Explore the vast range of titles available.

Invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS) disease typically presents as a non-specific febrile illness that can progress to bloodstream infections and carries a high case fatality rate. Early detection improves patient outcomes, however, in resource-constrained settings, limited diagnostic capacity leads to underdiagnosis, insufficient incidence data, and incomplete epidemiological and socio-economic research on iNTS. Although no licensed vaccines currently exist, several candidates are in pre-clinical and clinical development. In the early stages of vaccine development, it is essential to consider country-level perspectives and priorities to guide the development of novel vaccines. To support this, the World Health Organization’s Vaccine Innovation Framework was applied to conduct a consultation with 40 stakeholders representing the national immunization programmes in Burkina Faso, Ghana the Gambia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique. The consultation aimed to assess the stakeholder perceptions on the need for an iNTS vaccine and to evaluate its desirability, suitability, and evidence requirements from a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) perspective. Stakeholders argued that although an iNTS vaccines is desirable, the lack of nationally available epidemiological data is a barrier to accurately understanding the disease burden. A novel vaccine would be more desirable if it aligns with the preferred product characteristics specified, and helps mitigate, rather than exacerbate, current immunization programme challenges. They also expressed a preference for combination vaccines that align programmatically, including formulations combining iNTS with typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV), to reduce the number of injections and simplify delivery logistics. To make evidence-based decisions on potential introduction, stakeholders emphasized the need for robust data on the value and impact of iNTS vaccines.

Typhoid fever is a continuing public health problem in many low- and middle-income countries; however, routine vaccination as a recommended control strategy has not been implemented in the past in most countries. Greater understanding of the typhoid fever burden, the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance, and licensure of a new generation of typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs) were instrumental in paving the way for the World Health Organization (WHO) to issue a revised global policy on typhoid vaccines in March 2018. The new policy follows evidence-based recommendations by the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization for routine and catch-up vaccination with TCVs and highlights considerations for universal, risk-based, or phased vaccination strategies in different settings. Further, the first WHO-prequalified TCV and Gavi funding for eligible countries make vaccination a realistic control strategy for many affected countries, especially if combined with improved water and sanitation services, strengthened surveillance systems, and appropriate antimicrobial treatment.

Invasive disease caused by non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars (iNTS) occurs with increased risk in the presence of other comorbidities such as malaria, HIV, malnutrition, anaemia and sickle cell disease. While infection with non-typhoidal (NTS) serovars often results in self-limited enterocolitis in high-income settings, in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where these risk-comorbidities are common, an invasive (iNTS) disease phenotype is seen, associated with up to 20 % case-fatality ratio, and antimicrobial resistance is both significant and growing. The need to evaluate the potential public health value of vaccines against iNTS disease is increasingly being recognized, and several candidate vaccines are in early development. A better understanding of the global burden and epidemiology of iNTS disease, as well as the potential public health and socio-economic benefits that iNTS vaccines may offer is fundamental to support and justify the investments in vaccine development. In addition, the pathways for licensure, policy recommendations and eventual vaccine prioritization and use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) need to be defined. Here, we report on the proceedings of an expert consultation held on 29 November – 1 December 2021 as part of an overall project to develop a Full Value of Vaccines Assessment (FVVA) for iNTS vaccines and in addition to more recent iNTS vaccine developments. Experts at the consultation reviewed the current evidence on iNTS disease and discussed knowledge gaps to be addressed to accelerate vaccine development, licensure and introduction, as well as LMIC perspectives on potential iNTS vaccine use and demand. The learnings from this consultation are critical inputs to inform remaining work under the iNTS FVVA project.

Typhoid fever, an acute febrile illness caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi), is endemic in many low- and middle-income countries (1). In 2015, an estimated 11-21 million typhoid fever cases and 148,000-161,000 associated deaths occurred worldwide (2). Effective prevention strategies include improved access to and use of infrastructure supporting safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH); health education; and vaccination (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends programmatic use of typhoid conjugate vaccines for typhoid fever control and prioritization of vaccine introduction in countries with the highest typhoid fever incidence or high prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant S. Typhi (1). This report describes typhoid fever surveillance, incidence estimates, and the status of typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction during 2018-2022. Because routine surveillance for typhoid fever has low sensitivity, population-based studies have guided estimates of case counts and incidence in 10 countries since 2016 (3-6). In 2019, an updated modeling study estimated that 9.2 million (95% CI = 5.9-14.1) typhoid fever cases and 110,000 (95% CI = 53,000-191,000) deaths occurred worldwide, with the highest estimated incidence in the WHO South-East Asian (306 cases per 100,000 persons), Eastern Mediterranean (187), and African (111) regions (7). Since 2018, five countries (Liberia, Nepal, Pakistan, Samoa [based on self-assessment], and Zimbabwe) with estimated high typhoid fever incidence (≥100 cases per 100,000 population per year) (8), high antimicrobial resistance prevalence, or recent outbreaks introduced typhoid conjugate vaccines into their routine immunization programs (2). To guide vaccine introduction decisions, countries should consider all available information, including surveillance of laboratory-confirmed cases, population-based and modeling studies, and outbreak reports. Establishing and strengthening typhoid fever surveillance will be important to measure vaccine impact.

Typhoid fever is estimated to cause between 11.9–26.9 million infections globally each year with 129,000–216,510 deaths. Access to improved water sources have reduced disease incidence in parts of the world but the use of efficacious vaccines is seen as an important public health tool for countries with a high disease burden. A new generation of Vi typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs), licensed for use in young children and expected to provide longer lasting protection than previous vaccines, are now available. The WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) has convened a working group to review the evidence on TCVs and produce an updated WHO position paper for all typhoid vaccines in 2018 that will inform Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance's future vaccine investment strategies for TCVs. The Typhoid Vaccine Acceleration Consortium (TyVAC) has been formed through a $36.9 million funding program from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to accelerate the introduction of TCVs into Gavi-eligible countries. In October 2016, a meeting was held to initiate planning of TCV effectiveness studies that will provide the data required by policy makers and stakeholders to support decisions on TCV use in countries with a high typhoid burden. Discussion topics included (1) the latest evidence and data gaps in typhoid epidemiology; (2) WHO and Gavi methods and data requirements; (3) data on TCV efficacy; (4) cost effectiveness analysis for TCVs from mathematical models; (5) TCV delivery and effectiveness study design. Specifically, participants were asked to comment on study design in 3 sites for which population-based typhoid surveillance is underway. The conclusion of the meeting was that country-level decision making would best be informed by the respective selected sites in Africa and Asia vaccinating children aged from 9-months to 15-years-old, employing either an individual or cluster randomized design with design influenced by population characteristics, transmission dynamics, and statistical considerations.

The health consequences of typhoid, including increasing prevalence of drug-resistant strains, can stress healthcare systems. While vaccination is one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions, vaccine introduction can take years and require considerable effort. The Typhoid Vaccine Acceleration Consortium (TyVAC) employs an integrated, proactive approach to accelerate the introduction of a new typhoid conjugate vaccine to reduce the burden of typhoid in countries eligible for support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. TyVAC and its partners are executing a plan, informed by prior successful vaccine introductions, and tailored to the nuances of typhoid disease and the typhoid conjugate vaccine. The iterative process detailed herein summarizes the strategy and experience gained from the first 2 years of the project.

With a newly World Health Organization (WHO)–prequalified typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV), Gavi funding for eligible countries, and a WHO policy recommendation for TCV use, now is the time for countries to introduce TCVs as part of an integrated typhoid control program, particularly in light of the increasing burden of antimicrobial resistance. Continued vaccine development efforts will lead to secure supply of low-cost vaccines, and ongoing vaccine studies will provide critical vaccine performance data and inform optimal deployment strategies, in both routine use and in outbreak settings. TCV programs should include thoughtful communication planning and community engagement to counter vaccine hesitancy.

Dengue is a rapidly growing public health threat with approximately 2.5billion people estimated to be at risk. Several vaccine candidates are at various stages of pre-clinical and clinical development. Thus far, live dengue vaccine candidates have been administered to several thousands of volunteers and were well-tolerated, with minimal short-term safety effects reported in Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. Based on the natural history of dengue, a theoretical possibility of an increased risk of severe dengue as a consequence of vaccination has been hypothesized but not yet observed. In October 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) convened a consultation of experts in dengue, vaccine regulation and vaccine safety to review the current scientific evidence regarding safety concerns associated with live attenuated dengue vaccines and, in particular, to consider methodological approaches for their long-term evaluation. In this paper we summarize the scientific background and methodological considerations relevant to the safety assessment of these vaccines. Careful planning and a coordinated approach to safety assessment are recommended to ensure adequate long-term evaluation of dengue vaccines that will support their introduction and continued use.

In the planning and implementation of mass immunization campaigns, vaccine delivery has always been a priority. However, safety issues have gained increasingly more attention and grown in importance, and campaign planners must now take them into prime consideration. The World Health Organization has released guidelines to assist with the design and implementation of safety surveillance systems, primarily for developing countries, and these include a new monograph for measles mass campaigns. Experience in the past decade with mass campaigns (primarily in developed countries) shows that measles vaccine performs in these settings as anticipated from pre‐ and post‐licensure studies. Serious adverse events are rare, even under the increased scrutiny extended during a campaign. The experience in developing country settings is growing. The implementation of safety surveillance for mass campaigns offers a unique opportunity for countries to avoid crisis situations and to begin vaccine safety monitoring in routine immunization programs.