Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Blood purification through the removal of plasma solutes by adsorption to beads of charcoal or resins contained in a cartridge (hemoperfusion) has a long and imperfect history. Developments in production and coating technology, however, have recently increased the biocompatibility of sorbents and have spurred renewed interest in hemoperfusion. Methods We performed a narrative assessment of the literature with focus on the technology, characteristics, and principles of hemoperfusion. We assessed publications in ex vivo, animal, and human studies. We synthesized such literature in a technical and state-of-the-art summary. Results Early hemoperfusion studies were hampered by bioincompatibility. Recent technology, however, has improved its safety. Hemoperfusion has been used with positive effects in chronic dialysis and chronic liver disease. It has also demonstrated extraction of a variety of toxins and drugs during episodes of overdose. Trials with endotoxin binding polymyxin B have shown mixed results in septic shock and are under active investigation. The role of non-selective hemoperfusion in sepsis or inflammation remains. Although new technologies have made sorbents more biocompatible, the research agenda in the field remains vast. Conclusion New sorbents markedly differ from those used in the past because of greater biocompatibility and safety. Initial studies of novel sorbent-based hemoperfusion show some promise in specific chronic conditions and some acute states. Systematic studies of novel sorbent-based hemoperfusion are now both necessary and justified.

Key Points CSA-AKI is the second most common cause of AKI in the intensive care setting and is associated with increased mortality The pathophysiology of CSA-AKI is very complex and probably includes renal ischaemia–reperfusion injury, inflammation, oxidative stress, haemolysis and nephrotoxins To date, no consensus definition for CSA-AKI exists, but the KDIGO criteria for AKI are commonly used in clinical practice To date, no pharmacological or non-pharmacological preventive strategies have been shown to reduce the occurrence of CSA-AKI in clinical trials The management of CSA-AKI requires a multifaceted approach Renal replacement therapy is necessary in 1–5% of patients with CSA-AKI and is associated with poor patient and renal prognosis, both in the short and long-term Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is the most common complication in adult patients undergoing open heart surgery. In this Review, the authors discuss the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology and risk factors of CSA-AKI. The authors also explore the use of novel biomarkers of AKI and their potential utility in preventing or treating CSA-AKI. Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is the most common clinically important complication in adult patients undergoing open heart surgery, and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. In patients in intensive care units, CSA-AKI is the second most common type of AKI after septic AKI. In this Review, we explore the definition of CSA-AKI, discuss its epidemiology and identify its risk factors. We discuss current theories of the pathophysiology of CSA-AKI and describe its clinical course. Furthermore, we introduce diagnostic tools with particular reference to novel biomarkers of AKI and their potential utility; we analyse currently applied interventions aimed at attenuating AKI in patients undergoing cardiac surgery; and describe evidence from randomized controlled trials aimed at preventing or treating CSA-AKI. Finally, we explore issues in the use of renal replacement therapy, its timing, its intensity and its preferred modalities in patients with CSA-AKI, and we discuss the prognosis of CSA-AKI in terms of patient survival and kidney recovery.

Sepsis remains a major global cause of morbidity and death. This investigation from Australia and New Zealand ICUs challenges the utility of the two criteria of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a key element in defining severe sepsis. Severe sepsis is a major cause of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and death. 1 , 2 The criteria according to the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were described 23 years ago as a clinical expression of the host response to inflammation. 3 In this context and in the presence of symptoms meeting two or more SIRS criteria, severe sepsis was seen as evolving from infection to sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, in order of increasing severity. This approach was codified by the consensus statement of the American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine in 1992 . . .

Rapid-response teams aim to care for inpatients in whom acute respiratory, neurologic, or cardiac insufficiency is developing. This review describes the prevalence and consequences of sudden critical illness outside the ICU and discusses the rationale for rapid-response systems. Rapid-response teams have been introduced to intervene in the care of patients with unexpected clinical deterioration. These teams are key components of rapid-response systems, which have been put in place because of evidence of “failure to rescue” with available clinical services, leading to serious adverse events. 1 A serious adverse event may be defined as an unintended injury that is due in part to delayed or incorrect medical management and that exposes the patient to an increased risk of death and results in measurable disability. 2 Rapid-response systems aim to improve the safety of hospital-ward patients whose condition is deteriorating. These systems . . .

Acute kidney injury (formerly known as acute renal failure) is a syndrome characterised by the rapid loss of the kidney's excretory function and is typically diagnosed by the accumulation of end products of nitrogen metabolism (urea and creatinine) or decreased urine output, or both. It is the clinical manifestation of several disorders that affect the kidney acutely. Acute kidney injury is common in hospital patients and very common in critically ill patients. In these patients, it is most often secondary to extrarenal events. How such events cause acute kidney injury is controversial. No specific therapies have emerged that can attenuate acute kidney injury or expedite recovery; thus, treatment is supportive. New diagnostic techniques (eg, renal biomarkers) might help with early diagnosis. Patients are given renal replacement therapy if acute kidney injury is severe and biochemical or volume-related, or if uraemic-toxaemia-related complications are of concern. If patients survive their illness and do not have premorbid chronic kidney disease, they typically recover to dialysis independence. However, evidence suggests that patients who have had acute kidney injury are at increased risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease.

Over the past decade, new insights into epidemiology, pathophysiology and biomarkers have modified our understanding of acute kidney dysfunction and damage, and their association with subsequent chronic kidney disease. The concept of acute kidney injury (AKI), which has relied on established but nonetheless flawed biomarkers of solute clearance (serum creatinine levels and urinary output), has been challenged by the identification of novel biomarkers of tubular stress and/or damage. The expression of some of these novel biomarkers precedes changes in conventional biomarkers or can increase their predictive power, and might therefore enhance the clinical accuracy of the definition of AKI. In addition, the need to consider AKI recurrence, duration and progression to chronic kidney disease within the clinical and epidemiological framework of AKI led to the emergence of the concept of acute kidney disease. New definitions of acute syndromes of kidney impairment and injury are needed.The concepts of kidney damage and dysfunction, including subclinical damage and loss of renal functional reserve, are relevant to the detection of acute kidney injury (AKI). Here, the authors examine these concepts, as well as AKI duration and relapse, and discuss potential changes to AKI classification criteria.

Patients with vasodilatory shock were randomly assigned to angiotensin II or placebo. At 3 hours, more patients in the angiotensin II group than in the placebo group had an increase in mean arterial pressure of at least 10 mm Hg or to at least 75 mm Hg.

In a study of fluid resuscitation, patients received 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES; 130/0.4) or saline until ICU discharge or death or for 90 days. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality, although more patients in the HES group received renal-replacement therapy. The administration of intravenous fluids to increase intravascular volume is a frequent intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU), but the choice of resuscitation fluid remains controversial. 1 , 2 Globally, 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) is the most commonly used fluid, although colloids are administered as often as crystalloids, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is the most frequently used colloid. 3 Several studies have questioned the safety of HES in critically ill patients, with particular concern that its use increases the risk of acute kidney injury. 4 , 5 Most concern has focused on the use of concentrated HES solutions (10%) with a molecular weight of . . .

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with persistent renal dysfunction, the receipt of dialysis, dialysis dependence, and mortality. Accordingly, the concept of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) has been adopted as an endpoint for assessing the impact of AKI. However, applied criteria or observation periods for operationalizing MAKE appear to vary across studies. To evaluate this heterogeneity for MAKE evaluation, we performed a systematic scoping review of studies that employed MAKE as an AKI endpoint. Four major academic databases were searched, and we identified 122 studies with increasing numbers over time. We found marked heterogeneity in applied criteria and observation periods for MAKE across these studies, with some even lacking a description of criteria. Moreover, 13 different observation periods were employed, with 30 days and 90 days as the most common. Persistent renal dysfunction was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (34%) or serum creatinine concentration (48%); however, 37 different definitions for this component were employed in terms of parameters, cut-off criteria, and assessment periods. The definition for the dialysis component also showed significant heterogeneity regarding assessment periods and duration of dialysis requirement (chronic vs temporary). Finally, MAKE rates could vary by 7% [interquartile range: 1.7-16.7%] with different observation periods or by 36.4% with different dialysis component definitions. Our findings revealed marked heterogeneity in MAKE definitions, particularly regarding component assessment and observation periods. Dedicated discussion is needed to establish uniform and acceptable standards to operationalize MAKE in terms of selection and applied criteria of components, observation period, and reporting criteria for future trials on AKI and related conditions.