Explore the vast range of titles available.

Citizen scientists play an increasingly important role in biodiversity monitoring. Most of the data, however, are unstructured—collected by diverse methods that are not documented with the data. Insufficient understanding of the data collection processes presents a major barrier to the use of citizen science data in biodiversity research. We developed a questionnaire to ask citizen scientists about their decision-making before, during and after collecting and reporting species observations, using Germany as a case study. We quantified the greatest sources of variability among respondents and assessed whether motivations and experience related to any aspect of data collection. Our questionnaire was answered by almost 900 people, with varying taxonomic foci and expertise. Respondents were most often motivated by improving species knowledge and supporting conservation, but there were no linkages between motivations and data collection methods. By contrast, variables related to experience and knowledge, such as membership of a natural history society, were linked with a greater propensity to conduct planned searches, during which typically all species were reported. Our findings have implications for how citizen science data are analysed in statistical models; highlight the importance of natural history societies and provide pointers to where citizen science projects might be further developed.

Background COVID-19 vaccine hesistancy is a serious policy issue in Germany as vaccinations have stagnated at low levels compared to most other European countries. In this context, we study whether and how health workers can be leveraged to promote the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Methods We employed an information experiment with health workers in Germany to quantify how access to information related to (i) AstraZeneca’s vaccine safety, (ii) misinformation, (iii) individual health risks, and (iv) public health risks can sway health workers’ recommendations for any of the following vaccines: AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinopharm, and Sputnik-V. The information experiment was conducted as a randomized controlled trial with four treatment arms and was embedded in an online survey. Results Health workers reduce their willingness to recommend four out of six vaccines once they learn about different statements of European and German health authorities with respect to the safety of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Consistent with the discussion on AstraZeneca’s safety focusing on possible side effects among younger women, we find that especially female health workers become less likely to recommend the majority of COVID-19 vaccines. Lastly, we show that health workers vaccine recommendations are not affected by misinformation and appeals to individual or public health. Conclusion In order to mobilize health workers in the fight against vaccine hesitancy, information campaigns need to be tailor-made for the target audience. In particular, health workers react to different types of information than the general public. As with the general public, we provide suggestive evidence that health workers require unambigious messages from drug authorities in order to support vaccination efforts. We believe that a more coordinated and coherent approach of public authorities can reduce the amount of mixed signals that health workers receive and therefore contribute to health workers engagement in the outroll of mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. Trial registration The trial was registered retrospectively with the repository of the Open Science Framework (OSF) under the number osf.io/qa4n2 .

Social networking sites have become a predominant means of communication across the globe. Activities on these sites generate massive amounts of personal information and raise concerns about its potential abuse. Means designed to protect the user’s privacy and prevent exploitation of confidential data often go unused. In this study, we draw on the theory of planned behavior, a reasoned action approach, to explain intentions to adopt privacy behaviors on social networking sites, with a focus on Twitter users. Consistent with the theory, an online survey of Twitter users (n = 1,060) found that instrumental and experiential attitudes and descriptive and injunctive subjective norms regarding these behaviors were direct predictors of intentions. Perceived behavioral control had a moderating effect, such that subjective norm was a better predictor of intentions for participants high as opposed to low in perceived control. We briefly discuss the implications of these results for developing theory-driven and evidence-based interventions to promote privacy behavior.

Aims Studies have reported a strongly varying co‐prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA). We sought to histologically determine the co‐prevalence of AS and CA in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Consequently, we aimed to derive an algorithm to identify cases in which to suspect the co‐prevalence of AS and CA. Methods and results In this prospective, monocentric study, endomyocardial biopsies of 162 patients undergoing TAVR between January 2017 and March 2021 at the University Medical Centre Göttingen were analysed by one pathologist blinded to clinical data using haematoxylin–eosin staining, Elastica van Gieson staining, and Congo red staining of endomyocardial biopsies. CA was identified in only eight patients (4.9%). CA patients had significantly higher N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels (4356.20 vs. 1938.00 ng/L, P = 0.034), a lower voltage‐to‐mass ratio (0.73 vs. 1.46 × 10−2 mVm2/g, P = 0.022), and lower transaortic gradients (Pmean 17.5 vs. 38.0 mmHg, P = 0.004) than AS patients. Concomitant CA was associated with a higher prevalence of post‐procedural acute kidney injury (50.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.018) and sudden cardiac death [SCD; P (log‐rank test) = 0.017]. Following propensity score matching, 184 proteins were analysed to identify serum biomarkers of concomitant CA. CA patients expressed lower levels of chymotrypsin (P = 0.018) and carboxypeptidase 1 (P = 0.027). We propose an algorithm using commonly documented parameters—stroke volume index, ejection fraction, NT‐proBNP levels, posterior wall thickness, and QRS voltage‐to‐mass ratio—to screen for CA in AS patients, reaching a sensitivity of 66.6% with a specificity of 98.1%. Conclusions The co‐prevalence of AS and CA was lower than expected, at 4.9%. Despite excellent 1 year mortality, AS + CA patients died significantly more often from SCD. We propose a multimodal algorithm to facilitate more effective screening for CA containing parameters commonly documented during clinical routine. Proteomic biomarkers may yield additional information in the future.