Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Background Globally, no trial data are available on head-to-head comparison between 10 mg/kg and 25/35 mg/kg rifampicin in treating pulmonary tuberculosis during study initiation. Methods A multicentric, phase IIb randomized trial recruited 333 new culture-positive, drug-sensitive adult patients with pulmonary tuberculosis to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose rifampicin (R25/R35), against conventional dose (R10) given daily for 8 weeks followed by standard doses for 16 weeks. Main outcomes were treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and time-to-culture conversion in liquid media, assessed by division of AIDS system for grading the severity of adverse events division of AIDS criteria and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results In a modified intention-to-treat population of 323 patients (R10: 105/R25: 112/R35: 106), grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 34 patients (R10: 9.5% [10/105], R25: 9.8% [11/112], R35: 12.3% [13/106]) during the intensive phase. Among 23 patients (R10: 3.8% [4/105], R25: 6.3% [7/112], R35: 11.3% [12/106]) with grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity, 15 (R10: 1.9% [2/105], R25: 3.6% [4/112], R35: 8.5% [9/106]) had grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia and 9 patients (R10: 1.0% [1/105], R25: 0.9% [1/112], R35: 6.6% [7/106]) developed clinical jaundice. Significant differences observed only between R10 and R35 with hepatotoxicity (P = .039), hyperbilirubinemia (P = .031), clinical jaundice (P = .032), and treatment interruption (P = .039). Eighteen serious AEs and 6 deaths (R10: 3/R25: 1/R35: 2) occurred during study period. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in R25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–2.31 [solid: 1.97; 95% CI, 1.46–2.67]) and R35 (1.81; 95% CI, 1.33–2.48 [solid: 2.24; 95% CI, 1.64–3.06]), than R10 (34 vs 44 days). R25 had no failure/relapse. Conclusions Hepatotoxicity, clinical jaundice, and treatment interruptions occurred significantly higher with R35 than R10. Because R25 was comparably safe as R10 and also highly efficacious than R10, it may be considered for implementation. Clinical Trials Registration. CTRI/2017/12/010951. Our randomized clinical trial compared safety and efficacy of high-dose rifampicin (R25/R35) against conventional dose (R10). We found that R35 was more toxic than R10. R25 was equally safe and more efficacious than R10; hence, it may be implemented for treatment shortening of drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Graphical Abstract Graphical abstract https://tidbitapp.io/tidbits/safety-and-efficacy-of-25-mg-and-35-mg-versus-10-mg-rifampicin-in-pulmonary-tb-a-randomised-trial/

Direct smear microscopy of sputum forms the mainstay of TB diagnosis in resource-limited settings. Stained sputum smear slides can serve as a ready-made resource to transport sputum for molecular drug susceptibility testing. However, bio-safety is a major concern during transport of sputum/stained slides and for laboratory workers engaged in processing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected sputum specimens. In this study, a bio-safe USP (Universal Sample Processing) concentration-based sputum processing method (Bio-safe method) was assessed on 87 M. tuberculosis culture positive sputum samples. Samples were processed for Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear, liquid culture and DNA isolation. DNA isolated directly from sputum was subjected to an IS6110 PCR assay. Both sputum DNA and DNA extracted from bio-safe ZN concentrated smear slides were subjected to rpoB PCR and simultaneously assessed by DNA sequencing for determining rifampin (RIF) resistance. All sputum samples were rendered sterile by Bio-safe method. Bio-safe smears exhibited a 5% increment in positivity over direct smear with a 14% increment in smear grade status. All samples were positive for IS6110 and rpoB PCR. Thirty four percent samples were RIF resistant by rpoB PCR product sequencing. A 100% concordance (κ value = 1) was obtained between sequencing results derived from bio-safe smear slides and bio-safe sputum. This study demonstrates that Bio-safe method can address safety issues associated with sputum processing, provide an efficient alternative to sample transport in the form of bio-safe stained concentrated smear slides and can also provide information on drug (RIF) resistance by direct DNA sequencing.

Background: Detection of ethionamide (ETH) resistance is crucial as it is part of antitubercular regime. It is crucial to examine the role of inhA gene mutations as a surrogate marker for the detection of ETH resistance, in the Indian context. The present retrospective study was designed with this objective. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted in National Reference Laboratory within the tertiary care institute from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, over 18 months duration. A total of 6612 sputum samples from presumptive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) patients were received from four districts of Delhi, outdoor and inpatients. Line probe assay (LPA) was performed for smear-positive or culture-positive samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. All isolates found to be INH resistant by LPA were cultured and phenotypic susceptibility to ETH was conducted for selected isolates as per the guidelines. Results: A total of 246 isolates were analyzed, for which phenotypic susceptibility to ETH and mutations in inhA were available. ETH resistance was detected among 87/108 (80.5%) isolates with inhA mutation. Sensitivity and specificity of inhA mutation for detection of ETH resistance were 80.5% and 83.8%, respectively. No inhA mutation was detected in 29/116 (25%) ETH-resistant isolates in our study, whereas ETH was found to be phenotypically susceptible in spite of the presence of inhA mutation among 21/130 (16.1%) isolates. Conclusions: Mutations in inhA gene in LPA predict ETH resistance with fairly good sensitivity and specificity. However, it is imperative to perform phenotypic detection of ETH resistance at proper concentration, in addition to detecting inhA mutation.

In 2019, amongst half a million new rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) cases, 78% were multi drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). Access to rapid and Universal-Drug susceptibility testing (DST) to patients in remote areas is a major challenge to combat drug-resistant TB. To overcome this challenge, we had recently reported the development of ‘TB Concentration & Transport kit’ for bio-safe ambient temperature transport of dried sputum on filter-paper (Trans-Filter). The present study was conducted to evaluate the utility of DNA extracted from sputum on Trans-Filter in a Multiplex PCR-based sequencing assay (Mol-DSTseq) for diagnosing drug-resistant TB. The developed Mol-DSTseq assays were standardized on Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates (n = 98) and further validated on DNA extracted from sputum on Trans-Filter (n = 100). Using phenotypic DST as gold standard, the Mol-DSTseq assay showed 100% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 79.4–100%) and 73.3% (95% CI 54.1–87.7%) sensitivity for detecting rifampicin and isoniazid resistance with a specificity of 85.1% (95% CI 66.2–95.8%) and 100% (95% CI:82.3–100%), respectively. For fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides, the Mol-DSTseq assay showed a sensitivity of 78.5% (95% CI 49.2–95.3%) and 66.6% (95% CI 9.4–99.1%) with a specificity of 88.2% (95% CI 72.5–96.7%) and 100% (95% CI 93.1–100%), respectively. The Mol-DSTseq assays exhibited a high concordance of ~ 83–96% (κ value: 0.65–0.81) with phenotypic DST for all drugs. In conclusion, the ‘TB Concentration and Transport kit’ was compatible with Mol-DSTseq assays and has the potential to provide ‘Universal-DST’ to patients residing in distant areas in high burden countries, like India for early initiation of anti-tubercular treatment.

The present study was undertaken to determine the incidence of drug resistance against anti-tubercular drugs among patients from an endemic zone.  Methodology: Forty consecutive clinico-radiologically diagnosed patients of osteoarticular tuberculosis (29: spine, 11: extraspinal) were enrolled. Pus from needle aspiration was taken in 31 cases, tissue following spinal decompression in seven, synovial in one, and sinus edge biopsy in one. The pus/tissue was subjected to acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining and liquid culture, sensitivity to 13 anti-tubercular drugs (Isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), kanamycin (KAN), amikacin (AMK,) capreomycin (CAP), ethionamide (ETH), levofloxacin (LEV), moxifloxacin (MOX), linezolid (LNZ), para-amino-salicylic acid (PAS), bedaquiline (BDQ), delamanid (DLM), and clofazimine (CFO)) were checked, and histopathological/cytopathological examination and molecular tests were performed.   Results: The mean age of patients was 29.07(9-65) years; 21 were female and 19 were male. The diagnostic accuracy for tuberculosis was 20% by AFB smear, 65% by liquid culture, 82.5% by histopathology, and 90% by cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification testing (CBNAAT). All culture-positive isolates were identified as with no non-tubercular . The drug resistance detected on CBNAAT was 11.1%, line probe assay (LPA) first line was 15.4%, LPA second line was 4%, and liquid drug susceptibility testing (DST) 11.5%. We detected 15.4% INH resistance, 11.1% RIF, 7.6% LEV, 3.8% MOX and PAS. No resistance was detected against second-line injectable drugs (SLID), ETH, LNZ, BDQ, DLM, and CFO.    Conclusions: No single laboratory modality can ascertain the diagnosis in all cases; hence, samples should be sent for all tests in tandem. In the presence of insufficient samples, tissue may be subjected to CBNAAT and histopathology to arrive at tissue diagnosis. In this subset, overall drug resistance incidence was 12.5% (5/40) with one patient each of isolated INH and RIF resistance, one of multidrug-resistance (MDR), and two of pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR). Primary drug resistance came out to be 11.1% (4/36) with one patient each of isolated INH and RIF resistance, one of MDR, and one Pre-XDR.

Rapid differentiation of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT) is crucial to facilitate early and effective treatment of the patients. Clinical presentation of MTBC and MOTT is not always very clear and routine conventional methods are time consuming. In the present study, the MPT64 protein detection-based immunochomatographic test (SD Bioline Kit, Standard Diagnostics, Inc., Korea) was compared with the conventional biochemical method. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values of the SD AgMPT64 kit were found to be 100, 96.4, 98.72, and 100%, respectively. Our results have demonstrated that the SD bioline kit is a rapid, reliable method and it can be used in the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) of India, for the appropriate management of tuberculosis.

A total of 312 sputum samples from pediatric patients presumptive of multidrug resistant tuberculosis were tested for the detection of drug resistance using the GenoTypeMTBDRplus assay. A total of 193 (61.8%) patients were smear positive and 119 (38.1%) were smear negative by Ziehl–Neelsen staining. Line probe assay (LPA) was performed for 208 samples/cultures (193 smear positive samples and 15 cultures from smear negative samples). Valid results were obtained from 198 tests. Of these, 125/198 (63.1%) were sensitive to both rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH). 73/198 (36.9%) were resistant to at least INH/RIF, out of which 49 (24.7%) were resistant to both INH and RIF (multidrug resistant). Children with tuberculosis are often infected by someone close to them, so strengthening of contact tracing in the program may help in early diagnosis to identify additional cases within the household. There is a need to evaluate newer diagnostic assays which have a high sensitivity in the case of smear negative samples, additional samples other than sputum among young children not able to expectorate, and also to fill the gap between estimated and reported cases under the program.

Data regarding prevalence of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and associated common mutations is scarce from Punjab region. The study was designed to determine rate of MDR-TB among presumptive MDR-TB from Punjab and mutation patterns using GenoType MTBDRplus assay. Total of 812 consecutive sputum samples were received from January 2012 to July 2013, from 14 districts of Punjab at the National Reference Laboratory at New Delhi for diagnosis of MDR-TB as hand holding activity. Presumptive MDR-TB patients were identified on basis of criterion B defined by the programme. Smear positive and negatives patients were found to be 636/798 (79.7%) and 162/ 798 (20.3%) respectively. Total of 606 GenoType MTBDRplus tests were conducted and mutations in rpoB, kat G and inhA genes analyzed. Total of 94/606 (15.5%), 43/606 (7.1%) and 40/606 (6.6%) were found to be RIF and INH resistant, mono-RIF resistant and 40/606 (6.6%) mono-INH resistant respectively. Commonest known mutation for RIF in rpoB gene and INH in kat G gene was S531L (80/ 137; 58.4%) and S315T1 (119/134; 88.8%) respectively. Mutations in inhA were found in 21/134 (15.7%) strains. Average turn-around time (TAT) for dispatch of result toPunjab was 4.6days. Prevalence of RIF resistance in Punjab was found to be 22.6%. Common mutations for RIF and INH were similar to that in other regions of country. GenoType MTBDRplus was found to be useful assay for rapid detection of MDR-TB, responsible for determining better management of MDR-TB patients under the programme.

There is limited information of level of drug resistance to first-line and second line anti-tuberculosis agents in treatment naïve pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients from the Indian region. Therefore, the present prospective study was conducted to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility to first-line and second line anti-TB drug resistance in such patients. Sputum samples from consecutive treatment naïve PTB cases registered in Lala Ram Sarup (LRS) district, under RNTCP containing 12 Directly Observed Treatment Centre’s (DOTS), were enrolled using cluster sampling technology. A total of 453 samples were received from July 2011 to June 2012. All samples were cultured on solid medium followed by drug susceptibility to first and second line anti-tubercular drugs as per RNTCP guidelines. Primary multi-drug resistance (MDR) was found to be 18/453; (4.0%). Extensively drug resistance (XDR) was found in one strain (0.2%), which was found to be resistant to other antibiotics. Data of drug resistant tuberculosis among treatment naïve TB patients are lacking in India. The presence of XDR-TB and high MDR-TB in small population studied, calls for conducting systematic multi-centric surveillance across the country.

Data regarding prevalence of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and associated common mutations is scarce from Punjab region. The study was designed to determine rate of MDR-TB among presumptive MDR-TB from Punjab and mutation patterns using GenoType MTBDRplus assay. Total of 812 consecutive sputum samples were received from January 2012 to July 2013, from 14 districts of Punjab at the National Reference Laboratory at New Delhi for diagnosis of MDR-TB as hand holding activity. Presumptive MDR-TB patients were identified on basis of criterion B defined by the programme. Smear positive and negatives patients were found to be 636/798 (79.7%) and 162/ 798 (20.3%) respectively. Total of 606 GenoType MTBDRplus tests were conducted and mutations in rpoB, kat G and inhA genes analyzed. Total of 94/606 (15.5%), 43/606 (7.1%) and 40/606 (6.6%) were found to be RIF and INH resistant, mono-RIF resistant and 40/606 (6.6%) mono-INH resistant respectively. Commonest known mutation for RIF in rpoB gene and INH in kat G gene was S531L (80/ 137; 58.4%) and S315T1 (119/134; 88.8%) respectively. Mutations in inhA were found in 21/134 (15.7%) strains. Average turn-around time (TAT) for dispatch of result toPunjab was 4.6 days. Prevalence of RIF resistance in Punjab was found to be 22.6%. Common mutations for RIF and INH were similar to that in other regions of country. GenoType MTBDRplus was found to be useful assay for rapid detection of MDR-TB, responsible for determining better management of MDR-TB patients under the programme.