Explore the vast range of titles available.

Hearing protection devices (HPDs) remain the first line of defense against hazardous noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Despite the increased awareness of NIHL as a major occupational health hazard, implementation of effective hearing protection interventions remains challenging in at-risk occupational groups including those in public safety that provide fire, emergency medical, or law enforcement services. A reduction of situational awareness has been reported as a primary barrier to including HPDs as routine personal protective equipment. This study examined the effects of hearing protection and simulated NIHL on spatial awareness in ten normal hearing subjects. In a sound-attenuating booth and using a head-orientation tracker, speech intelligibility and localization accuracy were collected from these subjects under multiple listening conditions. Results demonstrate that the use of HPDs disrupts spatial hearing as expected, specifically localization performance and monitoring of speech signals. There was a significant interaction between hemifield and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with speech intelligibility significantly affected when signals were presented from behind at reduced SNR. Results also suggest greater spatial hearing disruption using over-the-ear HPDs when compared to the removal of high frequency cues typically associated with NIHL through low-pass filtering. These results are consistent with reduced situational awareness as a self-reported barrier to routine HPD use, and was evidenced in our study by decreased ability to make accurate decisions about source location in a controlled dual-task localization experiment.

Objectives: In the absence of binaural hearing, individuals with single-sided deafness can adapt to use monaural level and spectral cues to improve their spatial hearing abilities. Contralateral routing of signal is the most common form of rehabilitation for individuals with single-sided deafness. However, little is known about how these devices affect monaural localization cues, which single-sided deafness listeners may become reliant on. This study aimed to investigate the effects of contralateral routing of signal hearing aids on localization performance in azimuth and elevation under monaural listening conditions. Design: Localization was assessed in 10 normal hearing adults under three listening conditions: (1) normal hearing (NH), (2) unilateral plug (NH-plug), and (3) unilateral plug and CROS aided (NH-plug + CROS). Monaural hearing simulation was achieved by plugging the ear with E-A-Rsoft™ FX™ foam earplugs. Stimuli consisted of 150 ms high-pass noise bursts (3–20 kHz), presented in a random order from fifty locations spanning ±70° in the horizontal and ±30° in the vertical plane at 45, 55, and 65 dBA. Results: In the unilateral plugged listening condition, participants demonstrated good localization in elevation and a response bias in azimuth for signals directed at the open ear. A significant decrease in performance in elevation occurs with the contralateral routing of signal hearing device on, evidenced by significant reductions in response gain and low r2 value. Additionally, performance in azimuth is further reduced for contralateral routing of signal aided localization compared to the simulated unilateral hearing loss condition. Use of the contralateral routing of signal device also results in a reduction in promptness of the listener response and an increase in response variability. Conclusions: Results suggest contralateral routing of signal hearing aids disrupt monaural spectral and level cues, which leads to detriments in localization performance in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. Increased reaction time and increasing variability in responses suggests localization is more effortful when wearing the contralateral rerouting of signal device.

Background: Transparency mode in hearables aims to maintain environmental awareness by transmitting external sounds through built-in microphones and speakers. While technical assessments have documented acoustic alterations in these devices, their impact on spatial hearing abilities under realistic listening conditions remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate how transparency mode affects sound localization performance with and without background noise. Methods: Ten normal-hearing adults completed sound localization tasks across azimuth (±90°) and elevation (±30°) with and without background noise. Performance was assessed with and without AirPods Pro in transparency mode. Sound localization performance was evaluated through linear regression analysis and mean absolute errors. Head-Related Transfer Function measurements quantified changes in binaural and spectral cues. Results: While interaural time differences were largely preserved, transparency mode introduced systematic alterations in level differences (up to 8 dB) and eliminated spectral cues above 5 kHz. These modifications resulted in increased localization errors, particularly for elevation perception and in noise. Mean absolute errors increased from 6.81° to 19.6° in azimuth and from 6.79° to 19.4° in elevation without background noise, with further degradation at lower SNRs (p < 0.05). Response times were affected by background noise (p < 0.001) but not by device use. Conclusions: Current transparency mode implementation significantly compromises spatial hearing abilities, particularly in noisy environments typical of everyday listening situations. These findings highlight the need for technological improvements in maintaining natural spatial cues through transparency mode, as current limitations may impact user safety and communication in real-world environments.

As in any biophysical electrode-tissue environment, impedance measurement shows a complex relationship which reflects the electrical characteristics of the medium. In cochlear implants (CIs), which is mostly a stimulation-oriented device, the actual clinical approach only considers one arbitrary time-measure of the impedance. However, to determine the main electrical properties of the cochlear medium, the overall impedance and its subcomponents (i.e., access resistance and polarization impedance) should be described. We here characterized, validated and discussed a novel method to calculate impedance subcomponents based on CI measurement capabilities. With an electronic circuit of the cochlear electrode-tissue interface and its computational simulation, the access resistance and polarization impedance were modeled. Values of each electrical component were estimated through a custom-made pulse delivery routine and the acquisition of multiple data points. Using CI hardware, results fell within the electronic components nominal errors (± 10%). Considering the method's accuracy and reliability, it is readily available to be applied in research-clinical use. In the man-machine nature of the CI, this represents the basis to optimize the communication between a CI electrode and the spiral ganglion cells.As in any biophysical electrode-tissue environment, impedance measurement shows a complex relationship which reflects the electrical characteristics of the medium. In cochlear implants (CIs), which is mostly a stimulation-oriented device, the actual clinical approach only considers one arbitrary time-measure of the impedance. However, to determine the main electrical properties of the cochlear medium, the overall impedance and its subcomponents (i.e., access resistance and polarization impedance) should be described. We here characterized, validated and discussed a novel method to calculate impedance subcomponents based on CI measurement capabilities. With an electronic circuit of the cochlear electrode-tissue interface and its computational simulation, the access resistance and polarization impedance were modeled. Values of each electrical component were estimated through a custom-made pulse delivery routine and the acquisition of multiple data points. Using CI hardware, results fell within the electronic components nominal errors (± 10%). Considering the method's accuracy and reliability, it is readily available to be applied in research-clinical use. In the man-machine nature of the CI, this represents the basis to optimize the communication between a CI electrode and the spiral ganglion cells.

Bilateral cochlear-implant (CI) users and single-sided deaf listeners with a CI are less effective at localizing sounds than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. This performance gap is due to the degradation of binaural and monaural sound localization cues, caused by a combination of device-related and patient-related issues. In this study, we targeted the device-related issues by measuring sound localization performance of 11 NH listeners, listening to free-field stimuli processed by a real-time CI vocoder. The use of a real-time vocoder is a new approach, which enables testing in a free-field environment. For the NH listening condition, all listeners accurately and precisely localized sounds according to a linear stimulus–response relationship with an optimal gain and a minimal bias both in the azimuth and in the elevation directions. In contrast, when listening with bilateral real-time vocoders, listeners tended to orient either to the left or to the right in azimuth and were unable to determine sound source elevation. When listening with an NH ear and a unilateral vocoder, localization was impoverished on the vocoder side but improved toward the NH side. Localization performance was also reflected by systematic variations in reaction times across listening conditions. We conclude that perturbation of interaural temporal cues, reduction of interaural level cues, and removal of spectral pinna cues by the vocoder impairs sound localization. Listeners seem to ignore cues that were made unreliable by the vocoder, leading to acute reweighting of available localization cues. We discuss how current CI processors prevent CI users from localizing sounds in everyday environments.

Introduction: Cochlear implant (CI) impedance reflects the status of the electro neural interface, potentially acting as a biomarker for inner ear injury. Most impedance shifts are diagnosed retrospectively because they are only measured in clinical appointments, with unknown behavior between visits. Here we study the application and discuss the benefits of daily and remote impedance measures with software specifically designed for this purpose.Methods: We designed software to perform CI impedance measurements without the intervention of health personnel. Ten patients were recruited to self-measure impedance for 30 days at home, between CI surgery and activation. Data were transferred to a secured online server allowing remote monitoring.Results: Most subjects successfully performed measurements at home without supervision. Only a subset of measurements was missed due to lack of patient engagement. Data were successfully and securely transferred to the online server. No adverse events, pain, or discomfort was reported by participants.Discussion: This work overviews a flexible and highly configurable platform for self-measurement CI impedance. This novel approach simplifies the CI standard of care by reducing the number of clinical visits and by proving useful and constant information to CI clinicians.

There is an increasing global recognition of the negative impact of hearing loss, and its association to many chronic health conditions. The deficits and disabilities associated with profound unilateral hearing loss, however, continue to be under-recognized and lack public awareness. Profound unilateral hearing loss significantly impairs spatial hearing abilities, which is reliant on the complex interaction of monaural and binaural hearing cues. Unilaterally deafened listeners lose access to critical binaural hearing cues. Consequently, this leads to a reduced ability to understand speech in competing noise and to localize sounds. The functional deficits of profound unilateral hearing loss have a substantial impact on socialization, learning and work productivity. In recognition of this, rehabilitative solutions such as the rerouting of signal and hearing implants are on the rise. This review focuses on the latest insights into the deficits of profound unilateral hearing impairment, and current treatment approaches.

Hearing protection devices (HPDs) remain the first line of defense against hazardous noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Despite the increased awareness of NIHL as a major occupational health hazard, implementation of effective hearing protection interventions remains challenging in at-risk occupational groups including those in public safety that provide fire, emergency medical, or law enforcement services. A reduction of situational awareness has been reported as a primary barrier to including HPDs as routine personal protective equipment. This study examined the effects of hearing protection and simulated NIHL on spatial awareness in ten normal hearing subjects. In a sound-attenuating booth and using a head-orientation tracker, speech intelligibility and localization accuracy were collected from these subjects under multiple listening conditions. Results demonstrate that the use of HPDs disrupts spatial hearing as expected, specifically localization performance and monitoring of speech signals. There was a significant interaction between hemifield and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with speech intelligibility significantly affected when signals were presented from behind at reduced SNR. Results also suggest greater spatial hearing disruption using over-the-ear HPDs when compared to the removal of high frequency cues typically associated with NIHL through low-pass filtering. These results are consistent with reduced situational awareness as a self-reported barrier to routine HPD use, and was evidenced in our study by decreased ability to make accurate decisions about source location in a controlled dual-task localization experiment.

Purpose: This study aimed to gain more insight into the primary auditory abilities of children with significant residual hearing in order to improve decision making when choosing between bimodal fitting or sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Method: Sound localization abilities, spatial release of masking, and fundamental frequency perception were tested. Nine children with bimodal fitting and seven children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants were included in the study. As a reference, 15 children with normal hearing and two children with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants were included. Results: On all outcome measures, the implanted children performed worse than the normal hearing children. For high-frequency localization, children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants performed significantly better than children with bimodal fitting. Compared to children with normal hearing, the left-right asymmetry in spatial release of masking was significant. When the implant was hindered by noise, bimodally fitted children obtained significantly lower spatial release of masking compared to when the hearing aid was hindered by noise. Overall, the larger the left-right asymmetry in spatial release of masking, the poorer the localization skills. No significant differences were found in fundamental frequency perception between the implant groups. Conclusions: The data hint to an advantage of bilateral implantation over bimodal fitting. The extent of asymmetry in spatial release of masking is a promising tool for decision making when choosing whether to continue with the hearing aid or to provide a second cochlear implant in children with significant residual hearing.