Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundPatients with long-standing UC have an increased risk for the development of colonic neoplastic lesions. Chromoendoscopy (CE) has been proven to enhance neoplasia detection while the role of virtual chromoendoscopy (VC) is still to be defined.ObjectiveTo compare the performance of CE to VC for the detection of neoplastic lesions in patients with long-standing UC.DesignA multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. 131 patients with long-standing UC were randomised between CE with methylene blue 0.1% (n=66) or VC with narrow band imaging (NBI) (n=65). Biopsies were taken from visible lesions and surrounding mucosa. No random biopsies were performed. The primary outcome was the difference in total number of neoplastic lesions detected in each group.ResultsThere was no significant difference between NBI and CE for neoplasia detection. Mean number of neoplastic lesions per colonoscopy was 0.47 for CE and 0.32 for NBI (p=0.992). The neoplasia detection rate was not different between CE (21.2%) and NBI (21.5%) (OR 1.02 (95% CI 0.44 to 2.35, p=0.964). Biopsies from the surrounding mucosa yielded no diagnosis or dysplasia. The per lesion neoplasia detection was 17.4% for CE and 16.3% for NBI (OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.99, p=0.793). The total procedural time was on average 7 min shorter in the NBI group.ConclusionCE and NBI do not differ significantly for detection of colitis-associated neoplasia. Given the longer withdrawal time for CE and easier applicability, NBI may possibly replace classical CE.Trial registration numberNCT01882205; Results.

INTRODUCTION:Endoscopic healing is currently considered the main target in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). There are conflicting data about the role of histology as a stricter treatment objective. We aim at evaluating the additional benefit of histologic remission over endoscopic remission.METHODS:We performed a prospective observational study at the McGill University Health Center. We enrolled adult patients with UC in clinical remission for at least 3 months undergoing a colonoscopy. Endoscopic disease activity was based on the Mayo endoscopic score. Rectal biopsies were obtained, and the histologic activity was evaluated using the Geboes score (active disease defined as Geboes score ≥ 3.1) with the addition of assessing the presence of basal plasmacytosis. Patients were followed up for 12 months for disease relapse defined as a partial Mayo score of > 2. At the time of relapse or end of follow-up, all patients underwent repeat endoscopic evaluation. The primary end point was clinical relapse.RESULTS:Two hundred fifty-three patients were included. The presence of basal plasmacytosis was associated with relapse (adjusted odd ratio = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–4.18, P = 0.042). Time to clinical relapse was significantly higher for patients with Mayo endoscopic score > 0 with adjusted hazard ratio = 2.65, 95% CI 1.31–5.39, and P = 0.007. Time to clinical relapse was not significantly higher for Geboes score ≥ 3.1 with adjusted hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% CI 0.67–2.49, and P = 0.45.DISCUSSION:Active histologic disease did not affect time to clinical relapse in patients with UC who achieved endoscopic remission while the presence of basal plasmacytosis is associated with relapse.

This study assesses 2 different disease activity measures, the Modified Truelove Witts Severity Index and the partial Mayo score, in hospitalized patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) for prediction of postdischarge corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement to help guide future considerations for disease activity assessment. In this post hoc analysis from the Tofacitinib for Hospitalized Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Management (TRIUMPH) trial, these results suggest resolution of the Mayo rectal bleeding subscore may have high prognostic utility and could be considered as a primary end point for hospitalized UC trials. The study underscores the need for further research on patient-reported outcomes and endoscopic indices in larger populations for inpatient UC trials.

Interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors have rapidly become an essential component of the therapeutic armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab share broadly similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, including linear clearance, long half-lives, and low immunogenicity. While therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is well established in the use of anti-TNF agents, its role in IL-23 inhibitors remains undefined. Emerging evidence, mostly for risankizumab, demonstrates dose–response relationships, suggests potential maintenance thresholds, and outlines possible dose optimization strategies. However, this preliminary data is predominantly retrospective, often single-center, and involves a small number of patients. Until more robust evidence supporting the efficacy of TDM and dose optimization emerges, routine use of this clinical practice in IBD remains investigational.

Background Real-life data on the efficacy of ustekinumab as first-line therapy for the treatment of luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are lacking. We compared the clinical response rates at 3 months in 2 cohorts of biologic-naïve patients treated by ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents. Methods Biologic-naïve patients starting either ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for luminal CD between 2016 and 2019 in 2 tertiary centers were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was clinical response at 3 months, defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw Index <4 or a 3-point drop in the score without steroids, need for CD-related surgery, or treatment discontinuation owing to failure or intolerance. Patients treated with ustekinumab were matched to patients receiving anti-TNF agents by a propensity score algorithm. Results We included 156 patients starting anti-TNF agents (95 adalimumab and 61 infliximab) and 50 ustekinumab. After matching, clinical response rates at 3 months were 64% and 86% in the ustekinumab and anti-TNF groups, respectively (P = .01). At 12 months, in multivariate analysis adjusted for disease duration, location, concomitant immunosuppressant and steroids, and symptoms, clinical remission was independently associated with the biological therapy received (odds ratio, 2.6 for anti-TNF agent vs ustekinumab; P = .02). With a median follow-up duration of 40 (interquartile range, 23-52) months, no difference was observed in terms of time to drug withdrawal (P = .29) or safety. Conclusions This retrospective real-world data suggest that an anti-TNF agent as a first-line biological therapy is associated with higher rates of response at 3 months than ustekinumab in patients with CD. Lay Summary We conducted a retrospective real-world study to compare the efficacy of biologics in Crohn’s disease. Our data suggest that an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent as a first-line biological therapy is associated with higher rates of response at 3 months than ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with an elevated risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), driven by chronic inflammation and a distinct inflammation–dysplasia–carcinoma pathway. Conventional surveillance relies on colonoscopy and histologic assessment, but flat, multifocal dysplasia and sampling limitations challenge early detection. Tissue-based biomarkers offer promise in improving risk stratification and identifying patients at high risk for UC-associated CRC (UC-CRC). This review explores key categories of tissue biomarkers with potential clinical utility, including genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations, microRNA expression profiles, and markers of genomic instability such as telomere shortening, copy number variants, and aneuploidy. Many of these molecular alterations precede histologic dysplasia and reflect a “field effect,” suggesting their potential role in early cancer detection. Despite compelling associations between these biomarkers and neoplastic progression, most lack prospective validation and are not yet ready for routine clinical use. Future research should prioritize the development of integrated biomarker panels and validate their predictive accuracy in longitudinal UC cohorts. Molecular profiling may ultimately enable personalized, risk-adapted surveillance strategies that improve early detection while minimizing unnecessary interventions.

Background: Different endoscopic scoring systems for assessing ulcerative colitis (UC) severity are available. However, most of them are not correlated with disease extent. Objectives: Our study aimed to compare the predictive value of the PanMay score versus the endoscopic Mayo (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and Dublin score in predicting long-term outcomes of UC. Design: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive UC patients who underwent colonoscopy before at least a 3-year follow-up. Methods: The PanMayo, MES, UCEIS, and Dublin scores and the baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were assessed. Endpoints were disease flare that required novel biological therapy, colectomy, and hospitalization. Patients were stratified using baseline clinical activity. Results: Approximately 62.8% of the 250 enrolled patients were in clinical remission. In these patients, the PanMayo, MES, and Dublin scores were positively associated with the risk of clinical flare. The MES score increased with clinical flare. The PanMayo score (>12 points), but not the MES score, was associated with the need for novel biological initiation and biological escalation. Furthermore, the Dublin and UCEIS scores of patients in remission who need novel biological treatment had a similar trend. Colectomy risk was associated with PanMayo and Dublin scores. Conclusion: The combined endoscopic assessment of disease extent and severity can be more accurate in predicting outcomes among patients with UC. PanMayo score can be utilized in addition to the existing scoring systems, thereby leading to a more accurate examination. Summary: UC endoscopic scores do not assess extension. Our study aimed to analyze the predictive value of the PanMayo score. Based on 250 patients, results showed that the long-term disease outcomes of UC could be predicted with the PanMayo score more accurately.

Solitary Peutz–Jeghers-type polyp (SPJP) is a rare hamartomatous lesion. It is considered a different entity from Peutz–Jeghers syndrome despite similar histopathological findings. It can be found in the GI tract but rarely in the jejunum. Jejunal SPJP is susceptible to necrosis, ulceration, and intussusception, resulting in GI bleeding or small bowel obstruction. We describe a case of subacute gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to jejunal SPJP to share our approach to this challenging case using therapeutic endoscopy. An 81-year-old male patient with a history of atrial fibrillation on warfarin with stable therapeutic INR levels presented with a 1-week history of melena, generalized fatigue, and shortness of breath on exertion and was found to have profound iron deficiency anemia. Esophageal gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy failed to identify the source of bleeding; however, single-balloon enteroscopy detected a 4 cm polyp with a stalk in the proximal jejunum. Endoscopic polypectomy was performed, and the whole polyp was removed. Histopathological examination was consistent with Peutz–Jeghers polyp. The genetic analysis was negative for STK11 mutation. Follow-up magnetic resonance enterography and video capsule endoscopy did not reveal any other polypoid lesion in the GI tract. The patient’s symptoms resolved gradually, and his hemoglobin level returned back to normal levels within 6 months. To our knowledge, this is the first case of endoscopic polypectomy during balloon-assisted enteroscopy for jejunal SPJP.