Explore the vast range of titles available.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D spine deformity that also causes ribcage and torso distortion. While clinical metrics are important for monitoring disorder progression, patients are often most concerned about their cosmesis. The aim of this study was to automate the quantification of AIS cosmesis metrics, which can be measured reliably from patient-specific 3D surface scans (3DSS). An existing database of 3DSS for pre-operative AIS patients treated at the Queensland Children’s Hospital was used to create 30 calibrated 3D virtual models. A modular generative design algorithm was developed on the Rhino-Grasshopper software to measure five key AIS cosmesis metrics from these models—shoulder, scapula and hip asymmetry, torso rotation and head-pelvis shift. Repeat cosmetic measurements were calculated from user-selected input on the Grasshopper graphical interface. InterClass-correlation (ICC) was used to determine intra- and inter-user reliability. Torso rotation and head-pelvis shift measurements showed excellent reliability (> 0.9), shoulder asymmetry measurements showed good to excellent reliability (> 0.7) and scapula and hip asymmetry measurements showed good to moderate reliability (> 0.5). The ICC results indicated that experience with AIS was not required to reliably measure shoulder asymmetry, torso rotation and head-pelvis shift, but was necessary for the other metrics. This new semi-automated workflow reliably characterises external torso deformity, reduces the dependence on manual anatomical landmarking, and does not require bulky/expensive equipment.

3D non-contact surface scanners capture highly accurate, calibrated images of surface topography for 3D structures. This study sought to establish the efficacy and accuracy of using 3D surface scanning to characterise spinal curvature and sagittal plane contour. 10 healthy female adults with a mean age of 25 years, (standard deviation: 3.6 years) underwent both MRI and 3D surface scanning (3DSS) (Artec Eva, Artec Group Inc., Luxembourg) while lying in the lateral decubitus position on a rigid substrate. Prior to 3DSS, anatomical landmarks on the spinous processes of each participant were demarcated using stickers attached to the skin surface. Following 3DSS, oil capsules (fiducial markers) were overlaid on the stickers and the subject underwent MRI. MRI stacks were processed to measure the thoracolumbar spinous process locations, providing an anatomical reference. 3D coordinates for the markers (surface stickers and MRI oil capsules) and for the spinous processes mapped the spinal column profiles and were compared to assess the quality of fit between the 3DSS and MRI marker positions. The RMSE for the polynomials fit to the spinous process, fiducial and surface marker profiles ranged from 0.17-1.15mm for all subjects. The MRI fiducial marker location was well aligned with the spinous process profile in the thoracic and upper lumbar spine for nine of the subjects. Over the 10 subjects, the mean RMSE between the MRI and 3D scan sagittal profiles for all surface markers was 9.8mm (SD 4.2mm). Curvature was well matched for seven of the subjects, with two showing differing curvatures across the lumbar spine due to inconsistent subject positioning. Comparison of the observed trends for vertebral position measured from MRI and 3DSS, suggested the surface markers may provide a useful method for measuring internal changes in sagittal curvature or skeletal changes.

IntroductionPaediatric cervical spine injury (CSI) is uncommon but can have devastating consequences. Many children, however, present to emergency departments (EDs) for the assessment of possible CSI. While imaging can be used to determine the presence of injuries, these tests are not without risks and costs, including exposure to radiation and associated life-time cancer risks. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) to guide imaging decisions exist, although two of the existing rules, the National Emergency X-Radiography Low Risk Criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR), focus on adults and a newly developed paediatric rule from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) is yet to be externally validated. This study aims to externally validate these three CDRs in children.Methods and analysisThis is a multicentre prospective observational study of children younger than 16 years presenting with possible CSI following blunt trauma to 1 of 14 EDs across Australia, New Zealand and Singapore. Data will be collected on presenting features (history, injury mechanism, physical examination findings) and management (diagnostic imaging, admission, interventions, outcomes). The performance accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) of three existing CDRs in identifying children with study-defined CSIs and the specific CDR defined outcomes will be determined, along with multiple secondary outcomes including CSI epidemiology, investigations and management of possible CSI.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for the study was received from the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee in Australia (HREC/69436/RCHM-2020) with additional approvals from the New Zealand Human and Disability Ethics Committee and the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and future management guidelines.Trial registration numberRegistration with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry prior to the commencement of participant recruitment (ACTRN12621001050842). 50% of expected patients have been enrolled to date.

Purpose To understand how the axial plane deformity contributes to progression of the three-dimensional spinal deformity of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), with a main thoracic curve type, using a series of sequential magnetic resonance images (MRI). Methods Twenty-seven AIS patients (at scan 1: mean 12.4 years (± 1.5), mean Cobb angle 29.1°(± 8.8°)) had 3 MRI scans (T4-L1) performed at intervals of mean 0.7 years (± 0.4). The outer profile of the superior and inferior endplates were traced on a reformatted axial image using ImageJ (NIH). Endplate AVR, and intravertebral rotation (IVR), defined as the difference between superior and inferior endplate AVR, was calculated for each vertebral level. Results For all patients and scans, the mean AVR was greatest at the curve apex, with AVR diminishing in a caudal and cephalic direction from the apex. At scan 3 the mean apical AVR was 15.1°(± 4.6°) with a mean change in apical AVR between MRI 1 and 3 of 2.7°(± 2.9°). The increase in standing height between MRI 1 and 3 was mean 7.4 cm (± 4.6). Linear regression showed a positive correlation between apical AVR and Cobb angle ( R 2  = 0.57, P  < 0.001), and a positive correlation between apical AVR and rib hump ( R 2  = 0.54, p  < 0.001). The mean change in IVR was greater 3 vertebral levels cephalic and caudal to the apex (1.4°(± 4.1°) and 1.2°(± 2.0°), respectively), compared to the apex (0.4°(± 3.1°)). Conclusions AVR increased, during curve progression, most markedly at the curve apex. The greatest IVR was observed at the periapical levels, with the apex by contrast having only a modest degree of rotation, suggesting the periapical vertebral levels of the scoliosis deformity may be a significant driver in the progression of AIS.

Purpose Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a recent procedure to correct and reduce spinal curves in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the expected curve reduction and potential complications for adolescent patients after VBT. Methods PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched until February 2022. Records were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data sources were prospective and retrospective studies. Demographics, mean differences in Cobb angle, surgical details and complication rates were recorded. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results This systematic review includes 19 studies, and the meta-analysis includes 16 of these. VBT displayed a statistically significant reduction in Cobb angle from pre-operative to final (minimum 2 years) measurements. The initial mean Cobb angle was 47.8° (CI 95% 42.9–52.7°) and decreased to 22.2° (CI 95% 19.9–24.5°). The mean difference is − 25.8° (CI 95% − 28.9–22.7) ( p  < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 23% (CI 95% 14.4–31.6%), the most common complication was tether breakage 21.9% (CI 95% 10.6–33.1%). The spinal fusion rate was 7.2% (CI 95% 2.3–12.1%). Conclusion VBT results in a significant reduction of AIS at 2 years of follow-up. Overall complication rate was relatively high although the consequences of the complications are unknown. Further research is required to explore the reasons behind the complication rate and determine the optimal timing for the procedure. VBT remains a promising new procedure that is effective at reducing scoliotic curves and preventing spinal fusion in the majority of patients. Level of evidence Systematic review of Therapeutic Studies with evidence level II–IV.

Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity of the spine characterized by deformities in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. Spinal fusion using pedicle screw instrumentation is a widely used method for surgical correction in severe (coronal deformity, Cobb angle > 45°) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves. Understanding the anatomic difference in the pedicles of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is essential to reduce the risk of neurovascular or visceral injury through pedicle screw misplacement. Questions/Purposes To use CT scans (1) to analyze pedicle anatomy in the adolescent thoracic scoliotic spine comparing concave and convex pedicles and (2) to assess the intra- and interobserver reliability of these measurements to provide critical information to spine surgeons regarding size, length, and angle of projection. Methods Between 2007 and 2009, 27 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent thoracoscopic anterior correction surgery by two experienced spinal surgeons. Preoperatively, each patient underwent a CT scan as was their standard of care at that time. Twenty-two patients (mean age, 15.7 years; SD, 2.4 years; range, 11.6–22 years) (mean Cobb angle, 53°; SD, 5.3°; range, 42°–63°) were selected. Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, female, and Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the major curve confined to the thoracic spine. Using three-dimensional image analysis software, the pedicle width, inner cortical pedicle width, pedicle height, inner cortical pedicle height, pedicle length, chord length, transverse pedicle angle, and sagittal pedicle angles were measured. Randomly selected scans were remeasured by two of the authors and the reproducibility of the measurement definitions was validated through limit of agreement analysis. Results The concave pedicle widths were smaller compared with the convex pedicle widths at T7, T8, and T9 by 37% (3.44 mm ± 1.16 mm vs 4.72 mm ± 1.02 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.27 mm; 95% CI, 0.92 mm–1.62 mm), 32% (3.66 mm ± 1.00 mm vs 4.82 mm ± 1.10 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.16 mm; 95% CI, 0.84 mm–1.49 mm), and 25% (4.10 mm ± 1.57 mm vs 5.12 mm ± 1.17 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, 0.66 mm–1.39 mm), respectively. The concave pedicle heights were smaller than the convex at T5 (9.43 mm ± 0.98 vs 10.63 mm ± 1.10 mm; p = 0.002; mean difference, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, 0.59 mm–1.45 mm), T6 (8.87 mm ± 1.37 mm vs 10.88 mm ± 0.81 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 2.02 mm; 95% CI, 1.40 mm–2.63 mm), T7 (9.09 mm ± 1.24 mm vs 11.35 mm ± 0.84 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 2.26 mm; 95% CI, 1.81 mm–2.72 mm), and T8 (10.11 mm ± 1.05 mm vs 11.86 mm ± 0.88 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.75 mm; 95% CI, 1.30 mm–2.19 mm). Conversely, the concave transverse pedicle angle was larger than the convex at levels T6 (11.37° ± 4.48° vs 8.82° ± 4.31°; p = 0.004; mean difference, 2.54°; 95% CI, 1.10°–3.99°), T7 (12.69° ± 5.93° vs 8.65° ± 3.79°; p = 0.002; mean difference, 4.04°; 95% CI, 1.90°–6.17°), T8 (13.24° ± 5.28° vs 7.66° ± 4.87°; p < 0.001; mean difference, 5.58°; 95% CI, 2.99°–8.17°), and T9 (19.95° ± 5.69° vs 8.21° ± 4.02°; p < 0.001; mean difference, 4.74°; 95% CI, 2.68°–6.80°), indicating a more posterolateral to anteromedial pedicle orientation. Conclusions There is clinically important asymmetry in the morphologic features of pedicles in individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The concave side of the curve compared with the convex side is smaller in height and width periapically. Furthermore, the trajectory of the pedicle is more acute on the convex side of the curve compared with the concave side around the apex of the curve. Knowledge of these anatomic variations is essential when performing scoliosis correction surgery to assist with selecting the correct pedicle screw size and trajectory of insertion to reduce the risk of pedicle wall perforation and neurovascular injury.

Purpose The Cobb technique is the universally accepted method for measuring the severity of spinal deformities. Traditionally, Cobb angles have been measured using protractor and pencil on hardcopy radiographic films. The new generation of mobile ‘smartphones’ make accurate angle measurement possible using an integrated accelerometer, providing a potentially useful clinical tool for assessing Cobb angles. The purpose of this study was to compare Cobb angle measurements performed using a smartphone and traditional protractor in a series of 20 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Methods Seven observers measured major Cobb angles on 20 pre-operative postero-anterior radiographs of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients with both a standard protractor and using an Apple iPhone. Five of the observers repeated the measurements at least a week after the original measurements. Results The mean absolute difference between pairs of smartphone/protractor measurements was 2.1°, with a small (1°) bias toward lower Cobb angles with the iPhone. 95% confidence intervals for intra-observer variability were ±3.3° for the protractor and ±3.9° for the iPhone. 95% confidence intervals for inter-observer variability were ±8.3° for the iPhone and ±7.1° for the protractor. Both of these confidence intervals were within the range of previously published Cobb measurement studies. Conclusions We conclude that the iPhone is an equivalent Cobb measurement tool to the manual protractor, and measurement times are about 15% less. The widespread availability of inclinometer-equipped mobile phones and the ability to store measurements in later versions of the angle measurement software may make these new technologies attractive for clinical measurement applications.

Purpose Identification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with mild curvatures who pose significant risk of progressing to severe levels of curvatures is of paramount importance for clinical care. This study aimed to compare segmental deformity changes in AIS sub-cohorts that are dichotomised by progression status. Methods Thirty-six female participants with Lenke 1 AIS curves were investigated with sequential MRIs during growth. Scans were reformatted to measure orthogonal segmental parameters, including sagittal/coronal wedging angles and axial rotation angles. Participants were dichotomised by progression. Two-tailed, independent sample t-tests were used to compare sub-cohort multi-segmental and segmental deformity parameters. Measurements were compared at each scan number and variable rates of change were determined using actual time between measures. Results AIS progression status sub-cohorts were comparable at scan 1 for multi-segmental deformity parameters (e.g. major thoracic curve angle, rib hump, kyphosis) ( P  > 0.05). However, apical measures of coronal IVD wedging, axial IVD rotation and axial vertebral rotation were segmental parameters at scan 1 which were larger for participants whose AIS would later go on to clinically progress (all P  < 0.05). Measures of segmental hypokyphosis were comparable between groups. As development was tracked at each subsequent scan, coronal and axial plane differences between groups increased in both magnitude and number of differences. Conclusion Initial disparity and then subsequent increasing magnitude of change of axial rotation may indicate a higher propensity to clinically progress in the future. This knowledge hopes to provide useful management information for AIS care providers and prognostic education for patients alike. Level of evidence II.

Prior studies have suggested that biomodels enhance patient education, preoperative planning and intra-operative stereotaxy; however, the usefulness of biomodels compared to regular imaging modalities such as X-ray, CT and MR has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the surgeon's perceptions on the usefulness of biomodels compared to standard visualisation modalities for preoperative planning and intra-operative anatomical reference. Physical biomodels were manufactured for a series of 26 consecutive patients with complex spinal pathologies using a stereolithographic technique based on CT data. The biomodels were used preoperatively for surgical planning and customising implants, and intra-operatively for anatomical reference. Following surgery, a detailed biomodel utility survey was completed by the surgeons, and informal telephone interviews were conducted with patients. Using biomodels, 21 deformity and 5 tumour cases were performed. Surgeons stated that the anatomical details were better visible on the biomodel than on other imaging modalities in 65% of cases, and exclusively visible on the biomodel in 11% of cases. Preoperative use of the biomodel led to a different decision regarding the choice of osteosynthetic materials used in 52% of cases, and the implantation site of osteosynthetic material in 74% of cases. Surgeons reported that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 8% in tumour patients and 22% in deformity procedures. This study supports biomodelling as a useful, and sometimes essential tool in the armamentarium of imaging techniques used for complex spinal surgery.