Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionLong-leg radiographs are used to plan and supervise the correction of bone deformity in patients treated with the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF). Often radiographs are performed with malpositioning of the limb leading to wrong alignment measurements. The aim of this retrospective study was to show the usefulness of a simple device which might enhance the reproducibility of limb rotation on long-leg radiographs.Materials and methodsWe included 20 consecutive patients with TSF treatment and at least three long-leg radiographs (4.9 ± 1.3). Eight out of 20 patients received radiographs with the help of a rotation rod (device with two clamps and a carbon tube). It is placed at the most frontal tab of the reference ring while conducting the radiograph. By this means, limb rotation can be controlled. To show the usefulness of this device, two observers measured the relation of the distances between the middle of the reference ring to the medial and lateral fourth hole on the reference ring (TSF-RR). The standard deviation and range of the TSF-RR of all radiographs for each patient was calculated and compared between patients without and with the rotation rod.ResultsThe standard deviations of TSF-RR in patients without the rotation rod was significantly higher compared to patients with rotation rod (observer 1: p = 0.0228, observer 2: p = 0.0038). Also, the range of the TSF-RR within one patient is significant higher (observer 1: p = 0.0279, observer 2: p = 0.0038) in patients without the rotation rod compared to patients with the rotation rod.ConclusionsThe variability of rotation on radiographs was lower with the rotation rod. Therefore, more reproducible and better comparable radiographs can be conducted. Radiologic exposure might be reduced as repetition of wrongly positioned limbs on radiographs are less frequent.

Introduction Managing open lower extremity fractures is challenging, with potential complications such as amputation and infection. The aim of the study was to determine whether the time delay and initial treatment of the patients treated in a non-specialized hospital before being transferred to a dedicated level I trauma center led to a worse outcome. Methods Retrospective data from 44 patients (37 males and seven females) undergoing free tissue transfer for lower extremity open fractures from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed. Group A received primary care externally and was later transferred for definitive treatment (n=17, 38.6%), while group B received initial care at a level I trauma center (n=27, 61.4%). Surgical outcomes, complications, the duration of the hospital stay, and assessment times were compared. Various demographic variables, co-morbidities, prior interventions, and flap types were analyzed.  Results Average age (A: 55.1±16.7; B: 38.7±19.8 years; p=0.041), overall hospitalization (A: 55.7±22.8; B: 42.8±21.3 days; p=0.041), and time to soft tissue reconstruction differed significantly between groups (A: 30.7±12.2; B: 18.9±9.3 days; p=0.013). Overall, 31.8% had multiple injuries without statistical differences between groups A and B (29.4% vs. 33.3%; p>0.05). There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of major and minor complications and bone healing characteristics. Limb salvage was successful overall in 93.2% (A: 94.1%; B: 92.6%; P>0.05). Major complications occurred in 9.1%; three patients underwent major amputation (A: n=2; B: n=1). Minor complications were observed in 43.2% of patients (partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence and non-union; A: 41.2%; B: 44.4%; p>0.05). Overall, 65.9% of patients (A: 64.7%; B: 66.7%; p>0.05) experienced uneventful bone healing, while 18.2% of patients (A: 23.5%; B: 14.8%; p>0.05) experienced delayed healing. Flaps used were mostly musculocutaneous (71.7%). Various assessed demographic characteristics, including age and presence of polytrauma, showed no significant influence on complications (p>0.05). Conclusion  Although there is a significant difference in the time course of externally treated patients with open fractures, prolonged treatment is not associated with a higher complication rate or compromised bone healing outcome. Despite the findings, it is important to avoid delays and strive for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Early and reliable detection of infection is vital for successful treatment. Serum markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are known to increase with a time lag. Azurocidin 1 (AZU1) has emerged as a promising marker for septic patients, but its diagnostic value in orthopedic and trauma patients remains unexplored. Between July 2020 and August 2023, all patients necessitating inpatient treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), peri-implant infection (II), soft tissue infection, chronic osteomyelitis, septic arthrodesis, bone non-union with and without infection were enrolled. Patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) served as the control group. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for CRP, white blood cell count (WBC), PCT, and AZU1. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria 222 patients were included in the study (trauma = 38, soft tissue infection = 75, TJA = 33, PJI/II = 39, others = 37). While sensitivity and specificity were comparably high for AZU1 (0.734/0.833), CRP and PCT had higher specificity (0.542/1 and 0.431/1, respectively), and WBC a slightly higher sensitivity (0.814/0.455) for septic conditions. Taken together, the area under the curve (AUC) showed the highest accuracy for AZU1 (0.790), followed by CRP (0.776), WBC (0.641), and PCT (0.656). The Youden-Index was 0.57 for AZU1, 0.54 for CRP, 0.27 for WBC, and 0.43 for PCT. Elevated AZU1 levels effectively distinguished patients with a healthy condition from those suffering from infection. However, there is evidence suggesting that trauma may influence the release of AZU1. Additional research is needed to validate the diagnostic value of this new biomarker and further explore its potential clinical applications.

Current fracture fixation follow-up is based on subjective radiological and clinical examination. Efforts to objectify the procedure have been undertaken since decades. Assessment of implant load as an indirect predictor of callus maturity has so far failed to enter clinical routine due to limited practicability, technical obstacles and its snap-shot nature. We recently introduced the concept of continuous implant load monitoring to aid in diagnosing fracture healing progression. This study aimed at investigating the feasibility of the system in a clinical context. Ten patients treated with Taylor-Spatial-Frame external fixators following pathological tibia fractures were equipped with a Fracture Monitor device attached to a fixator-strut and were monitored until hardware removal. Two patients were excluded due to technical issues. Implant load and fracture activity was continuously and autonomously measured for 139 ± 89 days (mean ± SD). Data was wirelessly collected with consumer smartphones. Relative implant load initially rose for 34.1 ± 22.2 days and finally declined to a level of 45.0 ± 33.8% of the maximum implant load. In five patients the load dropped below 50% of the maximum load. These patients underwent hardware removal according to the clinical assessment. In three patients, whose external fixators were exchanged to internal fixation at the end of the study, implant load did not drop below the 50% margin. The continuous measurement principle allows resolving implant load progression and appears indicative for the bone healing status. Data can be acquired in a homecare setting and is believed to provide valuable information to support timely healing assessment and enable patient specific after-care.

Zusammenfassung Pseudarthrosen nach Sternotomien sind rar und meist gut im Rahmen operativer Revisionen zu behandeln. Bei fehlgeschlagenen Revisionen ist ein differenziertes Vorgehen notwendig, das sowohl die biologischen wie auch biomechanischen Rahmenbedingungen berücksichtigt. Es wird über den Fall einer therapierefraktären atrophen Pseudarthrose nach auswärtig erfolgloser Revision berichtet. Diese wurde durch ein Therapievorgehen, orientiert an den Kriterien des Non Union Scoring System (NUSS), erfolgreich behandelt. Die Versorgungsstrategie wie auch der erfolgreiche Behandlungsverlauf werden dargestellt.

IntroductionThe influence of limb malrotation on long-leg radiographs (LLR) is frequently discussed in literature. This systematic review aimed to describe the influence of limb rotation on alignment measurements alone and in combination with knee flexion, and determine its clinical impact.Materials and methodsA literature search was conducted in June 2021 using the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), and Embase. The search term ((radiograph OR X-ray) AND (position OR rotation) AND limb alignment) was used. Database query, record screening, and study inclusion and exclusion were performed by two reviewers independently. Experimental studies (using either specimens or synthetic bones) or clinical studies (prospective or retrospective using radiographs of patients) analyzing the influence of limb rotation on anatomic and mechanical limb alignment measurements were included. Characteristics and results of the included studies were summarized, simplified, and grouped for comparison to answer the research question. Studies were compared descriptively, and no meta-analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 22 studies were included showing large heterogeneity, comprising studies with cadavers, patients, and synthetic bones. Most studies (7 out of 8) reported that external rotation (ER) causes less apparent valgus and leads to more varus and internal rotation (IR) causes more valgus and leads to less varus. However, there is no consensus on the extent of rotation influencing alignment measures. Studies reported about an average change of > 2° (n = 4) and < 2° (n = 4) hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) between 15°IR and 15°ER. There is a consensus that the impact of rotation on mechanical alignment is higher if additional sagittal knee angulation, such as knee flexion, is present. All five studies analyzing the influence of rotation combined with knee flexion (5°–15°) showed an HKA change of > 2° between 15°IR and 15°ER.ConclusionMalrotation is frequently present on LLR, possibly influencing the measured alignment especially in knees with extension deficit. Surgeons must consider this when measuring and treating deformities (high tibial osteotomy or total knee arthroplasties), and analyzing surgical outcomes. Especially in patients with osteoarthritis with knee extension deficits or postoperative swelling, the effect of malrotation is significantly greater.

Introduction There is a tremendous scope of hardware and software development going on in augmented reality (AR), also in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. However, there are only a few systems available for intra-operative 3D imaging and guidance, most of them rely on peri- and intra-operative X-ray imaging. Especially in complex situations such as pelvic surgery or multifragmentary multilevel fractures, intra-operative 3D imaging and implant tracking systems have proven to be of great advantage for the outcome of the surgery and can help reduce X-ray exposure, at least for the surgical team (Ochs et al. in Injury 41:1297 1305, 2010). Yet, the current systems do not provide the ability to have a dynamic live view from the perspective of the surgeon. Our study describes a prototype AR-based system for live tracking which does not rely on X-rays. Materials and methods A protype live-view intra-operative guidance system using an AR head-mounted device (HMD) was developed and tested on the implantation of a medullary nail in a tibia fracture model. Software algorithms that allow live view and tracking of the implant, fracture fragments and soft tissue without the intra-operative use of X-rays were derived. Results The implantation of a medullar tibia nail is possible while only relying on AR-guidance and live view without the intra-operative use of X-rays. Conclusions The current paper describes a feasibility study with a prototype of an intra-operative dynamic live tracking and imaging system that does not require intra-operative use of X-rays and dynamically adjust to the perspective of the surgeons due to an AR HMD. To our knowledge, the current literature does not describe any similar systems. This could be the next step in surgical imaging and education and a promising way to improve patient care.

IntroductionIn absence of deformity or injury of the contralateral leg, the contralateral leg length is used to plan limb lengthening. Length variability on long-leg weight-bearing radiographs (LLR) can lead to inaccurate deformity correction. The aim of the study was to (1) examine the variability of the measured limb length on LLR and (2) to examine the influence of the position of the magnification device.Materials and methodsThe limb lengths of 38 patients during deformity correction with a taylor-spatial-frame were measured retrospectively on 7.3 ± 2.6 (4–13) LLR per patient. The measured length of the untreated limb between LLR were used to determine length variability between LLR in each patient. To answer the secondary aim, we took LLR from a 90 cm validation distance. A magnification device was placed in different positions: at the middle of the 90 cm distance (z-position), 5 cm anterior and 5 cm posterior from the z-position, at the bottom and top of the validation distance as well as 5 cm medial and 15 cm lateral from the z-position.ResultsThe measured length variability ranged within a patient from 10 to 50 mm. 76% of patients had a measured limb length difference of ≥ 2 cm between taken LLR. Compared to length measurement of the 90 cm test object with the magnification device in the z-position (90.1 cm), positioning the device 5 cm anterior led to smaller (88.6 cm) and 5 cm posterior led to larger measurements (91.7 cm). The measured length with the magnification device at the bottom, top, medial or lateral (90.4; 89.9; 90.2; 89.8 cm) to the object differed not relevantly.ConclusionsHigh variability of limb length between different LLR within one patient was observed. This can result from different positions of the magnification device in the sagittal plane. These small changes in positioning the device should be avoided to achieve accurate deformity correction and bone lengthening. This should be considered for all length and size measurements on radiographs.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and work intensity following double-level knee osteotomy (DLO). It was hypothesized that postoperative HRQL would be comparable to that of the general population and that work intensity can be restored in the short term. Methods Twenty-four patients (28 varus knees; mechanical tibiofemoral angle: −11.0 ± 3.0° (−6.0 to −17.0), age: 49.1 ± 9.5 (31–65) years) who underwent DLO were included. The duration the patients were unable to work was evaluated. HRQL was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire, which consists of a physical (PCS) and mental component summary score (MCS). The pre- to postoperative changes in the PCS and MCS were analysed. The PCS and MCS were also compared to those of the general population, who has a reference score value of 50 points. The work intensity measured with the REFA classification and the Tegner activity scale were assessed preoperatively and at the final postoperative follow-up examination (18.0 ± 10.0 (5–43) months). Results The duration that the patients were unable to work was 12.2 ± 4.4 (6–20) weeks. The PCS improved from 32.1 ± 11.3 (14.5–53.3) preoperatively to 54.6 ± 8.5 (25.2–63.7) ( p  < 0.001) at the final follow-up, and the MCS improved from 53.9 ± 11.1 (17.1–67.7) to 57.2 ± 3.1 (47.3–61.7) (n.s). The preoperative PCS was significantly lower than the reference score of the general population ( p  < 0.001), whereas the preoperative MCS was similar between the two groups (n.s . ). At follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the PCS and the MCS of the patient group and those of the general population. Five patients who were unable to work prior to surgery due to knee symptoms returned to work with moderate (four patients) or even very heavy (one patient) workloads. The Tegner activity scale increased significantly from a median of 2.0 (0.0–5.0) to 4.0 (2.0–7.0) ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Our results demonstrate an improvement in quality of life and return to working activity following DLO in the short term. The HRQL can be improved by DLO in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis to the level of the general population. These results can assist surgeons in discussing realistic expectations when considering patients for DLO. Level of evidence Study type: therapeutic, IV.

The reconstruction of posttraumatic defects of bone and soft tissue, as well as residual deformities of the bone is often a lengthy and complicated procedure. Multiple surgical interventions are necessary to reconstruct the affected extremity and restore its functionality. To achieve an optimal result it often takes months or years and requires great patience and compliance of the patient. This treatment should be carried out in centers with the appropriate instrumental and human resources. Since the pathologies are often complex with bony deformities or loss of bone, as well as infections and soft tissue defects, the treatment should be carried out by very experienced surgeons to successfully manage these complex reconstructions. This often requires interdisciplinary cooperation, especially with experienced plastic surgeons. A soft tissue reconstruction for better blood circulation in the exposed bony structures, as well as the bony defects themselves, can be reconstructed at the same time.The reconstruction of posttraumatic defects of bone and soft tissue, as well as residual deformities of the bone is often a lengthy and complicated procedure. Multiple surgical interventions are necessary to reconstruct the affected extremity and restore its functionality. To achieve an optimal result it often takes months or years and requires great patience and compliance of the patient. This treatment should be carried out in centers with the appropriate instrumental and human resources. Since the pathologies are often complex with bony deformities or loss of bone, as well as infections and soft tissue defects, the treatment should be carried out by very experienced surgeons to successfully manage these complex reconstructions. This often requires interdisciplinary cooperation, especially with experienced plastic surgeons. A soft tissue reconstruction for better blood circulation in the exposed bony structures, as well as the bony defects themselves, can be reconstructed at the same time.