Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have minimal therapeutic effect in hormone receptor-positive (HR+ ) breast cancer. We present final overall survival (OS) results ( n  = 88) from a randomized phase 2 trial of eribulin ± pembrolizumab for patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer, computationally dissect genomic and/or transcriptomic data from pre-treatment tumors ( n  = 52) for molecular associations with efficacy, and identify cytokine changes differentiating response and ICI-related toxicity ( n  = 58). Despite no improvement in OS with combination therapy (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.59–1.55, p  = 0.84), immune infiltration and antigen presentation distinguished responding tumors, while tumor heterogeneity and estrogen signaling independently associated with resistance. Moreover, patients with ICI-related toxicity had lower levels of immunoregulatory cytokines. Broadly, we establish a framework for ICI response in HR+ breast cancer that warrants diagnostic and therapeutic validation. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03051659. A randomized phase 2 clinical trial has recently shown no benefit of the combination eribulin and pembrolizumab over pembrolizumab alone in HR + metastatic breast cancer patients (NCT03051659). Here, the authors are reporting the final OS data and biomarker analyses on a subset of samples to analyze molecular correlates

In the phase II NIMBUS trial, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB ≥ 9 mut/Mb) received nivolumab (3 mg/kg biweekly) and low-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for 2 years or until progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Among 30 patients enrolled, the median TMB was 10.9 mut/Mb (range: 9–110) and the confirmed objective response rate was 20%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, and safety and tolerability, including immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A prespecified correlative outcome was to evaluate the ORR in patients with a TMB ≥ 14 mut/Mb. Patients with TMB ≥ 14 mut/Mb (n = 6) experienced higher response rates (60% vs 12%; p = 0.041) and showed a trend towards improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to patients with TMB < 14 mut/Mb. Exploratory genomic analyses suggested that ESR1 and PTEN mutations may be associated with poor response, while clinical benefit was associated with a decrease or no change in tumor fraction by serial circulating tumor DNA during treatment. Stool microbiome analysis revealed that baseline blood TMB, PD-L1 positivity, and immune-related diarrhea are associated with distinct taxonomic profiles. In summary, some patients with hypermutated HER2-negative MBC experience extended clinical benefit with a dual immunotherapy regimen; a higher TMB, and additional genomic and microbiome biomarkers may optimize patient selection for therapy with nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03789110). The current use of immune checkpoint inhibitors without chemotherapy on patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not proven useful. Here this group reports a phase 2 NIMBUS trial evaluating the efficacy/safety of nivolumab + low dose ipilimumab in 30 patients with hypermutated HER2-negative MBC.

BackgroundPreclinical and clinical data support potential synergy between anti-HER2 therapy plus immune checkpoint blockade. The safety and tolerability of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) combined with pembrolizumab is unknown.MethodsThis was a single-arm phase Ib trial (registration date January 26, 2017) of T-DM1 plus pembrolizumab in metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients had HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab, and were T-DM1-naïve. A dose de-escalation design was used, with a dose-finding cohort followed by an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), with mandatory baseline biopsies. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Immune biomarkers were assessed using histology, protein/RNA expression, and whole exome sequencing. Associations between immune biomarkers and treatment response, and biomarker changes before and during treatment, were explored.Results20 patients received protocol therapy. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The RP2D was 3.6 mg/kg T-DM1 every 21 days plus 200 mg pembrolizumab every 21 days. 85% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) ≥grade 2, 20% of patients experienced grade 3 AEs, and no patients experienced grade >4 AEs. Four patients (20%) experienced pneumonitis (three grade 2 events; one grade 3 event). ORR was 20% (95% CI 5.7% to 43.7%), and median PFS was 9.6 months (95% CI 2.8 to 16.0 months). Programmed cell death ligand-1 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes did not correlate with response in this small cohort.ConclusionsT-DM1 plus pembrolizumab was a safe and tolerable regimen. Ongoing trials will define if there is a role for checkpoint inhibition in the management of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.Trial registration number NCT03032107.

Background Flat epithelial atypia (FEA), a rare breast proliferative lesion, is often diagnosed following core biopsy (CB) of mammographic microcalcifications. In the prospective multi-institution TBCRC 034 trial, we investigate the upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer following excision for patients diagnosed with FEA on CB. Patients and Methods Patients with a breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ≤ 4 imaging abnormality and a concordant CB diagnosis of FEA were identified for excision. Upgrade rates were determined on the basis of local and central pathology review. The prespecified threshold to omit excision of FEA on CB was an upgrade rate of ≤ 3%. Sample size and confidence intervals were based on exact binomial calculation. Results Overall, 129 patients underwent excision (median age 50 years, range 30–84 years). After local pathology review, 6/129 patients (4.7%; 95% CI 1.7–9.8%) were upgraded to invasive carcinoma ( n = 3) or DCIS ( n = 3) at excision. Among 116 patients with CB available for central pathology review, FEA was confirmed in 78 (67.2%, 95% CI 57.9–75.7%). Of these, only one patient was upgraded to DCIS (1.3%; 95% CI 0.03–6.9%), which was also one of the locally upgraded cases. Among the other five local upgrades, two did not have CB available for central review, two CB had ADH, and one CB had normal tissue on central review. Conclusions Among patients with FEA on CB, the upgrade rate was 4.7% based on local pathology review and 1.3% based on central pathology review. These findings highlight the importance of shared decision-making in the management of FEA.