Explore the vast range of titles available.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines consider 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence localisation after radical prostatectomy, whereas European Association of Urology guidelines recommend prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-CT. To the best of our knowledge, no prospective head-to-head comparison between these tests has been done so far. The aim of this study was to compare prospectively paired 18F-fluciclovine and PSMA PET-CT scans for localising biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations (<2·0 ng/mL). This was a prospective, single-centre, open-label, single-arm comparative study done at University of California Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA). Patients older than 18 years of age with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PSA levels ranging from 0·2 to 2·0 ng/mL without any prior salvage therapy and with a Karnofsky performance status of at least 50 were eligible. Patients underwent 18F-fluciclovine (reference test) and PSMA (index test) PET-CT scans within 15 days. Detection rate of biochemical recurrence at the patient level and by anatomical region was the primary endpoint. A statistical power analysis demonstrated that a sample size of 50 patients was needed to show a 22% difference in detection rates in favour of PSMA (test for superiority). Each PET scan was interpreted by three independent masked readers and a consensus majority interpretation was generated (two vs one) to determine positive findings. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03515577, and is complete. Between Feb 26, 2018, and Sept 20, 2018, 143 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 50 patients were enrolled into the study. Median follow-up was 8 months (IQR 7–9). The primary endpoint was met; detection rates were significantly lower with 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT (13 [26%; 95% CI 15–40] of 50) than with PSMA PET-CT (28 [56%; 41–70] of 50), with an odds ratio (OR) of 4·8 (95% CI 1·6–19·2; p=0·0026) at the patient level; in the subanalysis of the pelvic nodes region (four [8%; 2–19] with 18F-fluciclovine vs 15 [30%; 18–45] with PSMA PET-CT; OR 12·0 [1·8–513·0], p=0·0034); and in the subanalysis of any extrapelvic lesions (none [0%; 0–6] vs eight [16%; 7–29]; OR non-estimable [95% CI non-estimable], p=0·0078). With higher detection rates, PSMA should be the PET tracer of choice when PET-CT imaging is considered for subsequent treatment management decisions in patients with prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and low PSA concentrations (≤2·0 ng/mL). Further research is needed to investigate whether higher detection rates translate into improved oncological outcomes. None.

BackgroundNoninvasive molecular imaging using peptides and biomolecules labelled with positron emitters has become important for detection of cancer and other diseases with PET (positron emission tomography). The positron emitting radionuclide fluorine-18 is widely available in high yield from cyclotrons and has favorable decay (t1/2 109.7 min) and imaging properties. 18F-Labelling of biomolecules and peptides for use as radiotracers is customarily achieved in a two-step approach, which can be challenging to automate. 6-[18F]Fluoronicotinic acid 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester ([18F]F-Py-TFP) is a versatile 18F-prosthetic group for this purpose, which can be rapidly be produced in an one-step approach on solid support. This work details an automated procedure on the cassette-based GE FASTlab™ platform for the labeling of a peptidomimetic, exemplified by the case of using the Glu-CO-Lys motif to produce [18F]DCFPyL, a ligand targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA).ResultsFrom fluorine-18 delivery a fully automated two-step radiosynthesis of [18F]DCFPyL was completed in 56 min with an overall end of synthesis yield as high as 37% using solid phase extraction (SPE) purification on the GE FASTlab™ platform.ConclusionsPutatively, this radiolabeling methodology is inherently amenable to automation with a diverse set of synthesis modules, and it should generalize for production of a broad spectrum of biomolecule-based radiotracers for use in PET imaging.

The aim of this guideline is to provide standards for the recommendation, performance, interpretation, and reporting of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. These recommendations will help to improve accuracy, precision, and repeatability of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT for prostate cancer essentially needed for implementation of this modality in science and routine clinical practice.

PurposeGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common glioma and standard therapies can only slightly prolong the survival. Neo-vascularization is a potential target to image tumor microenvironment, as it defines its brain invasion. We investigate [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 with PET/MRI for quantitative imaging of neo-vascularization in GBM bearing mice and human tumor tissue and compare it to [18F]FET and [18F]fluciclovine using PET pharmacokinetic modeling (PKM).Methods[18F]rhPSMA-7.3, [18F]FET, and [18F]fluciclovine were i.v. injected with 10.5 ± 3.1 MBq, 8.0 ± 2.2 MBq, 11.5 ± 1.9 MBq (n = 28, GL261-luc2) and up to 90 min PET/MR imaged 21/28 days after surgery. Regions of interest were delineated on T2-weighted MRI for (i) tumor, (ii) brain, and (iii) the inferior vena cava. Time-activity curves were expressed as SUV mean, SUVR and PKM performed using 1-/2-tissue-compartment models (1TCM, 2TCM), Patlak and Logan analysis (LA). Immunofluorescent staining (IFS), western blotting, and autoradiography of tumor tissue were performed for result validation.Results[18F]rhPSMA-7.3 showed a tumor uptake with a tumor-to-background-ratio (TBR) = 2.1–2.5, in 15–60 min. PKM (2TCM) confirmed higher K1 (0.34/0.08, p = 0.0012) and volume of distribution VT (0.24/0.1, p = 0.0017) in the tumor region compared to the brain. Linearity in LA and similar k3 = 0.6 and k4 = 0.47 (2TCM, tumor, p = ns) indicated reversible binding. K1, an indicator for vascularization, increased (0.1/0.34, 21 to 28 days, p < 0.005). IFS confirmed co-expression of PSMA and tumor vascularization. [18F]fluciclovine showed higher TBR (2.5/1.8, p < 0.001, 60 min) and VS (1.3/0.7, p < 0.05, tumor) compared to [18F]FET and LA indicated reversible binding. VT increased (p < 0.001, tumor, 21 to 28 days) for [18F]FET (0.5–1.4) and [18F]fluciclovine (0.84–1.5).Conclusion[18F]rhPSMA-7.3 showed to be a potential candidate to investigate the tumor microenvironment of GBM. Following PKM, this uptake was associated with tumor vascularization. In contrast to what is known from PSMA-PET in prostate cancer, reversible binding was found for [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 in GBM, contradicting cellular trapping. Finally, [18F]fluciclovine was superior to [18F]FET rendering it more suitable for PET imaging of GBM.

Because of a lower target-to-background ratio, fluciclovine PET is more difficult to interpret than PSMA PET, as also shown by low inter-reader agreement measurements.1,3 By contrast, the high target-to-background ratio of PSMA PET results in superior sensitivity and high inter-reader agreement.4,5 The difference of target-to-background ratio reflects how high the biological targets (amino acid transporters vs PSMA expression) are upregulated in cancer-target tissue compared with background organs. [...]similar detection rate differences can be expected when comparing fluciclovine with any other PSMA-targeting PET agents (eg, 68Ga-PSMA I&T, 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-PSMA-1007, and rhPSMA). [...]a post-hoc multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to rule out technical bias and potential confounding factors.1 Neither fluciclovine uptake time or any other technical parameters were a confounding factor. [...]we believe our study was not prone to any relevant bias.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines consider F-fluciclovine PET-CT for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence localisation after radical prostatectomy, whereas European Association of Urology guidelines recommend prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-CT. To the best of our knowledge, no prospective head-to-head comparison between these tests has been done so far. The aim of this study was to compare prospectively paired F-fluciclovine and PSMA PET-CT scans for localising biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations (<2·0 ng/mL). This was a prospective, single-centre, open-label, single-arm comparative study done at University of California Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA). Patients older than 18 years of age with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PSA levels ranging from 0·2 to 2·0 ng/mL without any prior salvage therapy and with a Karnofsky performance status of at least 50 were eligible. Patients underwent F-fluciclovine (reference test) and PSMA (index test) PET-CT scans within 15 days. Detection rate of biochemical recurrence at the patient level and by anatomical region was the primary endpoint. A statistical power analysis demonstrated that a sample size of 50 patients was needed to show a 22% difference in detection rates in favour of PSMA (test for superiority). Each PET scan was interpreted by three independent masked readers and a consensus majority interpretation was generated (two vs one) to determine positive findings. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02940262, and is complete. Between Feb 26, 2018, and Sept 20, 2018, 143 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 50 patients were enrolled into the study. Median follow-up was 8 months (IQR 7-9). The primary endpoint was met; detection rates were significantly lower with F-fluciclovine PET-CT (13 [26%; 95% CI 15-40] of 50) than with PSMA PET-CT (28 [56%; 41-70] of 50), with an odds ratio (OR) of 4·8 (95% CI 1·6-19·2; p=0·0026) at the patient level; in the subanalysis of the pelvic nodes region (four [8%; 2-19] with F-fluciclovine vs 15 [30%; 18-45] with PSMA PET-CT; OR 12·0 [1·8-513·0], p=0·0034); and in the subanalysis of any extrapelvic lesions (none [0%; 0-6] vs eight [16%; 7-29]; OR non-estimable [95% CI non-estimable], p=0·0078). With higher detection rates, PSMA should be the PET tracer of choice when PET-CT imaging is considered for subsequent treatment management decisions in patients with prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and low PSA concentrations (≤2·0 ng/mL). Further research is needed to investigate whether higher detection rates translate into improved oncological outcomes. None.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess treatment responses induced by the two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Imatinib and Sunitinib, in a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) xenograft using a clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scanner. Methods Nude mice bearing human GIST xenografts with mutations in exons 11 and 17 were randomly allocated to treatment with Imatinib, Sunitinib, or placebo daily for seven consecutive days. 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro- d -glucose PET ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) was performed in a clinical PET/CT scanner at baseline (day 0) and 1 and 7 days after onset of treatment. Treatment response was assessed by measuring tumor volumes and by calculation of tumor-to-liver 18 F-FDG uptake ratios. Results Minor reductions in tumor volume were observed in both treatment groups. For the two treatment groups, significantly decreased tumor-to-liver uptake ratios were observed both at day 1 (Imatinib, −41%, p  = .002; Sunitinib, −55%, p  < .001) and at day 8 (Imatinib, −35%, p  < .001; Sunitinib, −50%, p  < .001), when compared to individual baseline values. For the control tumors, neither tumor volumes nor tumor-to-liver uptake ratios were altered during the 8 days the experiment lasted. Conclusions Significant anti-tumor effects were demonstrated following treatment with both Imatinib and Sunitinib. Decreased tumor-to-liver uptake ratios were more pronounced than tumor volume reductions. Effects of novel targeted therapies can be evaluated in the GIST xenograft model using a clinical PET/CT scanner.

The present study was a proof-of-concept study to provide an initial indication of the efficacy and safety of imaging malignant breast tumors using ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692. The agent is a small peptide with high affinity for integrin receptors that are upregulated and expressed preferentially on proliferating endothelial cells. Methods: Sixteen patients with suggestive mammographic findings and 4 patients with benign lesions were included. The \"standard of truth\" was based on the histopathologic diagnosis of the recruited patients. All subjects received up to 75 µg of ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692 with an average ^sup 99m^Tc activity of 694 MBq (range, 561-747 MBq). Safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and changes in a limited physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, blood biochemistry, hematology, coagulation, vital signs, and urine analysis after administration of ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692 and throughout the 24-h follow-up. Static images and SPECT were acquired between 40 min and 2.5 h after injection of the agent. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians read the images in a nonblinded fashion. Results: Nineteen of 22 malignant lesions were detected using ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692 scintigraphy. Twenty lesions confirmed as malignant by histopathology were seen on mammography or ultrasound. Two additional lesions were identified from histopathology alone. Safety parameters evaluated through the follow-up period of 2.5 h included clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and ECG. Five of 20 subjects experienced nonserious AEs, and all AEs were classified as mild. One subject experienced an AE (dysgeusia) possibly related to administration of ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692. This AE was mild and lasted only for a few minutes. No deaths, serious AEs, or withdrawals due to AEs occurred during the study. Conclusion: Nineteen of 22 malignant lesions (86%) were clearly detected via scintigraphic imaging after administration of ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692. Overall, the efficacy data in subjects with suspected breast lesions suggest that ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692 scintigraphy may be effective in detecting malignant lesions. The use of ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692 in subjects with breast cancer is safe and well tolerated. Further studies are warranted to assess the clinical potential of ^sup 99m^Tc-NC100692. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

The present study was a proof-of-concept study to provide an initial indication of the efficacy and safety of imaging malignant breast tumors using (99m)Tc-NC100692. The agent is a small peptide with high affinity for integrin receptors that are upregulated and expressed preferentially on proliferating endothelial cells. Sixteen patients with suggestive mammographic findings and 4 patients with benign lesions were included. The \"standard of truth\" was based on the histopathologic diagnosis of the recruited patients. All subjects received up to 75 microg of (99m)Tc-NC100692 with an average (99m)Tc activity of 694 MBq (range, 561-747 MBq). Safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and changes in a limited physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, blood biochemistry, hematology, coagulation, vital signs, and urine analysis after administration of (99m)Tc-NC100692 and throughout the 24-h follow-up. Static images and SPECT were acquired between 40 min and 2.5 h after injection of the agent. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians read the images in a nonblinded fashion. Nineteen of 22 malignant lesions were detected using (99m)Tc-NC100692 scintigraphy. Twenty lesions confirmed as malignant by histopathology were seen on mammography or ultrasound. Two additional lesions were identified from histopathology alone. Safety parameters evaluated through the follow-up period of 2.5 h included clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and ECG. Five of 20 subjects experienced nonserious AEs, and all AEs were classified as mild. One subject experienced an AE (dysgeusia) possibly related to administration of (99m)Tc-NC100692. This AE was mild and lasted only for a few minutes. No deaths, serious AEs, or withdrawals due to AEs occurred during the study. Nineteen of 22 malignant lesions (86%) were clearly detected via scintigraphic imaging after administration of (99m)Tc-NC100692. Overall, the efficacy data in subjects with suspected breast lesions suggest that (99m)Tc-NC100692 scintigraphy may be effective in detecting malignant lesions. The use of (99m)Tc-NC100692 in subjects with breast cancer is safe and well tolerated. Further studies are warranted to assess the clinical potential of (99m)Tc-NC100692.