Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of drug diversity on treatment effectiveness in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Germany.DesignThis study employs real-world data captured in-time during clinical visits in 67 German neurology outpatient offices of the NeuroTransData (NTD) multiple sclerosis (MS) registry between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2019, including 237 976 visits of 17 553 patients with RRMS. Adherence and clinical effectiveness parameters were analysed by descriptive statistics, time-to-event analysis overall and by disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) stratified by administration modes (injectable, oral and infusion). Three time periods were compared: 2010–2012, 2013–2015 and 2016–2018.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2018, an increasing proportion of patients with RRMS were treated with DMTs and treatment was initiated sooner after diagnosis of MS. Introduction of oral DMT temporarily induced higher readiness to switch. Comparing the three index periods, there was a continuous decrease of annualised relapse rates, less frequent Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and increasing periods without relapse, EDSS worsening and with stability of no-evidence-of-disease-activity 2 and 3 criteria, lower conversion rates to secondary progressive MS on oral and on injectable DMTs.ConclusionSparked by the availability of new mainly oral DMTs, RRMS treatment effectiveness improved clinically meaningful between 2010 and 2018. As similar effects were seen for injectable and oral DMTs more than for infusions, a better personalised treatment allocation in many patients is likely. These results indicate that there is an overall beneficial effect for the whole patient with MS population as a result of the greater selection of available DMTs, a benefit beyond the head-to-head comparative efficacy, resulting from an increased probability and readiness to individualise MS therapy.

Background In EXPAND (NCT01665144), a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, siponimod reduced disability progression versus placebo in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Aim To understand how a real-world population with SPMS relates to that in EXPAND, we conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study using the German NeuroTransData (NTD) multiple sclerosis (MS) registry. Methods The NTD MS registry is run by a Germany-wide network of physicians. Two cross-sectional analyses were performed using the NTD MS registry. The first included patients with SPMS, as recorded in the registry, and compared their characteristics between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 with patients in EXPAND. The second described the characteristics of patients in the registry at the time of diagnosis of SPMS between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018. Results The first analysis included 773 patients: patients were older in the NTD MS registry than in EXPAND (mean age, 57.9 vs 48.0 years) and had a longer duration of SPMS (mean, 6.2 vs 3.8 years). In the NTD MS registry, median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were comparable to EXPAND (6.0 versus 6.0), although fewer patients had relapses in the previous 24 months (16% vs 36% [siponimod] and 37% [placebo]). Data on gadolinium-enhancing lesions were only available for 5.8% of patients in the NTD MS registry. The second analysis included 916 patients: at the time of SPMS diagnosis, the mean age was 53.2 years and the median EDSS score was 5.0. Conclusion The population in the NTD MS registry was older to that in EXPAND, but were similar in terms of disability. Differences likely reflect the inclusion criteria of EXPAND but also highlight that real-world populations encompass a wider range of patient characteristics.

With increasing availability of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), treatment decisions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have become complex. Data-driven algorithms based on real-world outcomes may help clinicians optimize control of disease activity in routine praxis. We previously introduced the PHREND (Predictive-Healthcare-with-Real-World-Evidence-for-Neurological-Disorders) algorithm based on data from 2018 and now follow up on its robustness and utility to predict freedom of relapse and 3-months confirmed disability progression (3mCDP) during 1.5 years of clinical practice. The impact of quarterly data updates on model robustness was investigated based on the model's C-index and credible intervals for coefficients. Model predictions were compared with results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Clinical relevance was evaluated by comparing outcomes of patients for whom model recommendations were followed with those choosing other treatments. Model robustness improved with the addition of 1.5 years of data. Comparison with RCTs revealed differences <10% of the model-based predictions in almost all trials. Treatment with the highest-ranked (by PHREND ) or the first-or-second-highest ranked DMT led to significantly fewer relapses ( < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and 3mCDP events ( = 0.007 and = 0.035, respectively) compared to non-recommended DMTs. These results further support usefulness of PHREND® in a shared treatment-decision process between physicians and patients.

Background Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) other than interferon (IFN) β-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) are lacking. Objectives To compare the treatment effect of OCR vs six DMTs’ (IFN β-1a, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab) treatment pathways used in clinical practice by combining clinical trial and real-world data. Methods Patient-level data from OPERA trials and open-label extension phase, and from the German NeuroTransData (NTD) MS registry, were used to build 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts controlling for seven baseline covariates, including brain imaging activity. Efficacy outcomes were time to first relapse and time to 24-week confirmed disability progression over 5.5 years of follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis using all outcome data irrespective of treatment switch was applied. Results The analyses included 611 OPERA patients and 7141 NTD patients. We built 12 paired-matched cohorts (six for each outcome, two for each DMT) to compare efficacy of OCR in OPERA with each DMT treatment pathway in NTD. Post-matching, baseline covariates and PS were well balanced (standardized mean difference <.2 for all cohorts). Over 5.5 years, patients treated with OCR showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratios [HRs] .30 to .54) and disability progression (HRs .51 to .67) compared with all index therapies and their treatment switching pathways in NTD. Treatment switch and/or discontinuation occurred frequently in NTD cohorts. Conclusion OCR demonstrates superiority in controlling relapses and disability progression in RMS compared with real-world treatment pathways over a 5.5-year period. These analyses suggest that high-efficacy DMTs and high treatment persistence are critical to achieve greatest clinical benefit in RMS. Registration OPERA I (NCT01247324), OPERA II (NCT01412333)

“Real-world evidence (RWE)” is becoming increasingly important in order to integrate the results of randomized studies into everyday clinical practice. The data collection of RWE is usually derived from large-scale national and international registries, often driven by academic centers. We have developed a digitalized doctor–patient platform called DESTINY ( D atabas E -assi S ted T herapy dec I sio N support s Y stem) that is utilized by NeuroTransData (NTD), a network of neurologists and psychiatrists throughout Germany. This platform can be integrated into everyday practice and, as well as being used for scientific evaluations in healthcare research, can also serve as an individual, personalized treatment application. Its various modules allow for a timely identification of side-effects or interactions of treatments, can involve patients via the “My NTC Health Guide” portal, and can collect data of individual disease histories that are integrated into innovative algorithms, e.g., for the prediction of treatment response [currently available for multiple sclerosis (MS), with other indications in the pipeline]. Here, we describe the doctor–patient platform DESTINY for outpatient neurological practices and its contribution to improved treatment success as well as reduction of healthcare costs. Platforms like DESTINY may facilitate the goal of personalized healthcare.

BackgroundComparative effectiveness (CE) research allows real-world treatment comparisons using outcome measurements important to physicians/patients. This German NeuroTransData registry-based analysis compared delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) effectiveness with interferons (IFN), glatiramer acetate (GA), teriflunomide (TERI), or fingolimod (FTY) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using propensity score matching (PSM).MethodsData from registry patients aged ≥ 18 years with RRMS, ≥ 1 relapse, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessment(s) after index therapy initiation underwent 1:1 PSM to match DMF with comparator populations baseline characteristics. Primary outcome measurement was time to first relapse (TTFR). Secondary outcome measurements included annualised relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapse free at 12 and 24 months, time to index therapy discontinuation (TTD), and reasons for discontinuation. Exploratory analyses included time to 3- and 6-month EDSS confirmed disability progression (CDP). Non-pairwise censoring was the primary analysis method; pairwise censoring was the main sensitivity analysis method.FindingsPost-matched cohorts were well-balanced. By non-pairwise censoring, TTFR and ARR were significantly lower in DMF populations versus matched IFN, GA, and TERI, but there was no evidence of difference between DMF and FTY. TTD was similar between DMF and IFN, GA, and TERI, but significantly shorter versus FTY. Time to CDP generally showed no evidence of difference between DMF and comparator populations. Pairwise censored analysis results confirmed the non-pairwise censoring results.InterpretationThese results support previous CE studies in demonstrating relative improvement in real-world effectiveness with DMF versus first-line agents IFN, GA, and TERI, and similar effectiveness versus FTY.

Background Prolonged-release fampridine (PR-FAM) 10-mg tablet twice daily is the only approved pharmacological treatment for improvement of walking ability in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). LIBERATE assessed the safety/effectiveness of PR-FAM in the real-world. Objectives The aim of this study was to collect additional safety data, including the incidence rate of seizures and other adverse events (AEs) of interest, from patients with MS taking PR-FAM in routine clinical practice (including patients aged ≥ 65 years and those with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors). Other objectives included change over time in patient-reported evaluation of physical and psychological impact of MS while taking PR-FAM, and change over time in physician-reported assessment of walking ability in MS patients taking PR-FAM. Methods Patients with MS newly prescribed PR-FAM were recruited (201 sites, 13 countries). Demographic/safety data were collected at enrolment through 12 months. Physician-rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scores for walking ability, and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) were assessed. Results Safety analysis included 4646 patients with 3534.8 patient-years of exposure; median (range) age, 52.6 (21–85) years, 87.3% < 65 years, and 65.7% women. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 2448 (52.7%) patients, and serious TEAEs were reported in 279 (6.0%) patients, of whom 37 (< 1%) experienced treatment-emergent serious AEs (TESAEs) considered related to PR-FAM. AEs of special interest (AESI) occurred in 1799 (38.7%) patients, and serious AESI in 128 (2.8%) patients. Seventeen (< 1%) patients experienced actual events of seizure. Overall, 1158 (24.9%) patients discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy. At 12 months, a greater proportion of patients on-treatment had improvement from baseline in CGI-I for walking ability versus those who discontinued (61% vs. 11%; p  <  0.001). MSIS-29 physical impact score improved significantly for patients on-treatment for 12 months versus those who discontinued (mean change, baseline to 12 months: − 9.99 vs. − 0.34 points; p  <  0.001). Results were similar for MSIS-29 psychological impact. Conclusion No new safety concerns were identified in this real-world study, suggesting that routine risk-minimization measures are effective. CGI-I and MSIS-29 scores after 12 months treatment with PR-FAM treatment show clinical benefits consistent with those previously reported. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01480063.

ObjectivesSome disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been associated with COVID-19 severity in people with MS. Comprehensive exploration of these relationships in large international samples is needed.MethodsClinician-reported demographic/clinical data from 27 countries were aggregated into a dataset of 5,648 patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19. COVID-19 severity outcomes (hospitalisation, admission to ICU, requiring artificial ventilation, death) assessed using multilevel mixed-effect ordered probit and logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, disability, and MS phenotype. DMTs were compared to glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, pooled other DMTs, and natalizumab.ResultsOf 5,648 patients (83.4% confirmed COVID-19) were included. Compared to glatiramer acetate, ocrelizumab and rituximab were associated with higher probability of hospitalisation (4%(95%CI=1–7) & 7%(95%CI=4–11)), ICU/artificial ventilation (2%(95%CI=0–4) & 4%(95%CI=2–6)), and death (1%(95%CI=0–2) & 2%(95%CI=1–4)) [predicted marginal effects]. Untreated patients had 5%(95%CI=2–8), 3%(95%CI=1–5), and 1%(95%CI=0–3) higher probabilities of the three respective levels of COVID-19 severity than glatiramer acetate. Compared to pooled other DMTs and to natalizumab, the associations of ocrelizumab and rituximab with COVID-19 severity were also more pronounced. Evaluation of interferon associations with COVID-19 severity found these only apparent in comparison with the untreated but not vs individual or pooled other DMTs. All associations persisted/enhanced on restriction to confirmed COVID-19.ConclusionsAnalysing the largest international real-world dataset of people with MS with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 confirms that the use of anti-CD20 medication (both ocrelizumab and rituximab) are associated with more severe course of COVID-19, while interferon-based DMTs have no intrinsic protective benefit from other treatment.