Explore the vast range of titles available.

Effective immunity requires a large, diverse naive T cell repertoire circulating among lymphoid organs in search of antigen. Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and its receptor S1PR1 contribute by both directing T cell migration and supporting T cell survival. Here, we addressed how S1P enables T cell survival and the implications for patients treated with S1PR1 antagonists. We found that S1PR1 limited apoptosis by maintaining the appropriate balance of BCL2 family members via restraint of JNK activity. Interestingly, the same residues of S1PR1 that enable receptor internalization were required to prevent this proapoptotic cascade. Findings in mice were recapitulated in ulcerative colitis patients treated with the S1PR1 antagonist ozanimod, and the loss of naive T cells limited B cell responses. Our findings highlighted an effect of S1PR1 antagonists on the ability to mount immune responses within lymph nodes, beyond their effect on lymph node egress, and suggested both limitations and additional uses of this important class of drugs.

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, progressive, inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Imbalance in the gut microbial community, or dysbiosis, and the subsequent immune response, represent the critical relationship between genetic susceptibility, microbes, and environment factors, that result in IBD. Gastrointestinal pathogens – a common cause of dysbiosis – have been implicated as an environmental trigger in new onset IBD, as well as flare of existing IBD. In this article, we systematically review clinical data regarding the association between specific gastrointestinal pathogens and IBD. Numerous bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD, and exacerbations of existing disease. In this article, we will also specifically discuss the less recognized microbes that have an inverse association with IBD, including certain bacterial pathogens, such as Helicobacter pylori, and parasites, such as Trichuris species. Future prospective and experimental studies are required to establish causality and clarify potential mechanisms of enteric pathogens in modifying the risk and course of IBD.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing intestinal neoplasia—particularly colorectal neoplasia, including dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC)—as a primary consequence of chronic inflammation. While the current incidence of CRC in IBD is lower compared with prior decades, due, in large part, to more effective therapies and improved colonoscopic technologies, CRC still accounts for a significant proportion of IBD-related deaths. The focus of this review is on the pathogenesis; epidemiology, including disease- and patient-related risk factors; diagnosis; surveillance; and management of IBD-associated neoplasia.

Introduction: In the general population, right I-sided dysplasia presents a higher risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and metachronous dysplasia compared to left (L)-sided dysplasia. Given that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at higher risk for dysplasia than the general population, we sought to assess the risk factors as well as the differences in outcomes between patients with R-sided, L-sided, and both R- and L-sided dysplasia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients at NYU Langone Health who had evidence of dysplasia on a colonoscopy between 2011 and 2021. Demographics and pertinent medical history were compiled. Cohorts were based on the dysplasia location (R-sided, L-sided, or R- and L-sided) and the IBD-related outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 71 patients had colonic dysplasia. The mean age was 54 years old (SD ± 17). The majority were male (72%), white (69%), and non-Hispanic (94%). A total of 76% had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 24% had Crohn’s disease (CD). Of all dysplastic lesions, 57 (80%) patients had unifocal disease and the remainder had multifocal disease. A total of 39 (55%) patients had R-sided dysplasia, 24 (34%) had L-sided dysplasia, and 8 (11%) had both R- and L-sided dysplasia. Patients with UC were more likely to have L-sided dysplasia (92% vs. 8% in CD; p = 0.04). Pseudopolyps were more likely associated with R- and L-sided dysplasia (38% in R- and L-sided dysplasia, 10% in R-sided dysplasia, and 4% in L-sided dysplasia; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with UC had a higher risk for L-sided colonic dysplasia compared to patients with CD; however, there were no differences in the progression of dysplasia between those who had R-sided and those who had L-sided dysplasia. Larger studies are needed to assess the risk factors and outcomes related to the laterality of dysplasia and further validate these findings among patients with IBD.

Background: In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who need intestinal resection, prior data suggest that earlier surgical intervention may be associated with improved outcomes. However, surgery is often deferred for additional trials of advanced therapies, which potentially shifts patients from a fit to a frail preoperative state. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate clinical changes that occur in the year prior to intestinal resection in patients with IBD. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: This was a multi-hospital retrospective study of patients ⩾18 years old who underwent initial IBD-related intestinal resection between January 1, 2018 and May 31, 2023. Clinical characteristics and radiographical skeletal muscle mass were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for continuous variables and McNemar’s test for categorical variables. Results: A total of 170 patients were included (120 with Crohn’s disease, 40 with ulcerative colitis, and 10 with indeterminate colitis), with a median disease duration of 7.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 3.3–13.8). Median age at surgery was 32.6 years (IQR 25.9–44.9), and 51% were female. In the month prior to surgery as compared to the 6–12 months prior, individuals were more likely to have an IBD-related hospitalization (31% vs 5%, p < 0.01), malnutrition (30% vs 18%, p < 0.01), or an infection (74% vs 28%, p < 0.01). Though not statistically significant, there was an increase in the proportion of individuals who developed a venous thromboembolism in the month prior to surgery, and a decrease in skeletal muscle mass among those with two computerized tomography scans in the year prior to surgery (n = 6, 126 vs 111 cm2; p = 0.06). Conclusion: In the 6–12 months prior to an IBD-related intestinal resection, as compared to the month prior, individuals were less likely to be malnourished, have an infection, or need hospitalization for IBD. This suggests that minimizing delays to surgery may lead to improved outcomes. Plain language summary An assessment of changes that occur in the year prior to surgery among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Why was the study done? Surgery may be delayed among patients with inflammatory bowel disease for repeated trials of medications. In order to assess the impact that these delays in surgery may have, we evaluated the clinical changes that occur in the year prior to surgery. What did the researchers find? Among the 170 patients with IBD who underwent their first intestinal surgery, there were significantly higher rates of malnutrition, IBD-related hospitalization, and infection in the month prior to surgery, as compared to the 6–12 months prior. There was also a decline in muscle mass in the year prior to surgery. What do the findings mean? Earlier surgical resection in patients with IBD may result in more favorable preoperative characteristics, thereby leading to improved clinical outcomes.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the urgent implementation of telehealth visits in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care; however, data assessing feasibility remain limited. Objectives: We looked to determine the completion rate of telehealth appointments for adults with IBD, as well as to evaluate demographic, clinical, and social predictors of incomplete appointments. Design: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with IBD who had at least one scheduled telehealth visit at the NYU IBD Center between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2021, with only the first scheduled telehealth appointment considered. Methods: Medical records were parsed for relevant covariables, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted association between demographic factors and an incomplete telehealth appointment. Results: From 1 March 2020 to 31 August 2021, there were 2508 patients with IBD who had at least one telehealth appointment, with 1088 (43%) having Crohn’s disease (CD), 1037 (41%) having ulcerative colitis (UC), and 383 (15%) having indeterminate colitis. Of the initial telehealth visits, 519 (21%) were not completed, including 435 (20%) among patients <60 years as compared to 84 (23%) among patients ⩾60 years (p = 0.22). After adjustment, patients with CD had higher odds of an incomplete appointment as compared to patients with UC [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR): 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.69], as did females (adjOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04–1.54), and patients who had a non-first-degree relative listed as an emergency contact (adjOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16–2.44). While age ⩾60 years was not associated with appointment completion status, we did find that age >80 years was an independent predictor of missed telehealth appointments (adjOR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.12–7.63) when compared to individuals aged 60–70 years. Conclusion: Patients with CD, females, and those with less social support were at higher risk for missed telehealth appointments, as were adults >80 years. Engaging older adults via telehealth, particularly those aged 60–80 years, may therefore provide an additional venue to complement in-person care.

Lay Summary In this study, we assessed the safety and effectiveness of risankizumab dose escalation in patients with incomplete response to standard dosing. We found that dose escalation was well tolerated and associated with lower rates of corticosteroid usage and few adverse events.

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), social determinants of health contribute to health inequalities. We aimed to compare patients with IBD treated at a private nonprofit vs public hospital in New York City. We performed a retrospective study of adult patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis with established IBD care. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, healthcare utilization, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes were collected. Using a series of linear mixed and logistic models, the differences between care at a private nonprofit vs public hospital were assessed while controlling for factors that differed between them. Our study included 418 patients with IBD, 209 from each hospital. Compared with public hospital patients, private hospital patients were more likely to be White, be non-Hispanic, and have private insurance (all P = .0005) and less likely to face housing instability (P < .0001), face unemployment (P = .0004), be current smokers (P = .03), or be foreign born (P < .0001). Patients at the private hospital were more likely to have multiple anti-tumor necrosis factor (P = .0001) and biologic use (P < .0001). Public hospital patients were less likely to be considered endoscopically adherent (odds ratio [OR], 0.377; P = .001) and more likely to visit the emergency department (OR, 5.01; P < .0001) and be hospitalized (OR, 1.92; P = .05). Our study is the first to identify significant differences in patient demographics, disease phenotype, treatments and clinical outcomes between patients treated for IBD at a private nonprofit vs public hospital. Our data suggest that social determinants of health drive disparities in the utilization of healthcare facilities.

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), social determinants of health contribute to health inequalities. We aimed to compare patients with IBD treated at a private nonprofit vs public hospital in New York City.BACKGROUNDIn patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), social determinants of health contribute to health inequalities. We aimed to compare patients with IBD treated at a private nonprofit vs public hospital in New York City.We performed a retrospective study of adult patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis with established IBD care. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, healthcare utilization, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes were collected. Using a series of linear mixed and logistic models, the differences between care at a private nonprofit vs public hospital were assessed while controlling for factors that differed between them.METHODSWe performed a retrospective study of adult patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis with established IBD care. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, healthcare utilization, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes were collected. Using a series of linear mixed and logistic models, the differences between care at a private nonprofit vs public hospital were assessed while controlling for factors that differed between them.Our study included 418 patients with IBD, 209 from each hospital. Compared with public hospital patients, private hospital patients were more likely to be White, be non-Hispanic, and have private insurance (all P = .0005) and less likely to face housing instability (P < .0001), face unemployment (P = .0004), be current smokers (P = .03), or be foreign born (P < .0001). Patients at the private hospital were more likely to have multiple anti-tumor necrosis factor (P = .0001) and biologic use (P < .0001). Public hospital patients were less likely to be considered endoscopically adherent (odds ratio [OR], 0.377; P = .001) and more likely to visit the emergency department (OR, 5.01; P < .0001) and be hospitalized (OR, 1.92; P = .05).RESULTSOur study included 418 patients with IBD, 209 from each hospital. Compared with public hospital patients, private hospital patients were more likely to be White, be non-Hispanic, and have private insurance (all P = .0005) and less likely to face housing instability (P < .0001), face unemployment (P = .0004), be current smokers (P = .03), or be foreign born (P < .0001). Patients at the private hospital were more likely to have multiple anti-tumor necrosis factor (P = .0001) and biologic use (P < .0001). Public hospital patients were less likely to be considered endoscopically adherent (odds ratio [OR], 0.377; P = .001) and more likely to visit the emergency department (OR, 5.01; P < .0001) and be hospitalized (OR, 1.92; P = .05).Our study is the first to identify significant differences in patient demographics, disease phenotype, treatments and clinical outcomes between patients treated for IBD at a private nonprofit vs public hospital. Our data suggest that social determinants of health drive disparities in the utilization of healthcare facilities.CONCLUSIONSOur study is the first to identify significant differences in patient demographics, disease phenotype, treatments and clinical outcomes between patients treated for IBD at a private nonprofit vs public hospital. Our data suggest that social determinants of health drive disparities in the utilization of healthcare facilities.

Introduction: Diarrhea is common in persons living with HIV (PLWH)/AIDS. With the increasing utilization of multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel (GI panel) testing, we aimed to characterize the roles of CD4 count and hospitalization in GI panel assessments of PLWH with acute diarrhea. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of adult PLWH with acute diarrhea who underwent GI panel testing at two urban academic centers. Demographic, HIV disease, GI panel result, and hospitalization data were collected, and patients were cohorted by CD4 count (CD4 < 200, CD4 200–499, CD4 > = 500). The primary outcome was enteric infection as detected by GI panel, and hospitalization. Results: Of 298 PLWH, 119 (39.9%) had a CD4 count below 200, 195 (65.4%) were hospitalized, and 137 (46.0%) had enteric infection. Bacterial infection correlated with higher CD4 count (41.9% (CD4 > = 500) vs 31.2% (CD4 200–499) vs 25.2% (CD4 < 200), p = 0.041). Hospitalization correlated with poorly controlled HIV and fewer enteric infections (34.4% vs 68.0%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for HIV disease severity, a negative GI panel remained independently associated with hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.72–10.9), even in patients tested within 72 hours of hospitalization. Despite better HIV control, men who have sex with men (MSM) had more frequent infectious diarrhea, including from E. coli, giardiasis, and multiple pathogens. MSM status independently predicted enteric infection (aOR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.02–3.67). Conclusions: GI panel results vary by HIV disease severity and hospitalization in PLWH. Clinicians – especially in the inpatient setting – should carefully consider these factors when interpreting GI panel results. Further characterization of diarrheal etiology in PLWH with a negative GI panel is needed. Plain Language Summary PCR stool test results are affected by certain factors in HIV-related diarrhea Diarrhea is common in people living with HIV (PLWH) and has a variety of causes, including infections, medications, and HIV itself. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stool testing simultaneously evaluates for a variety of common viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections of the gastrointestinal tract, and is increasingly being used in patients with diarrhea. However, patients with HIV and diarrheal illness may have uncommon infections not typically present in those with normal immune function – and thus not routinely evaluated for in stool testing. It is not known what factors, if any, might affect the results of PCR testing in HIV-related diarrhea. In this study, we examined all PLWH who underwent stool PCR testing for diarrhea over a 4-year period. We separated the patients into groups based on HIV disease severity as measured by CD4 T-cell count, or the count of the immune cells affected by HIV. We examined whether there were differences among groups in infection rates as detected by PCR stool testing. Separately, we studied the role of hospitalization in stool PCR test results. Of 298 PLWH who underwent stool PCR testing for diarrhea, 119 had a CD4 count less than 200 (low CD4 count), 195 were hospitalized at time of testing, and 137 had a positive stool PCR test. Compared to those with a low CD4 count, subjects with less severe HIV disease were more likely to have a bacterial infection on stool PCR testing and less likely to be hospitalized. Hospitalized patients were more likely to have a negative PCR stool test, regardless of CD4 count. Many patients with a low CD4 count had diarrheal etiologies not evaluated by multiplex stool PCR. In PLWH who experience diarrhea, stool PCR testing results vary by CD4 count and hospitalization. Providers should be mindful of these factors when interpreting stool PCR test results.