Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Is Full-Text Available
      Is Full-Text Available
      Clear All
      Is Full-Text Available
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
13 result(s) for "Augros, Joël"
Sort by:
One Dependent, some Dependents: the Interweaving of Independent and Commercial Sectors in Hollywood Today
The independent sector —producers as well as distributors —is in turmoil. This turmoil results from the influence of economic constraints but also from two main phenomena : the emergence of the major companies in this sector at the end of the last century, and the continuing growth of digital means of distribution. Nevertheless, independence still rests on the possibility of taking risks, either as an independent producer or as a producer working inside the majors.
Un dépendant des dépendants: l'imbrication des secteurs indépendants et commerciaux à Hollywood aujourd'hui
The independent sector—producers as well as distributors—is in turmoil. This turmoil results from the influence of economic constraints but also from two main phenomena : the emergence of the major companies in this sector at the end of the last century, and the continuing growth of digital means of distribution. Nevertheless, independence still rests on the possibility of taking risks, either as an independent producer or as a producer working inside the majors.
An addict, addicts: the interweaving of independent and commercial sectors in Hollywood today
ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH: The independent sector - producers as well as distributors - is in turmoil. This turmoil results from the influence of economic constraints but also from two main phenomena : the emergence of the major companies in this sector at the end of the last century, and the continuing growth of digital means of distribution. Nevertheless, independence still rests on the possibility of taking risks, either as an independent producer or as a producer working inside the majors. Reproduced by permission of Bibliothèque de Sciences Po
Un dépendant, des dépendants : l'imbrication des secteurs indépendants et commerciaux à Hollywood aujourd'hui
The independent sector —producers as well as distributors —is in turmoil. This turmoil results from the influence of economic constraints but also from two main phenomena : the emergence of the major companies in this sector at the end of the last century, and the continuing growth of digital means of distribution. Nevertheless, independence still rests on the possibility of taking risks, either as an independent producer or as a producer working inside the majors.
Le mythe de la production indépendante dans le cinéma américain
Starting from the well-known idea that Hollywood is dominated by the major companies whose purpose is to make money rather than art, while on the other hand, independent movie-makers are mostly interested in art, regardless of their bank account, this paper intends to show the interconnections between the two systems and the complexity of the problem. The basic question is to know what « independent » means. And how independent companies can finance their films and distribute them through the three key distribution markets: movie theaters, video networks, and foreign country markets.
Le mythe de la production indépendante dans le cinéma américain
Starting from the well-known idea that Hollywood is dominated by the major companies whose purpose is to make money rather than art, while on the other hand, independent movie-makers are mostly interested in art, regardless of their bank account, this paper intends to show the interconnections between the two systems and the complexity of the problem. The basic question is to know what « independent » means. And how independent companies can finance their films and distribute them through the three key distribution markets : movie theaters, video networks, and foreign country markets.
Le mythe de la production indépendante dans le cinéma américain
Starting from the well-known idea that Hollywood is dominated by the major companies whose purpose is to make money rather than art, while on the other hand, independent movie-makers are mostly interested in art, regardless of their bank account, this paper intends to show the interconnections between the two systems and the complexity of the problem. The basic question is to know what « independent » means. And how independent companies can finance their films and distribute them through the three key distribution markets : movie theaters, video networks, and foreign country markets. Augros Joël. Le mythe de la production indépendante dans le cinéma américain. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°56, mai 1993. Images de l'Amérique dans le cinéma américain. pp. 123-133.
Croissance, crash, crise, créances
La chute des recettes, elle, est démultipliée car, à la première désaffection du public, les salles ont répondu par une baisse du prix du ticket d'entrée. En 1933, le National Recovery Act mis en place par l'administration Roosevelt interdit un temps cadeaux et jeux comme procédant d'une concurrence déloyale. Avant même l'arrivée du parlant, et les capitaux importants qu'il fallut dégager pour mettre aux normes studios et salles, les compagnies ont lourdement investi dans la constitution de chaînes de salles ainsi que de salles phares (les Deluxe Theaters), condition sine qua non pour garantir à leurs films un débouché constant. L'administration Roosevelt, du moins dans un premier temps, laisse perdurer l'oligopole, favorisant même la signature (novembre 1933) d'un Code of Fair Competition for the Motion Picture Industry qui, au contraire de ce que laisse présager son libellé, n'est qu'une façon d'entériner l'organisation non concurrentielle de l'industrie.