Explore the vast range of titles available.

Non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) remains an uncertain indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-LBBB includes right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific LV conduction delay (NSCD), two different electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns which are not generally considered to be associated with LV conduction delay as judged by the invasive assessment of the Q-LV interval. We evaluated whether a novel ECG interval (QR-max index) correlated with the degree of LV conduction delay regardless of the type of non-LBBB ECG pattern, and could, therefore, predict CRT response. In 173 non-LBBB patients on CRT (92 NSCD, 81 RBBB), the QR-max index was measured as the maximum interval from QRS onset to R-wave offset in the limb leads. The correlation between QR-max index and Q-LV interval and the impact of the QR-max index on time to first heart failure hospitalization during 3-year follow-up were assessed. Q-LV correlated better with the QR-max index than with QRSd, particularly in the RBBB group (r = 0.91; p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.19; p < 0.089), while the correlations were r = 0.79 (p < 0.01) and r = 0.68 (p < 0.01), respectively, in the NSCD group. In both groups, the QR-max index was significantly more able than QRSd to identify CRT responders (AUC 0.825 vs. 0.576; p = 0.0008 in RBBB; AUC 0.738 vs. 0.701; p = 0.459 in NSCD). A QR-max index exceeding a cutoff value of 120 ms was associated with CRT response, with predictive values of 86.8 and 81.4% in RBBB and NSCD, respectively. The QR-max index reflects the degree of LV electrical delay regardless of QRS duration in RBBB and NSCD patients and is a useful indicator of suitability for CRT in non-LBBB patients.

PurposeIn order to increase the responder rate to CRT, stimulation of the left ventricular (LV) from multiple sites has been suggested as a promising alternative to standard biventricular pacing (BIV). The aim of the study was to compare, in a group of candidates for CRT, the effects of different pacing configurations—BIV, triple ventricular (TRIV) by means of two LV leads, multipoint (MPP), and multipoint plus a second LV lead (MPP + TRIV) pacing—on both hemodynamics and QRS duration.MethodsFifteen patients (13 male) with permanent AF (mean age 76 ± 7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 7%; 7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy; mean QRS duration 178 ± 25 ms) were selected as candidates for CRT. Two LV leads were positioned in two different branches of the coronary sinus. Acute hemodynamic response was evaluated by means of a RADI pressure wire as the variation in LVdp/dtmax.ResultsPer patient, 2.7 ± 0.7 veins and 5.2 ± 1.9 pacing sites were evaluated. From baseline values of 998 ± 186 mmHg/s, BIV, TRIV, MPP, and MPP-TRIV pacing increased LVdp/dtmax to 1200 ± 281 mmHg/s, 1226 ± 284 mmHg/s, 1274 ± 303 mmHg, and 1289 ± 298 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed significantly higher values during all pacing configurations in comparison with the baseline; moreover, higher values were recorded during MPP and MPP + TRIV than at the baseline or during BIV and also during MPP + TRIV than during TRIV. Mean QRS width decreased from 178 ± 25 ms at the baseline to 171 ± 21, 167 ± 20, 168 ± 20, and 164 ± 15 ms, during BIV, TRIV, MPP, and MPP-TRIV, respectively (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with AF, the acute response to CRT improves as the size of the early activated LV region increases.

Objective: Incidence and prognostic value of new-onset atrial fibrillation after single versus double stent strategy in bifurcation left main disease has not been yet investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the procedural and medical data of patients referred to our center for complex left main bifurcation disease, treated using crossover provisional stenting, T or T-and-Protrusion, Culotte, and Nano-inverted-T techniques between January 1, 2008, and May 1, 2018. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to assess the role of different stent strategies, adjusted for confounders, on the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation during the follow-up period. Results: Five hundred two patients (316 males, mean age 70.3 ± 12.8 years, mean Syntax score 31.6 ± 6.3) were evaluated. At a mean follow-up of 37.1 ± 10.8 months (range: 22.1- 39.3 months); Target lesion failure rate was 10.1%. Stent thrombosis and cardiovascular mor- tality were observed in 1.2% and 3.6% in of cases, respectively. New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 23 out of 502 patients (4.6%). Patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation resulted more frequently female, older, obese, and diabetic and more frequently experienced target lesion failure and cardiovascular death. New-onset atrial fibrillation-free survival favored single versus double stent technique and among double stent techniques nano-inverted-T tech- niques compared to the others. Single stent strategy had a lower risk of new-onset atrial fibril- lation compared to double stent technique on multivariate analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19, P < .001 vs. HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.32, P < .0001). Conclusion: New-onset atrial fibrillation in distal left main bifurcation disease treated with per- cutaneous coronary intervention had a low incidence but resulted more frequently after double than after single stenting technique and was associated with worse outcomes. Cite this article as: Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Picariello C, et al. Prognostic impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation after single or double stent left main bifurcation PCI. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2022;50(4):256-263.