Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Langerhans cell histiocytosis is rare in adults, and most of what we know about its diagnosis and treatment comes from pediatric studies. We report clinical findings and results of treatment in a retrospective series of 63 consecutive adult patients (18–76 years old), treated at our pediatric unit from 1990 to 2020 using the same approach as for children. Patients were classified as having single-system disease (SS-LCH) in 41 cases, which was unifocal in 34 of them and multifocal in 7, or multisystem disease (MS-LCH) in 17 and primary pulmonary (pLCH) in 5. Twenty patients also had diabetes insipidus. A “wait and see” strategy was recommended after biopsy/surgery for patients with unifocal SS-LCH. Systemic treatment was proposed for cases of SS-LCH involving “special sites” or with multifocal disease, and in cases of MS-LCH. EFS and OS for the cohort as a whole were 62.2% and 100%, respectively, at 5 years and 52.5% and 97.6% at 10 years. Three patients died due to the damage caused by the multiple therapies administered. The rate of disease reactivation was high (affecting 40% of cases), with several reactivations over the years despite multiple lines of treatment. Though clinical history of LCH may differ between adults and children, in the absence of specific, tailored protocols, clinical approach to adult cases may draw on pediatric experience. Patients with limited disease have a good prognosis without any need for systemic therapy. Potentially greater toxicity in adults of systemic treatments generally used in pediatric setting should be borne in mind.

Wilms tumor (or nephroblastoma), rhabdomyosarcoma, and medulloblastoma, common embryonal tumors in children, can occasionally occur in adults, for whom survival is significantly inferior than pediatric patients. Available data on adults with Wilms tumor consist of case or case series reports. Among other factors, the unfamiliarity of adult oncologists and pathologists with nephroblastoma and consequent delays in initiating the appropriate risk-adapted chemotherapy may negatively influence outcomes. The survival decrement in adults with rhabdomyosarcoma has been attributed to the lack of centralized care, the inconsistent use of standard protocol-driven multimodal therapy, and lower chemotherapy tolerance in adult patients. In children with medulloblastoma, evidence from randomized clinical trials has led to risk-tailored therapies tuned on histology, extent of initial disease, and biological features. Such refinements are still missing for adults due to the lack of similar trials and studies that might provide the same or a different understanding regarding patients’ individual prognosis, treatment morbidity, and quality of life. Recent experiences have suggested that applying or adjusting pediatric protocols to adult patients with these tumors is feasible and can improve survival. Here, we provide an evaluation of the current evidence for the management of Wilms tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, and medulloblastoma arising in adults. This review aims to promote the referral of adolescents and adults with pediatric tumors to pediatric centers for inclusion into pediatric protocols, or into protocols and studies specifically designed for that age group with the cooperation between pediatric and adult oncologists.

Background: Spinal solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are a rare oncological entity, almost anecdotal in the pediatric population. They have a high relapse rate and represent an ongoing oncological challenge. Methods: In this article, we conducted a systematic review starting from a case report to highlight the current state of the art in managing these tumors. Results: Spinal solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms that can be either intra- or extramedullary. Only a limited number of studies focus on primary pediatric spinal cord localization. Five pediatric cases of spinal SFT have been documented in the literature. On MRI, they typically present as highly vascularized, contrast-enhancing masses. Histologically, they are composed of spindle-shaped cells within a collagenous stroma featuring staghorn-shaped blood vessels. More aggressive subtypes, such as dedifferentiated SFTs, resemble high-grade sarcomas. The NAB2–STAT6 fusion is a key marker, driving EGFR signaling, collagen production, and fibrosis. Additional diagnostic markers include CD34, CD99, and Bcl-2. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment. In metastatic cases, chemotherapy—mainly with anthracyclines, dacarbazine, or temozolomide—is employed, although no standardized pediatric protocols exist. Anti-angiogenic agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown promise. Radiotherapy is used postoperatively for local disease control, but its impact on survival is still under investigation. Conclusions: Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment, significantly impacting the natural history of the disease and symptom control. While clinical trials exploring radiotherapy and chemotherapy are ongoing in adults, no specific treatment protocol has been established for pediatric patients.

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, established new approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading, emphasizing the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. This edition increased the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification while still relying on other established approaches such as histology and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, it introduced new tumor types and subtypes based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. Over the past decade, molecular techniques identified numerous key genetic alterations in CSN tumors, with important implications regarding the understanding of pathogenesis but also for prognosis and the development and application of effective molecularly targeted therapies. This review summarizes the major changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification of pediatric CNS tumors, highlighting for each entity the molecular alterations and other information that are relevant for diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic purposes and that patients’ and oncologists’ need from a pathology report.

To study a robust and reproducible procedure to investigate a relation between focal brain radiotherapy (RT) low doses, neurocognitive impairment and late White Matter and Gray Matter alterations, as shown by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), in children. Forty-five patients (23 males and 22 females, median age at RT 6.2 years, median age at evaluations 11.1 years) who had received focal RT for brain tumors were recruited for DTI exams and neurocognitive tests. Patients' brains were parceled in 116 regions of interest (ROIs) using an available segmented atlas. After the development of an ad hoc, home-made, multimodal and highly deformable registration framework, we collected mean RT doses and DTI metrics values for each ROI. The pattern of association between cognitive scores or domains and dose or DTI values was assessed in each ROI through both considering and excluding ROIs with mean doses higher than 75% of the prescription. Subsequently, a preliminary threshold value of dose discriminating patients with and without neurocognitive impairment was selected for the most relevant associations. The workflow allowed us to identify 10 ROIs where RT dose and DTI metrics were significantly associated with cognitive tests results (p<0.05). In 5/10 ROIs, RT dose and cognitive tests were associated with p<0.01 and preliminary RT threshold dose values, implying a possible cognitive or neuropsychological damage, were calculated. The analysis of domains showed that the most involved one was the \"school-related activities\". This analysis, despite being conducted on a retrospective cohort of children, shows that the identification of critical brain structures and respective radiation dose thresholds is achievable by combining, with appropriate methodological tools, the large amount of data arising from different sources. This supported the design of a prospective study to gain stronger evidence.

BackgroundRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), an aggressive soft tissue sarcoma of the skeletal muscle generally affecting children and adolescents, shows extensive heterogeneity in histology, site and age of onset, clinical course, and prognosis. Tumorigenesis of RMS is multifactorial and genetic predisposition together with the family history of cancer may provide critical information to enhance the current knowledge and foster genetic counseling and testing.MethodsIn our study, we evaluated the possible correlation of oncological family history with clinical outcomes in a cohort of RMS 512 patients and treated at the Pediatric Oncology Unit of our Institute. Family history was retrospectively collected from the specific ad hoc form available in medical records and filled in through an interview with the patients’ parents at the time of RMS diagnosis.ResultsWhile our series did not show a specific association between oncological family history and clinical variables, we observed an association with survival probabilities: among patients with a history of cancer-affected first-degree relatives at the time of the diagnosis, all children with alveolar RMS (ARMS) died of disease.ConclusionOur study not only reports an interesting and not previously described association between a poor clinical outcome and ARMS in patients with young cancer-affected relatives, but also stimulates the discussion on oncological family history in RMS, to improve the clinical management of these young patients and their families.

IntroductionMedulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children, but accounts for only 1% of brain cancers in adults. For standard-risk pediatric medulloblastoma, current therapy includes craniospinal irradiation (CSI) at reduced doses (23.4 Gy) associated with chemotherapy. Whereas most same-stage adult patients are still given CSI at 36 Gy, with or without chemotherapy, we report here on our use of reduced-dose CSI associated with chemotherapy for older patients.MethodsWe gathered non-metastatic patients over 18 years old (median age 28 years, range 18–48) with minimal or no residual disease after surgery, no negative histological subtypes, treated between 1996–2018 at the Centre Léon Bérard (Lyon) and the INT (Milano). A series of 54 children with similar tumors treated in Milano was used for comparison.ResultsForty-four adults were considered (median follow-up 101 months): 36 had 23.4 Gy of CSI, and 8 had 30.6 Gy, plus a boost to the posterior fossa/tumor bed; 43 had chemotherapy as all 54 children, who had a median 83-month follow-up. The PFS and OS were 82.2 ± 6.1% and 89 ± 5.2% at 5 years, and 78.5 ± 6.9% and 75.2 ± 7.8% at ten, not significantly different from those of the children. CSI doses higher than 23.4 Gy did not influence PFS. Female adult patients tended to have a better outcome than males.ConclusionThe results obtained in our combined series are comparable with, or even better than those obtained after high CSI doses, underscoring the need to reconsider this treatment in adults.

BackgroundThe risk of survivors developing a secondary bone sarcoma after being treated for pediatric cancers is well established. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with secondary osteosarcoma (SOS).MethodsThe study concerns survivors of childhood and adolescence primary neoplasms (PN) treated with chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy and surgery, subsequently diagnosed with SOS.ResultsWe identified 26 patients (13 females, 13 males) who developed SOS a median 7.3 years after being diagnosed with a PN (5/7 of these patients tested for Li–Fraumeni and found positive for the syndrome). The sample’s median age was 8.0 and 15.0 years when their PN and SOS were diagnosed, respectively. To treat their PN, 24 out of 26 patients had been given radiotherapy, and 19 had received chemotherapy including doxorubicin. A considerable number of SOS occurred at unfavorable sites (nine hip bone, six skull). All but one patient received chemotherapy with tailored schedules, omitting doxorubicin in 19 cases. Eighteen of the 26 patients underwent surgery. The 5- and 10-year overall survival and probabilities after the diagnosis of SOS (95% confidence interval) were 50% (32.7–76.5%) and 38.9% (22.4–67.4%); 5- and 10-year progression-free survival was 47% (29.9–73.7%) and 35.2% (19.3–64.4%), respectively.ConclusionsThe survival rates after SOS are lower than in patients with primary osteosarcoma, but not negligible. It is therefore mandatory to discuss the best choice of treatment for such patients at a referral center, in terms of their chances of cure and quality of life.

The incidence of cancer in children with intellectual disability has been poorly documented. We report our experience of treating children and adolescents with cancer and intellectual disability (40 patients), from 2004 to 2018. A treatment-sparing approach was adopted for 6 patients with severe intellectual impairment to minimize toxicity: a child with postpartum asphyxia and medulloblastoma did not receive radiotherapy; 1 patient with mitochondrial encephalopathy and a testicular germ cell tumor did not receive bleomycin and lung metastasectomy; 2 patients (1 with Down + West syndrome + Wilms tumor (WT) and 1 with Denys-Drash syndrome + WT) did not receive vincristine; 1 child with corpus callosum agenesis and anaplastic ependymoma did not receive chemotherapy; 1 child with structural chromosomal aberrations and a primitive neuro-ectodermal tumor received personalized chemotherapy. Heminephrectomy was performed in 4 patients with WT to preserve their kidney function. We found no statistically significant correlation between relapse or mortality rates and the use of a treatment-sparing approach. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 84.5% and 66.1% as opposed to 82.5% and 46.9%, respectively, for patients in our usual-treatment and treatment-sparing groups.Conclusion: We only opted for a treatment-sparing approach for patients with severe disabilities, and their OS was in line with that of children without intellectual disability.What is Known:• There are few reports on children/adolescents with cancer and intellectual disability (ID).• It is not clear how to manage them and whether a treatment sparing should be considered, especially in the case of severe disability.What is New:• Most patients received the standard cancer treatment and only in the case of severe disability, a therapeutic saving approach was applied.• No statistically significant correlations between relapse/mortality rates and the use of a treatment-sparing approach were found.

To improve the poor prognosis for children with metastatic osteosarcoma (OS), interleukin-2 (IL-2) was added to the standard treatment due to its capacity to activate lymphocytes and differentiate lymphocyte subsets into lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells that are capable of recognizing and killing various tumor cells. This study concerns a cohort of unselected patients aged < 18 years with metastatic OS, who were treated with IL-2, high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, ifosfamide, LAK reinfusion, and surgery, between 1995 and 2010. Thirty-five patients aged 4–17 years were involved. Thirty-two of the 35 patients underwent surgery on their primary tumor, and 25 had surgery on lung metastases too. Twenty-seven patients received IL-2 plus LAK reinfusion. The median follow-up was 130 months (77–228), and the 3-year event-free and overall survival rates were 34.3 and 45.0%, respectively. Eleven patients remained alive, all of whom achieved a complete surgical removal of the primary tumor and lung metastases (1 patient did not receive lung resections due to complete lung metastases remission). Patients who had a complete surgical remission of the primary and metastatic sites and who responded well to chemotherapy had a better event-free survival. These results confirm the importance of complete surgical remission and point to a noteworthy (though still be ameliorate) survival rate in our series of patients, underling a potential role for immunotherapy with IL-2 and LAK/NK cell activation.