Explore the vast range of titles available.

The inflammatory burden as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) is recognized as a cardiovascular risk factor, which can however be affected by lifestyle-related risk factors (LRF). Up-to-date the interplay between hsCRP, LRF and presence and extent of atherosclerotic disease is still largely unknown, which we therefore sought to investigate in a contemporary population-based cohort. We included participants from the cross-sectional population-based Hamburg City Health Study. Affected vascular beds were defined as coronary, peripheral, and cerebrovascular arteries. LRF considered were lack of physical activity, overweight, active smoking and poor adherence to a Mediterranean diet. We computed multivariable analyses with hsCRP as the dependent variable and LRF as covariates according to the number of vascular beds affected. In the 6765 individuals available for analysis, we found a stepwise increase of hsCRP concentration both according to the number of LRF present as well as the number of vascular beds affected. Adjusted regression analyses showed an independent association between increasing numbers of LRF with hsCRP levels across the extent of atherosclerosis. We demonstrate increasing hsCRP concentrations according to both the number of LRF as well as the extent of atherosclerosis, emphasizing the necessity of lifestyle-related risk factor optimization.

Background Valvular heart diseases are frequent and increasing in prevalence. Minimally invasive heart valve surgery embedded in an interdisciplinary enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program may have potential benefits with regard to reduced length of stay and improved patient reported outcomes. However, no prospective randomized data exist regarding the superiority of ERAS program for the patients’ outcome. Methods We aim to randomize (1:1) a total of 186 eligible patients with minimally invasive heart valve surgery to an ERAS program vs. standard treatment at two centers including the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, and the University Hospital Augsburg, Germany. The intervention is composed out of pre-, peri-, and postoperative components. The preoperative protocol aims at better preparation for the operation with regard to physical activity, nutrition, and psychological preparedness. Intraoperative anesthesiologic and surgical management are trimmed to enable an early extubation. Patients will be transferred to a specialized postoperative anesthesia care unit, where first mobilization occurs 3 h after surgery. Transfer to low care ward will be at the next day and discharge at the fifth day. Participants in the control group will receive treatment as usual. Primary endpoints include functional discharge at discharge and duration of in-hospital care during the first 12 months after index surgery. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life, health literacy, and level of physical activity. Discussion This is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an ERAS process after minimally invasive heart valve surgery. Interprofessional approach is the key factor of the ERAS process and includes in particular surgical, anesthesiological, physiotherapeutic, advanced nursing, and psychosocial components. A clinical implication guideline will be developed facilitating the adoption of ERAS model in other heart teams. Trial registration The study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04977362 assigned July 27, 2021).

After vessel preparation, using different strategies such as balloon angioplasty, specialty balloons, atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy, definitive treatment has emerged as a key feature in endovascular treatment strategies. Based on current guidelines, endovascular treatment is the most common treatment option in patients with claudication. In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), on the other hand, the best treatment modality, including bypass surgery and endovascular revascularization, needs to be selected by an interdisciplinary team, focusing on individual anatomic and patient-specific characteristics, on the availability of a vein graft and on cardiovascular and other comorbidities of the patients. With endovascular therapy, currently, a plethora of options are available for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions, which are increasingly gaining in complexity. Therefore, a practical systematic case-based approach, entailing contemporary treatment options, like drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty tools, self-expanding bare-metal stents (BMSs), drug-eluting stents (DESs), interwoven stents and covered stents, is crucial. Generally, most endovascular operators adhere to the ‘leave nothing behind’ concept, meaning that, after proper lesion preparation, lesions can be treated with DCBs, avoiding the implantation of permanent metallic implants. However, in the case of severe dissections or significant recoil, stent implantation becomes necessary to achieve adequate limb perfusion. The selection between long versus spot stenting and the different stent options depends on the current scientific evidence, guidelines and expert opinion statements. An interdisciplinary expert consensus was recently compiled on how these modalities should be used in specific lesions and patients in the femoropopliteal segment. Herein we present a practical case-based approach, which is based on this algorithm and aims at harmonization of endovascular treatment strategies in daily practice and ultimately at further improvements in limb and patient outcomes.

AimsThe first reports of declining hospital admissions for major cardiovascular emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic attracted public attention. However, systematic evidence on this subject is sparse. We aimed to investigate the rate of emergent hospital admissions, subsequent invasive treatments and comorbidities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.Methods and resultsThis was a retrospective analysis of health insurance claims data from the second largest insurance fund in Germany, BARMER. Patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, acute limb ischemia, aortic rupture, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020, were included. Admission rates per 100,000 insured, invasive treatments and comorbidities were compared from January–May 2019 (pre-COVID) to January–May 2020 (COVID). A total of 115,720 hospitalizations were included in the current analysis (51.3% females, mean age 72.9 years). Monthly admission rates declined from 78.6/100,000 insured (pre-COVID) to 70.6/100,000 (COVID). The lowest admission rate was observed in April 2020 (61.6/100,000). Administration rates for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (7.3–6.6), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (16.8–14.6), acute limb ischemia (5.1–4.6), stroke (35.0–32.5) and TIA (13.7–11.9) decreased from pre-COVID to COVID. Baseline comorbidities and the percentage of these patients treated with interventional or open-surgical procedures remained similar over time across all entities. In-hospital mortality in hospitalizations for stroke increased from pre-COVID to COVID (8.5–9.8%).ConclusionsAdmission rates for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular emergencies declined during the pandemic in Germany, while patients’ comorbidities and treatment allocations remained unchanged. Further investigation is warranted to identify underlying reasons and potential implications on patients’ outcomes.Graphic abstract

Background: Observational studies support an association between periodontitis (PD) and atherosclerotic vascular disease, but little is known specifically about peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Objectives: To systematically review the evidence for an association between PD and PAOD. Data Sources: Medline via PubMed. Review Methods: We searched the Pubmed database for original studies, case reports, case series, meta-analyses and systematic reviews that assessed whether there is an association between PD (all degrees of severity) and PAOD (all degrees of severity). The reporting of this systematic review was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement following the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO) format. Results: 17 out of 755 detected studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Nine studies demonstrated associations between PD and PAOD, and two studies reported associations between tooth loss and PAOD. Six studies addressed the pathomechanism regarding PD as a possible trigger for PAOD. No study that dismissed an association could be detected. Odds ratios or hazard ratios ranged from 1.3 to 3.9 in four large cohort studies after adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: The presented evidence supports a link between PD and PAOD. Further studies which address the temporality of PD and PAOD and randomized controlled intervention trials examining the causal impact of PD on PAOD are needed. Although our results cannot confirm a causal role of PD in the development of PAOD, it is likely that PD is associated with PAOD and plays a contributing role.

Coffee, next to water the most widespread beverage, is attributed both harmful and protective characteristics concerning cardiovascular health. This study aimed to evaluate associations of coffee consumption with cardiac biomarkers, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic parameters and major cardiovascular diseases. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 9009 participants of the population-based Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS), enrolled between 2016 and 2018 median age 63 [IQR: 55; 69] years. Coffee consumption was classified into three groups: < 3 cups/day (low), 3–4 cups/day (moderate), > 4 cups/day (high). In linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and additives, high coffee consumption correlated with higher LDL-cholesterol (β = 5.92; 95% CI 2.95, 8.89; p < 0.001). Moderate and high coffee consumption correlated with lower systolic (β = − 1.91; 95% CI − 3.04, − 0.78; p = 0.001; high: β = − 3.06; 95% CI − 4.69, − 1.44; p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (β = − 1.05; 95% CI − 1.67, − 0.43; p = 0.001; high: β = − 1.85; 95% CI − 2.74, − 0.96; p < 0.001). Different levels of coffee consumption did neither correlate with any investigated electrocardiographic or echocardiographic parameter nor with prevalent major cardiovascular diseases, including prior myocardial infarction and heart failure. In this cross-sectional analysis, high coffee consumption correlated with raised LDL-cholesterol levels and lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure. However, major cardiovascular diseases including heart failure and its diagnostic precursors were not associated with coffee consumption, connoting a neutral role of coffee in the context of cardiovascular health.

Body mass index (BMI) is seen as a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in lipedema patients. A valid predictor of CVD is increased aortic stiffness (IAS), and previous research described IAS in lipedema. However, it is not known if this applies to all patients. In this cross-sectional single-center cohort study, peripheral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a non-invasive indicator of aortic stiffness was measured in 41 patients with lipedema, irrespective of stage and without pre-existing cardiovascular conditions or a history of smoking and a maximum body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2. Automatically electrocardiogram-triggered oscillometric sensor technology by the Gesenius–Keller method was used. Regardless of the stage of lipedema disease, there was no significant difference in PWV compared to published standard values adjusted to age and blood pressure. BMI alone is not a predictor of cardiovascular risk in lipedema patients. Measuring other anthropometric factors, such as the waist–hip ratio or waist–height ratio, should be included, and the existing cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and adipose tissue distribution for accurate risk stratification should be taken into account. Automated sensor technology recording the PWV represents a valid and reliable method for health monitoring and early detection of cardiovascular risks.

Background: Various anatomical factors have been related to mortality after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This systematic review investigated the impact of the pre-operative maximum aortic aneurysm diameter on mortality after standard and complex EVAR. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to search the MEDLINE, EMBASE, via Ovid and CENTRAL databases, until 31st July 2025. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were eligible if they were published between 2015 and 2025 and reported on the association of the pre-operative maximum aortic aneurysm diameter with a 30-day and midterm mortality follow-up in standard and complex EVAR patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was the impact of the pre-operative maximum aortic aneurysm diameter on 30-day mortality after standard and complex EVAR. Results: From 1182 studies, 25 were included; 19 reporting on standard (130,476) patients and six on complex EVAR (14,097) patients. A significant heterogeneity in terms of maximum pre-operative aortic aneurysm diameter threshold to identify larger aneurysms was detected. Regarding standard EVAR, eight studies evaluated the impact of the pre-operative maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter on 30-day mortality (smaller: 0.3–13.2% vs. larger: 0.7–20.8%) with conflicting outcomes. Four studies (4/8 studies; 50%) concluded that a larger diameter was related to higher 30-day mortality in patients with standard EVAR, while four showed no statistical significance. Two out of five standard EVAR studies that investigated the pre-operative AAA diameter as an independent predictor for 30-day mortality confirmed this finding. During the mid-term follow-up, ten studies showed that the pre-operative maximum AAA diameter was independently related to mortality after standard EVAR. In complex EVAR, four out of six studies showed that the 30-day mortality was higher (smaller: 0.5–7.0% vs. larger: 4.0–15.0%) in larger aortic aneurysms, including juxta-, para-, supra-renal, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Four out of five (80.0%) studies showed that a larger diameter was an independent predictor for follow-up mortality after complex EVAR. Conclusions: The pre-operative aortic aneurysm diameter seems to be related to mortality after standard or complex EVAR. However, the impact of the pre-operative aortic aneurysm diameter on mortality seems to be more prominent in complex EVAR cases, with 80% of studies confirming this finding.