Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background/Objectives: Various surgical methods have been proposed for the treatment of comminuted Mason III/IV radial head fractures. In particular, the advantages and disadvantages between prosthesis implantation (RHA) or radial head resection (RHR) are not sufficiently quantified in the current literature. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase in February 2024. Studies conducted on patients with Mason type III or IV radial head fractures and studies relating to surgical methods, including radial head resection or Radial head prosthesis implantation, were included. The two methods were evaluated in terms of clinical and functional results through the DASH score (Disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), and flexion-extension range of motion. The onset of osteoarthritis and complications were also assessed. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using Cochrane guidelines. Results: A total of 345 articles were evaluated and, of these, 21 were included in the study for a total of 552 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed no significant differences in favor of RHA or RHR in terms of Mayo Elbow Performance (p = 0.58), degrees of flexion (p = 0.689), degrees of extension deficit (p = 0.697), and overall incidence of complications (p = 0.389), while it highlighted a statistically significant difference in terms of DASH score (19.2 vs. 16.2, respectively; p = 0.008) and subjects who developed osteoarthritis (13.4% vs. 47.3%, respectively; p = 0.046). Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that both surgical methods provide good functional outcomes, with no significant differences in MEPI, DASH, and range of motion. However, a higher incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis was observed in patients undergoing RHR. Additionally, RHR patients exhibited slightly worse functional outcomes in the DASH score; however, this difference is not substantial enough to be considered clinically significant. These findings suggest that while both techniques are viable, RHA may be preferable in patients at higher risk of joint degeneration and instability, and the choice of treatment should be tailored to individual patient characteristics.

Background/Objectives: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain in athletes and active individuals, often requiring hip arthroscopy followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Effective rehabilitation is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes and facilitating a return to sport. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to evaluate post-operative rehabilitation protocols after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies documenting rehabilitation post-arthroscopy for FAI, with a final selection of 14 studies encompassing 1105 patients. Data extraction focused on rehabilitation techniques, functional outcomes, and return-to-sport rates. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Rehabilitation protocols were categorized into four phases, emphasizing manual therapy, strengthening, stretching, aquatic exercises, and sport-specific drills. The average return-to-sport rate was 90.3%. Manual therapy and aquatic programs were critical in early recovery, while strengthening and proprioception exercises were central to later stages. Variability in protocols across studies was noted. Conclusions: Post-operative rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy for FAI is essential for recovery. A phased, individualized approach, integrating manual therapy, aquatic exercises, and sport-specific training, yields positive outcomes. However, the heterogeneity of protocols suggests the need for standardized guidelines tailored to individual patient needs and activity levels.

The institution of the nursing assistant (NA) profile in Italy, established by the Decree 28 February 2025 responds to the chronic shortage of healthcare personnel, especially in nursing. This figure, non-healthcare but trained to perform basic healthcare tasks, aims to support nurses and ensure continuity of care, especially in community and long-term care settings, through further nursing activities delegation. The model aligns with international practices, emphasizing delegation within multiprofessional teams, based on formalized protocols and continuous on-site training, within standardized, low-discretion contexts. The delegation of health activities, however, presents legal and medico-legal challenges regarding scope of practice and supervision. The aim of this paper is critically discussing delegation of health activities to non-healthcare providers and the related issues of liability in team-based delivery of care, considering the specific regulatory setting of health providers in Italy. Critical activities such as nutrition and hydration, in particular artificially, and drug administration highlight the limits of delegation and the ongoing need for professional nurse oversight. In pre-hospital emergency care, standardized, protocol-based systems and simulation-based training successfully integrate non-healthcare personnel within the health team. Conversely, chronic and long-term care remain fragmented, lacking organizational maturity, regular supervision, and uniform regulation. The decree represents a step toward structured team-based care, but its success depends on robust governance, protocol clarity, organizational guidelines, and sustained practice-based education to prevent unsafe delegation and unauthorized practice.

Background: No consensus in the literature has been found about the necessity of implementing a decolonization screening protocol for Staphylococcus aureus in patients who undergo prosthesis implantation of the knee (TKA) or of the hip (THA), with the aim of reducing periprosthetic infections (PJIs). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase in April 2024. Studies conducted on patients who underwent a TKA or THA and who followed a screening and decolonization protocol from S. aureus were included. The benefits of implementing this protocol were evaluated through the number of infections overall caused by S. aureus and other pathogens. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using Cochrane guidelines. Results: A total of 922 articles were evaluated, and of these, 12 were included in the study for a total of 56,930 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of overall PJI (p = 0.002), PJI caused by S. aureus (p < 0.0001), and PJI caused by MRSA (p < 0.0001) and highlighted no differences between the two groups in the onset of a PJI caused by other bacteria (p = 0.50). Conclusions: This study showed that the screening and decolonization of S. aureus in patients undergoing THA or THA procedures reduced the risk of a PJI. The screening and decolonization protocol for this kind of patient represents an important procedure for the safety of the patient and in social-economic and medico-legal terms.

(1) Background. A definition of healthcare-associated infections is essential also for the attribution of the restorative burden to healthcare facilities in case of harm and for clinical risk management strategies. Regarding M. chimaera infections, there remains several issues on the ecosystem and pathogenesis. We aim to review the scientific evidence on M. chimaera beyond cardiac surgery, and thus discuss its relationship with healthcare facilities. (2) Methods. A systematic review was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science on 7 May 2024 according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines for reporting systematic reviews, including databases searches with the keyword “Mycobacterium chimaera”. Article screening was conducted by tree authors independently. The criterion for inclusion was cases that were not, or were improperly, consistent with the in-situ deposition of aerosolised M. chimaera. (3) Results. The search yielded 290 eligible articles. After screening, 34 articles (377 patients) were included. In five articles, patients had undergone cardiac surgery and showed musculoskeletal involvement or disseminated infection without cardiac manifestations. In 11 articles, respiratory specimen reanalyses showed M. chimaera. Moreover, 10 articles reported lung involvement, 1 reported meninges involvement, 1 reported skin involvement, 1 reported kidney involvement after transplantation, 1 reported tendon involvement, and 1 reported the involvement of a central venous catheter; 3 articles reported disseminated cases with one concomitant spinal osteomyelitis. (4) Conclusions. The scarce data on environmental prevalence, the recent studies on M. chimaera ecology, and the medicalised sample selection bias, as well as the infrequent use of robust ascertainment of sub-species, need to be weighed up. The in-house aerosolization, inhalation, and haematogenous spread deserve experimental study, as M. chimaera cardiac localisation could depend to transient bacteraemia. Each case deserves specific ascertainment before tracing back to the facility, even if M. chimaera represents a core area for healthcare facilities within a framework of infection prevention and control policies.

Pseudarthrosis (PSA) is a possible complication of femoral shaft fracture treatment. It is often associated with reduced bone quality and can, therefore, adversely affect quality of life. Its treatment poses a major challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Several authors have set forth different surgical approaches for the treatment of pseudarthrosis, such as internal fixation with plate and screws, replacement of an intramedullary nail or prosthetic replacement. In cases associated with bone loss, osteopenia, or comminution of fracture fragments, autologous or homologous bone grafts may also be used. The chronic outcomes of the surgical treatment of femoral shaft pseudarthrosis, even when consolidation is achieved, are linked to disabling sequelae of clinical-functional relevance, deserving an adequate medico-legal evaluation. The purpose of this retrospective study is to analyse a clinical case series of patients treated for atrophic femoral shaft pseudarthrosis at the IRCCS Orthopaedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy, from 2014 to 2020 and their orthopaedic-traumatological and medico-legal implications.

Nonunion (NU) is one of the most feared complications of femoral shaft fracture treatment. Femoral shaft fracture treatment is often linked with poor bone stock and reduced bone metabolism. In this paper, the goal is to carefully analyze the best treatment options for patients who developed nonunion after the intramedullary nailing of a femoral shaft fracture. A systematic review of the literature available in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochran library databases was carried out, and 16 studies were included. Exclusion criteria included case reports and case series that do not have data about clinical outcomes or functional outcomes and included fewer than 10 patients. The reviewed data provide evidence for very good results about the treatment of this pathology with exchanging intramedullary nails or the implantation of a plate and screws (general healing rate of 96.3%). Moreover, the data support the utilization of autologous bone graft in order to stimulate the healing process. In conclusion, the choice between these two types of treatment must be guided by the type of pseudarthrosis that the patient presents. Additionally, bone grafting or growth factors promote bone regenerative processes, especially in patients with oligo-atrophic pseudoarthrosis.

Background/Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely performed procedure to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with hip disorders. However, leg length discrepancy (LLD) remains a prevalent complication. LLD can cause gait disturbances, back pain, postural imbalance, and patient dissatisfaction, along with significant medico-legal implications. This review examines the evaluation, management, and medico-legal aspects of LLD. Methods: The review analyzed literature on the prevalence, evaluation methods, and management strategies for LLD in THA. Radiographic and clinical assessment tools were considered, alongside factors such as pelvic obliquity and pre-existing conditions. The importance of preoperative planning, intraoperative techniques (including computer-assisted methods), and comprehensive documentation was evaluated to address both clinical and legal challenges. Results: The review shows that leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) occurs in 3% to 30% of cases, with mean values ranging from 3 to 17 mm. LLD may result from anatomical or procedural factors, and effective evaluation requires both radiographic imaging and clinical assessment. Preoperative planning plays a critical role in accurately assessing anatomical parameters and selecting appropriate prosthetic components to preserve or restore limb length symmetry. Advanced intraoperative techniques, including computer-assisted surgery, help reduce LLD incidence. While some complications may be unavoidable, proper documentation and patient communication, particularly regarding informed consent, are essential to mitigate medico-legal risks Conclusions: LLD after THA requires a multidimensional approach incorporating clinical, radiological, biomechanical, and legal considerations. Effective preoperative and intraoperative strategies, combined with robust communication and documentation, are essential to minimize LLD and its associated risks. A focus on precision and patient-centered care can improve outcomes and reduce litigation.

Background Dupuytren disease, a chronic thickening and retraction of the palmar aponeurosis of the hands, may result in permanent and progressive flexion of one or more fingers. Percutaneous needle fasciotomy is a simple method that uses a hypodermic needle usually performed under local anaesthesia. The study aim was to report the postoperative results and complications using a percutaneous approach to treat Dupuytren contracture in a consecutive series of patients with advanced Dupuytren disease, also considering the relevant medico-legal implications. Methods Retrospective multicentre study of all patients with Tubiana stage 3–4 Dupuytren contracture treated with percutaneous needle aponeurotomy, with no ultrasound assistance, from 2012 to 2022. Patient demographics, disease severity, treatment-related complications, and the incidence of recurrence were identified. An overview of therapeutic treatment options has accounted for 52 relevant sources spanning the 2007–2023 time period. Results Overall, 41.7% ( N  = 200) of patients were females, the mean age was 72 years (60–89), the right hand was treated in 54.2% ( N  = 260) of patients. The little finger was involved in 50% of the patients. The 12 months mean PED was 9°, the mean quickDASH was 8, the mean URAM 6. Minor complications were reported in 18.7% ( N  = 90) of patients, typically skin lacerations (83.3%) with no clinical sequelae, and no major complications were reported. Recurrence occurred in 30% ( N  = 144) of patients. Conclusions Percutaneous needle fasciotomy is safe and reliable even in patients with advanced Dupuytren disease, resulting in predictably acceptable outcome with low risk of complications.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) origin represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. These tumours spread to different parts of the body even if the site of origin has not been identified. When renal metastases are observed without an obvious primary lesion, it is important to exclude the possibility of a primary kidney tumour that may be unknown or too small to be detected. The diagnosis of CUP is established after a careful clinical evaluation and diagnostic tests, including blood chemistry and laboratory tests, instrumental exams (CT, MRI, PET, bone scan), biopsy, and molecular and cytogenetic analysis. Once the diagnosis of CUP with kidney metastases is confirmed, treatment depends on the location of the metastases, the patient’s health status, and available treatment options. The latter includes surgery to remove metastases, radiation therapy, or systemic treatment such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy. It is important that patients with CUP are evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of specialists, who can contribute to planning the most appropriate treatment. In this article, we report the clinical case of a patient with a pathological fracture of the proximal humerus which occurred on metastases of probable renal origin in the absence of primary lesions.