Explore the vast range of titles available.

Many non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remain unresponsive to the current standard of care, which includes chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, like anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. While interleukin (IL)-1β is known to promote lung cancer growth in humans and mice, we show here that IL-1β administration or overexpression overcomes resistance to classical chemo-immunotherapy (cisplatin/pemetrexed/anti-PD-1) in mouse lung cancer models. The antitumor effects of IL-1β rely on cancer cell-derived CXCL10 which mediates CD8 T cell recruitment at the tumor site. In lung cancer cells, Thioredoxin Interacting Protein (TXNIP) induces mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release in the cytosol, activating Absence in Melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasome, which subsequently triggers IL-1β and CXCL10 secretion, thereby reversing chemo-immunotherapy resistance. The clinical relevance of our findings is supported by the transcriptomic analysis of patient tumors, showing that high expression of IL1B, IL1R1, AIM2 and/or TXNIP is associated with better response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Additionally, drug screening identifies MEK and MDM2 inhibitors as inducers of TXNIP expression capable of reversing resistance to chemo-immunotherapy. This study highlights a positive role of IL-1β in lung cancer treatment and suggests that enhancing IL-1β production at the tumor site can overcome resistance to chemo-immunotherapy. Interleukin (IL)-1β has been shown to promote tumour growth in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here the authors show using chemo-immunotherapy resistant mouse tumour models that IL-1β improves CD8 T cell recruitment in a CXCL10-dependent manner and IL-1β therapy could be a useful adjunct to chemotherapy and anti-PD-1.

Background Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factors (G‐CSF) are commonly given to limit chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia, but, in case of weekly chemotherapy such as eribulin, their administration schedules remain empirical. Objectives This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was conducted to establish the effect of different G‐CSF regimens on neutropenia’s incidence for patients treated by eribulin, to propose an optimal G‐CSF dosing schedule. Methods A population PK/PD model was developed to describe absolute neutrophil counts’ (ANC) time course in 87 cancer patients receiving eribulin. The structural model considered ANC dynamics, neutropenic effect of eribulin and stimulating effect of G‐CSF. Final model estimates were used to calculate neutropenia’s incidence following different G‐CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects. Results The final model successfully described most of the ANC time course for all patients. Simulations showed that a single G-CSF administration 48 h after each eribulin injection reduced the risk of severe neutropenia from 29.7 to 5.2%. Five days of G‐CSF only after the second eribulin injection or no G-CSF administration induces similar incidence of neutropenia. Conclusion Simulations showed a single G‐CSF administration 48 h after the end of each eribulin injection seems to be the optimal schedule to reduce eribulin‐induced neutropenia. However, the new administration scheme should be tested in real life to evaluate its pertinence. Trial registration NCT02841722.

In the tumour microenvironment, IL-1α promotes neoangiogenesis, matrix remodelling, tumour proliferation, chemoresistance, and metastases. Highly expressed in human colorectal cancers, IL-1α is associated with poor prognosis. XB2001, a fully human monoclonal antibody neutralizing IL-1α, was evaluated for safety and preliminary efficacy with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies. This single institution, phase 1 study used a 3 + 3 design to assess XB2001 at doses of 250 mg, 500 mg and 1000 mg every 14 days, associated with FTD/TPI 35 mg/m² (days 1–5 and 8-12, every 28 days) (NCT05201352). The Maximum Tolerated Dose of XB2001 + FTD/TPI was then associated in combination with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15). Safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. Seventeen patients (median age: 67.4 years) were enroled. No patient exhibited dose-limiting toxicity at any dose. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade (G) were diarrhoea (35.3%), nausea (47.1%) and anaemia (35.3%). G3-4 TRAE were neutropenia (17.6%) hypertension and infection (5.9% each). The RP2D (recommended phase 2 dose) of XB2001 was 1000 mg. The disease control rate was 76%, with 23% of patients achieving an objective response, including one complete response. Response and longer progression-free survival were associated with a decrease in serum IL-6 levels during therapy. High intratumoral IL-1α expression at baseline and CD8/PD-L1 infiltration are associated with a better progression-free survival. The combination of XB2001 with FTD/TPI and bevacizumab is feasible and safe, and showed encouraging clinical activity in chemotherapy-resistant mCRC.

The care of metastatic colorectal cancers is based on combination chemotherapies including 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor. The regimen is determined based on the patient’s molecular biology and general condition. Irinotecan bifractionation showed efficacy in chemorefractory patients in a previous study, FOLFIRI-3, but a desynchronized triplet has never been tested. The aim of bFOLFIRINOX-3 is to determine the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of a new regimen (FOLFIRINOX-3 bevacizumab) in chemorefractory patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX-3 bevacizumab in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A standard phase I, “3 + 3” design study was performed. The standard protocol comprised simplified FOLFOX 4 (folinic acid 400 mg/m2), 5-fluorouracil (a 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and irinotecan (administered before and after 5-fluorouracil infusion), plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg). In a “3 + 3” design, three different doses of irinotecan were tested: 60, 70 and 90 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of irinotecan. The secondary endpoints included the objective response (at 8 and 16 weeks) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria and progression free survival. Thirteen patients were enrolled, and twelve patients were finally evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The dose level defined was 70 mg/m2 irinotecan. A total of three DLTs were observed (grade 3 diarrhea): two DLTs at the 90 mg/m2 dose level and one at the 70 mg/m2 dose level. The most frequently described adverse events were asthenia (93%), diarrhea (77%), nausea (62%) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (46%). The most frequent biological event was thrombopenia (54%). Regarding efficacy, among the 11 evaluable patients, no progression was observed at 8 weeks, and the partial response rate was 18.2%. At 16 weeks, a partial response rate of 27.3% was observed, and five patients had a stable disease. The new regimen of bFOLFIRINOX-3 with irinotecan at 70 mg/m2 was well tolerated. In chemorefractory patients, this protocol shows a high response rate.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still one of the most frequent forms of cancer in the world in terms of incidence. Around 40% of CRC patients carry a mutation of the Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene, while 10% have a mutation in the B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) gene. These mutations are responsible for dysregulation of the mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, leading to the proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis of cells. Activation of the MAPK pathway results in adaptive therapeutic resistance, rendering EGFR inhibitors ineffective. This review aims to highlight the recent findings that have improved our understanding of KRAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer and to describe new targeted therapies, used alone or in combination.