Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to analyse the number of myocardial infarction (MI) admissions during the COVID-19 lockdown periods of 2020 and 2021 (March 15th to June 15th) and compare them with corresponding pre-pandemic period in 2019. The study also evaluated changes in critical treatment intervals: onset to door (O2D), door to balloon (D2B) and door to needle (D2N) and assessed 30-day clinical outcomes. This study examined MI care trends in India during the COVID-19 lockdown period, irrespective of patients’ COVID-19 infection status.DesignMulticentre retrospective cohort studySettingTwenty-three public and private hospitals across multiple Indian states, all with 24/7 interventional cardiology facilities.ParticipantsAll adults (>18 years) admitted with acute myocardial infarction between March 15 and June 15 in 2019 (pre-pandemic), 2020 (first lockdown) and 2021 (second lockdown). A total of 3614 cases were analysed after excluding duplicates and incomplete data.Primary outcomesNumber of MI admissions, median O2D, D2B and D2N times.Secondary outcomes30-day outcomes including death, reinfarction and revascularisation.ResultsMI admissions dropped from 4470 in year 2019 to 2131 (2020) and 1483 (2021). The median O2D increased from 200 min (IQR 115–428) pre-COVID-19 to 390 min (IQR 165–796) in 2020 and 304 min (IQR 135–780) in 2021. The median D2B time reduced from 225 min (IQR 120–420) in 2019 to 100 min (IQR 53–510) in 2020 and 130 min (IQR 60–704) in 2021. Similarly, D2N time decreased from 240 min (IQR 120–840) to 35 min (IQR 25–69) and 45 min (IQR 24–75), respectively. The 30-day outcome of death, reinfarction and revascularisation was 4.25% in 2020 and 5.1% in 2021, comparable to 5.8% reported in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala study.ConclusionDespite the expansion of catheterisation facilities across India, the country continues to fall short of achieving international benchmarks for optimal MI care.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a recently recognized complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in end-stage renal disease. It has prevalence estimates of 30%-50% and is an independent predictor of increased mortality in CKD patients. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of PH in patients with CKD, its severity in different stages of CKD, and risk factors for it. One hundred and eight patients with CKD treated at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015, were selected. Clinical evaluation and relevant investigations including echocardiography were done. Follow-up echocardiography was done at 3 and 6 months and assessed. The mean age of studied population was 43.53 ± 14.63 years. Sex ratio was 2.72:1 (male:female). PH was present in 47 of 108 (43.5%) cases at beginning, 41 of 83 (491.4%) at 3 months, and 32 of 64 (50%) at 6 months. The prevalence and severity of PH increased with progression of CKD stage, although not statistically significant. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved EF were significantly higher among PH group compared to non-PH group (P < 0.01). Mean hemoglobin in PH group was significantly lower, compared to non-PH group (P < 0.01). Mean interdialytic weight gain and central venous pressure were higher among PH group than non-PH group. Higher calcium phosphate product ≥50 was more prevalent in PH group than in non-PH group. The majority of them had moderate PH at the beginning of the study which remained same, despite being on hemodialysis. PH is a common complication in CKD patients with prevalence of 43.5%-50%. Left-sided heart failure, anemia, fluid retention, and increased calcium phosphate product are the risk factors for developing PH.

In the Emergency Department (ED), ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a cornerstone of multimodal pain regimens. We investigated current national practices of UGNBs across academic medical center EDs, and how these trends have changed over time. We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of academic EDs with ultrasound fellowships across the United States. Twenty-item questionnaires exploring UGNB practice patterns, training, and complications were distributed between November 2021–June 2022. Data was manually curated, and descriptive statistics were performed. The survey results were then compared to results from Amini et al. 2016 UGNB survey to identify trends. The response rate was 80.5% (87 of 108 programs). One hundred percent of responding programs perform UGNB at their institutions, with 29% (95% confidence interval (CI), 20%–39%) performing at least 5 blocks monthly. Forearm UGNB are most commonly performed (96% of programs (95% CI, 93%–100%)). Pain control for fractures is the most common indication (84%; 95% CI, 76%–91%). Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 77%–92%) of programs report at least 80% of UGNB performed are effective. Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 66%–85%) of programs have had no reported complications from UGNB performed by emergency providers at their institution. The remaining 15% (95% CI, 8%–23%) report an average of 1 complication annually. All programs participating in our study report performing UGNB in their ED, which is a 16% increase over the last 5 years. UGNB's are currently performed safely and effectively in the ED, however practice improvements can still be made. Creating multi-disciplinary committees at local and national levels can standardize guidelines and practice policies to optimize patient safety and outcomes.

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have poor prognoses, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. First-line talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with placebo plus enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes in the all-comers cohort of TALAPRO-2, which included patients with and without alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. TALAPRO-2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 223 hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres in 26 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were male patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) who were receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, had asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had not received previous life-prolonging systemic therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralised interactive web response system and a permuted block size of 4 to oral talazoparib 0·5 mg once daily or placebo, plus oral enzalutamide 160 mg once daily. The funder, patients, and investigators were masked to allocation of talazoparib or placebo; enzalutamide was open-label. Stratification factors were HRR gene alteration status (deficient vs non-deficient or unknown) and previous treatment with docetaxel or abiraterone, or both (yes vs no) in the castration-sensitive setting. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival by blinded independent central review and has been reported previously. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as secondary endpoints in the patient-reported outcomes population, which comprised patients from the intention-to-treat population with a baseline patient-reported outcome assessment followed by at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome assessment. Patient-reported outcomes included mean change from baseline in patient-reported pain symptoms (per Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF]); global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), overall cancer and prostate cancer-specific functioning and symptoms (per European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Core Quality of Life Questionnaire [QLQ-C30] and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate [QLQ-PR25]); and general health status (per EQ-5D-5L). Time to deterioration in patient-reported pain symptoms (per BPI-SF), and time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported GHS/QoL (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and prostate cancer-specific urinary symptoms (per EORTC-QLQ-PR25) were the other secondary endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395197, and is ongoing. Between Jan 7, 2019, and Sept 17, 2020, 805 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment irrespective of HRR gene alteration status. 395 patients assigned to talazoparib plus enzalutamide and 398 assigned to placebo plus enzalutamide were included in the patient-reported outcome population. Median follow-up was 28·0 months (IQR 23·9–31·7) for talazoparib plus enzalutamide and 26·8 months (23·4–30·6) for placebo plus enzalutamide. Time to definitive deterioration in GHS/QoL was longer with talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide (median 30·8 months [95% CI 27·0–non-estimable] vs 25·0 months [22·9–30·7]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·62–0·99]; two-sided p=0·038). Median time to definitive deterioration in urinary symptoms was non-estimable (95% CI non-estimable–non-estimable) in the talazoparib plus enzalutamide group and was 35·9 months (95% CI 32·3–non-estimable) in the placebo plus enzalutamide group (HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·54–1·06]; two-sided p=0·11). No clinically meaningful differences (≥10 points) in mean changes from baseline were observed in GHS/QoL, symptom, and functional scales between the treatment groups. No differences were observed between the groups in time to deterioration of pain as measured by the BPI-SF (HR 0·98 [95% CI 0·69–1·40]; two-sided p=0·93), mean pain scores (estimated mean difference in value of worst pain in the past 24 h between treatment groups was −0·1 [95% CI −0·3 to 0·1]; two-sided p=0·27), or general health status as measured by the EQ-5D-5L (estimated mean difference 0·0 [95% CI 0·0–0·0]; two-sided p=0·37). Talazoparib plus enzalutamide prolonged time to definitive deterioration in GHS/QoL versus placebo plus enzalutamide. Together with clinical efficacy and safety data, these results inform the risk-benefit assessment of talazoparib plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in TALAPRO-2. Pfizer.

In the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial, talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with placebo plus enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harbouring alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). We aimed to assess patient-reported outcomes in patients with HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in TALAPRO-2. TALAPRO-2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 223 hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres in 26 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were male patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) who were receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, had asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had not received previous life-prolonging systemic therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients with HRR gene alterations were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralised interactive web response system and a permuted block size of 4 to oral talazoparib 0·5 mg once daily or placebo, plus oral enzalutamide 160 mg once daily, stratified by previous second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (abiraterone or orteronel) or docetaxel (yes vs no) in the castration-sensitive setting. The sponsor, patients, and investigators were masked to allocation of talazoparib or placebo; enzalutamide was open-label. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival by blinded independent central review and has been reported previously. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as secondary outcomes in the patient-reported outcomes population, which comprised patients from the intention-to-treat population with a baseline patient-reported outcome assessment and at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome assessment. Patient-reported outcomes included time to definitive deterioration in global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) per European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and prostate cancer-specific urinary symptoms per EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate (QLQ-PR25), and time to deterioration in pain symptoms per Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). Mean change from baseline in GHS/QoL, overall cancer and prostate cancer-specific functioning and symptoms (per EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25), in pain symptoms per BPI-SF, and in general health status per EQ-5D-5L were also patient-reported secondary outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395197, and is ongoing. Between Dec 18, 2018, and Jan 20, 2022, 399 patients with HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 197 assigned to talazoparib plus enzalutamide and 197 assigned to placebo plus enzalutamide were included in the patient-reported outcome population. Median follow-up was 22·2 months (IQR 13·8–27·7) in the talazoparib plus enzalutamide group and 20·2 months (13·5–26·6) for the placebo plus enzalutamide group. Median time to definitive deterioration of GHS/QoL was longer in the talazoparib plus enzalutamide group (27·1 months [95% CI 21·2–non-estimable]) than in the placebo plus enzalutamide group (19·3 months [16·6–23·0]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·49–0·97]; two-sided p=0·032). Median time to definitive deterioration in urinary symptoms was also longer in the talazoparib plus enzalutamide group (non-estimable [95% CI 32·2–non-estimable]) than in the placebo plus enzalutamide group (30·2 months [24·6–non-estimable; HR 0·56 [0·34–0·93]; two-sided p=0·022). Median time to deterioration in pain symptoms was non-estimable for both treatment groups (HR 0·58 [0·33–1·01]; two-sided p=0·051). Changes from baseline in worst pain in the past 24 h (BPI-SF, question three) and in general health status (EQ-5D-5L) also favoured talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide, although the differences were not clinically meaningful. Between-group differences in mean changes from baseline in GHS/QoL, functioning, and symptoms per EORTC QLQ-C30 did not reach the clinically meaningful threshold of 10 or more points, although physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning and pain favoured talazoparib plus enzalutamide. Similarly, differences in mean changes from baseline for urinary and bowel symptoms per EORTC QLQ-PR25 favoured talazoparib plus enzalutamide, but were not clinically meaningful. The demonstrated delays in definitive deterioration in GHS/QoL, urinary symptoms, and other functioning and symptom scales with talazoparib plus enzalutamide compared with placebo plus enzalutamide in patients with HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer provide insight that might inform clinical decisions for these patients. Pfizer.

Dravet syndrome is a rare, treatment-resistant developmental epileptic encephalopathy characterised by multiple types of frequent, disabling seizures. Fenfluramine has been reported to have antiseizure activity in observational studies of photosensitive epilepsy and Dravet syndrome. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we enrolled children and young adults with Dravet syndrome. After a 6-week observation period to establish baseline monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF; convulsive seizures were defined as hemiclonic, tonic, clonic, tonic-atonic, generalised tonic-clonic, and focal with clearly observable motor signs), patients were randomly assigned through an interactive web response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to placebo, fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg per day, or fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg per day, added to existing antiepileptic agents for 14 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in mean monthly frequency of convulsive seizures during the treatment period compared with baseline in the 0·7 mg/kg per day group versus placebo; 0·2 mg/kg per day versus placebo was assessed as a key secondary outcome. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with two identical protocols NCT02682927 and NCT02826863. Between Jan 15, 2016, and Aug 14, 2017, we assessed 173 patients, of whom 119 patients (mean age 9·0 years, 64 [54%] male) were randomly assigned to receive either fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg per day (39), fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg per day (40) or placebo (40). During treatment, the median reduction in seizure frequency was 74·9% in the fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg group (from median 20·7 seizures per 28 days to 4·7 seizures per 28 days), 42·3% in the fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg group (from median 17·5 seizures per 28 days to 12·6 per 28 days), and 19·2% in the placebo group (from median 27·3 per 28 days to 22·0 per 28 days). The study met its primary efficacy endpoint, with fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg per day showing a 62·3% greater reduction in mean MCSF compared with placebo (95% CI 47·7–72·8, p<0·0001); fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg per day showed a 32·4% reduction in mean MCSF compared with placebo (95% CI 6·2–52·3, p=0·0209). The most common adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients and more frequently in the fenfluramine groups) were decreased appetite, diarrhoea, fatigue, lethargy, somnolence, and decreased weight. Echocardiographic examinations revealed valve function within the normal physiological range in all patients during the trial and no signs of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In Dravet syndrome, fenfluramine provided significantly greater reduction in convulsive seizure frequency compared with placebo and was generally well tolerated, with no observed valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. Fenfluramine could be an important new treatment option for patients with Dravet syndrome. Zogenix.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), a rare locally aggressive neoplasm of the synovium of joints and tendon sheaths, is associated with joint destruction, inflammation, pain, and swelling, in part due to colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor–bearing macrophages recruited to the tumor by genetic elevation of colony-stimulating factor 1 activity. The most common treatment is surgery, although promising pharmacologic treatments are in development. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are critical end points in demonstrating the clinical relevance of standard oncologic outcome measures and the overall impact of novel pharmacologic therapies in nonmalignant neoplastic conditions such as TGCT. The content validity of PROs relevant to patients with TGCT has not been formally investigated, and instruments to evaluate such outcomes do not exist for this condition. PRO instruments of potential relevance were evaluated by using a literature review and by clinical and PRO experts. Patients with TGCT were recruited through clinical sites and the Internet for participation in qualitative research interviews to identify predominant symptoms and to test the relevance and content validity of several PRO measures. Select PRO measures were included in a Phase I clinical trial, and preliminary results of the PRO end points are reported descriptively. Of the 22 subjects who participated in qualitative interviews, 73% were female, and their mean age was 42.5 years (range, 27–56 years). The TGCTs (19 diffuse and 3 localized) were located in the knee (n = 15), hip (n = 3), ankle (n = 2), elbow (n = 1), and forearm (n = 1). The most common symptoms cited were pain (82%), swelling (86%), stiffness (73%), reduced range of motion (64%), and joint instability (64%), which were consistent with clinical expert input and with the content of instruments chosen by PRO experts. The worst pain numeric rating scale, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical functioning items, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as a worst stiffness numeric rating scale developed for TGCT, were confirmed as meaningful measures of TGCT patient symptoms and were well understood in qualitative interviews. Results from the Phase I trial showed trends of improvement in both pain and stiffness over time. This study is the first to gather information directly from patients with TGCT regarding their symptom experiences. Pain, stiffness, and physical functioning are important treatment outcomes in patients with TGCT. We have identified content-valid PRO measures of these concepts, which are included in an ongoing Phase III TGCT clinical trial with pexidartinib (PLX3397) (NCT02371369).

Abstract Introduction: Microglia exert a crucial role in homeostasis of white matter integrity, and several studies highlight the role of microglial dysfunctions in neurodegeneration. Primary microgliopathy is a disorder where the pathogenic abnormality of the microglia causes white matter disorder and leads to a neuropsychiatric disease. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM2), TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein (TYROBP) and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) are genes implicated in primary microgliopathy. The clinical manifestations of primary microgliopathy are myriad ranging from neuropsychiatric syndrome, motor disability, gait dysfunction, ataxia, pure dementia, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), and so on. It becomes imperative to establish the diagnosis of microgliopathy masquerading as degenerative dementia, especially with promising therapies on horizon for the same. We aimed to describe a case series of subjects with dementia harbouring novel genes of primary microgliopathy, along with their clinical, neuropsychological, cognitive profile and radiological patterns. Methods: The prospective study was conducted in a university referral hospital in South India, as a part of an ongoing clinico-genetic research on dementia subjects, and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. All patients underwent detailed assessment including sociodemographic profile, clinical and cognitive assessment, pedigree analysis and comprehensive neurological examination. Subjects consenting for blood sampling underwent genetic testing by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Results: A total of 100 patients with dementia underwent genetic analysis using WES and three pathogenic variants, one each of TREM2, TYROBP, and CSF1R and two variants of uncertain significance in CSF1R were identified as cause of primary microgliopathy. TREM2 and TYROBP presented as frontotemporal syndrome whereas CSF1R presented as frontotemporal syndrome and as AD. Conclusion: WES has widened the spectrum of underlying neuropathology of degenerative dementias, and diagnosing primary microglial dysfunction with emerging therapeutic options is of paramount importance. The cases of primary microgliopathy due to novel mutations in TREM2, TYROBP, and CSF1R with the phenotype of degenerative dementia are being first time reported from Indian cohort. Our study enriches the spectrum of genetic variants implicated in degenerative dementia and provides the basis for exploring complex molecular mechanisms like microglial dysfunction, as underlying cause for neurodegeneration.

No standard treatment exists for refractory or relapsed advanced thymic epithelial tumours. We investigated the efficacy of cixutumumab, a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in thymic epithelial tumours after failure of previous chemotherapy. Between Aug 25, 2009, and March 27, 2012, we did a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial in patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed recurrent or refractory thymic epithelial tumours. We enrolled individuals who had progressed after at least one previous regimen of platinum-containing chemotherapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had measurable disease and adequate organ function. Eligible patients received intravenous cixutumumab (20 mg/kg) every 3 weeks until disease progression or development of intolerable toxic effects. The primary endpoint was the frequency of response, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. We also did pharmacodynamic studies. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00965250. 49 patients were enrolled (37 with thymomas and 12 with thymic carcinomas) who received a median of eight cycles of cixutumumab (range 1–46). At the final actuarial analysis when follow-up data were updated (Nov 30, 2012), median potential follow-up (from on-study date to most current follow-up date) was 24·0 months (IQR 17·3–36·9). In the thymoma cohort, five (14%) of 37 patients (95% CI 5–29) achieved a partial response, 28 had stable disease, and four had progressive disease. In the thymic carcinoma cohort, none of 12 patients (95% CI 0–26) had a partial response, five had stable disease, and seven had progressive disease. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in both cohorts combined were hyperglycaemia (five [10%]), lipase elevation (three [6%]), and weight loss, tumour pain, and hyperuricaemia (two each [4%]). Nine (24%) of 37 patients with thymoma developed autoimmune conditions during treatment (five were new-onset disorders), the most common of which was pure red-cell aplasia. Two (4%) patients died; one was attributed to disease progression and the other to disease-related complications (respiratory failure, myositis, and an acute coronary event), which could have been precipitated by treatment with cixutumumab. Cixutumumab monotherapy is well-tolerated and active in relapsed thymoma. Development of autoimmunity during treatment needs further investigation. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis at the National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health), ImClone Systems.

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Intraarticular pilon fractures have a high rate of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) despite anatomic reduction of the articular surface. Elevated synovial inflammatory proteins triggered by injury contribute to PTOA development.MicroRNAs (miRNA), regulators of gene expression, are dysregulated in the cartilage of osteoarthritic joints, and their modulation may deter cartilage destruction. Specifically, miRNA-146a is associated with normal cartilage development and prevents overexpression of inflammatory proteins in degenerative osteoarthritis but is yet to be studied in clinical PTOA. This novel study aims to determine the effect of acute intraarticular pilon fracture on miRNA-146a expression and its association with inflammatory proteins. Methods: Bilateral ankles of patients with unilateral pilon fracture were aspirated for synovial fluid at the time of external fixation and/or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). After processing, synovial fluid samples were sequenced for small RNA analysis. Measured levels of miRNA-146a in injured ankles were compared to the contralateral uninjured ankles, which served as baseline controls. Results: Five patients with unilateral pilon fractures consented to participate in the study. miRNA-146a was readily detectable in all patient samples. Using uninjured ankles (n=5) as a control, mean fold miRNA-146a expression was 1.0 ±0.93 [Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD)]. In comparison, mean fold miRNA-146a in injured ankles (n=5) was 0.4 ± 0.53(p=0.07). Additional results will be analyzed and available to present at the 2024 AOFAS Annual Meeting. Conclusion: Though not statistically significant, our preliminary data demonstrated that miRNA-146a was lower in injured ankles when compared to uninjured ankles. This study aims to better characterize the effect of acute pilon fracture on miRNA-146 expression and its association with inflammatory proteins. Anticipated results will help elucidate the role of miRNA-146a in the pathogenesis of PTOA following pilon fracture, impacting future PTOA research on the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of miRNAs.