Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aims/hypothesis Observational and mechanistic studies have suggested a possible relationship between treatment with metformin and decreased incidence of cancer in participants with type 2 diabetes. We extracted data for malignancies from the ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial) and RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes) randomised controlled clinical trials, in which the efficacy and/or safety of metformin was assessed in comparison with sulfonylureas and rosiglitazone. Methods Neoplasm occurrences were collected as adverse events in these studies. We reviewed and re-analysed the individual participant data in both studies for serious adverse events, malignancies reported as adverse events and related neoplasms of special interest. Results In ADOPT, 50 participants (3.4%) on metformin and 55 (3.8%) on each of rosiglitazone and glibenclamide (known as glyburide in the USA and Canada) developed serious adverse event malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers). This corresponds to 1.03, 1.12 and 1.31 per 100 person-years, giving hazard ratios for metformin of 0.92 (95% CI 0.63-1.35) vs rosiglitazone and 0.78 (0.53-1.14) vs glibenclamide. In RECORD, on a background of sulfonylurea, 69 (6.1%) participants developed malignant neoplasms in the metformin group, compared with 56 (5.1%) in the rosiglitazone group (HR 1.22 [0.86-1.74]). On a background of metformin, 74 (6.7%) participants in the sulfonylurea group developed malignant neoplasms, compared with 57 (5.1%) in the rosiglitazone group (HR 1.33 [0.94-1.88]). Conclusions/interpretation The malignancy rates in these two randomised controlled clinical trials do not support a view that metformin offers any particular protection against malignancy compared with rosiglitazone. However, they do not refute the possibility of a difference compared with sulfonylureas.

Aims/hypothesis Insulin-mediated glucose disposal rates (R d) are reduced in type 2 diabetic patients, a process in which intrinsic signalling defects are thought to be involved. Phosphorylation of TBC1 domain family, member 4 (TBC1D4) is at present the most distal insulin receptor signalling event linked to glucose transport. In this study, we examined insulin action on site-specific phosphorylation of TBC1D4 and the effect of exercise training on insulin action and signalling to TBC1D4 in skeletal muscle from type 2 diabetic patients. Methods During a 3 h euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic (80 mU min⁻¹ m⁻²) clamp, we obtained M. vastus lateralis biopsies from 13 obese type 2 diabetic and 13 obese, non-diabetic control individuals before and after 10 weeks of endurance exercise-training. Results Before training, reductions in insulin-stimulated R d, together with impaired insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase fractional velocity, Akt Thr³⁰⁸ phosphorylation and phosphorylation of TBC1D4 at Ser³¹⁸, Ser⁵⁸⁸ and Ser⁷⁵¹ were observed in skeletal muscle from diabetic patients. Interestingly, exercise-training normalised insulin-induced TBC1D4 phosphorylation in diabetic patients. This happened independently of increased TBC1D4 protein content, but exercise-training did not normalise Akt phosphorylation in diabetic patients. In both groups, training-induced improvements in insulin-stimulated R d (~20%) were associated with increased muscle protein content of Akt, TBC1D4, α2-AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), glycogen synthase, hexokinase II and GLUT4 (20-75%). Conclusions/interpretation Impaired insulin-induced site-specific TBC1D4 phosphorylation may contribute to skeletal muscle insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. The mechanisms by which exercise-training improves insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes may involve augmented signalling of TBC1D4 and increased skeletal muscle content of key insulin signalling and effector proteins, e.g., Akt, TBC1D4, AMPK, glycogen synthase, GLUT4 and hexokinase II.

Aim/hypothesis Studies have suggested a link between insulin resistance and mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscles. Our primary aim was to investigate the effect of aerobic training on mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) release in skeletal muscle of obese participants with and without type 2 diabetes. Methods Type 2 diabetic men (n = 13) and control (n = 14) participants matched for age, BMI and physical activity completed 10 weeks of aerobic training. Pre- and post-training muscle biopsies were obtained before a euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp and used for measurement of respiratory function and ROS release in isolated mitochondria. Results Training significantly increased insulin sensitivity, maximal oxygen consumption and muscle mitochondrial respiration with no difference between groups. When expressed in relation to a marker of mitochondrial density (intrinsic mitochondrial respiration), training resulted in increased mitochondrial ADP-stimulated respiration (with NADH-generating substrates) and decreased respiration without ADP. Intrinsic mitochondrial respiration was not different between groups despite lower insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic participants. Mitochondrial ROS release tended to be higher in participants with type 2 diabetes. Conclusions/interpretation Aerobic training improves muscle respiration and intrinsic mitochondrial respiration in untrained obese participants with and without type 2 diabetes. These adaptations demonstrate an increased metabolic fitness, but do not seem to be directly related to training-induced changes in insulin sensitivity.

Aims/hypothesis It is commonly thought that hyperglycaemia results from insufficient compensation of insulin secretion for insulin resistance. To verify this hypothesis, we assessed beta cell function and insulin sensitivity (IS) in a large cohort of volunteers with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or impaired glucose regulation (IGR), i.e. impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose. Methods In men and women with NGT (n = 1,123) or IGR (n = 156) (age 44 ± 8 years, BMI 25 ± 4 kg/m², mean ± SD) we measured: (1) IS by clamp; (2) insulin secretion rates (ISR) and beta cell glucose sensitivity (=slope of the insulin secretion/plasma glucose dose-response) by C-peptide deconvolution and OGTT modelling; and (3) acute insulin response to intravenous glucose. Results After controlling for centre, sex, age and BMI, fasting and total ISR were inversely related to IS in both groups, whereas beta cell glucose sensitivity was not. Acute insulin response was reciprocally related to IS in both groups, but the relationships were incompatible with inadequate compensation and significance was lost after controlling for fasting ISR. In IGR vs NGT, IS was impaired (92 [75] vs 133 [86] μmol min⁻¹ [kg fat-free mass]⁻¹ [nmol/l]⁻¹, median [interquartile range], p < 0.0001) as was beta cell glucose sensitivity (69 [46] vs 119 [83] pmol min⁻¹ m⁻² [nmol/l]⁻¹, p < 0.0001), whereas fasting and total ISR were increased (35% and 25%, respectively, p < 0.0001). In fully adjusted models, beta cell glucose sensitivity was the strongest determinant of OGTT glucose levels. Conclusions/interpretation Insulin resistance normally upregulates the secretory tone, with no evidence of defective compensation in IGR. In contrast, beta cell glucose sensitivity is independent of insulin resistance, but a key determinant of glucose tolerance. This suggests that hyperglycaemia results from an intrinsic beta cell defect rather than from inadequate compensation for insulin resistance.

Aims/hypothesis The natural history and physiological determinants of glucose intolerance in subjects living in Europe have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to increase our understanding of this area. Methods We analysed the data from a population-based cohort of 1,048 non-diabetic, normotensive men and women (aged 30–60 years) in whom insulin sensitivity was measured by the glucose clamp technique ( M / I index; average glucose infusion rate/steady-state insulin concentration) and beta cell function was estimated by mathematical modelling of the oral glucose tolerance test at baseline and 3 years later. Results Seventy-seven per cent of the participants had normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 5% were glucose intolerant both at baseline and follow up; glucose tolerance worsened in 13% (progressors) and improved in 6% (regressors). The metabolic phenotype of the latter three groups was similar (higher prevalence of familial diabetes, older age, higher waist-to-hip ratio, higher fasting and 2 h plasma glucose, higher fasting and 2 h plasma insulin, lower insulin sensitivity and reduced beta cell glucose sensitivity with increased absolute insulin secretion). Adjusting for these factors in a logistic model, progression was predicted by insulin resistance (bottom M / I quartile, OR 2.52 [95% CI 1.51–4.21]) and beta cell glucose insensitivity (bottom quartile, OR 2.39 [95% CI 1.6–3.93]) independently of waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.13–1.84] for one SD). At follow up, insulin sensitivity and beta cell glucose sensitivity were unchanged in the stable NGT and stable non-NGT groups, worsened in progressors and improved in regressors. Conclusions/interpretation Glucose tolerance deteriorates over time in young, healthy Europids. Progressors, regressors and glucose-intolerant participants share a common baseline phenotype. Insulin sensitivity and beta cell glucose sensitivity predict and track changes in glucose tolerance independently of sex, age and obesity.

Aims/hypothesis This study is a 19 year observational follow-up of a pragmatic open multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial of 6 years of structured personal diabetes care starting from diagnosis. Methods A total of 1,381 patients aged ≥40 years and newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were followed up in national registries for 19 years. Clinical follow-up was at 6 and 14 years after diabetes diagnosis. The original 6 year intervention included regular follow-up and individualised goal setting, supported by prompting of doctors, clinical guidelines, feedback and continuing medical education (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01074762). The registry-based endpoints were: incidence of any diabetes-related endpoint; diabetes-related death; all-cause mortality; myocardial infarction (MI); stroke; peripheral vascular disease; and microvascular disease. Results At 14 year clinical follow-up, group differences in risk factors from the 6 year follow-up had levelled out, although the prevalence of (micro)albuminuria and level of triacylglycerols were lower in the intervention group. During 19 years of registry-based monitoring, all-cause mortality was not different between the intervention and comparison groups (58.9 vs 62.3 events per 1,000 patient-years, respectively; for structured personal care, HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83, 1.08, p  = 0.40), but a lower risk emerged for fatal and non-fatal MI (27.3 vs 33.5, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68, 0.98, p  = 0.030) and any diabetes-related endpoint (69.5 vs 82.1, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72, 0.97, p  = 0.016). These differences persisted after extensive multivariable adjustment. Conclusions/interpretation In concert with features such as prompting, feedback, clinical guidelines and continuing medical education, individualisation of goal setting and drug treatment may safely be applied to treat patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes to lower the risk of diabetes complications.

Rosiglitazone is an insulin sensitiser used in combination with metformin, a sulfonylurea, or both, for lowering blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes. We assessed cardiovascular outcomes after addition of rosiglitazone to either metformin or sulfonylurea compared with the combination of the two over 5–7 years of follow-up. We also assessed comparative safety. In a multicentre, open-label trial, 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy with mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7·9% were randomly assigned to addition of rosiglitazone (n=2220) or to a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (active control group, n=2227). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular hospitalisation or cardiovascular death, with a hazard ratio (HR) non-inferiority margin of 1·20. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00379769. 321 people in the rosiglitazone group and 323 in the active control group experienced the primary outcome during a mean 5·5-year follow-up, meeting the criterion of non-inferiority (HR 0·99, 95% CI 0·85–1·16). HR was 0·84 (0·59–1·18) for cardiovascular death, 1·14 (0·80–1·63) for myocardial infarction, and 0·72 (0·49–1·06) for stroke. Heart failure causing admission to hospital or death occurred in 61 people in the rosiglitazone group and 29 in the active control group (HR 2·10, 1·35–3·27, risk difference per 1000 person-years 2·6, 1·1–4·1). Upper and distal lower limb fracture rates were increased mainly in women randomly assigned to rosiglitazone. Mean HbA1c was lower in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group at 5 years. Addition of rosiglitazone to glucose-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes is confirmed to increase the risk of heart failure and of some fractures, mainly in women. Although the data are inconclusive about any possible effect on myocardial infarction, rosiglitazone does not increase the risk of overall cardiovascular morbidity or mortality compared with standard glucose-lowering drugs. GlaxoSmithKline plc, UK.

Studies suggest that in addition to blood glucose concentrations, thiazolidinediones such as rosiglitazone improve some cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and surrogate markers, that are abnormal in type 2 diabetes. However, fluid retention might lead to cardiac failure in a minority of people. The aim of the Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes (RECORD) study is to evaluate the long-term impact of these effects on CV outcomes, as well as on long-term glycaemic control, in people with type 2 diabetes. RECORD is a 6-year, randomised, open-label study in type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate blood glucose control (HbA1c 7.1-9.0%) on metformin or sulphonylurea alone. The study is being performed in 327 centres in Europe and Australasia. After a 4-week run-in, participants were randomised by current treatment stratum to add-on rosiglitazone, metformin or sulphonylurea, with dose titration to a target HbA1c of < or = 7.0%. If confirmed HbA1c rises to > or = 8.5%, either a third glucose-lowering drug is added (rosiglitazone-treated group) or insulin is started (non-rosiglitazone group). The same criterion for failure of triple oral drug therapy in the rosiglitazone-treated group is used for starting insulin in this group. The primary endpoint is the time to first CV hospitalisation or death, blindly adjudicated by a central endpoints committee. The study aim is to evaluate non-inferiority of the rosiglitazone group vs the non-rosiglitazone group with respect to CV outcomes. Safety, tolerability and study conduct are monitored by an independent board. All CV endpoint and safety data are held and analysed by a clinical trials organisation, and are not available to the study investigators while data collection is open. Over a 2-year period a total of 7,428 people were screened in 25 countries. Of these, 4,458 were randomised; 2,228 on background metformin, 2,230 on background sulphonylurea. Approximately half of the participants are male (52%) and almost all are Caucasian (99%). The RECORD study should provide robust data on the extent to which rosiglitazone, in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea therapy, affects CV outcomes and progression of diabetes in the long term.

Abstract Objective: To assess the effect of a multifaceted intervention directed at general practitioners on six year mortality, morbidity, and risk factors of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Design: Pragmatic, open, controlled trial with randomisation of practices to structured personal care or routine care; analysis after 6 years. Setting: 311 Danish practices with 474 general practitioners (243 in intervention group and 231 in comparison group). Participants: 874 (90.1%) of 970 patients aged ≥40 years who had diabetes diagnosed in 1989-91 and survived until six year follow up. Intervention: Regular follow up and individualised goal setting supported by prompting of doctors, clinical guidelines, feedback, and continuing medical education. Main outcome measures: Predefined clinical non-fatal outcomes, overall mortality, risk factors, and weight. Results: Predefined non-fatal outcomes and mortality were the same in both groups. The following risk factor levels were lower for intervention patients than for comparison patients (median values): fasting plasma glucose concentration (7.9 v 8.7 mmol/l, P=0.0007), glycated haemoglobin (8.5% v 9.0%, P<0.0001; reference range 5.4-7.4%), systolic blood pressure (145 v 150 mm Hg, P=0.0004), and cholesterol concentration (6.0 v 6.1 mmol/l, P=0.029, adjusted for baseline concentration). Both groups had lost weight since diagnosis (2.6 v 2.0 kg). Metformin was the only drug used more frequently in the intervention group (24% (110/459) v 15% (61/415)).Intervention doctors arranged more follow up consultations, referred fewer patients to diabetes clinics, and set more optimistic goals. Conclusions: In primary care, individualised goals with educational and surveillance support may for at least six years bring risk factors of patients with type 2 diabetes to a level that has been shown to reduce diabetic complications but without weight gain. What is already known on this topic Evidence is increasing that control of hyperglycaemia, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia may postpone the development of diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes Maintaining good control over a long period can be difficult What this study adds Structured individualised personal care with educational and surveillance support for general practitioners reduced levels of risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients after six years Risk factors were reduced to a level that has been shown to have a beneficial effect on diabetic complications Participants also showed modest weight loss

Study the influence of age, zygosity and birth weight on insulin action and insulin secretion in twins. In vivo insulin action and insulin secretion were measured using the euglycaemic, hyperinsulinaemic clamp technique and intravenous glucose tolerance test, respectively. We examined 104 monozygotic (MZ) twins and 88 dizygotic (DZ) twins in two age groups (25-34 and 57-66 years). There were no differences in birth weight, body mass index, waist to hip ratio or lean body mass between monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Younger monozygotic twins had a slightly higher insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (M) than younger dizygotic twins. In contrast, elderly monozygotic twins had a lower insulin-stimulated glucose uptake value compared with elderly dizygotic twins. Elderly monozygotic twins had a reduced insulin secretion relative to insulin resistance compared to dizygotic twins during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Birth weight per se was not associated with insulin secretion or action in the twins. However, correcting for the genetic influence on birth weight using intrapair differences among monozygotic twin pairs, low birth weight was associated with insulin resistance and low insulin secretion after both oral and intravenous glucose administration in elderly MZ twins. Zygosity status has a major age (or time) dependent impact on in vivo insulin secretion and insulin action in twins independent of birth weight and adult antropometry. An additional non-genetic impact of low birth weight on insulin secretion and insulin action was found in elderly monozygotic twins. Ageing could play an important role by unmasking the influence of an adverse intrauterine environment on insulin resistance and low insulin secretion in twins.