Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "Bering, Rasmus"
Sort by:
Effects of 12 weeks of upper‐body rowing exercise on autonomic cardiovascular control and vascular structure in spinal cord‐injured humans
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is characterized by autonomic cardiovascular dysfunction that may contribute to the three‐ to fourfold greater risk of heart disease and stroke compared to non‐injured individuals. While exercise training elicits beneficial changes in autonomic function and vascular structure in healthy individuals, it is unclear if similar adaptations occur in individuals with SCI. Adults with chronic SCI (>1 year post injury) were randomized to 12 weeks of supervised upper‐body rowing exercise (UBROW; 3×/week; n = 8), adhering to current exercise guidelines, or control (CON; n = 9). Autonomic cardiovascular control was assessed by heart rate variability (HRV; electrocardiography) and blood pressure responses to a sit‐up test (finger plethysmography). Brachial (peripheral) and carotid (central) artery diameter and wall thickness (near‐ and far‐wall carotid intima–media‐thickness) were measured using high‐resolution ultrasound. All measurements were conducted at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks. There was no effect of UBROW on time and frequency domain HRV or blood pressure responses to the sit‐up test (group‐by‐time interactions: P ≥ 0.28; effect sizes: ηp2 ≤ 0.11). For UBROW, brachial artery diameter increased from 4.80 ± 0.72 mm at baseline to 5.08 ± 0.91 mm after 12 weeks (P < 0.05, ηp2 = 0.27). Carotid artery dimensions did not change, and there were no correlations between changes (baseline–12 weeks) in brachial artery diameter and changes in HRV outcomes (r ≤ 0.40, P ≥ 0.14). While upper‐body rowing exercise enlarged brachial artery diameter, carotid artery dimensions and autonomic cardiovascular control did not change, suggesting local vascular remodelling, but no systemic vascular adaptations, in response to a supervised 12‐week exercise intervention in spinal cord‐injured humans. What is the central question of this study? What are the effects of volitional upper‐body rowing exercise on autonomic cardiovascular control and vascular structure in individuals with chronic SCI? What is the main findings and its importance? This study demonstrates that 12 weeks of volitional upper‐body rowing exercise results in localized enlargement of the brachial artery diameter with no influence on carotid artery dimensions (diameter and wall thickness) or autonomic vascular control. These findings provide novel evidence of local (and not systemic) vascular adaptations in response to exercise training in individuals with SCI.