea have been identified, which means its occurrence is unforeseeable. The aim of this study was to check whether any characteristics related to patients or chemotherapy could allow the identification of subsets of patients at higher risk of developing diarrhea while receiving a regimen containing 5FU. A logistic regression analysis was performed with age, sex, site of primary tumor, presence of primary tumor, presence of colostomy, time since surgery, number of courses of chemotherapy, diarrhea in previous courses, season of treatment, and chemotherapeutic regimens used as model parameters to predict occurrence of diarrhea in 258 colorectal cancer patients receiving a 5FU-containing regimen. Presence of primary tumor (P = 0.004), previous episodes of chemotherapy-related diarrhea (P = 0.00005) and summer season (P = 0.014) were found to be significant risk factors for developing diarrhea. The other variables examined, such as age, sex, chemotherapeutic regimen, site of primary tumor, presence of colostomy, and time since surgery, were not significantly correlated to diarrhea. Chemotherapeutic regimen was the only parameter that allowed prediction of the severity of diarrhea: 5FU/6S-leucovorin/interferon caused more severe diarrhea, followed by 5FU/leucovorin weekly. Although the analysis of these clinical features does not seem to allow the definition of a well-defined subset of colorectal cancer patients at higher risk of 5FU-induced diarrhea, it can be recommended that patients with primary tumor, or who have experienced diarrhea in earlier courses of chemotherapy or are receiving treatment in summer should be carefully monitored, especially in the first cycles.

Combination therapies of fluorouracil (FU) with irinotecan (CPT-11) and docetaxel plus cisplatin have been proven to be active in metastatic gastric cancer. In this paper, we present the results of a phase III trial in which these two combinations given sequentially were compared to mitomycin C (MMC) monochemotherapy in an adjuvant setting. 169 patients with radically resected gastric cancer were randomized to receive CPT-11 (180 mg/m2 day 1), leucovorin (100 mg/m2 days 1-2), FU (400-600 mg/m2 days 1-2, q 14; for four cycles; FOLFIRI regimen), followed by docetaxel (85 mg/m2 day 1), cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1, q 21; for three cycles; arm A), or MMC (8 mg/m2 days 1-2 as 2-hour infusion, q 42; for four cycles; arm B). All patients had histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma with nodal positivity or pT3/4. A total of 166 patients (85 in arm A and 81 in arm B) were treated. Adjuvant treatment was completed in 76% of the patients in arm A and in 70% of the patients in arm B. The main grade 3/4 side effects recorded were neutropenia in 35%, with only 1 febrile patient, and diarrhea in 11% in arm A, and thrombocytopenia in 10% and neutropenia in 7% in arm B. The FOLFIRI regimen and docetaxel/cisplatin given in sequence was well tolerated and feasible in adjuvant setting. This sequence treatment currently represents the experimental arm of an ongoing multicenter trial.

Objective: Several cytokines, particularly IL-2 and interferons, are thought to be effective in the palliative therapy of neoplastic effusions. We report on the activity and toxicity of intracavitary administration of low-dose IL-2 in a case series of 100 cancer patients with neoplastic effusions. Methods: One hundred patients with advanced solid tumors and neoplastic effusions underwent IL-2 intracavitary injection as first-line treatment. The most common sites of fluid accumulation were pleura (n = 68), peritoneum (n = 21) and pericardium (n = 11). Breast cancer, lung cancer and mesothelioma were the most frequent neoplasms in our series. One cycle consisted of intracavitary IL-2 at 6,000,000 IU on days 1 and 7. Results: According to Paladine’s criteria, an objective clinical response was achieved in 72% (complete response in 27% and partial response in 45%), with a median duration of 5 months (range: 1–11 months). The peritoneum was the least responsive site for neoplastic effusion reduction. IL-2 intracavitary injection was well tolerated in all patients; the only toxicity observed was fever >38°C in 6% of the patients. Conclusion: This study shows that intracavitary injection of IL-2 represents a feasible, well-tolerated and effective therapy of neoplastic fluid accumulation. Further studies are needed in order to compare the effectiveness of intracavitary IL-2 with other standard treatments.