Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
4 result(s) for "Banerjee, Goutami"
Sort by:
Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
Abstract Background: Enzymes for plant cell wall deconstruction are a major cost in the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. The goal of this research was to develop optimized synthetic mixtures of enzymes for multiple pretreatment/substrate combinations using our high-throughput biomass digestion platform, GENPLAT, which combines robotic liquid handling, statistical experimental design and automated Glc and Xyl assays. Proportions of six core fungal enzymes (CBH1, CBH2, EG1, β-glucosidase, a GH10 endo-β1,4-xylanase, and β-xylosidase) were optimized at a fixed enzyme loading of 15 mg/g glucan for release of Glc and Xyl from all combinations of five biomass feedstocks (corn stover, switchgrass, Miscanthus , dried distillers' grains plus solubles [DDGS] and poplar) subjected to three alkaline pretreatments (AFEX, dilute base [0.25% NaOH] and alkaline peroxide [AP]). A 16-component mixture comprising the core set plus 10 accessory enzymes was optimized for three pretreatment/substrate combinations. Results were compared to the performance of two commercial enzymes (Accellerase 1000 and Spezyme CP) at the same protein loadings. Results: When analyzed with GENPLAT, corn stover gave the highest yields of Glc with commercial enzymes and with the core set with all pretreatments, whereas corn stover, switchgrass and Miscanthus gave comparable Xyl yields. With commercial enzymes and with the core set, yields of Glc and Xyl were highest for grass stovers pretreated by AP compared to AFEX or dilute base. Corn stover, switchgrass and DDGS pretreated with AFEX and digested with the core set required a higher proportion of endo-β1,4-xylanase (EX3) and a lower proportion of endo-β1,4-glucanase (EG1) compared to the same materials pretreated with dilute base or AP. An optimized enzyme mixture containing 16 components (by addition of α-glucuronidase, a GH11 endoxylanase [EX2], Cel5A, Cel61A, Cip1, Cip2, β-mannanase, amyloglucosidase, α-arabinosidase, and Cel12A to the core set) was determined for AFEX-pretreated corn stover, DDGS, and AP-pretreated corn stover. The optimized mixture for AP-corn stover contained more exo-β1,4-glucanase (i.e., the sum of CBH1 + CBH2) and less endo-β1,4-glucanase (EG1 + Cel5A) than the optimal mixture for AFEX-corn stover. Amyloglucosidase and β-mannanase were the two most important enzymes for release of Glc from DDGS but were not required (i.e., 0% optimum) for corn stover subjected to AP or AFEX. As a function of enzyme loading over the range 0 to 30 mg/g glucan, Glc release from AP-corn stover reached a plateau of 60-70% Glc yield at a lower enzyme loading (5-10 mg/g glucan) than AFEX-corn stover. Accellerase 1000 was superior to Spezyme CP, the core set or the 16-component mixture for Glc yield at 12 h, but the 16-component set was as effective as the commercial enzyme mixtures at 48 h. Conclusion: The results in this paper demonstrate that GENPLAT can be used to rapidly produce enzyme cocktails for specific pretreatment/biomass combinations. Pretreatment conditions and feedstock source both influence the Glc and Xyl yields as well as optimal enzyme proportions. It is predicted that it will be possible to improve synthetic enzyme mixtures further by the addition of additional accessory enzymes.
Improving Enzymes for Biomass Conversion: A Basic Research Perspective
The cost of enzymes for converting plant biomass materials to fermentable sugars is a major impediment to the development of a practical lignocellulosic ethanol industry. Research on enzyme optimization with the goal of reducing the cost of converting biomass materials such as corn stover into glucose, xylose, and other sugars is being actively pursued in private industry, academia, and government laboratories. Under the auspices of the Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, we are taking several approaches to address this problem, including “bioprospecting” for superior key enzymes, protein engineering, and high-level expression in plants. A particular focus is the development of synthetic enzyme mixtures, in order to learn which of the hundreds of known enzymes are important and in what ratios. A core set comprises cellobiohydrolase, endoglucanase, β-glucosidase, endoxylanase, and β-glucosidase. Accessory enzymes include esterases, proteases, nonhydrolytic proteins, and glycosyl hydrolases that cleave the less frequent chemical linkages found in plant cell walls.
Enhancement of fermentable sugar yields by alpha-xylosidase supplementation of commercial cellulases
Doc number: 58 Abstract Background: Although α-linked xylose is a major constituent of the hemicelluloses of land plants, few secreted α-xylosidases have been described from fungi or bacteria. AxlA of Aspergillus niger is a secreted α-xylosidase that was earlier shown to promote the release of free glucose (Glc) and xylose (Xyl) from substrates containing α-linked xylose, including isoprimeverose (IP), the heptasaccharide subunit of pea xyloglucan (XG), and tamarind XG. Results: The utility of AxlA for enhancing release of free Glc and Xyl in combination with commercial enzyme cocktails from dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants was examined. Without AxlA supplementation, a mixture of CTec2 and HTec2 (both of which are derived from T. reesei ) did not release significant levels of Glc from pea XG or tamarind XG. This is consistent with their lack of detectable α-xylosidase activity using model substrates. On alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated corn stover, supplementation of CTec2/HTec2 (at a loading of 2.5 mg/g glucan) with AxlA (at a loading of 8 mg/g glucan) increased Glc yields from 82% to 88% of the total available Glc and increased Xyl yields from 55% to 60%. AxlA supplementation also improved Glc yields from corn stover treated with the commercial cellulase Accellerase 1000. The AxlA enhancement was not a general protein effect because bovine serum albumin or bovine gamma-globulin at similar concentrations did not enhance Glc yields from corn stover in response to CTec2/HTec2. Supplementation of CTec2/HTec2 with AxlA did not enhance Glc release from pretreated green or etiolated pea tissue. However, AxlA did enhance Glc and Xyl yields compared to CTec2/HTec2 alone from another dicotyledonous herbaceous plant, Chenopodium album (lamb's quarters). Conclusion: Supplementation of commercial cellulase cocktails with AxlA enhances yields of Glc and Xyl from some biomass substrates under some conditions, and may prove useful in industrial lignocellulose conversion.
Identification and characterization of genes involved in pathway(s) regulating mounds and fruiting bodies in Schizophyllum commune
An abnormal growth form called mound has been hypothesized to be a neoplasm in the filamentous fungus Schizophyllum commune. An alternative hypothesis is that mounds represent some unusual developmental form in the fruiting body morphogenetic pathway. Restriction Enzyme-Mediated Integration (REMI) was used to induce mutations in a monokaryotic strain of Schizophyllum commune that produced mounds. These abnormal growths manifest as large hemispherical masses of compacted hyphae, which form on the surface of colonies and often interfere with the development of fruiting bodies. The monokaryotic strain used in this study developed prolific numbers of mounds. Transformants produced by REMI were screened for their inability to form mounds. Analysis of a plasmid-disrupted gene in one moundless mutant led to the identification of a putative G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Dikaryons carrying a double dose of the disrupted GPCR gene neither developed mounds nor fruiting bodies despite extensive mycelial growth under fruiting conditions. These results suggest that these structures may be related and possibly share the same developmental pathway. To further determine possible relationships between mounds and fruiting bodies, mound tissue was examined for gas exchange pores and the presence of hydrophobins. Hydrophobin proteins, the most important of which is Sc4, have been found in fruiting bodies where they line the surface of gas exchange pores and function to keep the pores hydrophobic. Sc4 is also responsible for hyphal adhesion during fruiting body formation. Both monokaryotic and dikaryotic mound tissue exhibited high expression of the dikaryotic specific Sc4 hydrophobin gene. The expression of Sc4 hydrophobin genes in mounds suggests mound development uses this aspect of the dikaryotic fruiting developmental pathway. The REMI mutant with the disrupted GPCR, showed a steep decrease of Sc4 gene expression and showed no evidence of hyphal adhesion. Results presented in this thesis suggest that the novel GPCR regulates the fruiting body specific hydrophobin gene Sc4 and is an overall decisive factor for mound and fruiting body formation and development. This thesis also provides evidence clearly indicating that fruiting body and mound development are regulated in the same manner and shows similar growth and developmental patterns when subjected to similar conditions. Based on all the results obtained in the present research, a working model suggesting activation and signaling cascades involved in the regulation of the mnd allele is proposed. According to the hypothesis, in wild type monokaryotic strains mnd+ is upstream of the GPCR and is necessary for proper down-regulation of this GPCR resulting in down-regulation of the other genes necessary for fruiting body initiation and development. The conversion of the mnd+ allele to the mnd allele possibly results in its loss of function in monokaryotic mound strain. This loss of function may be responsible for the up-regulation of this GPCR resulting in up-regulation of other genes in the FBF gene cluster. This alteration possibly leads to the formation of mound by arresting fruiting body morphogenesis in stage II.