Explore the vast range of titles available.

Coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting millions of individuals each year. Coronary artery calcification is a common finding in patients with advanced atherosclerosis and represents an important determinant of procedural success during percutaneous coronary intervention. Severe calcifications are associated with increased procedural complexity and elevated complication rates due to challenging lesion preparation, suboptimal stent expansion, and less favorable long-term clinical results. This review summarizes the present understanding of vascular calcification mechanisms, discusses relevant diagnostic imaging modalities, and describes current plaque modification techniques used to optimize procedural outcomes. Methods such as rotational, orbital, and laser atherectomy, as well as specialized balloon technologies and intravascular lithotripsy, are discussed with regard to their mechanisms of action, clinical effectiveness, and safety profiles. Particular emphasis is placed on the integration of advanced imaging for precise lesion assessment, improved patient selection, and the use of combination strategies in complex cases. Finally, emerging technologies and future directions are highlighted, with the goal of enhancing procedural safety, device deliverability, and treatment outcomes in the evolving field of interventional cardiology.

Intravenous (IV) furosemide and torsemide represent a cornerstone of guideline-directed medical therapy for acute heart failure (AHF). However, the evidence regarding the superiority of each agent remains controversial. The prospective, open-label, comparative study included 51 adult patients hospitalized due to AHF. Torsemide was administered to 25 patients (49%), and furosemide to 26 patients (51%). The primary endpoint was the change in urinary spot sodium level at 24 h, used to assess diuretic efficacy. Secondary outcomes included lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines, clinical status evaluation based on the Borg scale, Killip-Kimball classification, and daily urine output. After 24 h of treatment, urinary sodium levels increased by an estimated marginal mean (EMM) of 21.84 mmol/L in the furosemide group and 0.97 mmol/L in the torsemide group (p = 0.173). The number of B-lines over 24 h decreased, with an EMM of 28.31 in the furosemide group, and 30.12 in the torsemide group (p = 0.779). The severity of dyspnea, measured by the Borg scale, decreased over 24 h with an EMM of 3.58 points in the furosemide group, and 3.62 points in the torsemide group (p = 0.891). Pulmonary congestion, measured by the Killip-Kimball classification, minimized with an EMM of 0.42 points in the furosemide group, and 0.47 points in the torsemide group (p = 0.770). Daily urine output after 24 h of treatment reached an EMM of 3,559.67 mL in the furosemide group, and 2,734.89 mL in the torsemide group (p = 0.068). Both furosemide and torsemide demonstrated comparable efficacy in the initial treatment of AHF, as assessed by laboratory, ultrasound, and clinical parameters.

Following an administered shock in cardiac arrest, the heart commonly experiences a short phase of inability to efficiently perfuse. Despite being a commonly used feature in the ICD population, postshock pacing (PSP) is yet to be adequately explored for its utility in this pulseless phase. Notably, an overwhelming proportion of available data for transcutaneous pacing in spontaneous cardiac arrest stem from the 1980s and 1990s and revolve largely around nonshockable, as opposed to shockable rhythms. The lack of large‐scale clinical trials assessing the efficacy of transcutaneous PSP and the considerable advancements in technology and training facilities since the 1990s indicates a need for reevaluation of current understanding of PSP and its applicability in cardiac arrest. Shedding light into the possible implications of transcutaneous PSP in emergency setting cardiac arrest may not only reshape the current protocols of ALS but also carry the potential of improving survival rates. This concise review serves as a summary of the existing knowledge on the subject of PSP and reveals further possible directions for the development of this therapy.

The left ventricular summit (LVS) is a triangular area located at the most superior portion of the left epicardial ventricular region, surrounded by the two branches of the left coronary artery: the left anterior interventricular artery and the left circumflex artery. The triangle is bounded by the apex, septal and mitral margins and base. This review aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive anatomical description and proper terminology in the LVS region that may facilitate exchanging information among anatomists and electrophysiologists, increasing knowledge of this cardiac region. We postulate that the most dominant septal perforator (not the first septal perforator) should characterize the LVS definition. Abundant epicardial adipose tissue overlying the LVS myocardium may affect arrhythmogenic processes and electrophysiological procedures within the LVS region. The LVS is divided into two clinically significant regions: accessible and inaccessible areas. Rich arterial and venous coronary vasculature and a relatively dense network of cardiac autonomic nerve fibers are present within the LVS boundaries. Although the approach to the LVS may be challenging, it can be executed indirectly using the surrounding structures. Delivery of the proper radiofrequency energy to the arrhythmia source, avoiding coronary artery damage at the same time, may be a challenge. Therefore, coronary angiography or cardiac computed tomography imaging is strongly recommended before any procedure within the LVS region. Further research on LVS morphology and physiology should increase the safety and effectiveness of invasive electrophysiological procedures performed within this region of the human heart.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the leading cause of stroke. The European Society of Cardiology(ESC) advises opportunistic AF screening among patients aged ≥ 65 years. Considering this, theaim herein, was compare the feasibility of two different systems of smartphone-based electrocardiogram(ECG) recordings to identify AF among those without a previous arrhythmia history. METHODS: Prospective AF screening was conducted at six pharmacies using Kardia Mobile andHartmann Veroval 2 in 1. A single-lead ECG was acquired by the placement of fingers on the pads.A cardiologist evaluated findings from both devices. RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation was identified in 3.60% and previously unknown AF was detected in 1.92%of the study participants. Sensitivity and specificity of the Kardia application in detecting AF were66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.4–88.2%) and 98.5% (95% CI 96.7–99.5%), and for Veroval10.0% (95% CI 0.23–44.5%) and 94.96% (95% CI 92.15–96.98%), accordingly. Inter-rater agreementwas k = 0.088 (95% CI 1.59–16.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Mobile devices can detect AF, but each finding must be verified by a professional. TheKardia application appeared to be more user-friendly than Veroval. Cardiovascular screening usingmobile devices is feasible at pharmacies. Hence it might be considered for routine use.

It has been suggested that the disparity of outcomes between the studies of transcutaneous edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) could be due to systematic differences in the populations studied. One proposal is that there are 2 broad groups: those with proportional FMR who respond less favorably, and those in whom the FMR is greater than expected (disproportionate) FMR where edge-to-edge TEER seems to be more effective. Whether this grouping is relevant for other percutaneous interventions for FMR is unknown. We sought to compare clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients with HFrEF and proportionate and disproportionate FMR treated with indirect annuloplasty using the Carillon device. This is a pooled analysis from 3 trials of patients with FMR. Key patient eligibility in these trials specified persistent grade 2+ to 4+ FMR with >5.5 cm left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and reduced ejection fraction. Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice area/LV end-diastolic volume (EROA/LVEDV) ratio under 0.15 were assigned to the proportionate FMR group (n = 74;65%) and those with a ratio above 0.15 were classed as having disproportionate FMR (n = 39;35%). At 12 months following treatment, both groups showed improvements in all MR variables including regurgitation volume, EROA and vena contracta. Moreover, in patients with proportionate MR there were clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in LV volumes and diameters. There was no independent relationship between the degree of proportionality as a continuous variable and the remodeling response to Carillon therapy (change in LVEDV r = 0.17; change in LVESV r = 0.14). Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty with the Carillon device reduces MR in patients with both proportionate and disproportionate FMR, and also results in LV reverse remodeling in those with proportionate FMR. The effect on remodeling remains to be verified in a large-scale trial. [Display omitted]

Background/Objectives: Persistent cardiovascular issues are common in COVID-19 survivors, making the detection of subtle myocardial injuries critical. This study evaluates myocardial work (MW) indices in patients recently recovering from mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Methods: A total of 105 recently recovered COVID-19 patients (who had a mean age of 52 years) underwent comprehensive laboratory testing and advanced echocardiographic assessments. The median time since their COVID-19 infections was 56 days (IQR: 42–71). The cohort was stratified based on high-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) levels: undetectable versus detectable. The echocardiographic analysis utilized pressure-strain loops to evaluate MW indices. Results: Detectable hs-TnI levels were observed in 42% of patients. The median values of MW indices for the entire group were slightly below normal values: global work index (GWI)—1834 mmHg% (IQR 1168–2054 mmHg%), global constructive work (GCW)—2130 mmHg% (IQR 2010–2398 mmHg%), global wasted work (GWW)—119 mmHg% (IQR 78–175 mmHg%), and global work efficiency (GWE)—94% (IQR 92–96%). Patients with detectable hs-TnI had higher GWW (168 vs. 97 mmHg%, p < 0.005) and lower GWE (93% vs. 95%, p < 0.005). In multiple regression analysis, strain dispersion (PSD) was the sole predictor for GWW (β = 0.67, p < 0.001), while for GWE, PSD (β = −0.67, p < 0.001) and LVEF (β = 0.16, p = 0.05) were significant predictors. Conclusions: Among patients recently recovering from mild-to-moderate COVID-19, elevated hs-TnI levels are linked with a reduction in GWE and an increase in GWW. PSD is an important predictor of myocardial inefficiency and wasted work. In this group, disruptions in the timing and coordination of cardiac muscle contractions may play a key pathophysiological role in reducing the efficiency of the heart’s performance.

  Background Adoption and outcomes for conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), in real-world settings are incompletely understood. We sought to describe real-world adoption of CSP lead implantation and subsequent outcomes. Methods We performed an online cross-sectional survey on the implantation and outcomes associated with CSP, between November 15, 2020, and February 15, 2021. We described survey responses and reported HBP and LBBAP outcomes for bradycardia pacing and cardiac resynchronization CRT indications, separately. Results The analysis cohort included 140 institutions, located on 5 continents, who contributed data to the worldwide survey on CSP. Of these, 127 institutions (90.7%) reported experience implanting CSP leads. CSP and overall device implantation volumes were reported by 84 institutions. In 2019, the median proportion of device implants with CSP, HBP, and/or LBBAP leads attempted were 4.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9–12.5%; range, 0.4–100%), 3.3% (IQR, 1.3–7.1%; range, 0.2–87.0%), and 2.5% (IQR, 0.5–24.0%; range, 0.1–55.6%), respectively. For bradycardia pacing indications, HBP leads, as compared to LBBAP leads, had higher reported implant threshold (median [IQR]: 1.5 V [1.3–2.0 V] vs 0.8 V [0.6–1.0 V], p  = 0.0008) and lower ventricular sensing (median [IQR]: 4.0 mV [3.0–5.0 mV] vs. 10.0 mV [7.0–12.0 mV], p  < 0.0001). Conclusion In conclusion, CSP lead implantation has been broadly adopted but has yet to become the default approach at most surveyed institutions. As the indications and data for CSP continue to evolve, strategies to educate and promote CSP lead implantation at institutions without CSP lead implantation experience would be necessary.

Background/Objectives: Remote monitoring (RM) cardiac implantable electronic devices for adults delivers improved patient outcomes. However, previously used bedside transmitters are not optimal due to deficient patient adherence. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RM regarding the connectivity of smartphone app-based solutions, adherence to scheduled automatic follow-ups, and prevalence of alert-based events. Methods: We evaluated the adult heart failure (HF) population with an implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) divided into two arms: with app-based RM (abRM) and without app-based RM (control). Results: A total of 81 patients (median age of 69.0) were included in our study. Sixty-five patients received a CRT-D with abRM functionality, and sixteen did not. Twelve patients had no smartphone, and two provided no consent, resulting in their transfer to the control group. Finally, the abRM arm consisted of 51 patients, while 30 patients were in the control group. The median period of follow-up lasted 12 months. Among abRM patients, 98.0% successfully transmitted their first scheduled follow-up, and 80.4% were continuously monitored. Alert-based events were mainly related to arrhythmic events and device functionality with significantly shorter median times to notification (1 day vs. 101 days; p < 0.0001) in the abRM group. Conclusions: Our study showed a high level of compliance with timely initial transmission and adherence to scheduled remote follow-ups. Patient enrollment eligibility was a major challenge due to the limited accessibility of smartphones in the population. App-based RM demonstrated an accurate notification of events and patient-initiated transmissions in emergencies, regardless of location.