Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
53
result(s) for
"Beth Giddens"
Sort by:
Class Action Dilemmas
by
Jennifer Gross
,
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Bonita Dombey-Moore
in
Civil Justice
,
Class actions (Civil procedure)
,
Class actions (Civil procedure) -- United States
2000
Class action lawsuits--allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress--have long been controversial. The current controversy, centered on lawsuits for money damages, is characterized by sharp disagreement among stakeholders about the kinds of suits being filed, whether plaintiffs' claims are meritorious, and whether resolutions to class actions are fair or socially desirable. Ultimately, these concerns lead many to wonder, Are class actions worth their costs to society and to business? Do they do more harm than good? To describe the landscape of current damage class action litigation, elucidate problems, and identify solutions, the RAND Institute for Civil Justice conducted a study using qualitative and quantitative research methods. The researchers concluded that the controversy over damage class actions has proven intractable because it implicates deeply held but sharply contested ideological views among stakeholders. Nevertheless, many of the political antagonists agree that class action practices merit improvement. The authors argue that both practices and outcomes could be substantially improved if more judges would supervise class action litigation more actively and scrutinize proposed settlements and fee awards more carefully. Educating and empowering judges to take more responsibility for case outcomes--and ensuring that they have the resources to do so--can help the civil justice system achieve a better balance between the public goals of class actions and the private interests that drive them.
Appendix B
by
Jennifer Gross
,
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Bonita Dombey-Moore
in
Civil actions
,
Civil law
,
Civil rights
2000
Book Chapter
Appendix E
by
Jennifer Gross
,
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Bonita Dombey-Moore
in
Accountancy
,
Administrative expenses
,
Average cost
2000
Book Chapter
Appendix A
by
Jennifer Gross
,
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Bonita Dombey-Moore
in
Appellate courts
,
Case dismissal
,
Civil actions
2000
Book Chapter
Appendix D
by
Jennifer Gross
,
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Bonita Dombey-Moore
in
Applied sciences
,
Case studies
,
Civil actions
2000
Book Chapter
CABLE TV LATE FEE LITIGATION
by
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Erik K. Moller
,
Deborah R. Hensler
in
Attorneys
,
Attorneys fees
,
Broadcast media
2000
Sacramento Cable Television is the sole cable television operator for Sacramento, California, a metropolitan area of about 1.5 million residents. It services the cities of Sacramento, Folsom, and Galt as well as the County of Sacramento. Through 1996, Sacramento Cable Television operated as a partnership of Scripps-Howard Cable Company of Sacramento, which was owned by the large Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Corporation, and River City Cable vision, Inc.³ Although the subscriber base has varied as households add and drop cable services, the company serviced, on average, approximately 209,000 subscribers per month between 1992 and 1994 for charges ranging from $10 to $23.⁴
Book Chapter
CREDIT LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM OVERCHARGING LITIGATION
2000
When a consumer buys relatively costly items such as automobiles, furniture, or appliances, the purchase price is often wholly or partly financed by the dealership or retail store. When the contracts of sale and financing are signed, buyers are frequently asked if they would also like to obtain a special kind of insurance—for an additional fee—that would protect their purchase from repossession if they were unable to make the required monthly payments as a result of various calamities. One such coverage, dubbed “credit life insurance,” is designed so that in the event of the purchaser’s death, no further
Book Chapter
COLLATERAL PROTECTION INSURANCE LITIGATION
by
Nicholas M. Pace
,
Erik K. Moller
,
Deborah R. Hensler
in
Bank collateral
,
Bank loans
,
Business
2000
The banking industry suffered a series of devastating failures in the 1980s. One result of these failures was closer regulatory examination of the solvency of banks and the financial arrangements into which banks entered.³ Banking regulators suggested that one practice of the banking business that contributed to the crises of the 1980s was that some banks undersecured their loans.
To head off the potential problems caused by undersecured loans, banking regulators recommended that all borrowers who secured their loans with collateral such as a car or a home carry insurance so that the loan would be safe if the collateral
Book Chapter