Explore the vast range of titles available.

Alectinib, a potent, highly selective, CNS-active inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), showed promising efficacy and tolerability in the single-arm phase 1/2 AF-001JP trial in Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Given those promising results, we did a phase 3 trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of alectinib and crizotinib. J-ALEX was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that recruited ALK inhibitor-naive Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, who were chemotherapy-naive or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen, from 41 study sites in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system using a permuted-block method stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, treatment line, and disease stage to receive oral alectinib 300 mg twice daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review facility. The efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The study is ongoing and patient recruitment is closed. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (number JapicCTI-132316). Between Nov 18, 2013, and Aug 4, 2015, 207 patients were recruited and assigned to the alectinib (n=103) or crizotinib (n=104) groups. At data cutoff for the second interim analysis, 24 patients in the alectinib group had discontinued treatment compared with 61 in the crizotinib group, mostly due to lack of efficacy or adverse events. At the second interim analysis (data cutoff date Dec 3, 2015), an independent data monitoring committee determined that the primary endpoint of the study had been met (hazard ratio 0·34 [99·7% CI 0·17–0·71], stratified log-rank p<0·0001) and recommended an immediate release of the data. Median progression-free survival had not yet been reached with alectinib (95% CI 20·3–not estimated) and was 10·2 months (8·2–12·0) with crizotinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred at a greater frequency with crizotinib (54 [52%] of 104) than alectinib (27 [26%] of 103). Dose interruptions due to adverse events were also more prevalent with crizotinib (77 [74%] of 104) than with alectinib (30 [29%] of 103), and more patients receiving crizotinib (21 [20%]) than alectinib (nine [9%]) discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event. No adverse events with a fatal outcome occurred in either treatment group. These results provide the first head-to-head comparison of alectinib and crizotinib and have the potential to change the standard of care for the first-line treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. The dose of alectinib (300 mg twice daily) used in this study is lower than the approved dose in countries other than Japan; however, this limitation is being addressed in the ongoing ALEX study. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.

Background Stratifin/14-3-3σ (SFN) is a new diagnostic biomarker of interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) pattern as well as a predictor of resistance to anticancer therapy. Despite the potential clinical benefit of SFN, its impact on therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI-induced interstitial lung disease (ICI-ILD) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving cancer immunotherapy is unknown. Methods Plasma samples were collected from patients with NSCLC at ICI initiation and 6 weeks later. The relationship between SFN levels and therapeutic efficacy of ICIs and development of ICI-ILD was analyzed. Results Pre-SFN levels were measured for 165 patients and post- and delta-SFN levels were measured for 113 patients. Of the patients with pre-SFN values, 25 developed ICI-ILD and 10 exhibited a DAD pattern. Among patients with post- and delta-SFN values, 15 developed ICI-ILD, and 6 had a DAD pattern. Pre- and post-SFN levels were not associated with ICI therapeutic efficacy or ICI-ILD. Meanwhile, delta-SFN, representing the change in SFN values between ICI initiation and at the 6-week point, was associated with progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, and ICI-ILD image patterns. Conclusion SFN levels in plasma were associated with therapeutic efficacy and ICI-ILD pattern in patients with NSCLC receiving cancer immunotherapy. SFN can be a diagnostic biomarker for ICI-ILD with DAD patterns as well as a prognostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy.

BackgroundIn the phase 3 CASPIAN study (NCT03043872), first-line durvalumab plus etoposide and cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved OS versus EP alone in patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.59–0.91; p = 0.0047]). Here we report results for a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients recruited in Japan.MethodsTreatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC received either 4 cycles of durvalumab 1500 mg plus EP q3w followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg q4w until disease progression or up to 6 cycles of EP q3w. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and tolerability.ResultsIn the Japan subgroup, 18 patients were randomized to durvalumab plus EP and 16 patients to EP. At the interim analysis with a median follow-up of 12.5 months in the subgroup, OS numerically favored durvalumab plus EP versus EP (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.26‒2.26]; median not reached vs 15.2 months). PFS was similar for durvalumab plus EP versus EP (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.43‒1.89]). Confirmed ORR was 89% with durvalumab plus EP versus 69% with EP. Adverse events (AEs) of CTCAE grade 3 or 4 were reported in 78% versus 94% of patients in the durvalumab plus EP versus EP arms. There were no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation or death in the Japan subgroup.ConclusionFirst-line durvalumab plus EP was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with ES-SCLC. Despite the small size of the Japan subgroup, results were generally consistent with the global study population.

Liquid biopsy offers a potential alternative to tissue biopsy for detection of genetic alterations in cancer, and it has been introduced into clinical practice to detect the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance‐conferring T790M mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We prospectively collected tumor and plasma samples from 25 NSCLC patients who harbored activating mutations of EGFR and experienced failure of treatment with afatinib. The samples were analyzed by digital PCR (dPCR) and next‐generation sequencing (NGS). T790M was detected in plasma with a respective sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 70.0% by dPCR and 50.0% and 70.0% by NGS relative to analysis of corresponding tumor samples. Quantitation of T790M based on the ratio of the number of T790M alleles to that of activating mutation alleles (T/A ratio) improved the specificity of plasma analysis to 100% for both dPCR and NGS without a reduction in sensitivity. Although several afatinib resistance mechanisms other than T790M—including copy number gain of NRAS or MET—were identified in tumor samples, the corresponding genetic alterations were not detected in plasma. TP53 mutations were frequently identified in plasma and tumor samples, with most such mutations also having been detected before afatinib treatment. The presence of de novo TP53 mutations was associated with reduced progression‐free survival. Quantitation of T790M in plasma is thus a clinically relevant approach to determine the T790M status of tumors. In addition, genetic alterations coexisting with EGFR mutations can affect the efficacy of EGFR‐TKI treatment. Quantitation of T790M in plasma is a clinically relevant approach to determine the T790M status of tumors.

Background Interstitial lung disease is frequently comorbid with dermatomyositis and has a poor prognosis, especially in patients with the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) autoantibody. However, the pathogenesis of dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease remains unclear. Methods We examined 18 and 19 patients with dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (control), respectively. Lung tissues obtained from these patients were semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunohistochemical staining with in-house anti-human MDA5 monoclonal antibodies, as well as anti-human immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgM, IgA, and complement component 3(C3) antibodies. We established human MDA5 transgenic mice and treated them with rabbit anti-human MDA5 polyclonal antibodies, and evaluated lung injury and Ig and C3 expression. Results MDA5 was moderately or strongly expressed in the lungs of patients in both groups, with no significant differences between the groups. However, patients with dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease showed significantly stronger expression of C3 (p < 0.001), IgG (p < 0.001), and IgM (p = 0.001) in the lungs than control. Moreover, lung C3, but IgG, IgA, nor IgM expression was significantly stronger in MDA5 autoantibody-positive dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease (n = 9) than in MDA5 autoantibody-negative dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease (n = 9; p = 0.022). Treatment with anti-MDA5 antibodies induced lung injury in MDA5 transgenic mice, and strong immunoglobulin and C3 expression was observed in the lungs of the mice. Conclusion Strong immunoglobulin and C3 expression in the lungs involve lung injury related to dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease. Enhanced immune complex formation in the lungs may contribute to the poor prognosis of MDA5 autoantibody-positive dermatomyositis-related interstitial lung disease.

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, has nowadays been applied to non-small cell lung cancer harboring activated EGFR mutation with or without T790M, but ultimately develop resistance to this drug. Here we report a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to osimertinib and the reversal of which could improve the clinical outcomes. In osimertinib-resistant lung cancer cell lines harboring T790M mutation that we established, expression of multiple EGFR family proteins and MET was markedly reduced, whereas expression of AXL, CDCP1 and SRC was augmented along with activation of AKT. Surprisingly, AXL or CDCP1 expression was induced by osimertinib in a time-dependent manner up to 3 months. Silencing of CDCP1 or AXL restored the sensitivity to osimertinib with reduced activation of SRC and AKT. Furthermore, silencing of both CDCP1 and AXL increased the sensitivity to osimertinib. Either silencing of SRC or dasatinib, a SRC family kinase (SFK) inhibitor, suppressed AKT phosphorylation and cell growth. Increased expression of AXL and CDCP1 was observed in refractory tumor samples from patients with lung cancer treated with osimertinib. Together, this study suggests that AXL/SFK/AKT and CDCP1/SFK/AKT signaling pathways play some roles in acquired osimertinib resistance of non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and hyperprogressive disease (HPD) are serious problems arising in the early period of monotherapy (MT) with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. However, the frequency and clinical features of these problems in patients receiving combination therapy (CT) with cytotoxic chemotherapy in addition to these agents remain unclear. We retrospectively screened patients with pathologically confirmed advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at Kurume University Hospital between February 2016 and March 2020. We recruited 210 patients, of whom 172 (81.9%) had received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor MT and 38 (18.1%) had received CT. The incidence of irAE during the 3 months after treatment initiation was significantly higher in the MT group (57 of 172, 33.1%) than in the CT group (6 of 38, 15.8%) (p = 0.049). During the same period, the incidence of pneumonitis was also higher in the MT group (18 of 172, 10.9%) than in the CT group (0 of 38) (p = 0.049). A similar trend was observed in patients who had received these treatments on a first line basis. The HPD rate was significantly lower in the CT group (1 of 34, 2.9%) than in the MT group (25 of 142, 17.6%) (p = 0.031). The incidences of HPD and irAE, especially pneumonitis, during 3 months after treatment initiation were relatively lower in the CT group than in the MT group. The mechanisms underlying these differences warrant further study.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory disease caused by a variety of factors, including infections and certain drugs. A 70‐year‐old man who was diagnosed with a postoperative recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma received nivolumab, ipilimumab, pemetrexed and carboplatin every 3 weeks for two cycles followed by nivolumab and ipilimumab, which resulted in a partial response. Four days after the dose of nivolumab, the patient returned with diarrhea and fever. The patient was diagnosed with COVID‐19 infection accompanied by severe colitis. Although intensive care was performed, the patient suddenly went into cardiopulmonary arrest. Examination revealed an abnormally high interleukin‐6 level, suggesting CRS. This is the first report of a patient with CRS accompanied with COVID‐19 infection during treatment with ICIs. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory disease caused by a variety of factors, including infections and certain drugs. Here, we report a case of non‐small cell lung cancer with CRS caused by COVID‐19 infection during treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Fever is a common event in cancer patients, especially in COVID‐19‐infected patients, but when fever develops during cancer immunotherapy, CRS should always be kept in mind. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory disease caused by a variety of factors, including infections and certain drugs. Here, we report a case of non‐small cell lung cancer with CRS caused by COVID‐19 infection during treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Fever is a common event in cancer patients, especially in COVID‐19‐infected patients, but when fever develops during cancer immunotherapy, CRS should always be kept in mind.

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were developed to target the EGFR T790M resistance mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients resistant to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. To investigate the efficacy of afatinib treatment for EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients showing resistance to osimertinib and alterations in somatic mutations and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during afatinib treatment, we conducted a prospective study using Cancer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). Nine NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation who showed resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs were enrolled in this study and treated with afatinib. Plasma samples were collected before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and at disease progression. The mutation profile and TMB in plasma ctDNA were analyzed by CAPP-Seq. The objective response rate and median progression-free survival associated with afatinib were 0% and 2.0 months, respectively. The C797S mutation-mediated resistance to osimertinib was observed in one patient and following afatinib treatment in two patients; the C797S mutations occurred in the same allele as the T790M mutation. After afatinib treatment, afatinib-sensitive mutant alleles, such as ERBB2, and TMB decreased. We have demonstrated that detection of mutant allele frequency and TMB of ctDNA by CAPP-Seq could help determine the effectiveness of and resistance to afatinib. Although afatinib monotherapy for T790M-positive NSCLC resistant to osimertinib was less effective, the action for multiclonal mutant alleles and TMB might contribute to further treatment strategy.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has a high recurrence rate after (chemo) radiation therapy [(C)RT]. The relationship between the changing levels of immune checkpoint molecules and immune cells in pre-(C)RT tissues and locally recurrent tissues in the irradiated field, after (C)RT completion, is not known. This study aimed to assess the changes in these immune parameters between pre-(C)RT tissue and the same area after local recurrence post-(C)RT. We retrospectively reviewed 30 (C)RT-treated patients with SCCHN. We performed immunohistochemical analyses on these immune parameters using paired tissue samples obtained pre-(C)RT and at local recurrence sites post-(C)RT. No significant changes in immune parameters were found between the pre-(C)RT and locally recurrent tissues. An increased density of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) showed a significantly positive correlation with PD-L expression on tumor cells (TC-PD-L1). Patients with increased TC-PD-L1 expression and CD8+TIL density showed favourable prognosis, and one of them showed a favourable response to nivolumab therapy. Our study shows a positive association between TC-PD-L1 upregulation and increased CD8+TIL density, and demonstrates that patients with these changes have a favourable survival outcome.