Explore the vast range of titles available.

The optimal scheduling of PD-1 inhibitors with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer is unknown. We aimed to investigate the activity of two differing schedules of neoadjuvant nivolumab initiation with 12 weeks of carboplatin and paclitaxel for this patient population. Neo-N is an investigator-initiated, non-comparative, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial conducted at 12 hospitals in Australia, one in New Zealand, and one in Italy. Participants had to be aged 18 years or older; have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, clinical stage I (cT1cN0) or II (cT1cN1, cT2cN0–1, or cT3cN0), oestrogen receptor expression of less than 1%, and progesterone receptor expression of less than 10%; had to be HER2 negative; and have previously untreated operable breast cancer with adequate organ function. Participants were stratified according to age and randomly assigned (1:1) centrally using a computer-generated sequence with a minimisation algorithm to either nivolumab 240 mg then 2 weeks later nivolumab 360 mg and carboplatin AUC5 every 3 weeks with concurrent paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week for 12 weeks (lead-in group) or concurrent nivolumab 360 mg and carboplatin AUC5 every 3 weeks with once per week paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks then 240 mg nivolumab 2 weeks later (concurrent group). Data were collected from registration until the 100-day safety follow-up visit, and survival follow-up continues. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (ypT0/Tis ypN0) at the time of surgery, analysed in each group separately and in all patients who received at least one dose of all three study treatment (modified intention-to-treat population). The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619001308189, and EudraCT, 2019-003465-18, and is ongoing. Between July 6, 2020, and April 1, 2022, 124 participants were enrolled and 14 were ineligible. 110 participants were randomly assigned and 108 were included in the modified intention-to treat analysis (53 in the lead-in group and 55 in the concurrent group). Median follow-up was 12 months (IQR 7–18). All patients were female with a median age of 49 years (IQR 43–60). 18 (17%) patients had clinically node-positive disease; 37 (34%) had clinical stage I, 70 (65%) had stage II, and one (1%) had stage III disease. The pathological complete response rate was observed in 27 (51% [39–63]) of 53 patients in the nivolumab lead-in group and in 30 (55% [43–66]) of 55 in the concurrent group. Treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 70 (65%; 32 [60%] of 53 in the lead-in group and 38 [69%] of 55 in the concurrent group) of 108 patients, with the most common being decreased neutrophil count (25 [47%] of 53 in the lead-in group vs 28 [53%] of 55 in the concurrent group), anaemia (six [11%] vs ten [19%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase (three [6%] vs three [6%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 16 (30%) patients in the lead-in group and 26 (47%) in the concurrent group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in seven (13%) patients in the lead-in group and 20 (36%) in the concurrent group. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. While this study did not support the hypothesis that lead-in nivolumab before chemotherapy was associated with a pathological complete response advantage, high pathological complete response rates were reached supporting shorter duration, non-anthracycline regimens in patients with newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer. Future trials are warranted to compare this regimen with the current standards of care. Breast Cancer Trials and Bristol Myers Squibb.

BackgroundIn this study, we assessed the activity of durvalumab, an antibody to programmed death ligand-1, in two cohorts of women with advanced endometrial cancers (AEC)—mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair deficient (dMMR).MethodsA multicenter phase two study was performed in women with AEC with pMMR tumor progressing after one to three lines of chemotherapy and women with AEC with dMMR tumor progressing after zero to three lines of chemotherapy. Mismatch repair status was based on immunohistochemistry expression. All women received durvalumab 1500 mg given every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response by RECIST V.1.1 modified for immune-based therapeutics.ResultsSeventy-one women were recruited: 35 dMMR and 36 pMMR. Median follow-up was 19 vs 21 months in dMMR versus pMMR, respectively. Median age was 67 years. Histology in dMMR versus pMMR included endometrioid (94% vs 57%) and serous (0% vs 31%) and was high grade in 26% vs 74%. The objective tumor response rate (OTRR) in the dMMR cohort was 47% (17/36, 95% CI 32 to 63), including 6 complete responses and 11 partial responses (PRs)) vs 3% in the pMMR cohort (1/35, 95% CI 1 to 15, PR). In the dMMR cohort, durvalumab was the first-line therapy in 58% (OTRR 57%) and the second-line therapy in 39% (OTRR 38%). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in the dMMR cohort vs 1.8 months in the pMMR cohort. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 71% in dMMR vs 51% in pMMR, with median OS not reached for dMMR vs 12 months for pMMR. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 14 women, mostly grades 1–2.ConclusionDurvalumab monotherapy showed promising activity and acceptable safety in AEC with dMMR regardless of prior lines of chemotherapy, but activity was limited in AEC with pMMR.Trial registration numbersANZGOG1601, ACTRN12617000106336, and NCT03015129.

SOLACE2 (ACTRN12618000686202) investigates whether 12-weeks of olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib priming, improves subsequent durvalumab-olaparib progression-free survival (PFS), and is superior to olaparib monotherapy without any priming, in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 114). We also evaluate the utility of CUP-CC assay, an immune signature of C-C chemokine receptor type 4 up-regulation, chemokines, and cytokines. Priming with olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib, followed by durvalumab-olaparib, are both associated with longer PFS compared to olaparib monotherapy, but do not reach the pre-specified primary endpoint of 36-week trial threshold (PFS36). PFS36 rates are 47.4% (95% CI, 31.0-62.1; olaparib priming then olaparib-durvalumab), 48.7% (32.5-63.2; olaparib-cyclophosphamide then olaparib-durvalumab) and 35.1% (20.4-50.3; olaparib monotherapy). PFS is significantly longer for the homologous recombination deficient (N = 71) as compared to the proficient (HRP) (N = 29) subgroups (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.55, 0.35-0.87). CUP-CC+ subgroup (N = 58) has a significantly longer PFS (HR 0.31, 0.19-0.49) than CUP-CC- (N = 46). Future studies should investigate whether CUP-CC has the potential to personalize poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapies for patients who are BRCA wild-type, including HRP patients. PARP inhibitors, either alone or in combination with bevacizumab, have regulatory approval as maintenance therapy following response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Here this group reports SOLACE2 trial investigating whether combining olaparib with low dose cyclophosphamide treatment improves progression-free survival, comparing to olaparib monotherapy alone, in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

This study evaluated the feasibility of achieving high response rates in stage II or III breast cancer by tailoring neoadjuvant therapy using clinical and histopathological features and the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score. Genomic determinants of response and resistance were also explored. Fifty-one patients were enrolled. The primary cohort comprised 40 patients: 15 human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-amplified; 15 triple-negative (TNBC); and ten hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-non-amplified tumours; with recurrence scores ≥25. Patients were treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by nab-paclitaxel, with the addition of trastuzumab if HER2-amplified. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast. Pre- and post-treatment tumour samples underwent variant burden, gene and gene pathway, mutational signature profile and clonal evolution analyses. The pCR rates were: overall 55% (n = 22), HER2-amplified 80% (n = 12), triple-negative 46% (n = 7) and HR-positive, HER2-non-amplified 30% (n = 3). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included febrile neutropenia (8%), neutropenia (18%), sensory neuropathy (5%), deranged transaminases (5%), fatigue (2%), diarrhoea (2%), and pneumothorax (2%). Molecular analyses demonstrated strong similarities between residual disease and matched primary tumour. ATM signalling pathway alterations and the presence of a COSMIC Signature 3 implied the majority of tumours contained some form of homologous repair deficiency. ATM pathway alterations were identified in the subset of TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR; Signature 3 was present in both pCR and non-pCR subgroups. Clonal evolution analyses demonstrated both persistence and emergence of chemoresistant clones. This treatment regime resulted in a high rate of pCR, demonstrating that tailored neoadjuvant therapy using a genomic recurrence score is feasible and warrants further investigation. Molecular analysis revealed few commonalities between patients. For TNBC future clinical gains will require precision medicine, potentially using DNA sequencing to identify specific targets for individuals with resistant disease. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01830244.

An interim analysis of a randomized trial in triple-negative breast cancer comparing the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone and adjuvant pembrolizumab with placebo after definitive surgery was reported after 39 months of follow-up. Event-free survival at 3 years was 84.5% in the pembrolizumab group and 76.8% in the group that did not receive pembrolizumab.

Women with advanced endometrial cancer that progressed during platinum-containing therapy were randomly assigned to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 3.8 months with chemotherapy; the median overall survival was 18.3 months and 11.4 months, respectively.

PurposeThe administration timing of antiemetic and chemotherapeutic regimens is often determined by regulatory indications, based on registration studies. Oral NEPA, fixed combination of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA) netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT3RA) palonosetron, is recommended to be administered approximately 60 min before chemotherapy. Reducing chair time for chemotherapy administration at oncology day therapy units would improve facility efficiency without compromising patient symptom management. The objective was to determine if oral NEPA can be administered closer to chemotherapy initiation without compromising patient symptom management.MethodsNK1 receptor occupancy (NK1RO) time course in the brain was determined using positron emission tomography; netupitant and palonosetron plasma concentration-time profiles were described by pharmacokinetic (PK) models; and the rate, extent, and duration of RO by netupitant and palonosetron were predicted by pharmacodynamic modeling. Clinical efficacy data from a pivotal study in cisplatin and oral NEPA-receiving patients were reviewed in the context of symptom management.ResultsStriatal 90% NK1RO, assumed to correlate with NK1RA antiemetic efficacy, was predicted at netupitant plasma concentration of 225 ng/mL, reached at 2.23 h following NEPA administration. Palonosetron 90% 5-HT3RO was predicted at a 188-ng/L plasma concentration, reached at 1.05 h postdose. The mean time to first treatment failure for the 1.5% of NEPA-treated patients without complete response receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy was 8 h. Antiemetic efficacy was sustained over 5 days despite the expected decrease of NK1RO and 5-HT3RO.ConclusionsResults suggest that administering oral NEPA closer to initiation of cisplatin administration would provide similar antiemetic efficacy. Prospective clinical validation is required.

Background: Currently, no specific immunohistochemical markers are available to differentiate primary mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (MOC) from adenocarcinomas originating at other sites that have metastasised to the ovary, which may have an impact on patient management and prognosis. Aim: To investigate the expression of two intestinal markers, galectin 4 and meprin α, in mucinous carcinomas of the ovary and gastrointestinal tract. Methods: Using immunohistochemical analysis, the expression of galectin 4 and meprin α was investigated in 10 MOCs and in 38 mucinous adenocarcinomas of colon, pancreas, stomach and appendix, the most common sites of origin of ovarian metastases. Results: Total cytoplasmic galectin 4 expression was relatively consistent between the different carcinomas. Membranous meprin α expression was significantly lower in MOCs compared with gastrointestinal carcinomas. Moreover, meprin α expression showed greater discrimination between the ovarian and gastrointestinal carcinomas than the cytokeratins CK7 and CK20, the current standard immunohistochemical markers used to determine the tissue origin of mucinous carcinomas involving the ovaries. Conclusions: Meprin α is a useful additional marker in differentiating primary from secondary mucinous adenocarcinomas of the ovary.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) intracranial activity has been observed in small or retrospective patient cohorts with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2 + ) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and stable or active (untreated/previously treated and progressing) brain metastases (BMs). The phase 3b/4 DESTINY-Breast12 study investigated T-DXd in patients with HER2 + mBC and is, to our knowledge, the largest prospective study of T-DXd in patients with BMs in this setting. Patients (stable/active BMs ( n  = 263) and no BMs ( n  = 241)) treated with one or more prior anti-HER2–based regimens received T-DXd (5.4 mg per kg). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS; BMs cohort) and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (non-BMs cohort). Additional endpoints included central nervous system (CNS) PFS, ORR, time to second progression, CNS ORR (BMs cohort), incidence of new symptomatic CNS metastases (non-BMs cohort), time to progression, duration of response, overall survival and safety (both cohorts). No formal hypothesis testing was conducted for this single-arm, open-label study. In the BMs cohort, 12-month PFS was 61.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 54.9–67.6), and 12-month CNS PFS was 58.9% (95% CI: 51.9–65.3). In the non-BMs cohort, ORR was 62.7% (95% CI: 56.5–68.8). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 51% (BMs cohort) and 49% (non-BMs cohort) of patients. Investigator-reported interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 16% (grade ≥3: 3%) of patients with BMs and 13% (grade ≥3: 1%) of patients without BMs. These data show substantial and durable overall and intracranial activity for T-DXd, supporting its use in previously treated patients with HER2 + mBC irrespective of stable/active baseline BMs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04739761 . In the non-randomized phase 3b/4 DESTINY-Breast12 study, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) treatment of patients with HER2 + advanced breast cancer and active or stable brain metastases showed consistent intracranial activity and systemic efficacy of T-DXd.

The addition of veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, to induction chemotherapy and maintenance therapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer significantly improved progression-free survival over induction chemotherapy alone without maintenance therapy. The improvement was especially notable in patients with mutated BRCA or homologous-recombination defects.