Explore the vast range of titles available.

Morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular methods often need to be combined for accurate diagnosis and optimal clinical management of sarcomas. Here, we have developed, a new molecular diagnostic assay, for the detection of gene fusions in sarcomas. This targeted multiplexed next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method utilizes ligation dependent reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (LD-RT-PCR-NGS) to detect oncogenic fusion transcripts involving 137 genes, leading to 139 gene fusions known to be recurrently rearranged in soft-tissue and bone tumors. 158 bone and soft-tissue tumors with previously identified fusion genes by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or RT-PCR were selected to test the specificity and the sensitivity of this assay. RNA were extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ( n  = 143) or frozen ( n  = 15) material (specimen; n  = 42 or core needle biopsies; n  = 116). Tested tumors encompassed 23 major translocation-related sarcomas types, including Ewing and Ewing-like sarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, desmoplastic small round-cell tumors, clear-cell sarcomas, infantile fibrosarcomas, endometrial stromal sarcomas, epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas, alveolar soft-part sarcomas, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcomas, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas, myxoid/round-cell liposarcomas, dermatofibrosarcomas protuberans and solitary fibrous tumors. In-frame fusion transcripts were detected in 98.1% of cases (155/158). Gene fusion assay results correlated with conventional techniques (FISH and RT-PCR) in 155/158 tumors (98.1%). These data demonstrate that this assay is a rapid, robust, highly sensitive, and multiplexed targeted RNA sequencing assay for the detection of recurrent gene fusions on RNA extracted from routine clinical specimens of sarcomas (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded or frozen). It facilitates the precise diagnosis and identification of tumors with potential targetable fusions. In addition, this assay can be easily customized to cover new fusions.

Objective Endocrine therapy is frequently administered in patients with hormone dependent (HR+) metastatic endometrial cancer. ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in HR + metastatic breast cancer and can be monitored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations in patients treated by AI or megestrol acetate (M) for advanced endometrial carcinoma. Methodology This single-center retrospective study was performed at the Henri Becquerel Center (Rouen) and looked for circulating ESR1 gene mutations by droplet digital PCR (E380Q, L536R, Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, D538G, S463P) in patients with advanced HR + endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2020 for at least 30 days by AI or M. Analyses were performed before exposure and at progression/during endocrine therapy. Results Twenty-two patients were included: 13 were treated with AI, 12 of whom progressed; 9 patients were treated with M, 8 of whom progressed. 68.1% of the patients had low-grade endometrial carcinoma and 54.5% had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The median duration of treatment was 152 days (min 47 – max 629) with AI and 155 days (min 91-max 1297) with M. Under AI, there was no ESR1 mutation at baseline, and one Y537C mutation at progression with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.14%. Under M, one patient had a Y537C (VAF 0.2%) at baseline that disappeared during treatment. Another patient had a Y537S mutation emergence at progression after 91 days of treatment (VAF 1.83%). There was no significant difference between the circulating DNA concentration before and after hormone therapy ( p  = 0.16). Conclusion ESR1 mutations do not seem to be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to AI or M in HR+ endometrial cancer. The clinical relevance of their detection is not demonstrated.

Background Detection of circulating ESR1 mutations is associated with acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) in metastatic breast cancer. Until now, the presence of circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of adjuvant treatment by AI in early breast cancer had never been clearly established. In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the circulating ESR1 mutation frequency at the end of adjuvant treatment and after relapse. Methods This monocentric retrospective study was based on available stored plasmas and included all early breast cancer patients who completed at least 2 years of AI adjuvant treatment and experienced a documented relapse after the end of their treatment. Circulating ESR1 mutations (D538G, Y537S/N/C) were assessed by droplet digital PCR in plasma samples taken at the end of adjuvant treatment, at time of relapse and at time of progression under first line metastatic treatment. Results A total of 42 patients were included, with a median adjuvant AI exposure of 60 months (range 41–85). No circulating ESR1 mutation was detectable at the end of AI adjuvant therapy. At first relapse, 5.3% of the patients (2/38) had a detectable circulating ESR1 mutation. At time of progression on first-line metastatic treatment, 33% of the patients (7/21) under AI had a detectable circulating ESR1 mutation compared to none of the patients under chemotherapy (0/10). The two patients with a detectable ESR1 mutation at relapse were treated by AI and had an increase of their variant allele fraction at time of progression on first-line metastatic treatment. Conclusions Circulating ESR1 mutation detection at the end of AI-based adjuvant treatment is not clinically useful. Circulating ESR1 mutation could be assessed as soon as first relapse to guide interventional studies.

Background Endocrine therapy is recommended as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+MBC) patients. No biomarker has been validated to predict tumor progression in that setting. We aimed to prospectively compare the risk of early progression according to circulating ESR1 mutations, CA-15.3, and circulating cell-free DNA in MBC patients treated with a first-line aromatase inhibitor (AI). Methods Patients with MBC treated with a first-line AI were prospectively included. Circulating biomarker assessment was performed every 3 months. The primary objective was to determine the risk of progression or death at the next follow-up visit (after 3 months) in case of circulating ESR1 mutation detection among patients treated with a first-line AI for HR+MBC. Results Overall, 103 patients were included, and 70 (68%) had progressive disease (PD). Circulating ESR1 mutations were detected in 22/70 patients with PD and in 0/33 patients without progression ( p  < 0.001). Among the ESR1 -mutated patients, 18/22 had a detectable mutation prior to progression, with a median delay of 110 days from first detection to PD. The detection of circulating ESR1 mutations was associated with a 4.9-fold (95% CI 3.0–8.0) increase in the risk of PD at 3 months. Using a threshold value of 25% or 100%, a CA-15.3 increase was also correlated with progression ( p  < 0.001 and p  = 0.003, respectively). In contrast to ESR1 , the CA-15.3 increase occurred concomitantly with PD in most cases, in 27/47 (57%) with a 25% threshold and in 21/25 (84%) with a 100% threshold. Using a threshold value of either 25% or 100%, cfDNA increase was not correlated with progression. Conclusion The emergence of circulating ESR1 mutations is associated with a 4.9-fold increase in the risk of early PD during AI treatment in HR+MBC. Our results also highlighted that tracking circulating ESR1 mutations is more relevant than tracking CA-15.3 or cfDNA increase to predict progression in this setting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials . gov, NCT02473120 . Registered 16 June 2015—retrospectively registered after one inclusion (first inclusion 1 June 2015)

The clinical implications of plasmatic cell-free and tumor DNA (cfDNA and ctDNA) are challenging in glioblastoma. This prospective study included 52 consecutive newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 49) or gliosarcoma (n = 3) patients treated with concomitant temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT-TMZ), followed by a TMZ maintenance phase. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, before RT-TMZ (pre-RT-TMZ) and at the end of adjuvant TMZ, or at the time of progression in cases of progressive disease (PD). The cfDNA concentration was measured with a fluorometric method, and ctDNA was detected using targeted droplet digital PCR. The main objectives were to analyze the associations between cfDNA and ctDNA measurements during the course of treatment with PD and survival. There was a significant decrease in median cfDNA concentration from baseline to pre-RT-TMZ—19.4 versus 9.7 ng/mL ( p  < 0.0001)—in the entire cohort. In patients with PD, a significant increase in cfDNA concentration from pre-RT-TMZ to time of PD was observed, from 9.7 versus 13.1 ng/mL ( p  = 0.037), respectively, while no difference was observed for nonprogressive patients. Neither the cfDNA concentration at baseline nor its kinetics correlated with survival. ctDNA was detected in 2 patients (3.8%) and only in gliosarcoma subtypes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial, NCT02617745. Registered 1 December 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617745?term=glioplak&draw=2&rank=1 .

Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) amplification and EGFR variant III ( EGFRvIII , deletion of exons 2–7) are of clinical interest for glioblastoma. The aim was to develop a digital PCR (dPCR)-based method using locked nucleic acid (LNA)-based hydrolysis probes, allowing the simultaneous detection of the EGFR amplification and EGFRvIII variant. Sixty-two patients were included. An exploratory cohort ( n  = 19) was used to develop the dPCR assay using three selected amplicons within the EGFR gene, targeting intron 1 (EGFR1), junction of exon 3 and intron 3 (EGFR2) and intron 22 (EGFR3). The copy number of EGFR was estimated by the relative quantification of EGFR1, EGFR2 and EGFR3 amplicon droplets compared to the droplets of a reference gene. EGFRvIII was identified by comparing the copy number of the EGFR2 amplicon to either the EGFR1 or EGFR3 amplicon. dPCR results were compared to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing for amplification; and to RT-PCR-based method for EGFRvIII . The dPCR assay was then tested in a validation cohort ( n  = 43). A total of 8/19 EGFR -amplified and 5/19 EGFRvIII- positive tumors were identified in the exploratory cohort. Compared to FISH, the EGFR3 dPCR assay detected all EGFR -amplified tumors (8/8, 100%) and had the highest concordance with the copy number estimation by NGS. The concordance between RT-PCR and dPCR was also 100% for detecting EGFRvIII using an absolute difference of 10.8 for the copy number between EGFR2 and EGFR3 probes. In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of dPCR using EGFR3 probes were 100% for the EGFR amplification detection compared to FISH (19/19). EGFRvIII was detected by dPCR in 8 EGFR -amplified patients and confirmed by RT-PCR. Compared to FISH, the EGFR2/EGFR3 dPCR assay was estimated with a one-half cost value. These results highlight that dPCR allowed the simultaneous detection of EGFR amplification and EGFRvIII for glioblastoma.

Background: The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs). Methods: We included 68 patients with a SPT referred for EUS-FNA. CTCs were analysed using size-based platform and ctDNA using digital PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were evaluated for each marker and their combination. Results: SPTs corresponded to 58 malignant tumours (52 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) and 6 others) and 10 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for PA diagnosis were 73% and 88% for EUS-FNA, 67% and 80% for CTC, 65% and 75% for ctDNA and 79% and 93% for CA19.9, respectively. The positivity of at least 2 markers was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 91%, respectively. CtDNA was the only marker associated with overall survival (median 5.2 months for ctDNA+ vs 11.0 months for ctDNA−, P =0.01). Conclusions: CA19.9 alone and in combination with ctDNA and/or CTC analysis may represent an efficient method for diagnosing PA in patients with SPTs. Further studies including a larger cohort of patients with both malignant and benign lesions will be necessary to confirm these promising results.

Abstract Background Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the reference COVID-19 diagnosis method but exhibits imperfect sensitivity. Methods We developed a multiplex reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR) assay, targeting 6 SARS-CoV-2 genomic regions, and evaluated it on nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples collected from 130 COVID-19 positive or negative ambulatory individuals, who presented symptoms suggestive of mild or moderate SARS-CoV2 infection. Results For the nasopharyngeal swab samples, the results obtained using the 6-plex RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR assays were all concordant. The 6-plex RT-ddPCR assay was more sensitive than RT-qPCR (85% versus 62%) on saliva samples from patients with positive nasopharyngeal swabs. Conclusion Multiplex RT-ddPCR represents an alternative and complementary tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19, in particular to control RT-qPCR ambiguous results. It can also be applied to saliva for repetitive sampling and testing individuals for whom nasopharyngeal swabbing is not possible.

Background We previously reported that CEA kinetics are a marker of progressive disease (PD) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study was specifically designed to confirm CEA kinetics for predicting PD and to evaluate CA19-9, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumour cell (CTC) kinetics. Methods Patients starting a chemotherapy (CT) with pre-treatment CEA > 5 ng/mL and/or CA19.9 > 30 UI/mL were prospectively included. Samples were collected from baseline to cycle 4 for CEA and CA19-9 and at baseline and the sixth week for other markers. CEA kinetics were calculated from the first to the third or fourth CT cycle. Results A total of 192 mCRC patients were included. CEA kinetics based on the previously identified >0.05 threshold was significantly associated with PD ( p  < 0.0001). By dichotomising by the median value, cfDNA, ctDNA and CA19-9 were associated with PD, PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. A circulating scoring system (CSS) combining CEA kinetics and baseline CA19-9 and cfDNA values classified patients based on high ( n  = 58) and low risk ( n  = 113) of PD and was independently associated with PD (ORa = 4.6, p  < 0.0001), PFS (HRa = 2.07, p  < 0.0001) and OS (HRa = 2.55, p  < 0.0001). Conclusions CEA kinetics alone or combined with baseline CA19-9 and cfDNA are clinically relevant for predicting outcomes in mCRC. Trial registration number NCT01212510.

Introduction/BackgroundEndocrine therapy is frequently administered in patients with hormone dependent (HR+) metastatic endometrial cancer. ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of anti-aromatase (AA) resistance in HR+ metastatic breast cancer and can be monitored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence of circulating ESR1 mutations in patients treated by AA or megestrol acetate (M) for advanced endometrial carcinoma.MethodologyThis single-center retrospective study was performed at the Henri Becquerel Center (Rouen) and looked for circulating ESR1 gene mutations by droplet digital PCR (E380Q, L536R, Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, D538G, S463P) in patients with advanced HR+ endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2020 for at least 30 days by AA or M. Timepoints were before exposure and at progression/during endocrine therapy.Results22 patients were included: 13 were treated with AA, 12 of whom progressed; 9 patients were treated with M, 8 of whom progressed. 68.1% of the patients had low-grade endometrial carcinoma and 54.5% had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The median duration of treatment was 106 days (min 47 – max 358) with AA and 132 days (min 91-max 272) with M. Under AA, there was no ESR1 mutation at baseline, and one Y537C mutation at progression with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.14%. Under M, one patient had a Y537C (VAF 0.2%) at baseline that disappeared during treatment. Another patient had a Y537S mutation emergence at progression after 91 days of treatment (VAF 1.83%). There was no significant difference between the circulating DNA concentration before and after hormone therapy (p = 0.16).Conclusion ESR1 mutations do not seem to be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to AA or M in HR+ endometrial cancer. The clinical relevance of their detection is not demonstrated.