Explore the vast range of titles available.

Independent, science-based regulation of medical products is a critical part of ensuring quality healthcare and, when conducted in a transparent, science-based, efficient, accountable, and predictable manner, it can help ensure access to quality products that patients need and can have a very positive impact on public health. [...]African countries must contend with 75% of the world’s HIV/AIDS cases and 90% of its malaria deaths, and access to quality versions of the newest and most effective medicines is key in treating these infections [8], as well as in disease control strategies. The consortium included regulatory and political bodies (AUDA-NEPAD, PAP, the African Union Commission, the Heads of NMRAs, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS), the World Bank, technical partners (WHO, the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products [Swissmedic]), and donors (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, the UK Department for International Development) [12]. At this time, there was only sufficient funding for the consortium to support one pilot project. [...]the consortium decided to solicit proposals from each of the RECs and fund the most promising plan for MRH over the next 5 years.

Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda outlines future challenges for the East African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda outlines future challenges for the East African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1], NMRAs contribute to promoting and protecting public health and safety by ensuring that. * medicines are of the required quality, safety, and efficacy; * health professionals and patients have the necessary information to enable them to use medicines rationally; * medicines are appropriately manufactured, stored, distributed, and dispensed; * illegal manufacturing and trade are detected and adequately sanctioned; * promotion and advertising are fair, balanced, and aimed at rational drug use; and * access to medicines is not hindered by unjustified regulatory work. Afterward, the medicines were registered by Kenya and Uganda (although the medicines were eligible for registration in all EAC countries, the manufacturer decided to register them in only 3). Because of this new regional approach to product assessment, these medicines were available in EAC countries sooner than they would have been otherwise. [...]the EAC MRH initiative was expected to identify a funding mechanism that would allow it to sustain and broaden its regulatory activities after the catalytic donor support available for the first 5 years expired. The initiative’s Medicines Evaluation & Registration Working Group, led by Tanzania’s NMRA, created this CTD as part of the program’s larger mandate of harmonizing technical requirements, standards, and standard operating procedures (SOPs) for medicines assessment and registration across the region [8]. Because the EAC’s CTD is based on the formats used by ICH and the WHO’s Prequalification Programme, EAC Partner States can easily leverage dossiers previously submitted to other regulatory authorities, such as the WHO, US Food and Drug Administration, or European Medicines Agency.

BackgroundThis study sought to identify criteria and current practices for implementing an abridged review process and understanding barriers and enablers in utilizing reliance models and to offer recommendations for the implementation of an abridged review process in South Africa based on good reliance practices (GRelP).MethodsA questionnaire was completed by six national regulatory authorities (NRAs) to determine criteria and current practices for implementing an abridged review process. In addition, two focus group discussions were conducted on the practical implementation of an abridged review process based on GRelP.ResultsParticipating NRAs indicated that reliance would be placed on one reference agency. Applications submitted to NRAs for an abridged review had to be identical to those submitted to the reference agency. Unredacted reference agency assessment reports would be required to facilitate the abridged review process. A full technical dossier would also be required, but only parts would be assessed during the abridged review. Focus groups indicated that abridged review elements had been identified and should be considered in implementing GRelP.ConclusionsNRAs strive to improve regulatory performance and accelerate approval times; however, many continue to face challenges due to resource constraints. Increasing workloads, advancing technologies, and limited expertise require NRAs to leverage regulatory convergence initiatives, collaborative registration procedures, and functional regional, continental and international networks to fulfil regulatory mandates. Recommendations for the implementation of an abridged review process and a framework for GRelP have been made with a view to optimise regulatory review processes in South Africa.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Certification Scheme on the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products moving in International Commerce (hereinafter referred to as the \"Scheme\") has demonstrated its value as a tool for quality assurance during the importation and exportation of medicines for WHO Member States. Since its approval in 1969, it became more and more widely used by national regulatory authorities and its main document, The Certificate of a Pharmaceutical Product, has proved to be an essential instrument in providing information about relevant provisions already approved in marketing authorization, including the good manufacturing practices of manufacturers and for the prevention and detection of the export, import and smuggling of falsified or substandard pharmaceutical preparations. This voluntary agreement has evolved constantly in order to respond to the regulatory and pharmaceutical environment demands.