Explore the vast range of titles available.

Afflicting up to 1% of population, pulmonary hypertension (PH) is commonly associated with cardiopulmonary and metabolic diseases, but the effect of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing PH remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients who had undergone right-heart-catheterization within the VA Healthcare system and had a subsequent hospital admission with COVID-19 (inpatient cohort, n=1204) or had COVID-19 positivity but not admitted (outpatient cohort, n=6576). Inpatient findings were confirmed in a non-VA validation cohort (n=656) who had undergone echocardiography with subsequent admission. PH was defined invasively as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg and non-invasively as estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) >30 mmHg. In-hospital outcomes (inpatient cohort) and 1-year mortality (outpatient cohort) were assessed using multivariable logistic or Cox regression adjusting for confounders. Pre-existing PH was independently associated with greater in-hospital mortality (PH using mPAP: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.60, 95%CI: 1.04-2.46; PH using RVSP: aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.18-3.82). Among outpatients, those with COVID-19 had >8-fold higher 90-day and 2.8 fold higher 91-365 day adjusted hazard of mortality irrespective of PH status. Hazards of 90-day hospitalization were similarly driven by COVID-19. The findings were comparable for patient subgroup with normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Pre-existing PH is independently associated with higher in-hospital COVID-19 mortality. In outpatients, COVID-19 positivity was associated with increased mortality over 1 year irrespective of PH status, with highest risk within the first 90 days.

Infective endocarditis (IE) of prosthetic or bioprosthetic heart valves is a serious complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Data on the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of IE after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the United States are limited. We used the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases to determine the incidence of early IE after TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the US. Clinical characteristics, independent predictors, and outcomes of patients with IE post-TAVI were examined. In 29,306 TAVI and 66,077 SAVR patients, the incidence rates of early IE were 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5% to 1.9%) and 2.5% (95% CI 2.3% to 2.9%) per person-year, respectively. In a propensity-matched cohort of 15,138 TAVI and 15,030 SAVR patients (weighted), there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of IE (1.7% [95% CI 1.4% to 2.0%] vs 1.9% [95% CI 1.6% to 2.2%] per person-year, log-rank p = 0.29) or in the median (interquartile range) time to IE (91 [48 to 146] vs 92 [61 to 214] days, p = 0.13). Staphylococcus (30.4%), Streptococcus (29.9%), and Enterococcus (20.5%) were the most common causative organisms of IE post-TAVI. Younger age, history of heart failure, need for permanent pacemaker placement, cardiac arrest, major bleeding, and sepsis during the index TAVI hospitalization were independently associated with an increased risk of IE. In-hospital mortality rate during readmission for IE was 15.6%. In conclusion, in a nationally representative cohort of TAVI patients in the US, the incidence rate of early IE was 1.7% per person-year. Age, co-morbid conditions, invasive procedures, and complications during the index hospitalization were associated with incident IE post-TAVI.

The optimal therapy for submassive pulmonary embolism (sPE), defined by right ventricular dysfunction without hemodynamic instability, is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) versus systemic anticoagulation (SA) alone in patients with sPE. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar (from inception through May 2022) for studies comparing outcomes of CDT versus SA in sPE. Studies were identified, and data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes included in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality, major and minor bleeding, and need for blood transfusion. A total of 12 studies (1 randomized, 11 observational) with 9,789 patients were included. Compared with SA, CDT was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.56, p <0.00001), 30-day mortality (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.73, p = 0.004), 90-day mortality (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.72, p = 0.004), and a tendency toward lower 1-year mortality (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.05, p = 0.07). The risks of major bleeding (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.57 to 3.01, p = 0.53), minor bleeding (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.63, p = 0.20), and the rates of blood transfusion (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.15, p = 0.08) were similar between the 2 strategies. In conclusion, in patients with sPE, CDT is associated with significantly lower in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality and a tendency toward lower 1-year mortality with similar bleeding rates compared with SA. This study expands the evidence supporting CDT as first-line therapy for sPE, and randomized controlled trials are indicated to confirm our findings. [Display omitted]

Bleeding events result in morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are limited data on the predicting bleeding complications in patients who underwent stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) and Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) scores’ ability to predict in-hospital outcomes in patients who underwent PCI. Consecutive patients who underwent PCI at tertiary centers from January 2016 to March 2018 were identified and the bleeding risk scores were calculated. The primary end point was the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-defined in-hospital bleeding stratified by low versus high predicted bleeding risk. The major and net adverse cardiovascular events were also examined. The discriminatory ability of the risk models was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Among 3,659 patients studied, the in-hospital major bleeding was 3.3% (n = 121). The patients characterized as high bleeding risk by either criterion had significantly higher bleeding rates than those meeting the low-risk criteria (ARC-HBR 5.4% vs 3.3%, p <0.001; PRECISE-DAPT 5.8% vs 2.4%, p <0.001), and higher major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events. These risk estimates showed moderate and similar predictive ability (ARC-HBR high-risk area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.62, PRECISE-DAPT ≥25 AUC 0.61, p = 0.49), with no incremental benefit to adding the estimates (AUC 0.60). The subgroup analysis revealed that women had higher bleeding rates than men (5.53% vs 2.39%, p <0.001); however, the predictive ability of the criteria were similar in women and men. The patients identified as having a high bleeding risk by the PRECISE-DAPT and the ARC-HBR criteria before PCI are at high risk for in-hospital bleeding and adverse outcomes independent of gender. The 2 scores have moderate predictive ability for bleeds. Further study is needed to determine strategies to reduce risk in this population.

Timely revascularization is essential for limb salvage and to reduce mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In patients who are candidates for endovascular therapy and surgical bypass, the optimal revascularization strategy remains uncertain. Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have presented conflicting results. We conducted a trial-level meta-analysis to compare the outcomes between endovascular-first and surgery-first strategies for revascularization. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs comparing the outcomes of endovascular-first versus surgery-first strategies for revascularization in patients with CLTI. Data were pooled for major outcomes and their aggregate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. Kaplan–Meier curves for amputation-free survival and overall survival time were plotted using the pooled aggregated data from published curves, with their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals reported for up to 5 years of follow-up. A total of 3 RCTs with 2,627 patients (1,312 endovascular-first and 1,315 surgery-first) were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 1,864 patients (70.9%) were men and 347 (13.2%) were older than 80 years. Comparing the endovascular-first and surgery-first approaches, there was no significant difference in the overall (HR 0.92 [0.83 to 1.01], p = 0.09) or amputation-free survival (HR 0.98 [0.92 to 1.03], p = 0.42), reintervention (RR 1.24 [0.74 to 2.07], p = 0.41), major amputation, (RR 1.16 [0.87 to 1.54], p = 0.31), or therapeutic crossover (RR 0.92 [0.37 to 2.26], p = 0.85). In conclusion, data from available RCTs suggest that there is no difference in clinical outcomes between endovascular-first and surgery-first revascularization strategies for CLTI. A planned patient-level meta-analysis may provide further insight.

Aortic stenosis (AS) and regurgitation (AR) may be treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter AVR (TAVR), or medical therapy (MT). Data are lacking regarding the usage of SAVR, TAVR, and MT for patients hospitalized with aortic valve disease and the characteristics of the patients and hospitals associated with each therapy. From the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we determined utilization trends for SAVR, TAVR, and MT in patients with aortic valve disease admitted from 2012 to 2016 for valve replacement, heart failure, unstable angina, non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or syncope. We also performed multinomial logistic regressions to investigate associations between patient and hospital characteristics and treatment. Among 366,909 patients hospitalized for aortic valve disease, there was a 48.1% annual increase from 2012 through 2016. Overall, 19.9%, 6.7%, and 73.4% of patients received SAVR, TAVR, and MT, respectively. SAVR decreased from 21.9% in 2012 to 18.5% in 2016, whereas TAVR increased from 2.6% to 12.5%, and MT decreased from 75.5% to 69.0%. Older age, female sex, greater severity of illness, more admission diagnoses, not-for-profit hospitals, large hospitals, and urban teaching hospitals were associated with greater use of TAVR. In multivariable analysis, likelihood of TAVR relative to SAVR increased 4.57-fold (95% confidence interval 4.21 to 4.97). TAVR has increased at the expense of both SAVR and MT, a novel finding. However, this increase in TAVR was distributed inequitably, with certain patients more likely to receive TAVR certain hospitals more likely to provide TAVR. With the expected expansion of indications, inequitable access to TAVR must be addressed.

The traditional definition of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been an absolute rise of serum creatinine (Cr) of ≥0.5 mg/dL, although most recent clinical trials have included a ≥25% increase from baseline Cr. The clinical implication of this definition change remains unknown. We compared the association of the two definitions with risk of death or need for dialysis among 58,957 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in 2007 to 2008 in a large collaborative registry. Patients with a preexisting history of renal failure requiring dialysis were excluded. Contrast-induced nephropathy as defined by a rise in Cr ≥0.5 mg/dL (CINTraditional) developed in 1,601, whereas CIN defined either as Cr ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% increase in baseline Cr (CINNew) developed in 4,308 patients. Patients meeting the definition of CINNew but not CINTraditional were classified as CINIncremental (n = 2,707). Compared with CINNew, CINTraditional was more commonly seen in patients with abnormal renal function, which was more likely to develop in patients with normal renal function at baseline. Compared with CINIncremental, patients meeting the definition of CINTraditional were more likely to die (16.7% vs 1.7%) and require in-hospital dialysis (9.8% vs 0%). Our data suggest that the traditional definition of CIN (a rise in Cr of ≥0.5 mg/dL) in patients undergoing PCI is superior to ≥25% increase in Cr at identifying patients at greater risk for adverse renal and cardiac events.

Left atrial veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (LAVA-ECMO) in cardiogenic shock (CS) is a novel mechanical cardiocirculatory support strategy that provides robust cardiocirculatory support and simultaneous left and right atrial venting by way of a multifenestrated transeptal catheter. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients aged ≥18 years with CS who underwent LAVA-ECMO at a quaternary care institution from 2018 to 2023. Clinical outcomes and prehemodynamics and posthemodynamics were evaluated. A total of 68 patients were analyzed (75% were men, 72% were white, median age of 63 years). The indications for LAVA-ECMO were CS because of myocardial infarction (29.4%), biventricular failure (26.5%), and/or valvular heart disease (26.5%). Trans-septal puncture was guided by intracardiac echocardiography (86.8%) or transesophageal echocardiography (13.2%). Arterial cannulation was performed by way of transcaval access in 25% of the cases. Post-LAVA-ECMO cannulation was associated with substantial improvement in the hemodynamics within 24 hours after cannulation, including reduction in right atrial pressure (absolute mean difference: −5.0 mm Hg, p <0.001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (−9.0 mm Hg, p <0.001), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (−10.0 mm Hg, p <0.001), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (−14.0 mm Hg, p <0.001). Survival to decannulation occurred in 69.1%, whereas the 30-day survival from cannulation was 51.5%. The in-hospital all-cause mortality was 51.5%. Only 5 patients (7.4%) required additional mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (4 Impella, 1 veno-arterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). There were no complications related to transeptal placement of the venous ECMO cannula. In conclusion, LAVA-ECMO, an MCS strategy providing biatrial drainage, appears to also provide simultaneous left ventricular venting, as demonstrated by improved invasive hemodynamics. Although the procedure appears safe, with no direct complications to interatrial septal cannulation, postcannulation complications remain high, and further studies are needed to evaluate the full safety profile of LAVA-ECMO compared with alternative MCS strategies.