Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction Many laparoscopic surgeons report musculoskeletal symptoms that are thought to be related to the ergonomic stress of performing laparoscopy. Robotic surgical systems may address many of these limitations. To date, however, there have been no studies exploring the quantitative ergonomics of robotic surgery. In this study, we sought to compare the activation of bilateral biceps, triceps, deltoid, and trapezius muscle groups during traditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS) and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) procedures, as quantified by surface electromyography (sEMG). Methods One surgeon with expertise in TLS and RALS performed 18 operative procedures (13 TLS, 5 RALS) while sEMG measurements were obtained from bilateral biceps, triceps, deltoid, and trapezius muscles. sEMG measurements were normalized to the maximum voluntary contraction of each muscle (%MVC). We compared mean %MVC values for each muscle group during TLS and RALS with unpaired t-tests and considered differences with a p value <0.05 to be statistically significant. Results Muscle activation was higher during TLS compared to RALS in bilateral biceps (L Biceps RALS:1.01 %MVC, L Biceps TLS:3.14, p  = 0.01; R Biceps RALS:1.81 %MVC, R Biceps TLS:4.53, p  = 0.0002). Muscle activation was higher during TLS compared to RALS in bilateral triceps (L Triceps RALS:1.73 %MVC, L Triceps TLS:3.58, p  = 0.04; R Triceps RALS:1.59 %MVC, R Triceps TLS:5.11, p  = 0.02). Muscle activation was higher during TLS compared to RALS in bilateral deltoids (L Deltoid RALS:1.50 %MVC, L Deltoid TLS:3.68, p  = 0.03; R Deltoid RALS:1.19 %MVC, R Deltoid TLS:2.57, p  = 0.01). Significant differences were not detected in the bilateral trapezius muscles (L Trapezius RALS:1.50 %MVC, L Trapezius TLS:3.68, p  = 0.03; R Trapezius RALS:1.19 %MVC, R Trapezius TLS:2.57, p  = 0.01). Discussion We have quantitatively examined the ergonomics of TLS and RALS and shown that in a single surgeon, TLS procedures are associated with significantly elevated biceps, triceps, and deltoid activation bilaterally when compared to RALS procedures.

Trainee participation and progression in robotic general surgery remain poorly defined. Computer-assisted technology offers the potential to provide and track objective performance metrics. In this study, we aimed to validate the use of a novel metric—active control time (ACT)—for assessing trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Performance data from da Vinci Surgical Systems was retrospectively analyzed for all robotic cases involving trainees with a single minimally invasive surgeon over 10 months. The primary outcome metric was percent ACT—the amount of trainee console time spent in active system manipulations over total active time from both consoles. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U statistical tests were applied in analyses. A total of 123 robotic cases with 18 general surgery residents and 1 fellow were included. Of these, 56 were categorized as complex. Median %ACT was statistically different between trainee levels for all case types taken in aggregate (PGY1s 3.0% [IQR 2–14%], PGY3s 32% [IQR 27–66%], PGY4s 42% [IQR 26–52%], PGY5s 50% [IQR 28–70%], and fellow 61% [IQR 41–85%], p  =  < 0.0001). When stratified by complexity, median %ACT was higher in standard versus complex cases for PGY5 (60% vs. 36%, p  = 0.0002) and fellow groups (74% vs. 47%, p  = 0.0045). In this study, we demonstrated an increase in %ACT with trainee level and with standard versus complex robotic cases. These findings are consistent with hypotheses, providing validity evidence for ACT as an objective measurement of trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Future studies will aim to define task-specific ACT to guide further robotic training and performance assessments.

BackgroundMedian arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare and debilitating condition that remains difficult to diagnose. Proper patient selection remains key to achieving favorable outcomes for those undergoing MALR. The robotic technique facilitates a minimally invasive MALR approach given the fine precision of the instrumentation and stability of visualization. Here we describe our management algorithm and clinical outcomes for a large series of robotic MALR patients. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients who underwent robotic MALR performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary academic hospital from 2014 to 2021. The diagnosis of MALS was made using objective criteria from celiac artery duplex ultrasound with a peak systolic velocity of > 350 cm/s combined with a right upper quadrant abdominal ultrasound, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and computer tomography or magnetic resonance angiography to exclude other diagnoses. Information on patient demographics, perioperative factors, and patient reported symptoms up to 1-year post-operatively were collected.ResultsA total of 74 patients underwent robotic MALR during the study period. The mean age was 27.3 ± 7.9 years and the majority of patients were female (n = 60/74, 81.1%). The most common presenting symptom was post-prandial abdominal pain (n = 65/74, 87.7%). The mean operative time was 52.6 ± 18.1 min. There were no conversions to open surgery and minimal blood loss (mean = 13.9 ± 8.4 mL). At 3-months, 12% (n = 9/74) of patients had persistent abdominal pain and underwent additional imaging. 5 of these 9 patients had persistently elevated DUS expiratory PSV and were referred for angioplasty. 3 of these 5 referred patients had resolution of abdominal pain after angioplasty. At 1-year follow up, 90.3% (n = 56/62) continued to have no abdominal pain.ConclusionsThrough this series, the largest set of minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) MALR procedures published to date, we show that with strict adherence to a management algorithm, the robotic approach to MALR is safe and feasible, with good patient outcomes.

IntroductionSurgical autonomy for trainees has remained elusive to quantify. Proportion of active control time (ACT) of a trainee during a robotic case can be used as a broad measure of autonomy. However, this metric lacks in the granular detail of quantifying at what specific steps trainees were actively participating. We aim to quantify trainee involvement during robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair at a task-specific level.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of surgical performance data from robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs performed. These cases were segmented into 5 tasks by AI-assisted annotation with human review. The segmented tasks included: hiatal dissection, gastric fundus mobilization, mediastinal dissection, cruroplasty and fundoplication. Tasks were excluded if video segmentation of tasks was incorrect. During each task, ACT was recorded for resident, fellow and attending. Resident and fellow ACT per task was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsResidents had the highest %ACT in the hiatal dissection (53%), gastric fundus mobilization (84%) and fundoplication (57%) tasks. Fellows had greater than 80% ACT in all 5 tasks, with the highest %ACT in the gastric fundus mobilization (100%) and hiatal dissection (88%). There was a significant difference between resident and fellow ACT during mediastinal dissection and cruroplasty.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates how objective performance metrics and automated case segmentation can quantify trainee participation at a task-specific level. By utilizing data afforded by a robotic surgery platform, we are able to provide an objective and automated form of assessment with minimal impact on the workflow of attendings and residents. Our findings can serve to inform residents on what steps they can expect to be involved in during the procedure, appropriate to their PGY level. With this task-level data, we can provide a roadmap for trainee progression to achieve full surgical autonomy.

Obesity is associated with significant morbidity, with an estimated prevalence of 42.4% in the USA. Treatment of severe obesity often involves Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. More recently, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty has emerged as a minimally invasive option for patients with mild to moderate obesity. Endoluminal functional luminal impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) uses impedance planimetry to assess tissue distensibility and geometric changes across an area but its role in bariatric surgery and bariatric endoscopy has not been fully elucidated. EndoFLIP has some utility in measuring gastric sleeve pouch size during sleeve surgery, assessing gastric sleeve stenosis, predicting the risk of post-sleeve GERD and response to endoscopic dilation, assisting in intraoperative gastric bands adjustment, and evaluating gastrojejunal anastomosis to predict weight regain after gastric bypass. Graphical Abstract

BackgroundThe absence of force feedback (FFB) is considered a technical limitation in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). This pre-clinical study aims to evaluate the forces applied to tissues using a novel integrated FFB technology, which allows surgeons to sense forces exerted at the instrument tips.MethodsTwenty-eight surgeons with varying experience levels employed FFB instruments to perform three robotic-assisted surgical tasks, including retraction, dissection, and suturing, on inanimate or ex-vivo models, while the instrument sensors recorded and conveyed the applied forces to the surgeon hand controllers of the robotic system. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models were used to analyze the mean and maximal forces applied during each task with the FFB sensor at the “Off” setting compared to the “High” sensitivity setting for retraction and to the “Low”, “Medium”, and “High” sensitivity settings for dissection and suturing. Sub-analysis was also performed on surgeon experience levels.ResultsThe use of FFB at any of the sensitivity settings resulted in a significant reduction in both the mean and maximal forces exerted on tissue during all three robotic-assisted surgical tasks (p < 0.0001). The maximal force exerted, potentially associated with tissue damage, was decreased by 36%, 41%, and 55% with the use of FFB at the “High” sensitivity setting while performing retraction, dissection, and interrupted suturing tasks, respectively. Further, the use of FFB resulted in substantial reductions in force variance during the performance of all three types of tasks. In general, reductions in mean and maximal forces were observed among surgeons at all experience levels. The degree of force reduction depends on the sensitivity setting selected and the types of surgical tasks evaluated.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the utilization of FFB technology integrated in the robotic surgical system significantly reduced the forces exerted on tissue during the performance of surgical tasks at all surgeon experience levels. The reduction in the force applied and a consistency of force application achieved with FFB use, could result in decreases in tissue trauma and blood loss, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RAS. Future studies will be important to determine the impact of FFB instruments in a live clinical environment.

BackgroundEvidence for how to best train surgical residents for robotic bariatric procedures is lacking. We developed targeted educational resources to promote progression on the robotic bariatric learning curve. This study aimed to characterize the effect of resources on resident participation in robotic bariatric procedures.MethodsPerformance metrics from the da Vinci Surgical System were retrospectively reviewed for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) cases involving general surgery trainees with a single robotic bariatric surgeon. Pictorial case guides and narrated operative videos were developed for these procedures and disseminated to trainees. Percent active control time (%ACT)—amount of trainee console time spent in active instrument manipulations over total active time from both consoles—was the primary outcome measure following dissemination. One-way ANOVA, Student’s t-tests, and Pearson correlations were applied.ResultsFrom September 2020 to July 2021, 50 cases (54% SG, 46% RYGB) involving 14 unique trainees (PGY1-PGY5) were included. From November 2021 to May 2022 following dissemination, 29 cases (34% SG, 66% RYGB) involving 8 unique trainees were included. Mean %ACT significantly increased across most trainee groups following resource distribution: 21% versus 38% for PGY3s (p = 0.087), 32% versus 45% for PGY4s (p = 0.0009), and 38% versus 57% for PGY5s (p = 0.0015) and remained significant when stratified by case type. Progressive trainee %ACT was not associated with total active time for SG cases before or after intervention (pre r = − 0.0019, p = 0.9; post r = − 0.039, p = 0.9). It was moderately positively associated with total active time for RYGB cases before dissemination (r = 0.46, p = 0.027) but lost this association following intervention (r = 0.16, p = 0.5).ConclusionUse of targeted educational resources promoted increases in trainee participation in robotic bariatric procedures with more time spent actively operating at the console. As educators continue to develop robotic training curricula, efforts should include high-quality resource development for other sub-specialty procedures. Future work will examine the impact of increased trainee participation on clinical and patient outcomes.

IntroductionVideo-based case review for minimally invasive surgery is immensely valuable for education and quality improvement. Video review can improve technical performance, shorten the learning curve, disseminate new procedures, and improve learner satisfaction. Despite these advantages, it is underutilized in many institutions. So far, research has focused on the benefits of video, and there is relatively little information on barriers to routine utilization.MethodsA 36-question survey was developed on video-based case review and distributed to the SAGES email list. The survey included closed and open-ended questions. Numeric responses and Likert scales were compared with t-test; open-ended responses were reviewed qualitatively through rapid thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes.Results642 people responded to the survey for a response rate of 11%. 584 (91%) thought video would improve the quality of educational conferences. 435 qualitative responses on the value of video were analyzed, and benefits included (1) improved understanding, (2) increased objectivity, (3) better teaching, and (4) better audience engagement. Qualitative comments regarding specific barriers to recording and editing case video identified challenges at all stages of the process, from (1) the decision to record a case, (2) starting the recording in the OR, (3) transferring and storing files, and (4) editing the file. Each step had its own specific challenges.ConclusionMinimally invasive surgeons want to increase their utilization of video-based case review, but there are multiple practical challenges to overcome. Understanding these barriers is essential in order to increase use of video for education and quality improvement.

BackgroundGeneral surgery has the fastest growing robotic operative volume in the United States, but most robotic curricula are focused on basic psychomotor skills. There are limited curricula focused on advanced robotic technical and related non-technical skills. We describe a novel pilot curriculum for robotic hiatal hernia repair developed for senior surgical residents to provide training and standardized assessment of higher-order robotic technical and leadership skills.MethodsTwelve senior residents, post-graduate year (PGY) 4 & 5, participated in a robotic hiatal hernia repair skills curriculum. Residents completed a pre- and post-survey on confidence and ability ratings on a 5-point Likert-type Scale, and a knowledge assessment. An informal faculty-led didactic was provided prior to the simulation. Residents were scored on two validated assessment tools: Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE) and Global Ratings Scale of Operative Performance (GRS) by faculty proctors.ResultsConfidence in ability to independently complete a robotic hiatal hernia case increased from mean of 2.6 ± 0.8 to 3.3 ± 0.6 (p = 0.0007). Following the simulation, residents reported increased overall confidence and ability to operate independently with mean scores of 3.3 ± 0.8 and 3.8 ± 0.9, respectively. Mean O-SCORE and GRS scores were 3.6 (range 2 – 4) and 25.4 (range 12 – 31), respectively. Number of prior live robotic cases was strongly positively correlated to O-SCORE (R = 0.84, p = 0.0006) and GRS (R = 0.88, p = 0.0002).ConclusionOur pilot study suggests live-operative robotic training is not sufficient alone for advanced robotic skill training. Simulations such as this can be used to (1) practice advanced robotic technical and relevant non-technical skills such as communication and operating room leadership in a low stake setting and (2) assess residents in a standardized environment to eventually evaluate robotic competency.

BackgroundThe robotic surgical approach offers enhanced visualization, dexterity and reach, which may facilitate the more technically demanding portions of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair such as hiatal reconstruction and mediastinal dissection. We sought to compare the peri-operative clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic vs. robotic approach to PEH repair.MethodsA prospective, IRB-approved database was maintained for all robotic PEH repairs performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary academic hospital from 2009 to 2019. A retrospective review of laparoscopic PEH over this same time period was used as a comparison group. Outcome measures included: operative time, conversion to open, need for an esophageal lengthening procedure, operative equipment costs and length of stay (LOS).Results1854 patients underwent PEH repair during this time period (830 robotic; 1024 laparoscopic). Demographics of both groups were similar, including BMI and PEH type, although a higher proportion of robotic cases were re-operative PEH repairs (32.5% vs 24.0%; p < 0.001). Patients who underwent a robotic PEH had a significant reduction in esophageal lengthening procedures performed (0.1% vs. 11.0%; p < 0.001), conversion to open (0% vs. 7.0%; p < 0.001), and LOS (1.8 days vs. 3.1 days; p < 0.001). Intra-operative equipment costs were similar.ConclusionsIn one of the largest robotic PEH case series reported to date, there were significant improvements in peri-operative outcomes in patients undergoing a robotic-assisted approach. Although a greater number of patients in the robotic group were redo PEH repairs, when compared to the laparoscopic group, there were no conversions to open and significantly fewer esophageal lengthening procedures, both of which carry significant morbidity. The similar intra-operative costs were likely balanced by the higher costs associated with stapling equipment and conversions in the laparoscopic group. Our findings show that the robotic PEH repair is safe and can result in improved peri-operative outcomes.