Explore the vast range of titles available.

Land conflict in Nigeria has escalated in recent years, particularly with the rising clashes between farmers and herders over access to grazing lands. The enactment of anti-open grazing laws by state governments, aimed at curbing these conflicts in Nigeria, has introduced new political dynamics that complicate land governance and resource control. This study examined the political intrigues surrounding the establishment of the anti-open grazing law and the promotion of ranching as an alternative livestock management approach. It adopted a theoretical/conceptual research method that relies on logical reasoning, existing literature, and abstract thinking. Anchored in political ecology theory, the study examined how political interests, power struggles, and historical land use patterns shape the implementation and resistance to these policies. Findings revealed that while the law aimed to reduce violent clashes, it has also deepened ethnic and political tensions, with implications for national unity and security. The study argued for inclusive policy frameworks that balance pastoralist and agrarian interests. It recommended integrative approaches to land management to promote sustainable peace and development.